Colts vs Commanders Picks & Props
IND vs WAS Picks
NFL PicksEV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projections forecast the Washington Commanders to be the 9th-least pass-focused team among all teams this week with a 55.1% pass rate, based on their underlying traits and matchup dynamics.. The Commanders have run the 8th-fewest plays in the league since the start of last season, totaling a measly 55.0 plays per game.. Our trusted projections expect Marcus Mariota to attempt 31.8 passes in this week's game, on average: the 7th-fewest out of all quarterbacks.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 5 out of 5
Given their underlying play style and matchup dynamics, the projections expect the Commanders to run on 44.9% of their downs: the 9th-highest frequency among all teams this week.. The leading projections forecast this game to see the 5th-highest number of plays run out of all the games this week at 127.6 plays, based on the tendencies of each team and game dynamics.. As it relates to the safeties' role in stopping the run, Indianapolis's collection of safeties has been dreadful since the start of last season, grading out as the 3rd-worst in football. in football.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 5 out of 5
The Washington Commanders may pass less in this contest (and call more carries) since they be rolling with backup QB Marcus Mariota.. At a -3.5-point disadvantage, the Commanders are underdogs in this week's game, indicating more of a focus on throwing than their usual game plan.. The Commanders have run the 8th-fewest plays in the league since the start of last season, totaling a measly 55.0 plays per game.. After comprising 14.8% of his offense's rush attempts last year, Marcus Mariota has been less involved in the run game this year, now comprising only 7.0%.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 5 out of 5
A rushing game script is implied by the Colts being a 3.5-point favorite in this game.. Accounting for their underlying strategic approach and matchup dynamics, the leading projections forecast the Indianapolis Colts to run on 46.0% of their chances: the 6th-greatest rate on the slate this week.. Given their underlying propensities and game dynamics, the Indianapolis Colts are expected by our trusted projection set to call 65.1 offensive plays in this contest: the 7th-most among all teams this week.. Indianapolis's passing stats since the start of last season may be artificially too high (and rushing stats deflated) due to playing the 2nd-most "low wind" (4-mph or less) games in football. We ought to be able to count on some correction with windier conditions in this week's game.. Opposing squads have run for the 7th-most adjusted yards in football (135 per game) vs. the Washington Commanders defense since the start of last season.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 5 out of 5
The Washington Commanders may pass less in this contest (and call more carries) since they be rolling with backup QB Marcus Mariota.. At a -3.5-point disadvantage, the Commanders are underdogs in this week's game, indicating more of a focus on throwing than their usual game plan.. The leading projections forecast this game to see the 5th-highest number of plays run out of all the games this week at 127.6 plays, based on the tendencies of each team and game dynamics.. Opposing quarterbacks have averaged 36.1 pass attempts per game versus the Colts defense since the start of last season: 3rd-most in football.. The predictive model expects Stefon Diggs to garner 7.0 targets in this game, on average, putting him in the 80th percentile among wide receivers.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
A rushing game script is implied by the Colts being a 3.5-point favorite in this game.. Accounting for their underlying strategic approach and matchup dynamics, the leading projections forecast the Indianapolis Colts to run on 46.0% of their chances: the 6th-greatest rate on the slate this week.. Given their underlying propensities and game dynamics, the Indianapolis Colts are expected by our trusted projection set to call 65.1 offensive plays in this contest: the 7th-most among all teams this week.. Indianapolis's passing stats since the start of last season may be artificially too high (and rushing stats deflated) due to playing the 2nd-most "low wind" (4-mph or less) games in football. We ought to be able to count on some correction with windier conditions in this week's game.. While Daniel Jones has garnered 8.4% of his offense's run game usage in games he has played this year, the projections expect him to be a more important option in Indianapolis's running game in this game at 14.5%.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Given their underlying play style and matchup dynamics, the projections expect the Commanders to run on 44.9% of their downs: the 9th-highest frequency among all teams this week.. The leading projections forecast this game to see the 5th-highest number of plays run out of all the games this week at 127.6 plays, based on the tendencies of each team and game dynamics.. As it relates to the safeties' role in stopping the run, Indianapolis's collection of safeties has been dreadful since the start of last season, grading out as the 3rd-worst in football. in football.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Given their underlying propensities and game dynamics, the Indianapolis Colts are expected by our trusted projection set to call 65.1 offensive plays in this contest: the 7th-most among all teams this week.. The Indianapolis offensive line grades out as the best in the league since the start of last season in protecting the quarterback, which has a positive influence on all passing offense metrics across the board.. Since the start of last season, the shaky Commanders defense has conceded a whopping 72.8% Adjusted Completion Rate to opposing offenses: the 7th-highest rate in football.. Since the start of last season, the poor Commanders defense has yielded a monstrous 2.20 touchdowns through the air per game to opposing teams: the largest rate in the NFL.. The Washington Commanders safeties grade out as the 6th-worst collection of safeties in the league since the start of last season in pass coverage.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Given their underlying propensities and game dynamics, the Indianapolis Colts are expected by our trusted projection set to call 65.1 offensive plays in this contest: the 7th-most among all teams this week.. The Indianapolis offensive line grades out as the best in the league since the start of last season in protecting the quarterback, which has a positive influence on all passing offense metrics across the board.. Since the start of last season, the shaky Commanders defense has conceded a whopping 72.8% Adjusted Completion Rate to opposing offenses: the 7th-highest rate in football.. The Washington Commanders defense has yielded the most TDs through the air in the league to TEs: 0.85 per game since the start of last season.. The Washington Commanders safeties grade out as the 6th-worst collection of safeties in the league since the start of last season in pass coverage.
IND vs WAS Consensus Picks
IND vs WAS Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPREAD
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL
Under
47.0 Total
42.62 UNDER
PROJECTION
-4.4
DIFFERENCE
21.71%
EV
|
|||||||
|
PASSING YARDS
M. Mariota
(QB)
u212.5 Passing Yards
202.65 UNDER
PROJECTION
-9.9
DIFFERENCE
21.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
PASSING YARDS
D. Jones
(QB)
o224.5 Passing Yards
228.25 OVER
PROJECTION
+3.7
DIFFERENCE
12.49%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RUSHING YARDS
J. Croskey-Merritt
(RB)
o51.5 Rushing Yards
63.35 OVER
PROJECTION
+11.9
DIFFERENCE
25.46%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RUSHING YARDS
M. Mariota
(QB)
u28.5 Rushing Yards
21.20 UNDER
PROJECTION
-7.3
DIFFERENCE
25.38%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RUSHING YARDS
D. Jones
(QB)
o10.5 Rushing Yards
19.56 OVER
PROJECTION
+9.1
DIFFERENCE
24.87%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RUSHING YARDS
J. Taylor
(RB)
o89.5 Rushing Yards
91.33 OVER
PROJECTION
+1.8
DIFFERENCE
-13.02%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RECEIVING YARDS
S. Diggs
(WR)
o40.5 Receiving Yards
53.78 OVER
PROJECTION
+13.3
DIFFERENCE
25.57%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RECEIVING YARDS
J. Taylor
(RB)
u19.5 Receiving Yards
18.67 UNDER
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
10.3%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RECEIVING YARDS
J. Downs
(WR)
o63.5 Receiving Yards
64.74 OVER
PROJECTION
+1.2
DIFFERENCE
3.96%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RECEIVING YARDS
T. Warren
(TE)
o48.5 Receiving Yards
49.65 OVER
PROJECTION
+1.1
DIFFERENCE
-28.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RECEPTIONS MADE
S. Diggs
(WR)
o4.5 Receptions Made
4.57 OVER
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.36%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RUSHING ATTEMPTS
D. Jones
(QB)
o3.5 Rushing Attempts
4.37 OVER
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
18.54%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RUSHING ATTEMPTS
J. Croskey-Merritt
(RB)
o13.5 Rushing Attempts
15.18 OVER
PROJECTION
+1.7
DIFFERENCE
17.8%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RUSHING ATTEMPTS
J. Taylor
(RB)
u20.5 Rushing Attempts
20.02 UNDER
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-1.47%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RUSHING ATTEMPTS
M. Mariota
(QB)
o4.5 Rushing Attempts
4.74 OVER
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-20.56%
EV
|
|||||||
|
PASSING ATTEMPTS
M. Mariota
(QB)
u30.5 Passing Attempts
29.54 UNDER
PROJECTION
-1.0
DIFFERENCE
6.03%
EV
|
|||||||
|
PASSING COMPLETIONS
M. Mariota
(QB)
u19.5 Passing Completions
18.43 UNDER
PROJECTION
-1.1
DIFFERENCE
10%
EV
|
|||||||
|
PASSING COMPLETIONS
D. Jones
(QB)
o20.5 Passing Completions
21.03 OVER
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-1.07%
EV
|
|||||||
|
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
D. Jones
(QB)
Anytime Touchdown
0.27 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
19.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
T. Warren
(TE)
Anytime Touchdown
0.44 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
16.54%
EV
|
|||||||
|
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
J. Taylor
(RB)
Anytime Touchdown
0.87 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
13.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
S. Diggs
(WR)
Anytime Touchdown
0.32 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
9.83%
EV
|
|||||||
|
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
M. Mariota
(QB)
Anytime Touchdown
0.2 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
1.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
J. Croskey-Merritt
(RB)
Anytime Touchdown
0.43 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
-5.03%
EV
|
|||||||
|
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
J. Bates
(TE)
Anytime Touchdown
0.08 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
-20.42%
EV
|
|||||||
|
INTERCEPTIONS THROWN
D. Jones
(QB)
u0.5 Interceptions Thrown
0.42 UNDER
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
14.55%
EV
|
|||||||
|
INTERCEPTIONS THROWN
M. Mariota
(QB)
o0.5 Interceptions Thrown
0.94 OVER
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
6.94%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
SPREAD
TOTAL
Under
47.0 Total
42.62 UNDER
PROJECTION
-4.4
DIFFERENCE
21.71%
EV
PASSING YARDS
M. Mariota
(QB)
u212.5 Passing Yards
202.65 UNDER
PROJECTION
-9.9
DIFFERENCE
21.68%
EV
PASSING YARDS
D. Jones
(QB)
o224.5 Passing Yards
228.25 OVER
PROJECTION
+3.7
DIFFERENCE
12.49%
EV
RUSHING YARDS
J. Croskey-Merritt
(RB)
o51.5 Rushing Yards
63.35 OVER
PROJECTION
+11.9
DIFFERENCE
25.46%
EV
RUSHING YARDS
M. Mariota
(QB)
u28.5 Rushing Yards
21.20 UNDER
PROJECTION
-7.3
DIFFERENCE
25.38%
EV
RUSHING YARDS
D. Jones
(QB)
o10.5 Rushing Yards
19.56 OVER
PROJECTION
+9.1
DIFFERENCE
24.87%
EV
RUSHING YARDS
J. Taylor
(RB)
o89.5 Rushing Yards
91.33 OVER
PROJECTION
+1.8
DIFFERENCE
-13.02%
EV
RECEIVING YARDS
S. Diggs
(WR)
o40.5 Receiving Yards
53.78 OVER
PROJECTION
+13.3
DIFFERENCE
25.57%
EV
RECEIVING YARDS
J. Taylor
(RB)
u19.5 Receiving Yards
18.67 UNDER
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
10.3%
EV
RECEIVING YARDS
J. Downs
(WR)
o63.5 Receiving Yards
64.74 OVER
PROJECTION
+1.2
DIFFERENCE
3.96%
EV
RECEIVING YARDS
T. Warren
(TE)
o48.5 Receiving Yards
49.65 OVER
PROJECTION
+1.1
DIFFERENCE
-28.41%
EV
RECEPTIONS MADE
S. Diggs
(WR)
o4.5 Receptions Made
4.57 OVER
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.36%
EV
RUSHING ATTEMPTS
D. Jones
(QB)
o3.5 Rushing Attempts
4.37 OVER
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
18.54%
EV
RUSHING ATTEMPTS
J. Croskey-Merritt
(RB)
o13.5 Rushing Attempts
15.18 OVER
PROJECTION
+1.7
DIFFERENCE
17.8%
EV
RUSHING ATTEMPTS
J. Taylor
(RB)
u20.5 Rushing Attempts
20.02 UNDER
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-1.47%
EV
RUSHING ATTEMPTS
M. Mariota
(QB)
o4.5 Rushing Attempts
4.74 OVER
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-20.56%
EV
PASSING ATTEMPTS
M. Mariota
(QB)
u30.5 Passing Attempts
29.54 UNDER
PROJECTION
-1.0
DIFFERENCE
6.03%
EV
PASSING COMPLETIONS
M. Mariota
(QB)
u19.5 Passing Completions
18.43 UNDER
PROJECTION
-1.1
DIFFERENCE
10%
EV
PASSING COMPLETIONS
D. Jones
(QB)
o20.5 Passing Completions
21.03 OVER
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-1.07%
EV
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
D. Jones
(QB)
Anytime Touchdown
0.27 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
19.6%
EV
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
T. Warren
(TE)
Anytime Touchdown
0.44 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
16.54%
EV
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
J. Taylor
(RB)
Anytime Touchdown
0.87 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
13.39%
EV
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
S. Diggs
(WR)
Anytime Touchdown
0.32 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
9.83%
EV
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
M. Mariota
(QB)
Anytime Touchdown
0.2 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
1.68%
EV
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
J. Croskey-Merritt
(RB)
Anytime Touchdown
0.43 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
-5.03%
EV
ANYTIME TOUCHDOWN
J. Bates
(TE)
Anytime Touchdown
0.08 TDs
PROJECTION
-
DIFFERENCE
-20.42%
EV
INTERCEPTIONS THROWN
D. Jones
(QB)
u0.5 Interceptions Thrown
0.42 UNDER
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
14.55%
EV
INTERCEPTIONS THROWN
M. Mariota
(QB)
o0.5 Interceptions Thrown
0.94 OVER
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
6.94%
EV
Recent Form Trends
Over is 6-1 in Commanders last 7 games overall.
Over is 6-1 in Commanders last 7 games as an underdog.
Over is 10-1 in Colts last 11 games after allowing less than 90 yards rushing in their previous game.
Over is 5-1 in Commanders last 6 games in Week 4.
Commanders are 4-1 ATS in their last 5 games overall.
Commanders are 4-1 ATS in their last 5 games as an underdog.
Over is 4-1-1 in Commanders last 6 games after allowing more than 350 total yards in their previous game.
Over is 4-1-1 in Commanders last 6 games following a straight up win.
ROI Trends
Over
Under
IND
WAS
Over
Under
Over
Under
IND
WAS
IND
WAS
IND
WAS
IND
WAS
Over
Under
Over
Under
Over
Under
Over
Under
IND
WAS
IND
WAS
Over
Under
IND
WAS
IND
WAS
IND
WAS