Yo I dig on your swine papi but let’s leave the strictly dirty adjectives game when peppering your dialogue for the others in the forum to pound into oblivion .
” Evil “ and “ dangerous “
Come on . If you ain’t better than that then make yourself a ham sandwich and pass it around like a dutchie to the left hand side .
damn .
I can’t read that blatant shit . Especially if you’re not gonna expound on your last point about the electoral college .
the good news for you though is that your post doesn’t reference any Tucker Carlson interviews with Putin so this won’t be moved to the Website Promotions Forum
wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
Yo I dig on your swine papi but let’s leave the strictly dirty adjectives game when peppering your dialogue for the others in the forum to pound into oblivion .
” Evil “ and “ dangerous “
Come on . If you ain’t better than that then make yourself a ham sandwich and pass it around like a dutchie to the left hand side .
damn .
I can’t read that blatant shit . Especially if you’re not gonna expound on your last point about the electoral college .
the good news for you though is that your post doesn’t reference any Tucker Carlson interviews with Putin so this won’t be moved to the Website Promotions Forum
Since we can not win a Presidential election honestly. Flood Texas with millions of illegals to flip the electoral college!
Law prohibits non-citizens voting in federal and state elections. However over a dozen cities in 3 states allow non-citizens to vote in local elections. No evidence millions of illegal immigrants are voting in federal elections.
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
Since we can not win a Presidential election honestly. Flood Texas with millions of illegals to flip the electoral college!
Law prohibits non-citizens voting in federal and state elections. However over a dozen cities in 3 states allow non-citizens to vote in local elections. No evidence millions of illegal immigrants are voting in federal elections.
Yo I dig on your swine papi but let’s leave the strictly dirty adjectives game when peppering your dialogue for the others in the forum to pound into oblivion . ” Evil “ and “ dangerous “ Come on . If you ain’t better than that then make yourself a ham sandwich and pass it around like a dutchie to the left hand side . damn . I can’t read that blatant shit . Especially if you’re not gonna expound on your last point about the electoral college . the good news for you though is that your post doesn’t reference any Tucker Carlson interviews with Putin so this won’t be moved to the Website Promotions Forum
Thank you for finding 'Tucker and Putin! The Covers' search does not take you to Websites and Promotions! A very unclassy decision by a mod moving the thread from the politics forum! The planet will be anxiously waiting for Tucker to drop his interview with Putin! Hopefully it drops before the friendly and very caring Dems start WWIII.
Quote Originally Posted by spockgato:
Yo I dig on your swine papi but let’s leave the strictly dirty adjectives game when peppering your dialogue for the others in the forum to pound into oblivion . ” Evil “ and “ dangerous “ Come on . If you ain’t better than that then make yourself a ham sandwich and pass it around like a dutchie to the left hand side . damn . I can’t read that blatant shit . Especially if you’re not gonna expound on your last point about the electoral college . the good news for you though is that your post doesn’t reference any Tucker Carlson interviews with Putin so this won’t be moved to the Website Promotions Forum
Thank you for finding 'Tucker and Putin! The Covers' search does not take you to Websites and Promotions! A very unclassy decision by a mod moving the thread from the politics forum! The planet will be anxiously waiting for Tucker to drop his interview with Putin! Hopefully it drops before the friendly and very caring Dems start WWIII.
That was censorship . Plain and simple . I’ll tell you honestly that I never really cared much for the politics that plays out on the world’s grand stage . I never scoped my eyeball dead center on it’s details and the many vast layers hiding just below the surface of the headlines .
I came to this forum expecting to learn new things and to broaden my horizons . But what I’ve learned is that the politics that play out in our government buildings , with everyone wearing their spiffy suits and shiny shoes and their incessant talking in circles , is nothing really too different from the politics that goes on in any neighborhood growing up ,
or in the school setting where the hierarchies amongst the students and the faculty are constantly trying to make a name for themselves , and out-do each other at the expense of truth and morals , and what is just ….
or the politics of youth sports programs at any age from tee ball to university , or any office or work setting anywhere . For that matter it is the same as the politics that goes on in this very forum . I guess in learning nothing new I learned something new . How’s that for a mindfuck ?
you can all keep your details , and the arguing of referendums and laws passed , and your biases , and your egotistical sinful ways that delve into the minutiae of every dimple crevice of the buttcheek that you guys call “ politics “….
But I will focus on the crux of the problem .
That when push comes to shove people will do what’s best for the situation and play games the rest of the time and masquerade around anything else that is important because the human ego is a motherfucker .
wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
That was censorship . Plain and simple . I’ll tell you honestly that I never really cared much for the politics that plays out on the world’s grand stage . I never scoped my eyeball dead center on it’s details and the many vast layers hiding just below the surface of the headlines .
I came to this forum expecting to learn new things and to broaden my horizons . But what I’ve learned is that the politics that play out in our government buildings , with everyone wearing their spiffy suits and shiny shoes and their incessant talking in circles , is nothing really too different from the politics that goes on in any neighborhood growing up ,
or in the school setting where the hierarchies amongst the students and the faculty are constantly trying to make a name for themselves , and out-do each other at the expense of truth and morals , and what is just ….
or the politics of youth sports programs at any age from tee ball to university , or any office or work setting anywhere . For that matter it is the same as the politics that goes on in this very forum . I guess in learning nothing new I learned something new . How’s that for a mindfuck ?
you can all keep your details , and the arguing of referendums and laws passed , and your biases , and your egotistical sinful ways that delve into the minutiae of every dimple crevice of the buttcheek that you guys call “ politics “….
But I will focus on the crux of the problem .
That when push comes to shove people will do what’s best for the situation and play games the rest of the time and masquerade around anything else that is important because the human ego is a motherfucker .
@MrWhatsItToYa Then wouldn't Texas sending them into other cities also be "supporting them"? Maybe you can make the argument they are tacitly but only because they are not in charge of deporting them, the Federal government is in charge of that. So, if they do not want to support them they shift that to a state that wants to support them. So, overall, no, they are not; they are shifting that support to another state.
Texas is the 1st step in helping them avoid deportation,they are purposely sending them to areas that they know will help them avoid deportation.Sounds like Texas is enabling the whole situation.If Illinois paid for a bus to take their homeless to Texas to avoid the cold,wouldn't Illinois be helping them "avoid" the cold?
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
@MrWhatsItToYa Then wouldn't Texas sending them into other cities also be "supporting them"? Maybe you can make the argument they are tacitly but only because they are not in charge of deporting them, the Federal government is in charge of that. So, if they do not want to support them they shift that to a state that wants to support them. So, overall, no, they are not; they are shifting that support to another state.
Texas is the 1st step in helping them avoid deportation,they are purposely sending them to areas that they know will help them avoid deportation.Sounds like Texas is enabling the whole situation.If Illinois paid for a bus to take their homeless to Texas to avoid the cold,wouldn't Illinois be helping them "avoid" the cold?
@MrWhatsItToYa Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: @Raiders22 Again,I wasn't comparing an illegal immigration problem for a whole nation to one persons legal problems.I was comparing people justifying things in general.That Mugg thinks it's crazy how people can justify the issues going on with immigration.And that I think it's crazy that people can justify that 1 president supposedly should have absolute immunity,as those same people are looking for crimes a different president supposedly did.But the republican party is justifying this action. Who is saying this?Who is saying what? Who is saying that?Umm,some republicans and trump and his lawyers.Isn't it supposed to go before the Supreme Court soon? Who? So, no one on here?
Oh,so now you've decided we can only talk about things that others on here have talked about?Since I have talked about it,and think its pretty important that our leaders shouldn't be able to commit any crime they want.What are your thoughts on if all presidents should have "absolute immunity" to commit any crime they want?
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
@MrWhatsItToYa Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: @Raiders22 Again,I wasn't comparing an illegal immigration problem for a whole nation to one persons legal problems.I was comparing people justifying things in general.That Mugg thinks it's crazy how people can justify the issues going on with immigration.And that I think it's crazy that people can justify that 1 president supposedly should have absolute immunity,as those same people are looking for crimes a different president supposedly did.But the republican party is justifying this action. Who is saying this?Who is saying what? Who is saying that?Umm,some republicans and trump and his lawyers.Isn't it supposed to go before the Supreme Court soon? Who? So, no one on here?
Oh,so now you've decided we can only talk about things that others on here have talked about?Since I have talked about it,and think its pretty important that our leaders shouldn't be able to commit any crime they want.What are your thoughts on if all presidents should have "absolute immunity" to commit any crime they want?
The problem with having to pay and foot the bill for illegal immigrants that need assistance would be there either way right ? because they are allowed in even though it’s illegal . And Texas not believing in paying for something that is illegal decides to send them to an area where the illegal thing is welcomed so they do that . what’s the problem ? It’s not necessarily passing the buck is it ? let the chips fall where they may in my opinion.
This is not really true. Texas is overwhelmed and they do pay. How many people allowed to enter Texas and how many have they bussed out?
Washington Post; U.S. has released more than 2.3 million into the country since 2021. So let's say Texas got 1/2 of them, that's a conservative figure of 1.15 million in Texas.
MSN; Texas has bussed 102,000 to sanctuary cities since 2022. Not even 10%.
Quote Originally Posted by spockgato:
The problem with having to pay and foot the bill for illegal immigrants that need assistance would be there either way right ? because they are allowed in even though it’s illegal . And Texas not believing in paying for something that is illegal decides to send them to an area where the illegal thing is welcomed so they do that . what’s the problem ? It’s not necessarily passing the buck is it ? let the chips fall where they may in my opinion.
This is not really true. Texas is overwhelmed and they do pay. How many people allowed to enter Texas and how many have they bussed out?
Washington Post; U.S. has released more than 2.3 million into the country since 2021. So let's say Texas got 1/2 of them, that's a conservative figure of 1.15 million in Texas.
MSN; Texas has bussed 102,000 to sanctuary cities since 2022. Not even 10%.
Hmmmm . I take it back . They have hearts made of gold then .
if that’s the case then what’s the problem ?
It’s like going out to eat with family .
You can’t expect one guy to pick up the whole check every time and also hear the complaints from everybody else that they shoulda left a bigger tip ? Right ?
wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
Hmmmm . I take it back . They have hearts made of gold then .
if that’s the case then what’s the problem ?
It’s like going out to eat with family .
You can’t expect one guy to pick up the whole check every time and also hear the complaints from everybody else that they shoulda left a bigger tip ? Right ?
Who said anything about me looking to have a constructive conversation with anybody.I just like pointing out facts about how 1 of our people running for president is a traitor to this country.And if you can't see that maybe you are the 1 with the clouded judgement.
You are right about a couple things though,I cannot have constructive conversations (even about people I don't personally know,I didn't personally know Hitler either,but I think most people can agree he was a POS) with people who support a traitor who sat there and allowed our country to be attacked,and did absolutely nothing to stop the attack.I cannot have constructive conversations with people who are ok with someone trying to overturn our election results.And then these people act like nothing happened.Republican so-called leaders the day after the attack were all blaming trump for what happened Jan 6th,the next couple days when they found out the republican voters didn't give two shits about something so trivial as our election being over thrown,as long as they were the ones doing it.Those so-called republican leaders who are complete cowards,went back to kissing the guys ass who attacked us.And you want me to have a calm constructive conversation with these people,that's not ever gonna happen.
And another thing you are right about is,I will post negative comments on trump as much as I possibly can.You don't like that,then just don't read my posts,problem solved.
@ABooksNightmare
In reply to your post #314.
Who said anything about me looking to have a constructive conversation with anybody.I just like pointing out facts about how 1 of our people running for president is a traitor to this country.And if you can't see that maybe you are the 1 with the clouded judgement.
You are right about a couple things though,I cannot have constructive conversations (even about people I don't personally know,I didn't personally know Hitler either,but I think most people can agree he was a POS) with people who support a traitor who sat there and allowed our country to be attacked,and did absolutely nothing to stop the attack.I cannot have constructive conversations with people who are ok with someone trying to overturn our election results.And then these people act like nothing happened.Republican so-called leaders the day after the attack were all blaming trump for what happened Jan 6th,the next couple days when they found out the republican voters didn't give two shits about something so trivial as our election being over thrown,as long as they were the ones doing it.Those so-called republican leaders who are complete cowards,went back to kissing the guys ass who attacked us.And you want me to have a calm constructive conversation with these people,that's not ever gonna happen.
And another thing you are right about is,I will post negative comments on trump as much as I possibly can.You don't like that,then just don't read my posts,problem solved.
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Then wouldn't Texas sending them into other cities also be "supporting them"? Maybe you can make the argument they are tacitly but only because they are not in charge of deporting them, the Federal government is in charge of that. So, if they do not want to support them they shift that to a state that wants to support them. So, overall, no, they are not; they are shifting that support to another state.Texas is the 1st step in helping them avoid deportation,they are purposely sending them to areas that they know will help them avoid deportation.Sounds like Texas is enabling the whole situation.If Illinois paid for a bus to take their homeless to Texas to avoid the cold,wouldn't Illinois be helping them "avoid" the cold?
Find me the quotes where they said this. Otherwise, we can just go with the reasons that they give and not your speculation.
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Then wouldn't Texas sending them into other cities also be "supporting them"? Maybe you can make the argument they are tacitly but only because they are not in charge of deporting them, the Federal government is in charge of that. So, if they do not want to support them they shift that to a state that wants to support them. So, overall, no, they are not; they are shifting that support to another state.Texas is the 1st step in helping them avoid deportation,they are purposely sending them to areas that they know will help them avoid deportation.Sounds like Texas is enabling the whole situation.If Illinois paid for a bus to take their homeless to Texas to avoid the cold,wouldn't Illinois be helping them "avoid" the cold?
Find me the quotes where they said this. Otherwise, we can just go with the reasons that they give and not your speculation.
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: @Raiders22 Again,I wasn't comparing an illegal immigration problem for a whole nation to one persons legal problems.I was comparing people justifying things in general.That Mugg thinks it's crazy how people can justify the issues going on with immigration.And that I think it's crazy that people can justify that 1 president supposedly should have absolute immunity,as those same people are looking for crimes a different president supposedly did.But the republican party is justifying this action. Who is saying this?Who is saying what? Who is saying that?Umm,some republicans and trump and his lawyers.Isn't it supposed to go before the Supreme Court soon? Who? So, no one on here?Oh,so now you've decided we can only talk about things that others on here have talked about?Since I have talked about it,and think its pretty important that our leaders shouldn't be able to commit any crime they want.What are your thoughts on if all presidents should have "absolute immunity" to commit any crime they want?
Correct. You gave a general sweeping statement indicating that some Republicans are saying this. None on here have that I have seen. So, exactly who are you talking about?
Otherwise, it is simply your opinion that someone 'thinks' this.
@MrWhatsItToYa
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: @Raiders22 Again,I wasn't comparing an illegal immigration problem for a whole nation to one persons legal problems.I was comparing people justifying things in general.That Mugg thinks it's crazy how people can justify the issues going on with immigration.And that I think it's crazy that people can justify that 1 president supposedly should have absolute immunity,as those same people are looking for crimes a different president supposedly did.But the republican party is justifying this action. Who is saying this?Who is saying what? Who is saying that?Umm,some republicans and trump and his lawyers.Isn't it supposed to go before the Supreme Court soon? Who? So, no one on here?Oh,so now you've decided we can only talk about things that others on here have talked about?Since I have talked about it,and think its pretty important that our leaders shouldn't be able to commit any crime they want.What are your thoughts on if all presidents should have "absolute immunity" to commit any crime they want?
Correct. You gave a general sweeping statement indicating that some Republicans are saying this. None on here have that I have seen. So, exactly who are you talking about?
Otherwise, it is simply your opinion that someone 'thinks' this.
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:I stand by what I said, notice how WallStreet doesn't post at the same time as Buckfalls or MrWITY yup same person, multi personality disorder. Funny how every word I say that Mr. W doesn't agree with, they are all over the posts like white on rice. But my accusations were left to fade away with no argument...anyhoo..
Well I told you before I'd give you +200 odds,and still you don't "stand by what you said" by putting your money where your mouth is.I'll raise it to +500 odds,and like Fan Duel I'll let you bet your 1st $1,000 risk free,c'mon dime store psychiatrist "stand by what you said".
Quote Originally Posted by soup-can:
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:I stand by what I said, notice how WallStreet doesn't post at the same time as Buckfalls or MrWITY yup same person, multi personality disorder. Funny how every word I say that Mr. W doesn't agree with, they are all over the posts like white on rice. But my accusations were left to fade away with no argument...anyhoo..
Well I told you before I'd give you +200 odds,and still you don't "stand by what you said" by putting your money where your mouth is.I'll raise it to +500 odds,and like Fan Duel I'll let you bet your 1st $1,000 risk free,c'mon dime store psychiatrist "stand by what you said".
@MrWhatsItToYa The last mushroom that bet me on Trump beating Joe is no longer in this forum. That wager is still available. I'm talking to you Raiders22 & Rush.
I'm smart enough to know that if I bet on Trump, I have to get two things right. #1 Him winning the election .... and #2 Him beating the "system"... Because I don't know what shenanigans your party is going to pull w/ bogus votes to keep Trump from "winning" the Presidency.
Just to get to #1, we still have to work through 91 (bogus) counts against him, and threats to remove him from the ballot in several states, that are still to be resolved by the Supreme Court.
Lots of shit to get though,.. and you DEMs have obviously put up this obstacle course for Trump for obvious reasons.
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
@MrWhatsItToYa The last mushroom that bet me on Trump beating Joe is no longer in this forum. That wager is still available. I'm talking to you Raiders22 & Rush.
I'm smart enough to know that if I bet on Trump, I have to get two things right. #1 Him winning the election .... and #2 Him beating the "system"... Because I don't know what shenanigans your party is going to pull w/ bogus votes to keep Trump from "winning" the Presidency.
Just to get to #1, we still have to work through 91 (bogus) counts against him, and threats to remove him from the ballot in several states, that are still to be resolved by the Supreme Court.
Lots of shit to get though,.. and you DEMs have obviously put up this obstacle course for Trump for obvious reasons.
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Then wouldn't Texas sending them into other cities also be "supporting them"? Maybe you can make the argument they are tacitly but only because they are not in charge of deporting them, the Federal government is in charge of that. So, if they do not want to support them they shift that to a state that wants to support them. So, overall, no, they are not; they are shifting that support to another state.Texas is the 1st step in helping them avoid deportation,they are purposely sending them to areas that they know will help them avoid deportation.Sounds like Texas is enabling the whole situation.If Illinois paid for a bus to take their homeless to Texas to avoid the cold,wouldn't Illinois be helping them "avoid" the cold?
Nope . That actually starts higher up the foodchain w/ Biden.
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa Then wouldn't Texas sending them into other cities also be "supporting them"? Maybe you can make the argument they are tacitly but only because they are not in charge of deporting them, the Federal government is in charge of that. So, if they do not want to support them they shift that to a state that wants to support them. So, overall, no, they are not; they are shifting that support to another state.Texas is the 1st step in helping them avoid deportation,they are purposely sending them to areas that they know will help them avoid deportation.Sounds like Texas is enabling the whole situation.If Illinois paid for a bus to take their homeless to Texas to avoid the cold,wouldn't Illinois be helping them "avoid" the cold?
Nope . That actually starts higher up the foodchain w/ Biden.
@MrWhatsItToYa The last mushroom that bet me on Trump beating Joe is no longer in this forum. That wager is still available. I'm talking to you Raiders22 & Rush.
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
@MrWhatsItToYa The last mushroom that bet me on Trump beating Joe is no longer in this forum. That wager is still available. I'm talking to you Raiders22 & Rush.
Republican McConnell and US border patrol union endorse bipartisan senate immigration bill. "This bill would codify in law authorities that patrol agents didn't have in the past. A step in the right direction and is far better than the status quo." Immigration problems cannot be solved without congress. But history shows mostly republicans have blocked bipartisan immigration reforms. For decades, US has an underfunded immigration system bound by out of date laws and divisive politics.
Republican McConnell and US border patrol union endorse bipartisan senate immigration bill. "This bill would codify in law authorities that patrol agents didn't have in the past. A step in the right direction and is far better than the status quo." Immigration problems cannot be solved without congress. But history shows mostly republicans have blocked bipartisan immigration reforms. For decades, US has an underfunded immigration system bound by out of date laws and divisive politics.
This administration has done nothing for the border but encourage to cross it. This is your mess, your blind eye and willingness to neglect has caused some problems.
This administration has done nothing for the border but encourage to cross it. This is your mess, your blind eye and willingness to neglect has caused some problems.
Republican McConnell and US border patrol union endorse bipartisan senate immigration bill. "This bill would codify in law authorities that patrol agents didn't have in the past. A step in the right direction and is far better than the status quo." Immigration problems cannot be solved without congress. But history shows mostly republicans have blocked bipartisan immigration reforms. For decades, US has an underfunded immigration system bound by out of date laws and divisive politics.
They have a bipartisan border proposal finally but the CHAOS PARTY & CLOWN SHOW will shoot it down......just because....
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Republican McConnell and US border patrol union endorse bipartisan senate immigration bill. "This bill would codify in law authorities that patrol agents didn't have in the past. A step in the right direction and is far better than the status quo." Immigration problems cannot be solved without congress. But history shows mostly republicans have blocked bipartisan immigration reforms. For decades, US has an underfunded immigration system bound by out of date laws and divisive politics.
They have a bipartisan border proposal finally but the CHAOS PARTY & CLOWN SHOW will shoot it down......just because....
Congress should reject the Senate's border security bill and any other legislation that doesn't "cut off and eliminate all illegal entry into the United States," an Arizona border county official said.
"Do not vote yes on the bill," Yuma County Supervisor Jonathan Lines told Fox News. "Sit down with the Freedom Caucus, sit down with all interested parties and establish what needs to be done as a baseline, which is shutting the border down right now."
"There are thousands of people on their way," he added. "There is a pipeline to the United States. You see them in airports, you see them in police stations sleeping on the floor, you see cities that are unable to care for these people. They don't have the resources to do it and it's simply because these numbers continue to multiply on a daily basis.
Congress should reject the Senate's border security bill and any other legislation that doesn't "cut off and eliminate all illegal entry into the United States," an Arizona border county official said.
"Do not vote yes on the bill," Yuma County Supervisor Jonathan Lines told Fox News. "Sit down with the Freedom Caucus, sit down with all interested parties and establish what needs to be done as a baseline, which is shutting the border down right now."
"There are thousands of people on their way," he added. "There is a pipeline to the United States. You see them in airports, you see them in police stations sleeping on the floor, you see cities that are unable to care for these people. They don't have the resources to do it and it's simply because these numbers continue to multiply on a daily basis.
Hot Forum Topics
