All Forums | Pro Football

Denver at Oakland (12/06/2012)

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 31285
Posts: 144
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 288
Posted: #101
Quote Originally Posted by booyahz123:


another moron speaks.  My take on this game is accurate, maybe you should just sit this one out and watch

I completely agree with you... That logic makes perfect sense and is the reason I'm also taking Oakland. 

Cheers!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 1668
Posted: #102
under is the easy play


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 50
Posted: #103
so many experts on this site.37-6 the first time out. whats to think about denver minus ten over 48. unless im missing something this is easy money. by the way they are still playing for home field.over is money also.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #104

        Nwhere To Hide . . . 

  As bad as Raiders n' Vuepicks are, All bad things must come to an end.

 I think . . .

Raiders have luxury of catching Traveling Broncs on short week which factors heavily on tonite's spread outcome.
As for Vue's data , action,prime and new and improved comment ? play gimmicks, let's just say he's due.
For tonite's game, One fact stands clear to be considered : Peyton Manning is physically not 100 % fit and by now,
everyone should be familiar with Coach Fox's veteran's wise ways , knowing he will absolutely NOT take the risk of injury or fatiguing Peyton Manning via pass attack on short rest.

Would be like Girardi pushing Andy Petite on 2 days rest with playoffs around the corner.
Raiders have no defense ranked 28 th, allowing 131 yrds rushing per game , which will allow 
 Broncs to stick to a conservative,run and grind type of game plan allowing Denver's D ranked 3 rd in the league to control the pace vs Ineffective Raiders O that only could score 6 points @ Denver with a healthy Mc Fadden earlier this year.

As far as meaning of this game.It's truly unbelievable that anybody in this forum can even suggest this game has little importance for Denver.
Whoever believes such BS ,should really not be gambling, less it be quarter bets , lol , as some do.

Denver is tied for 2 nd seed with Ravens + Pats and will be hell bent to win out , securing  first round bye ,doing everything to avoid playing @ Baltimore ,where Ravens DOMINATE. Ironically Broncs will be playing Ravens next week ,so this is a must win for them in order to try to secure HUGE advantage of playing @ Mile High and perhaps less importantly go for divisional sweep with only Chiefs standing in the way after Raiders tonite for perfect division record.

Could be wrong but Fox would be out of his mind to unleash Peyton towards back to back 300 + yrds on only three days rest.
Denver's D n' Running game will dictate clock while Raiders may hit 16 Pt plateau.

BRONCOS 26  RAIDERS 16
BOLA

Lovin$ the Under


               
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 1928
Posted: #105
Look for the Raiders to run the ball and milk the clock, keeping Manning off the field. Denver wins but "DO NOT" cover the spread.Just another example of the public gambling community not taking into account other factors that affect this game.I will be waiting for line to move up and then be big on Raiders to cover.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 1210
Posted: #106

QUOTE Originally Posted by Brzfan:

Quote Originally Posted by Dogs-run-wild:

Just how do they score 19 points in a football game?

A touchdown with extra point and a field goal = 10 pts.  

A Safety = 2 pts.  Then, a touchdown and extra point = 19 pts.

Also, a touchdown with extra point and four field goals = 19 pts.

Also, five field goals scored, and two safeties = 19 pts.

Probably many other ways LOL  Hope this helps 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 776
Posted: #107
Oakland has the 28th ranked D in the league, while Denver has the 3rd best D.  DD home dog, short week, division rivals, I get it, but damn the Raiders are just plain terrible most of the time.  

My humble little capping program puts the # @ -12 and for me that's to close to call.    

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 298
Posted: #108
21 out of 22 seems like its worth for a 1 unit play

Might as well hedge with the Under since its Thurs and I always play the

1.Dogs
2.Home Teams
3.Under

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 2497
Posted: #109
cant remember the last time manning turned the ball over ..raiders seem to turn it over everyday . sure 10 looks sweet heck even 13 , but turnovers is so cruicial palmer could easily turn it over 3-4 times @ his own 20 giving denver the reigns
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 40
Posted: #110
RAIDERS AND UND!!!!! LOCKED AND LOADED!!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33
Posted: #111
My play is den -7 at the half 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 19
Posted: #112

teased denver -4.5 over 42 and over 48

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 36
Posted: #113
I am to rolling with Denver @ -10.5
They have burnt me several times on these larger spreads, but Oakland doesn't have much of a defense.

On the other topic of buying points, I have no problem with buying the hook, but never buying more than that. If I am placing a real money bet, I expect that team to cover. If I buy the hook, its just a little insurance.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 296
Posted: #114
Takin da raiders!!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 5199
Posted: #115

Broncos 28

Raiders 17

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 332
Posted: #116
oakland will look to run clock "play keep away" teasing them with under
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 6791
Posted: #117
Denver/Oakland UNDER 48LARGE
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 39
Posted: #118
Quote Originally Posted by DrDogs:

The doc had the chiefs in the last double digit home underdog adventure. Cant believe there's another one so close together. Put your largest large on OAK!!!! 
Lol peyton manning is going to show the world why he's the top 2 qb's in the NFL and fight for a top seed by blowing the jock straps off the horrible disgraceful raiders. The chiefs played Carolina and had a ton of heart to play w that game. Denver for the small b/c there is always wayyyy easier picks when you have 11 matchups or so on Sunday......Holla
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 452
Posted: #119
Dont see Oakland scoreing more than 14-17pts and Denver is good for at least 27to30pts.Go PeytonGleout
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 109
Posted: #120
simon_says:

DENVER -10 
UNDER 48 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 549
Posted: #121
Well, i posted on this thread earlier this week how i've been betting on denver the last 3 wks (2loss 1 push) and was undecided on this divisional matchup .Yea i know that dog stat about the 22-2 ats,but couldnt' still make up my mind..So i did sumthin I rarely do and paid a capper for his pick for tonights game(+army/navy game for free) and his pick was.......denver -10  the guys on a 11-2 run in the nfl. So there you go,hope this helps if you wer teetering on the fence as well.BEST OF LUCK AND GO BRONCO'S
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 1210
Posted: #122
Quote Originally Posted by booyahz123:

some of you people are a joke with posting waste of money teasers.  grow some balls and make a real pick and bet.  teasers are a waste of time and money, a fools bet thats why they have them.  You cant pick teasers on here for these contest either so why post that kind of stupid betting.

 Dont see DEN doing more than running the ball on a short week against a team like OAK.  under 48 and take the points, everyone betting DEN like they need to win big.  Manning is not going to come out throw 40 times on a short week at his age in a game that really means nothing to them

+10.5 and under 48  24-16 DEN

Thanks for the confirmation on those "teaser" rip-offs booyahz123!  Thought is was me!  I only go "straight up" bets with small 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8-Team Parlays!

But the "straight up" bets is where I make the best money.  Even parlays (let alone "teasers") are hard to connect.  Checked those teaser rules out, and ran away fast!  Thanks, but no thanks!  Thanks again for your intelligent insight!

BOL   

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 633
Posted: #123

[Quote: Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace] Takin da raiders!!!

Im with Sammy, I think Raiders will play up here in this spot. +10 @ home division game.

BOL!!!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 1210
Posted: #124

Quote Originally Posted by binger1:

Well, i posted on this thread earlier this week how i've been betting on denver the last 3 wks (2loss 1 push) and was undecided on this divisional matchup .Yea i know that dog stat about the 22-2 ats,but couldnt' still make up my mind..So i did sumthin I rarely do and paid a capper for his pick for tonights game(+army/navy game for free) and his pick was.......denver -10  the guys on a 11-2 run in the nfl. So there you go,hope this helps if you wer teetering on the fence as well.BEST OF LUCK AND GO BRONCO'S

Best of Luck for you this time binger1!  Mentioned you in my above post on page 3, post # 59.  I decided not to touch the game for the reasons in my post...but hope you can make up for your two losses.

GL to You          

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3072
Posted: #125
Quote Originally Posted by SportsPredictor:

Can't argue with a confident man UHQB!  I've seen many of your picks on covers...and they're damn good!  I won't have a dog in this fight, so all on Denver or Oakland, I wish Good Luck.

BOL                         

I've been following you also SportsPredictor. Your Goldsheet picks are pretty darn good. I would believe that you were writing for them the way you analyze the games.

Noticed Denver went right down and scored easily?

 

All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.