All Forums | Pro Football

Denver at Oakland (12/06/2012)

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 31285
Posts: 144
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  Denver [6-6 ATS]
Home:  Oakland [3-9 ATS]

Game Time: 8:20 PM
Stadium: O.co Coliseum

Recent Meetings:
09/30/12 - OAK 6 vs. DEN 37

Team Leaders:

Denver:
Passing: Peyton Manning (3502)
Rushing: Willis McGahee (731)
Receiving: Demaryius Thomas (1114)

Oakland:
Passing: Carson Palmer (3532)
Rushing: Darren McFadden (455)
Receiving: Brandon Myers (721)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 851
Posted: #2
7 point teaser... Denver -3.5 and Navy +0.0 = 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 353
Posted: #3

Double digit DIVISIONAL home underdogs have covered 21 of the last 22 ATS, and the number may rise....

Oakland +10.5

GL

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 29
Posted: #4
Under 49.5 get it NOW!!!!!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 186
Posted: #5
Gonna review this more, but Denver is rolling and Oakland is fading fast. This would appear to be a very lop sided victory for the Broncos. But this season has proven that double digit spreads have almost always ended in favor of the underdog. Though, outside of Thanksgiving, the favorites have covered the last 4 Thursday Night games.

Right now I'm leaning

Denver -10.5

Under 49
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 265
Posted: #6

Look people last week all the games but one fell to a 4 team teaser you could have had either side (the bengals were the one) just something to think about when you call THE MAN.

TEASERES

2team move 3pt  3 team move 6pt  4 team move 12pt

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 1730
Posted: #7

OAKLAND

YTD: 75-56-1 (57.3%)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 288
Posted: #8

Wait on the line to go up even higher and take Oakland. I could see the line at local spots getting to as high as 13.

Everyone likes to bet Peyton and will especially be incline to take Denver over Oakland. However, Denver just locked up the division and has to travel after a tough game. I'm sure a lot of effort went into game planning to win that game to lock the division up.

Also, this is the first time during the season that Oakland gets to play back to back home games. On a short week, that's a major advantage. Plus McFadden and Goodson will be back.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2070
Posted: #9
The doc had the chiefs in the last double digit home underdog adventure. Cant believe there's another one so close together. Put your largest large on OAK!!!! 
If you’re not large, you’re small - the DOC
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #10

Quote Originally Posted by DrDogs:

The doc had the chiefs in the last double digit home underdog adventure. Cant believe there's another one so close together. Put your largest large on OAK!!!! 

Reason: angle  Comments:  Since 2010, home dogs of 7.5 points and higher, have covered at the phenomenal rate of 82.4 % ATS. As always, LISTEN TO THE DOCTOR, and please fade me_I need your money!

OAKLAND  + 10.5

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 17
Posted: #11
You guys are forgetting how horrible the Raiders are. The defense cant stop anyone. The D-line cant pressure and the secondary is even worse. The offense can move the ball but cant score in the redzone. This game is gonna be just like Ravens, Saints, Bengals and it will be over by 1st quarter. Stats and trends point towards OAK, but that doesnt take into account: Dennis Allen has lost the team, no talent on defense and the players easily give up. I am a season ticket holder and I watch this team closely.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 549
Posted: #12
Tough one to pick.I've put money on denver 3 wks in a row now and lost 2 and pushed 1. They win the game but their terrible at covering.LEANING RAIDERS HERE +10.5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 19
Posted: #13
Yeh we all know how bad the ravaged Raiders are and so is KC philly and Jville but they all seem to pull a rabbit out of there hats in these divisional rematches ! Besides Manning is a farce in these double digit cover situations he always seem to shank the cover in the forth quarter..IE: KANSAS CITY!!.LAY THE WOOD ON THAT OAK TREE!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3284
Posted: #14
I THINK I WILL BUY IT DOWN TO -9.5.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1827
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:

Reason: angle  Comments:  Since 2010, home dogs of 7.5 points and higher, have covered at the phenomenal rate of 82.4 % ATS. As always, LISTEN TO THE DOCTOR, and please fade me_I need your money!

OAKLAND  + 10.5

Vue, I'm not a fan of everything you do, but, here's one thing I absolutely LOVE:

DOUBLE DIGIT DIVISION HOME DOGS

people, say what you want, Peyton Manning, playoffs, blah, blah, blah,................and I'll just keep repeating:

DOUBLE DIGIT DIVISION HOME DOGS

DOUBLE DIGIT DIVISION HOME DOGS

not saying the Raidahz win, outright, but, this is a gambling site, right?!?!!?!? 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 17
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by FB1:

Yeh we all know how bad the ravaged Raiders are and so is KC philly and Jville but they all seem to pull a rabbit out of there hats in these divisional rematches ! Besides Manning is a farce in these double digit cover situations he always seem to shank the cover in the forth quarter..IE: KANSAS CITY!!.LAY THE WOOD ON THAT OAK TREE!!!!


The difference between KC and OAK is that KC defense plays hard no matter what. They got pass rushers that get sacks every game. OAK does not have that and their D-line cant pressure and than basically gives up.

The Raiders are full of players that shouldnt even be starting at any level. On defense worth mentioning they got Branch, Huff, Burris, and Wheeler. Seymour is a wannabe leader that is just there to collect his paycheck. Kelly is average but has no help. Like I said, the Raiders cant stop anyone and against strong teams, they get blown out by halftime. The Raiders is the kind of team that will break the wrong kinds of records.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 288
Posted: #17

Quote Originally Posted by rarafromphilly:

I THINK I WILL BUY IT DOWN TO -9.5.

If you feel you have to buy points on any bet, you probably shouldn't bet the game... 4.5% vig is enough to be giving.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 310
Posted: #18
Vue I'm starting to like your picks at the end of the season on games I consider playing. Early lean on the Raiders!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5
Posted: #19

Week(14) Fearless Predictions

Here we go boys....Time to get large and in charge in time for the playoffs.

Thurs--12/6-8:30--Den(-10.5)-vs-35-Oak19=54=Den by 16, OV

100-Rams 28-vs-Buff(-3) -24=52=Rams by 4, OV

100-KC 24-vs-Browns(-5.5) -23=47=KC by 1, OV

100-Eagles 19-vs-TB(-7)--27=46=TB by 8, UN

100-Balt(PK)-23-vs-Wash(PK)-31=54=Wash by 8, OV

100-Atl.(-3.5)-24-vs-Caro-21=45=Atl by 3, UN

100-Bears(-3)-19-vs-Minne-23=42=Minne by 4, OV

100-Jets(-1.5)-23-vs-Jack-19=42=Jets by 4, OV

100-Tenn17-vs-Colts(-5.5)-31=48=Colts by 14, UN

100-Dall-21-vs-Cinn(-3)-26=47=Cinn by 5, OV

100-SD-16-vs-Pitt-20=36=

405-Mia.-17-vs-SF(-10)-28=45= SF by 11, OV

425-Ariz.-13-vs-Sea.(-10.5) -28=41= Sea. by 12, OV

425-N.Orleans-31-vs-Giants(-6)-28=59=N.O by 3, OV

820-Det.-24-vs-GB(-6.5)-31=55=GB by 7, OV

(MON) 830-Hou.-25-NE(-4)-31=56=NE by 6, OV

(SAT) 12/3-300-Navy(-7)-24-Army-26=50=Army by 2, UN 57

 

 

Quote Originally Posted by Covers:

Away:  Denver [6-6 ATS]
Home:  Oakland [3-9 ATS]

Game Time: 8:20 PM
Stadium: O.co Coliseum

Recent Meetings:
09/30/12 - OAK 6 vs. DEN 37

Team Leaders:

Denver:
Passing: Peyton Manning (3502)
Rushing: Willis McGahee (731)
Receiving: Demaryius Thomas (1114)

Oakland:
Passing: Carson Palmer (3532)
Rushing: Darren McFadden (455)
Receiving: Brandon Myers (721)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:

Reason: angle  Comments:  Since 2010, home dogs of 7.5 points and higher, have covered at the phenomenal rate of 82.4 % ATS. As always, LISTEN TO THE DOCTOR, and please fade me_I need your money!

OAKLAND  + 10.5

I'll give all you Oak fanatics +14 all day and I'll have Peyton  look through his earhole the whole game and throw left handed to give you a breathing chance in hell, and still win by 16. Just like the man below Oaks secondary is gonna need a crutch.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8326
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by Chiefan34:

Double digit DIVISIONAL home underdogs have covered 21 of the last 22 ATS, and the number may rise....

Oakland +10.5

GL

But the number won't rise! These are the Raiders sheeple. How have the Raiders profited you this year?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #22

OVER  48

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 167
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by DrDogs:

The doc had the chiefs in the last double digit home underdog adventure. Cant believe there's another one so close together. Put your largest large on OAK!!!! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3284
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by GordoPockets:

If you feel you have to buy points on any bet, you probably shouldn't bet the game... 4.5% vig is enough to be giving.

LISTEN UP,THE HOOK KILLS!LOL..I GOT THIS.
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 38371
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by 3Fiddy:



The difference between KC and OAK is that KC defense plays hard no matter what. They got pass rushers that get sacks every game. OAK does not have that and their D-line cant pressure and than basically gives up.

The Raiders are full of players that shouldnt even be starting at any level. On defense worth mentioning they got Branch, Huff, Burris, and Wheeler. Seymour is a wannabe leader that is just there to collect his paycheck. Kelly is average but has no help. Like I said, the Raiders cant stop anyone and against strong teams, they get blown out by halftime. The Raiders is the kind of team that will break the wrong kinds of records.

Really ?...KC defense plays hard and they get sacks every game? What happened in week 8 when Oakland smoked them 28-16. What happened in week 11 when the  Bengals and the Red Rifle put 28 on that defense. Didn't Buffalo at one time put 28 on them also. TBay slammed them for 38 .

Hey... did you see Rivers Sunday afternoon throwing water ballons at Cincys defense. He put 30 on KC with that rubber band arm of his.  Every game means every game. I didn't see to many sacks in those games. Maybe  Defensive Sacks is not the stat you're lookin for...try Defensive sucks. 

We all know Oakland will not win this one. However, Manning will person out toward the end of the game on a short week and hand the reins over to his defense to pay Vegas this time.

Oakland +1.5
- The storms will come, the storms will pass -
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.