Exclusive $60 Bonus
CODE: COVERS60
Find the best NFL bets today - Oct. 2, 2026. Free expert and computer picks for every NFL game.
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
23.66 |
+0.0 -225 |
o47.5 -105 |
-205 |
|
|
20.03 |
+0.0 +170 |
u47.5 -107 |
+188 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21.09 |
+0.0 -139 |
o44.0 -110 |
-136 |
|
|
18.92 |
+0.0 +112 |
u44.5 -110 |
+125 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
22.27 |
+7.0 -115 |
o49.5 -110 |
+275 |
|
|
26.20 |
-7.0 -105 |
u50.5 -115 |
-305 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18.60 |
+3.5 -108 |
o42.5 -115 |
+160 |
|
|
22.53 |
-3.5 -104 |
u43.5 -120 |
-176 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24.00 |
+3.5 -120 |
o47.5 -115 |
+140 |
|
|
27.66 |
-3.5 +110 |
u49.5 -120 |
-154 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24.05 |
+0.0 -190 |
o42.5 -110 |
-185 |
|
|
20.61 |
+0.0 +145 |
u43.5 -115 |
+160 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
22.83 |
+0.0 -195 |
o39.0 -107 |
-180 |
|
|
18.48 |
+0.0 +150 |
u39.5 -110 |
+160 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
15.63 |
+12.5 -115 |
o42.5 -108 |
+560 |
|
|
26.17 |
-12.5 -105 |
u43.5 -120 |
-699 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
23.26 |
+2.5 +100 |
o51.5 -102 |
+125 |
|
|
26.63 |
-2.5 -112 |
u51.5 -108 |
-134 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
14.99 |
+10.5 -109 |
o38.5 -108 |
+475 |
|
|
26.67 |
-10.5 +100 |
u38.5 -107 |
-599 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
26.94 |
+0.0 -230 |
o47.5 -108 |
-213 |
|
|
22.30 |
+0.0 +175 |
u48.0 -113 |
+188 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19.08 |
+7.5 -115 |
o42.5 -110 |
+295 |
|
|
25.51 |
-7.5 +100 |
u43.5 -123 |
-350 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24.28 |
+2.5 +100 |
o47.5 -112 |
+130 |
|
|
25.32 |
-2.5 -114 |
u48.0 -110 |
-136 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
26.89 |
-3.5 -112 |
o50.5 -115 |
-185 |
|
|
23.89 |
+3.5 -104 |
u51.5 -115 |
+172 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
23.78 |
+2.5 -107 |
o47.5 -107 |
+120 |
|
|
23.28 |
-2.5 -105 |
u48.5 -110 |
-130 |
Downs has yet to reach the endzone this season, but he leads the Colts in targets (24) and reception yards (186) and ranks second in receptions (14).
Washington has surrendered six receiving touchdowns to wideouts this season, tied with the Arizona Cardinals for most in the NFL.
With Keenan Allen (groin) a non-participant in Friday’s practice and Alec Pierce (heel), the Colts’ receiving depth is razor thin heading to London, and Downs should see even more looks in this highly-exploitable matchup.
The Commanders defense has surrendered the most passing touchdowns per game (3.7) while only forcing two total interceptions. Washington has given up the third-most passing yards per game at a healthy 287.
For as vulnerable as the Commanders are through the air, they’ve been stout against the run, giving up the third-fewest rush yards (56) and no rushing touchdowns.
Jones tossed multiple scores only six times in 13 games last season, and he hasn’t been a prolific QB throughout his career, which accounts for the low probability. Given Washington’s horrendous pass defense and strong rush defense, I’m willing to trade this up to 55% and bet on a breakout performance.
Brissett threw for two touchdowns last week against the San Francisco 49ers, and the Giants allowed six touchdown passes through the first two weeks of the season. The New York defensive injuries aren’t being fully accounted for in this prop, and I’d recommend Brissett for two-plus passing touchdowns to +100 because the Giants are being given too much credit for a strong defensive game in miserable weather against the Tennessee Titans in Week 3.
McBride has scored in 11 of his past 20 games and has garnered 40% of the red-zone targets for the Cards through three weeks, so I recommend him to score down to +140. The Giants also allowed an 82.4% completion percentage to tight ends through their first two games before playing in horrible weather in Week 3, so with New York also allowing touchdowns on 77.8% of its opponent’s trips to the end zone, McBride is in a great matchup to score against an injury-depleted secondary Sunday.
Cook already has two touchdowns this season, and the volume suggests there are plenty more to come. He's left some meat on the bone with Josh Allen vulturing a few scoring opportunities, but the workload remains extremely encouraging. Against the Patriots, Cook should see similar volume inside the 20, and that’s all I need to back him heading into Week 4. Averaging just around 20 totes per game against a defense allowing teams to score at a 62% clip in the red zone, Cook is as safe a bet as you're going to get in this game.
I'm buying Khalil Shakir at 3.55x with a fair price of 3.2x. Trevor Lawrence might not have had a huge game last week against the Patriots, but he was perfect in the red zone, going 5-for-5 with three passing TDs, all coming to his wide receivers. Josh Allen has been quite greedy in the red zone with eight carries for five TDs and a 61% run rate inside the 20. With Allen's health already showing some concern after he picked up a knee injury late in Week 3, and turnovers being an issue, some more passing in tight could go a long way in the Bills' play calling. This season, Shakir has the most red-zone targets of all the Buffalo pass catchers and played the most snaps among the wide receivers in Week 3 at 71%. He hasn't looked great this year, but the snaps, red-zone usage, and hopeful change in RZ philosophy have me reaching here at this long price when DJ Moore is too short at 2.5x.
While the Chicago Bears deploy D'Andre Swift primarily in the running game, he's also capable of making noise in the passing attack. The result is that Swift has had at least 88 total yards from scrimmage in each of Chicago's first three games. I see that streak continuing without issue against the Jets, and I'm taking Swift to get 80+ combined yards at 60% or lower.
Kyle Monangai is averaging 5.9 yards per run over 30 carries so far this year for the Chicago Bears. Monangai only has one touchdown so far this season, but he's consistently getting 10 rushes per game. That usage and his big play ability -- he sprang a 61-yard run in Week 1 -- makes him a TD threat every week.
Dallas tight end Jake Ferguson has seen his involvement in the Cowboys’ passing attack tick up the past two games, drawing a total of nine passes for seven receptions and a collective 66 yards. He’s run 82 routes on 128 total snaps, garnering a 10.9% target rate through three games, which is pretty good when you consider CeeDee Lamb and George Pickens are on the field. Ferguson faces a Houston defense getting bullied by tight ends this season. The Texans have watched rival TEs catch 18 of 21 pass attempts for 213 yards – fourth most in the NFL. Houston’s linebacking corps is thin and its top coverage LBs are either injured or out in Week 4. Ferguson’s projections are very positive for Sunday, ranging from 25 yards to a ceiling of 38 yards. My number shakes out to 31+ receiving yards from the Dallas TE.
Dallas tight end Jake Ferguson isn’t the same receiving threat as CeeDee Lamb or George Pickens. But when all eyes are on those two WRs, Ferguson is making the most of his soft coverage. He’s scored three touchdowns in the past two games, catching all four red zone targets his way this season. Despite that activity in the end zone, Ferguson is still trading at a respectable return to find paydirt again in Week 4. His TD projections sit between 25% and 40% in Week 4 with most probabilities north of 30%.
I got this at 4.3x, and if both Terrance Ferguson and Colby Parkinson sit, this should have a fair price of 3.5x. The Rams use heavy tight-end sets at one of the highest rates in football, and even if Puka Nacua suits up, Tyler Higbee will have a ton of snaps. He took advantage of those snaps last week, seeing nine targets and leading the team with eight receptions and a score. He also has the same number of red-zone targets as Davante Adams. The Rams' PROE is climbing after a run-heavy game in Australia, and a negative game script could have Matthew Stafford throwing the ball 40-plus times again this week. I'm getting on this early, as Ferguson is likely out and Parkinson isn't practicing early in the week. Davis Allen to score at 9x is also worth a sniff.
Play up to 53%. Jordan Love has thrown exactly two touchdown passes in all three games this season. Tampa Bay owns one of the NFL’s best rushing defenses, while Green Bay ranks last in rushing offense, potentially pushing even more responsibility onto Love.
I'd be willing to trade up to Spears 17+ rushing yards because he should see favorable rushing looks against Baltimore's 21st-ranked rushing success defense. His receiving ability can produce lighter boxes, while a Ravens lead wouldn't necessarily hurt the prop because softer late-game fronts could create cheap rushing yards.
So much for Cincinnati’s defensive turnaround. The previously incompetent Steelers burned them for 30 points and 7.0 yards per play in Week 3. These defenses rank 24th and 25th in explosive play rate allowed, while Jacksonville’s offense is buzzing to open the season and Cincinnati dropped 33 points in its lone home game. These teams combined for 58 here last season with Jake Browning playing most of the snaps for the Bengals. Six of Cincinnati’s last nine home games reached at least 58 points.
I got this at 3.66x and would play to 3.4x. The Bengals are a tight-end funnel. No team gives up more yards to opposing tight ends than Cincinnati at 92 yards per game, which is a full 10-plus yards more than the next team. Having both starting safeties limited to start the week only makes this spot for Brenton Strange even better. The No. 1 tight end had five targets last week, is playing 75% of the snaps (second among pass catchers), and is running 74% of the routes. There are a lot of mouths to feed in this Jacksonville offense, but Strange has a red-zone role, and the price makes him my favorite TD pick in this game, which could see both sides score 25-plus points.
Play up to 60%. Malik Washington leads Miami with 12 receptions and is averaging 7.66 targets per game through three weeks. He has cleared this number in back-to-back contests, and Minnesota’s biggest defensive weakness has come against the pass. With consistent volume, four catches is a very manageable threshold.
Play up to 45%. Jordan Addison could see an even larger role if Justin Jefferson remains sidelined. He sits just one target behind Jefferson for the team lead and stepped up immediately last week with five catches for 90 yards and a touchdown. His big-play ability makes him an appealing scoring option against Miami.
I got this at 2.95x, and Brock Bowers should be in that 2.6x range in a tough matchup. It's an indoor home game, which helps, but Bowers also saw 13 targets last week (43% target share) and had double-digit receptions and a score. He has a 92% route share on the season, and his monstrous 43.3% target share leads all of football. I don't care who the home matchup is against. If I'm getting 2.7x or better with this target share, I'm saying yes every week. Kansas City has been an average defense against the position this year.
The breakeven number for Walker to find the end zone is -175, so there’s value here. He’s handled 51.3% of the touches and 71.4% of the carries for the Chiefs inside the red zone and scored four times through three games. Of course, Walker’s underlying numbers also pop with a league-high 4.66 yards after contact per carry and PFF elusive rating.
AJ Barner has four TDs over his last 10 games and was as short as 3.1x in the playoffs last year. Now that the Seahawks can't run the ball, Barner's scoring role is better than it was in the postseason. He leads all Seahawks with an 85% snap share on the season, runs the second-most routes (71%), and has a tush-push role on the goal line and in short yardage, which might be needed this week after the running backs gained one yard on three RZ carries last week. The injuries to Jadarian Price (LP) and George Holani (LP) only help.
Dobbins' rushing Under is playable down to 55.5 yards. He's averaging just 3.5 yards per carry on a 42.2% snap share, and a Niners lead could further limit his rushing volume against a Top-10 run defense.
Carolina is 10-0 ATS after an outright loss since the start of last season, and Detroit hasn’t earned my respect enough to be a 3.5-point favorite on the road in this matchup. Both Lions wins went down to the wire at home, while their lone road game was a blowout loss. The Panthers rank higher in yards per play and will be able to go shot-for-shot vs a Lions defense that just got lit up by Geno Smith.
Detroit games have had an averaged combined score of 62.6 points so far this season. Carolina has put up 37 and 34 in two of its three games, but got obliterated for 59 by Chicago the lone time they faced a respectable offense. Both secondaries are severly beat up, with Carolina’s Jaycee Horn and Mike Jackson now on injured reserve. The Lions can go shot for shot with anyone, while their defense has been awful on third down and in the red zone.
It's tough to ignore the chemistry between Michael Penix and Drake London. The wide receiver saw 10 targets last week on a short week and turned that into a monster nine-catch, 194-yard game. It was the seventh game these two have played together and the sixth time London has hit the century mark. He’s averaged 120 receiving yards per game with Penix getting him the ball. The projection for London this week is 86 yards, and the market has been on the move after opening at 72.5. It might be late for that number, but the indoor setting, the potential passing-game script as a road dog, the Saints owning a bottom-five success-rate defense against both the run and pass, and the cluster of linebacker injuries have me reaching for 80+ and his 100+ alternatives at 34%.
Michael Penix gets extra rest and was a Top-4 quarterback in EPA/dropback last week, while the cluster of injuries to the Saints’ linebackers is going to be a problem for the 2.5-point favorite. I’m backing the Falcons on the spread Monday, with THE BLITZ having Atlanta as a near coinflip to win the game at 48.9% probability. The Saints were already a defense giving up 27.7 points per game (26th) and ranked 31st in success rate, and now they have to stop a rejuvenated Atlanta offense with competent quarterback play while potentially missing 75% of its starting linebacker unit and some depth. Bijan Robinson is coming off a 200-plus-yard game and could do similar damage against a thin New Orleans defense indoors. Look for the Falcons to control the ball and be the better defense. Atlanta is the No. 3 success-rate defense.
Our experts and prediction models are hard at work analyzing the data. Check back shortly for today's picks, or explore our Computer Picks for inspiration.
For every matchup in an NFL season, our NFL computer produces selections for a variety of different betting angles. Our computer picks are based on a proprietary algorithm that values each team in the current week to produce moneyline, spread, and point total selections.
The table above, below the game picks, tracks our NFL computer's results over the last 100 games, outlining the record and profit for selections, based on $100 unit size. We track the profit based on both opening and closing lines for every matchup.
The easiest way to utilize our computer picks is to simply follow our selections for every matchup, what you'd call ailing the computer." But there are other ways to utilize our NFL computer picks, as well.
You can use our NFL computer as a jumping-off point to do more research into specific lines, cross-referencing with expert picks, which can be found above the selections for some matchups, recent NFL betting trends, and more.
As well, you can gauge the confidence of the matchup. The larger the projected score, the more confident the computer is in a specific pick.
Or, if you want to implement a system, betting only on underdogs, for example, you can look for matchups in which our computer likes the underdog to inform which picks you're going to hone in on for a given week.
We have these computer picks for every sport you're looking to wager on, as well:
NFL moneyline picks are the simplest way to get in on the NFL action. All you have to do is simply bet on which team you think will win the game.
For moneyline picks, the favorite is represented with a minus sign (-) in front of the odds, while the underdog has a plus (+). However, you don't get the same profit for picking an underdog compared to a favorite. If the favored team is -120, a $100 bet on them would pay out $80 in profit and $180 total, if they win the game. The underdog winning at +150 would pay out a $150 profit, $250 total.
We have a complete breakdown of how to read NFL moneyline odds for these NFL computer picks.
While moneyline picks are the simplest, picking NFL games against the spread is probably the most common wager for regular NFL bettors.
To bet an NFL spread, you wager on whether a team will win by a certain number of points or more or if they'll lose by fewer points than the spread. For example, if the spread is -6.5 for the New England Patriots, you would win the bet if they win the game by 7 points or more. Or if a team is +6.5, you're betting on if they'll win outright or lose by fewer than 6.5 points.
There is a correlation between moneyline odds and the spread, as books set these lines based on the same information.
You can read more about NFL spreads here.
If you aren’t entirely sold on which NFL team will win or cover in an NFL game, you can still use our NFL computer picks to bet on the point total.
As opposed to taking a side, in total or Over/Under betting, you wager on whether both NFL teams will combine for a final score of more than (Over) or less than (Under) the total number of points set by oddsmakers.
The computer picks, and your handicapping of totals is more about how you think both teams will score points, not which team has the edge to win.
Our NFL Computer Picks are a great way to place weekly football wagers, but you should also consider handicapping games yourself using some of our other tools. If you're looking to bet on long-term futures this football season, check out some of our other dedicated pages:
If you’re ready to bet on NFL picks, you first need to find the right sportsbook. Our NFL betting sites guide offers secure banking, the best odds, bonuses, and reliable customer service options for you.
Covers NFL picks are released two to three days before each game on the NFL schedule.
Covers provides free NFL picks covering many markets, including point spreads, totals, moneylines, player props, and more.