Posted:
#126
Raiders looking awesome! Lol.
Denver at Oakland (12/06/2012)
Posted:
#127
Quote Originally Posted by UHQB:
QUOTE Originally Posted by SportsPredictor:
"Can't argue with a confident man UHQB! I've seen many of your picks on covers...and they're damn good! I won't have a dog in this fight, so all on Denver or Oakland, I wish Good Luck.
BOL 
I've been following you also SportsPredictor. Your Goldsheet picks are pretty darn good. I would believe that you were writing for them the way you analyze the games.
Noticed Denver went right down and scored easily? "
Yes, saw Denver score, and I'm pulling for both bling1 and you on this one! But want to see Denver put up more points...and run away with this one!
Like doing my Gold Sheet write ups like advertisements. Probably used to it because I've been running auctions on eBay for the past 15 years. And have fun writing in broken, fast sentences with my analysis.
Have to run out, but will put you down as a friend if that's ok? Would like to see your picks and run with some of them.
Will be posting a hugh 5-Team play beginning with the St. Louis board on Saturday afternoon. Might want to check it out!
Baltimore is starting to look terrible too! We need Manning to put them away before the half. Best of Luck UHQB!
Posted:
#129
Quote Originally Posted by SportsPredictor:
Best of Luck for you this time binger1! Mentioned you in my above post on page 3, post # 59. I decided not to touch the game for the reasons in my post...but hope you can make up for your two losses.
GL to You THANKS BRO BUT IM A DUDE NOT A SHE LIKE YOU KEPT SAYN.
Posted:
#134
Quote Originally Posted by dustyvaultz:
booyahz123 hey d bag how much did you loose did you break even? u suck
booyahz123 hey d bag how much did you loose did you break even? u suck
booyahz called me a moron. whose the moron now???
LARGE 
Posted:
#136
Quote Originally Posted by easypics:
N
where To Hide . . .
where To Hide . . . As bad as Raiders n' Vuepicks are, All bad things must come to an end.
I think . . .
Raiders have luxury of catching Traveling Broncs on short week which factors heavily on tonite's spread outcome.
As for Vue's data , action,prime and new and improved comment ? play gimmicks, let's just say he's due.
For tonite's game, One fact stands clear to be considered : Peyton Manning is physically not 100 % fit and by now,
everyone should be familiar with Coach Fox's veteran's wise ways , knowing he will absolutely NOT take the risk of injury or fatiguing Peyton Manning via pass attack on short rest.
Would be like Girardi pushing Andy Petite on 2 days rest with playoffs around the corner.
Raiders have no defense ranked 28 th, allowing 131 yrds rushing per game , which will allow
Broncs to stick to a conservative,run and grind type of game plan allowing Denver's D ranked 3 rd in the league to control the pace vs Ineffective Raiders O that only could score 6 points @ Denver with a healthy Mc Fadden earlier this year.
As far as meaning of this game.It's truly unbelievable that anybody in this forum can even suggest this game has little importance for Denver.
Whoever believes such BS ,should really not be gambling, less it be quarter bets , lol , as some do.
Denver is tied for 2 nd seed with Ravens + Pats and will be hell bent to win out , securing first round bye ,doing everything to avoid playing @ Baltimore ,where Ravens DOMINATE. Ironically Broncs will be playing Ravens next week ,so this is a must win for them in order to try to secure HUGE advantage of playing @ Mile High and perhaps less importantly go for divisional sweep with only Chiefs standing in the way after Raiders tonite for perfect division record.
Could be wrong but Fox would be out of his mind to unleash Peyton towards back to back 300 + yrds on only three days rest.
Denver's D n' Running game will dictate clock while Raiders may hit 16 Pt plateau.
BRONCOS 26 RAIDERS 16
BOLA
Lovin$ the Under
How $weet it is. . .
Posted:
#139
Congrats all Denver and Under backers The under was the easiest call tonight as i had suspected. Really lucky on Dener covering the spread with the Oakland fumble at their 2 yard line allowing Denver to get a cheap TD. Never expected Denver to blow them out which they didn't. Denver's goal is to make it to the Superbowl, not blow out teams. Remeber this and you will make money with the Broncos the rest of the year or you will get burned by my team!
Posted:
#140
Quote Originally Posted by easypics:
Vue , call 1 - 800 EXorcism . . .
You may be cursed .
Good Job SportsPredictor. You can friend me anyday. You're way better than RazorSharp and he's now charging for his picks ! I don't mind sharing my input but this VUE guy is ridiculous! He's like a bad case of cancer that won't disappear.
Posted:
#141
Quote Originally Posted by Xyberz:
Congrats all Denver and Under backers The under was the easiest call tonight as i had suspected. Really lucky on Dener covering the spread with the Oakland fumble at their 2 yard line allowing Denver to get a cheap TD. Never expected Denver to blow them out which they didn't. Denver's goal is to make it to the Superbowl, not blow out teams. Remeber this and you will make money with the Broncos the rest of the year or you will get burned by my team!
Congrats all Denver and Under backers The under was the easiest call tonight as i had suspected. Really lucky on Dener covering the spread with the Oakland fumble at their 2 yard line allowing Denver to get a cheap TD. Never expected Denver to blow them out which they didn't. Denver's goal is to make it to the Superbowl, not blow out teams. Remeber this and you will make money with the Broncos the rest of the year or you will get burned by my team!
Actually the game wasn't as close as the final score indicated. Denver had to settle for a lot of FG's in the redzone. It still confuses me how people let one stat outweigh every other glaring fact. This was a no brainer.
Posted:
#142
Quote Originally Posted by XSixburghX:
Actually the game wasn't as close as the final score indicated. Denver had to settle for a lot of FG's in the redzone. It still confuses me how people let one stat outweigh every other glaring fact. This was a no brainer.
Surprisingly, the OAK D actually got up to play. While I predicted a blowout which could have easily been lopsided, the OAK offense never fails to deliver a letdown.
And to booyahz who called me and others a moron, I hope you you had bet everything and your mom on the raiders you effin loser!
Posted:
#143
Quote Originally Posted by booyahz123:
some of you people are a joke with posting waste of money teasers. grow some balls and make a real pick and bet. teasers are a waste of time and money, a fools bet thats why they have them. You cant pick teasers on here for these contest either so why post that kind of stupid betting.
some of you people are a joke with posting waste of money teasers. grow some balls and make a real pick and bet. teasers are a waste of time and money, a fools bet thats why they have them. You cant pick teasers on here for these contest either so why post that kind of stupid betting.
Dont see DEN doing more than running the ball on a short week against a team like OAK. under 48 and take the points, everyone betting DEN like they need to win big. Manning is not going to come out throw 40 times on a short week at his age in a game that really means nothing to them
+10.5 and under 48 24-16 DEN
You are probably the biggest idiot on this site. You call people out when you are a loser. If people want to play teasers why does it matter to you? If they win than thats good... something you suck at doing.
You call people morons when your logic is idiotic. Yah sure buddy, lets not make manning throw the ball cause hes old. This game means nothing for them when they can play for playoff position.
I look forward to reading some more of your game analysis'.
Hot Forum Topics
