Seattle vs Minnesota Picks & Props
SEA vs MIN Picks
MLB PicksEV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Kody Clemens is penciled in 5th on the lineup card in today's game.. Built 840 feet above sea level, Target Field has the 5th-highest elevation in MLB, which tends to lead to more offense.. The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 10.9-mph in this game, the 2nd-most-favorable of the day for bats.. Kody Clemens will receive the benefit of the platoon advantage against Luis Castillo in today's matchup... and even more favorably, Castillo has a large platoon split.. Among all the teams on the slate today, the 2nd-worst infield defense is that of the Seattle Mariners.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) ranks Matt Wallner as the majors's 18th-best home run batter.. The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 10.9-mph in this game, the 2nd-most-favorable of the day for bats.. Because of Luis Castillo's large platoon split, Matt Wallner will have a gigantic advantage hitting from the opposite side of the plate today.. Among all the teams on the slate today, the 2nd-worst infield defense is that of the Seattle Mariners.. Matt Wallner will benefit from the home field advantage today, which figures to boost all of his stats.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 10.9-mph in this game, the 2nd-most-favorable of the day for bats.. As a switch-hitter who performs better from the 0 side of the plate, Brooks Lee will have the advantage of batting from from his good side against a pitcher with a large platoon split (Luis Castillo) in today's game.. Among all the teams on the slate today, the 2nd-worst infield defense is that of the Seattle Mariners.. Home field advantage typically boosts hitter stats across the board, and Brooks Lee will hold that advantage in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Trevor Larnach in the 77th percentile when assessing his overall offensive ability.. Trevor Larnach is projected to bat 2nd in the lineup today.. The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 10.9-mph in this game, the 2nd-most-favorable of the day for bats.. Given Luis Castillo's large platoon split, Trevor Larnach will have a tremendous advantage batting from the opposite side of the dish today.. Among all the teams on the slate today, the 2nd-worst infield defense is that of the Seattle Mariners.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Byron Buxton projects as the 10th-best home run hitter in Major League Baseball, according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Byron Buxton is penciled in 1st in the lineup in today's game.. The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 10.9-mph in this game, the 2nd-most-favorable of the day for bats.. Among all the teams on the slate today, the 2nd-worst infield defense is that of the Seattle Mariners.. Byron Buxton is an extreme flyball hitter and matches up with the weak outfield defense of Seattle (#3-worst of all teams on the slate today).
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Julio Rodriguez as the 8th-best batter in the game as it relates to his BABIP skill.. Julio Rodriguez is projected to hit 3rd in the lineup in this matchup.. Built 840 feet above sea level, Target Field has the 5th-highest elevation in MLB, which tends to lead to more offense.. The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 10.9-mph in this game, the 2nd-most-favorable of the day for bats.. Julio Rodriguez will hold the platoon advantage against Connor Prielipp in today's matchup... and moreover, Prielipp has a large platoon split.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Kody Clemens is penciled in 5th on the lineup card in today's game.. Built 840 feet above sea level, Target Field has the 5th-highest elevation in MLB, which tends to lead to more offense.. The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 10.9-mph in this game, the 2nd-most-favorable of the day for bats.. Kody Clemens will receive the benefit of the platoon advantage against Luis Castillo in today's matchup... and even more favorably, Castillo has a large platoon split.. Among all the teams on the slate today, the 2nd-worst infield defense is that of the Seattle Mariners.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Julio Rodriguez as the 8th-best batter in the game as it relates to his BABIP skill.. Julio Rodriguez is projected to hit 3rd in the lineup in this matchup.. Built 840 feet above sea level, Target Field has the 5th-highest elevation in MLB, which tends to lead to more offense.. The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 10.9-mph in this game, the 2nd-most-favorable of the day for bats.. Julio Rodriguez will hold the platoon advantage against Connor Prielipp in today's matchup... and moreover, Prielipp has a large platoon split.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Trevor Larnach in the 77th percentile when assessing his overall offensive ability.. Trevor Larnach is projected to bat 2nd in the lineup today.. The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 10.9-mph in this game, the 2nd-most-favorable of the day for bats.. Given Luis Castillo's large platoon split, Trevor Larnach will have a tremendous advantage batting from the opposite side of the dish today.. Among all the teams on the slate today, the 2nd-worst infield defense is that of the Seattle Mariners.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) ranks Matt Wallner as the majors's 18th-best home run batter.. The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 10.9-mph in this game, the 2nd-most-favorable of the day for bats.. Because of Luis Castillo's large platoon split, Matt Wallner will have a gigantic advantage hitting from the opposite side of the plate today.. Among all the teams on the slate today, the 2nd-worst infield defense is that of the Seattle Mariners.. Matt Wallner will benefit from the home field advantage today, which figures to boost all of his stats.
SEA vs MIN Consensus Picks
SEA vs MIN Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MONEYLINE
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Naylor
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
6.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Raleigh
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
4.5%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Garver
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.61%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Lee
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-1.49%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
K. Clemens
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-1.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Crawford
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-2.14%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Buxton
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-2.54%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Wallner
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.09%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
T. Larnach
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.94
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.69%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
R. Refsnyder
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Young
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.85
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.21%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Rodriguez
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.20
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-6.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
R. Lewis
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-7.19%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
R. Arozarena
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.99
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-7.65%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
W. Wilson
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.54
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-23.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
K. Clemens
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.74
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
17.46%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Wallner
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
16.26%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Lee
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.86%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
T. Larnach
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
11.65%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Buxton
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
11.02%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Rodriguez
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
10.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
R. Arozarena
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.9%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
R. Lewis
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.41
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Naylor
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-6.7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Clemens
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
7.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Larnach
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.02%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Wallner
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.19
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.19%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Lee
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-7.33%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Rodriguez
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-12.42%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Buxton
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-13.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Lewis
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-15.11%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Naylor
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-27.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
W. Wilson
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.04
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
L. Castillo
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
5.57
PROJECTION
+1.1
DIFFERENCE
4.3%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
K. Clemens
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
16.18%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Rodriguez
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.66
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
15.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
T. Larnach
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
15.63%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Wallner
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
14.19%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Lee
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.83%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Raleigh
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.70
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
9.65%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Buxton
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.9%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
R. Lewis
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.45
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.14%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
R. Arozarena
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.54
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
5.06%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Naylor
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.34%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Crawford
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-4.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
W. Wilson
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.25
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-25.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Clemens
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.14
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
16.59%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Wallner
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
15.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Larnach
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
12.34%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Lee
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.77
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
12.32%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Rodriguez
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.47
PROJECTION
+1.0
DIFFERENCE
12.18%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Lewis
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
11.72%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Jeffers
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
10.54%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Buxton
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.28
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
10.3%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Raleigh
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.34
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
8.97%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Arozarena
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.07
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
7.05%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Naylor
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
0.25%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Crawford
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0.78%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
MONEYLINE
TOTAL
SPREAD
TOTAL HITS
J. Naylor
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
6.4%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Raleigh
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
4.5%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Garver
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.61%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Lee
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-1.49%
EV
TOTAL HITS
K. Clemens
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-1.93%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Crawford
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-2.14%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Buxton
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-2.54%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Wallner
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.09%
EV
TOTAL HITS
T. Larnach
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.94
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.69%
EV
TOTAL HITS
R. Refsnyder
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.73%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Young
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.85
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.21%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Rodriguez
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.20
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-6.78%
EV
TOTAL HITS
R. Lewis
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-7.19%
EV
TOTAL HITS
R. Arozarena
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.99
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-7.65%
EV
TOTAL HITS
W. Wilson
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.54
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-23.89%
EV
TOTAL BASES
K. Clemens
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.74
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
17.46%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Wallner
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
16.26%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Lee
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.86%
EV
TOTAL BASES
T. Larnach
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
11.65%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Buxton
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
11.02%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Rodriguez
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
10.22%
EV
TOTAL BASES
R. Arozarena
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.9%
EV
TOTAL BASES
R. Lewis
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.41
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
4%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Naylor
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-6.7%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Clemens
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
7.39%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Larnach
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.02%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Wallner
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.19
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.19%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Lee
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-7.33%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Rodriguez
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-12.42%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Buxton
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-13.39%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Lewis
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-15.11%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Naylor
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-27.39%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
W. Wilson
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.04
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
L. Castillo
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
5.57
PROJECTION
+1.1
DIFFERENCE
4.3%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
K. Clemens
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
16.18%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Rodriguez
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.66
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
15.73%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
T. Larnach
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
15.63%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Wallner
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
14.19%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Lee
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.83%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Raleigh
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.70
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
9.65%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Buxton
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.9%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
R. Lewis
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.45
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.14%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
R. Arozarena
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.54
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
5.06%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Naylor
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.34%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Crawford
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-4.39%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
W. Wilson
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.25
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-25.22%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Clemens
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.14
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
16.59%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Wallner
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
15.35%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Larnach
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
12.34%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Lee
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.77
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
12.32%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Rodriguez
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.47
PROJECTION
+1.0
DIFFERENCE
12.18%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Lewis
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
11.72%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Jeffers
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
10.54%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Buxton
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.28
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
10.3%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Raleigh
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.34
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
8.97%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Arozarena
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.07
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
7.05%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Naylor
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
0.25%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Crawford
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0.78%
EV
SEA vs MIN Trends
Check back shortly to see trends for this matchup