Clemson vs LSU Touchdown Picks & First TD Bet for College Football Week 1
Free College Football Expert and Computer Picks For Every Game Sept. 5, 2026
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
22.72 |
+8.5 -115 |
o50.5 -105 |
+270 |
|
|
30.77 |
-8.5 -105 |
u51.5 -115 |
-300 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
14.23 |
+25.5 -110 |
o51.5 -110 |
+1800 |
|
|
38.65 |
-25.5 -105 |
u52.0 -112 |
-2400 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
16.41 |
+29.5 -108 |
o59.5 -105 |
+2800 |
|
|
44.72 |
-29.5 +100 |
u60.5 -110 |
-8000 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
15.48 |
+23.5 -110 |
o51.5 -115 |
+1500 |
|
|
38.90 |
-23.5 -108 |
u52.5 -110 |
-1800 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24.40 |
+7.5 -115 |
o57.5 -115 |
+235 |
|
|
32.62 |
-7.5 +105 |
u59.0 -112 |
-250 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
22.36 |
+7.5 -111 |
o51.0 -110 |
+240 |
|
|
30.65 |
-7.5 +100 |
u51.5 -110 |
-278 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
32.65 |
-12.5 -120 |
o57.5 -108 |
-549 |
|
|
21.97 |
+12.5 -110 |
u58.0 -111 |
+450 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
5.96 |
+31.5 -105 |
o44.5 -109 |
+5000 |
|
|
37.86 |
-31.5 -105 |
u44.5 -105 |
-25000 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20.27 |
+3.5 -115 |
o45.5 -115 |
+135 |
|
|
23.30 |
-3.5 +105 |
u47.0 -118 |
-145 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20.28 |
+15.5 -115 |
o52.0 -112 |
+525 |
|
|
35.97 |
-15.5 -105 |
u53.5 -110 |
-649 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
7.72 |
+40.5 -105 |
o53.5 -110 |
+12500 |
|
|
47.49 |
-40.5 -110 |
u54.5 -110 |
-- |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17.08 |
+16.5 -105 |
o52.5 -105 |
+600 |
|
|
34.68 |
-16.5 -110 |
u54.5 -110 |
-800 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20.45 |
+11.5 -110 |
o52.5 -108 |
+360 |
|
|
31.80 |
-11.5 -105 |
u53.5 -110 |
-425 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
10.90 |
+27.5 -104 |
o48.5 -119 |
+2000 |
|
|
36.67 |
-27.5 -110 |
u49.5 -110 |
-4000 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
13.19 |
+28.5 -110 |
o54.5 -108 |
+2000 |
|
|
42.14 |
-28.5 +100 |
u54.5 -105 |
-4000 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19.11 |
+10.5 -115 |
o49.5 -108 |
+320 |
|
|
28.38 |
-10.5 +100 |
u50.5 -115 |
-375 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
16.55 |
+26.5 -105 |
o59.0 -114 |
+1800 |
|
|
41.83 |
-26.5 -105 |
u59.5 -110 |
-2800 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17.50 |
+10.5 -105 |
o46.5 -115 |
+375 |
|
|
28.46 |
-10.5 -108 |
u47.5 -110 |
-430 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
29.23 |
-1.5 -110 |
o55.5 -110 |
-150 |
|
|
26.96 |
+1.5 -110 |
u56.5 -110 |
+130 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
25.03 |
+1.5 -120 |
o51.5 -110 |
-110 |
|
|
24.42 |
-1.5 +100 |
u52.5 -110 |
+100 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
26.68 |
-2.5 -106 |
o53.5 -105 |
-124 |
|
|
25.52 |
+2.5 -105 |
u53.5 -108 |
+115 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
12.88 |
+24.5 -120 |
o49.0 -125 |
+1300 |
|
|
36.26 |
-24.5 +100 |
u51.5 -110 |
-2000 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
11.64 |
+20.5 +100 |
o46.5 -109 |
+1100 |
|
|
34.34 |
-20.5 -108 |
u46.5 -105 |
-1408 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
23.91 |
+6.5 +100 |
o54.5 -115 |
+220 |
|
|
31.21 |
-6.5 -114 |
u55.5 -108 |
-240 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
27.65 |
-2.5 -122 |
o52.5 -115 |
-150 |
|
|
25.50 |
+2.5 +105 |
u53.5 -110 |
+130 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
29.45 |
-7.0 -110 |
o50.5 -110 |
-245 |
|
|
23.34 |
+7.0 -110 |
u56.5 -173 |
+210 |
Tulane named Zeon Chriss-Gremillion the starting quarterback, meaning you should expect a run-heavy approach from the offense. With lead back Jamauri McClure banged up and considered questionable for this contest, the onus is on the QB run game against a Duke defense that could only be described as "atrocious" a year ago.
Tulane beat Duke last season and has more continuity than expected with Will Hall taking over after serving on last year’s staff. Duke won the ACC despite being outgained on the season and then unexpectedly lost starting QB Darian Mensah. My power ratings make Tulane +6.5, providing value through the key number of 7.
The market could be sleeping on Oregon's defense. According to ESPN's Bill Connelly, the Ducks are 11th nationally in returning defensive production and rank third in his defensive SP+ ratings. Since this is their Super Bowl, I'm expecting the Broncos to slow down the tempo, limit possessions, and increase the variance because that gives them their best chance to pull off an upset.
Oregon's offense upgraded from last year as they look very strong at wide receiver and running back. This matches up well with a Boise State defense that's been downgraded. Whenever you have a massive spread, you need to look at the backups. I'd argue that Oregon has the best backup QB in the country in Dylan Raiola who was a two-year starter at Nebraska, so I think Oregon will continue to score if they're up big in the second half. On the other side, Boise State has one of the most experienced QBs in the country who should help contribute to the scoring.
Given their slow start to last season (0-3 against the spread in its first three games), I'm expecting Texas to make a statement in Week 1 and to put a 50-burger on the Texas State Bobcats Saturday.
The Longhorns have beaten the brakes off inferior, non-conference opponents in recent years, featuring a 55-0 win over Sam Houston State last season and three 48+ victories over non-Power 4 schools in 2024.
Auburn and Baylor both enter Week 1 with new quarterbacks, but the Tigers may have the bigger advantage. Auburn added former USF standout Byrum Brown, who brings familiarity with head coach Alex Golesh, the system and several former USF teammates. Brown showed he can produce against Power 4 competition last season, including strong performances against Florida and Miami. Meanwhile, Baylor quarterback DJ Lagway enters the season with questions surrounding his supporting cast, while the Bears' defense still has plenty to prove under Dave Aranda. With Auburn's familiarity and talent, the Tigers are the side to target.
DJ Vonnahme is next up for Tight End U after averaging 74.2 receiving yards through the final five games of the season, capped by a 146-yard performance against Vanderbilt in the ReliaQuest Bowl. He leads all returning tight ends in yards per route run (3.10) and is a bona fide NFL prospect, and I'd keep playing this to 38.5.
Wyoming has been an Under machine during Jay Sawvel's tenure. The Cowboys hit the Under in 10 of 12 games last year behind one of the top defenses in the G6 (55th by SP+) and one of the worst offenses (130th by SP+). Colorado State's offense is dealing with a ton of roster turnover (116th in returning production), too, as Jim Mora Jr. takes over.
USF returns only three starters, but Brian Hartline brought in the best transfer class in the Group of Six, including 24 former Power Four players. FIU added just six Power Four transfers who combined for 41 snaps last season. The talent gap is significant, and my power ratings make USF -14.5.
The Texas A&M Aggies bring back starting quarterback Marcel Reed and boast a deep wide receiver corps including Mario Craver, Ashton Bethel-Roman, and Isaiah Horton. This offense put up 33.8 ppg last year and will be able to name its score against a Missouri State Bears team that is adjusting to a new head coach in Casey Woods, along with a new defensive coordinator. I'm backing Texas A&M to cover at up to 42.5 points.
Under Casey Woods, the Missouri State Bears will likely push the tempo, just as Woods did when he was the offensive coordinator with the SMU Mustangs. That won't necessarily translate to a ton of success against the Texas A&M Aggies, but it will keep the scoreboard busy. I like the Over at up to 54.5 points.
Sam Houston was terrible in Phil Longo's first season (2-10, 3-9 ATS), and this year won't be any better. The Bearkats are projected to rank 135th on defense by SP+ and are starting an O-line entirely made up of transfers. Troy is built to stop Sam Houston's Air Raid too, after the Trojans ranked 31st in EPA per pass on defense last year.
Former Kansas State standout Jayce Brown has generated plenty of hype since transferring to LSU. The senior receiver caught 41 passes for 712 yards and 5 touchdowns last season, averaging 17.4 yards per catch.
The 2025 All-Big 12 receiver has reportedly emerged as one of Sam Leavitt’s top targets in practice. When in doubt, trust your favorite pair of hands. Brown should provide a legitimate deep threat in this matchup.
Look for Leavitt to connect with Brown downfield.
Trey’Dez Green could be one of Sam Leavitt’s most important targets in this matchup. The LSU tight end is reportedly one of Leavitt’s favorite options and brings a rare combination of size and athleticism to the offense. At 6-foot-7 and 240 pounds, Green is a matchup nightmare and should serve as Leavitt’s safety blanket, particularly in the red zone. Green caught 33 passes for 433 yards and 7 touchdowns in 2025, averaging 13.1 yards per catch. Despite the price, Green should see plenty of opportunities in this matchup.
Central Michigan ran the ball (41.9 attempts per game) more than twice as much as it threw (19.6 attempts per game). New Mexico has one of the best run defenses in the G6. Led by Jaxton Eck, the Lobos were 36 in EPA per rush on defense in 2025. And New Mexico's ground game should gash a Chippewas defense that's 131st in returning production (29%).
We have a data point for both Week 0 participants, and UNLV's (460 yards against one of the best defenses in the Group of 6) is more encourgaing that Hawai'i's (36% rate offensively, 6.5 YPP allowed defensively). With wind and rain in the forecast, UNLV's ground-heavy offensive philosophy is well-suited to survive, whereas Hawai'i's ineffective, aerial-led Run-and-Shoot (just without the running) is not.
While both teams are coming off Week 0 losses, only one of them lost as more than a TD favorite at home. UNLV's offense fell apart in the second half against Memphis, as Jackson Arnold's pocket management issues showed up again (seven sacks). Hawaii has the offensive firepower, with QB Micah Alejado, to keep this game close at home.
Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele is great, but his statistical output may not match sky-high expectations this season. New offensive coordinator Jordan Somerville --- a 31-year-old first-time play caller at this level --- is installing a "pro style" offense that doesn't seem friendly to fat statistical performances. UCLA will look to control the clock, limiting time of possession for the Bears, who have new personnel out wide.
New offensive coordinator Dean Kennedy features the QB run game as a staple of his offense at JMU (Alonza Barnett III: 589 rushing yards, 15 TDs last year) and Holy Cross (Matthew Sluka: 2,481 yards and 20 touchdowns across two seasons). Nico ran for 664 sack-adjusted yards in 2025 and averaged a robust 4.68 yards after contact per attempt and will thrive on the ground against Cal (122nd in EPA per rush, loses the entire two-deep at LB).
For the first time in Jedd Fisch's tenure at Washington, he doesn't have Jonah Coleman and Denzel Boston. With the Huskies best two playmakers now in the NFL, Demond Williams Jr. could get off to a slow start in a rivalry game against a Wazzu defense full of upperclassmen. Scoring will be even harder for the Cougars, who have to deal with a Washington defense that was 10th in EPA per rush last year.
Even as Washington has pulled away from Washington State, the Cougars have shown up in the Apple Cup. They've covered in three of the last five, and while new head coach Kirby Moore is making his debut for Wazzu, this spread is too large. The Cougars have a transfer-heavy defense full of experience that should slow a Washington squad that lost its two best player to the NFL enough to cover.
The key to the Under will be Wisconsin's defense. The Badgers' offense is going to struggle to score more than 13 points at Lambeau Field against a Notre Dame defense with the best secondary in the country. But even while Wisconsin has struggled during the Luke Fickell era, the defense has been solid. It was ranked 35th by SP+ last year, and as long as it can keep Notre Dame to 35 or fewer points, the Under will be in good shape.
Notre Dame is arguably the most talented team in the country and ranks No. 1 nationally in returning production (72%). The Fighting Irish have a Heisman contender at QB and a defense full of NFL talent, including the country's best secondary. Luke Fickell's team is heavily relying on transfers, and if Old Dominion's Colton Joseph isn't at his best, the Badgers won't keep this close at Lambeau. Wisconsin was 122nd in SP+ on offense last season.
Since hiring Jeff Brohm in 2023, the Louisville Cardinals are 2-6 Over/Under against ranked teams. Only two of their offensive starters played on last year's team, and Ohio State transfer QB Lincoln Kienholz makes his team debut Sunday.
Pete Golding was a long-time defensive coordinator, which probably makes him a more conservative playcaller than Kiffin, and Ole Miss has more defensive continuity year over year. The Rebels lost five of their top-six receivers, so they should run more, at least in Week 1, which means more running clock.
This is Pete Golding's first head coaching job and going from a coordinator to a head coach of an SEC team that was a few plays away from being in the national championship is a huge jump professionally.
That said, I have a tough time accepting Mississippi as a -6.5 favorite vs. the Louisville Cardinals on a neutral field. Plus, do you know who beat Miami last season? The Cardinals on the road as +13 underdogs.
Three of their four losses last year were by three or fewer points and two were in overtime. Louisville finished tied for 23rd in net adjusted EPA/play last season, which adjusts for opponent strength and removes garbage time, and 17th in net yards per play, per GameOnPaper.com.
In Week 0, against a New Mexico State defense that was ranked 121st by SP+ last year, Florida State had just 17 points midway through the third quarter. The Seminoles' offense is clearly flawed with Ashton Daniels at QB. If the Mustangs' defense, which ranked 15th in EPA per rush in 2025, slows FSU's ground game, the Under will be in position to hit.
Florida State looked like one of the least prepared teams to take the field in Week 0. The Seminoles struggled with a G6 bottom-feeder at home (New Mexico State) and now must deal with an SMU team that's ranked in the Top 25 nationally in returning production (62%). SMU was 12th in EPA per rush on defense last year and can slow FSU's run-first approach. The Mustangs' offense is in even better shape with QB Kevin Jennings behind one of the ACC's most experienced O-lines.
Former Mississippi head coach Lane Kiffin will take his new team, LSU, into Oxford. Considering the controversial way he left the Rebels prior to the playoffs last year, there might not be a more hostile environment in college football this season. It’s a game worthy of giving the home team more than three points of home-field advantage.
Our experts and prediction models are hard at work analyzing the data. Check back shortly for today's picks, or explore our Computer Picks for inspiration.
The table above lets you know how profitable and helpful our sports betting computer picks have been across the last 100 college football games played. Our NCAAF computer picks use expert data to review odds and generate moneyline, spread, and total bets for every game throughout the season.
Listed in the table are unit details, which show the total profit or loss based on a bettor placing $100 on each of the last 100 college football picks made by the computer, on both the opening and closing lines.
Take advantage of these free college football picks before you wager any money at sportsbooks.
As human beings, we're bound to be biased with our picks and potentially fall into the trap of swinging with the public. With advanced stats growing in popularity and getting harder to track, college football computer predictions are starting to become more relied on.
Betting on a moneyline simply means you're picking the outright winner of the game, regardless of the scoring margin or total. If the team you choose wins, then your bet hits. Here's what it will look like over at your favorite sportsbook:
| Team | Moneyline |
|---|---|
| Alabama Crimson Tide | -120 |
| Missouri Tigers | +150 |
In this case, Alabama is favored to win the game as its moneyline odds have a minus sign (-) in front of the number. The favorites will have the minus sign present, and the underdogs will have a plus sign (+). Easy, right?
Betting the spread gives your bet a bit more breathing room. Here, you don't need to sweat out a team to win. Instead, you can wager on the point differential on the scoreboard.
Betting on the spread is a good idea when the moneyline profits aren't enticing. There's no point betting on Alabama as a heavy -1500 favorite over Missouri. But taking Missouri to keep the scoring margin within a certain frame will get you more bang for your buck.
| Team | Spread |
|---|---|
| Alabama Crimson Tide | -24.5 (-105) |
| Missouri Tigers | +24.5 (-115) |
In this example, the Tide are favored to dominate their game against Missouri, outperforming them by at least 24.5 points.
If Alabama does win by more than 25 points, that would mean the Crimson Tide covered the spread. But if the Tide won by just 20 points, then that would mean the Tigers "covered the spread" instead.
If you think the outcome of a game could flip in either direction, then an Over/Under is the way to go. This bet relies on the combined score from both teams and whether it goes Over or Under the point total listed at sportsbooks. Then, who cares who wins?
| Team | Total |
|---|---|
| Alabama Crimson Tide | O 52.5 (-110) |
| Missouri Tigers | U 52.5 (-110) |
In this example, oddsmakers have set the total score for the game at 52.5 points. The choice is now up to you. If you think the Tide and Tigers will score a combined total of more than 52.5 points, 53 points or more, then pick the Over. If you're thinking otherwise, then bet the Under, and the bet will hit if they score fewer than 52.5 points.
If the set number was a whole number like 52 points and the two teams score exactly that amount, then it is considered a push and you'd get your money back.
Use these additional college football betting resources to compare markets, find more picks, and research specific betting angles before placing a wager.
If you're ready to bet on college football picks, you first need to find the right sportsbook. Our betting sites guide offers secure banking, the best odds, bonuses, and reliable customer service options for you.
More than a dozen Covers college football picks are released throughout the week during the season, covering all the biggest games and matchups.
Covers provides free NCAA football picks covering many markets, including point spreads, totals, moneylines, player props, and more.