All Forums | Politics

Immigration Issue

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 1776
Posts: 911
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16793
Posted: #376

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Republican McConnell and US border patrol union endorse bipartisan senate immigration bill. "This bill would codify in law authorities that patrol agents didn't have in the past.  A step in the right direction and is far better than the status quo."  Immigration problems cannot be solved without congress.  But history shows mostly republicans have blocked bipartisan immigration reforms.  For decades, US has an underfunded immigration system bound by out of date laws and divisive politics.They have a bipartisan border proposal finally but the CHAOS PARTY & CLOWN SHOW will shoot it down......just because....

 

chump behind the chaos  thumbs_down

 

 

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 10454
Posted: #377

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

They have a bipartisan border proposal finally but the CHAOS PARTY & CLOWN SHOW will shoot it down......just because....

Just like; 

May 2023: 

https://apnews.com/article/congress-border-immigration-bill-255921c69678468580d0d106282623f0

House Republicans passed a sweeping bill Thursday to build more U.S.-Mexico border wall and impose new restrictions on asylum seekers, 

The legislation passed 219-213, with all present Democrats voting against it. Biden promised to veto it. JUST BECAUSE

 

 

 

 

2018:

https://apnews.com/article/congress-border-immigration-bill-255921c69678468580d0d106282623f0

The House overwhelmingly opposed the latest Republican immigration bill on Wednesday, leaving Congress no closer to solving a thorny issue that has bewildered lawmakers for years.

The measure, which came about after weeks of negotiations among Republicans, easily failed in a 301 to 121 vote.

The measure got no support from Democrats. JUST BECAUSE.

 

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 10454
Posted: #378

Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

How about untie the Ukraine goodies from this scam and make it only about the border?

I agree.

peace_5

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 8841
Posted: #379

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Republican McConnell and US border patrol union endorse bipartisan senate immigration bill. "This bill would codify in law authorities that patrol agents didn't have in the past.  A step in the right direction and is far better than the status quo."  Immigration problems cannot be solved without congress.  But history shows mostly republicans have blocked bipartisan immigration reforms.  For decades, US has an underfunded immigration system bound by out of date laws and divisive politics.They have a bipartisan border proposal finally but the CHAOS PARTY & CLOWN SHOW will shoot it down......just because....

.... it will not solve the crisis on the southern border.   ( there,  finished your thought ) peace_5

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2002
Posts: 16805
Posted: #380

A small take from Putin on the invasion of the US on it's southern border.

TUCKER: Are you following what’s happening on the US southern border?

PUTIN: Actually yes. It’s part of my daily briefing. We Russians find it ironically amusing your Congress will spend billions protecting foreign borders but neglect it’s own. It’s quiet laughable but deadly.

TUCKER: Deadly? How do you mean that?

PUTIN: Deadly serious of course. People are dying daily crossing your border in an uncontrolled way. It is a free-for-all. The world hasn’t seen anything like it in the modern era – reckless for a country to throw itself wide open like that.

TUCKER: Is Russia taking advantage of the border situation in any way?

PUTIN: No. Why should we. We don’t have to do a thing. America is self destructing. And as Napoleon said, don’t stand in the way of your enemy destroying themselves.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 3239
Posted: #381

Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa  Then wouldn't Texas sending them into other cities also be "supporting them"? Maybe you can make the argument they are tacitly but only because they are not in charge of deporting them, the Federal government is in charge of that.  So, if they do not want to support them they shift that to a state that wants to support them.  So, overall, no, they are not; they are shifting that support to another state.Texas is the 1st step in helping them avoid deportation,they are purposely sending them to areas that they know will help them avoid deportation.Sounds like Texas is enabling the whole situation.If Illinois paid for a bus to take their homeless to Texas to avoid the cold,wouldn't Illinois be helping them "avoid" the cold? Find me the quotes where they said this.  Otherwise, we can just go with the reasons that they give and not your speculation.
By "where they said this" you are referring to my statement that "they are purposely sending them to areas",that's the part you are talking about?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 3239
Posted: #382

Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

@MrWhatsItToYa   Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa   Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa   Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa   Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: @Raiders22  Again,I wasn't comparing an illegal immigration problem for a whole nation to one persons legal problems.I was comparing people justifying things in general.That Mugg thinks it's crazy how people can justify the issues going on with immigration.And that I think it's crazy that people can justify that 1 president supposedly should have absolute immunity,as those same people are looking for crimes a different president supposedly did.But the republican party is justifying this action. Who is saying this?Who is saying what? Who is saying that?Umm,some republicans and trump and his lawyers.Isn't it supposed to go before the Supreme Court soon? Who?  So, no one on here?Oh,so now you've decided we can only talk about things that others on here have talked about?Since I have talked about it,and think its pretty important that our leaders shouldn't be able to commit any crime they want.What are your thoughts on if all presidents should have "absolute immunity" to commit any crime they want? Correct.  You gave a general sweeping statement indicating that some Republicans are saying this.  None on here have that I have seen.  So, exactly who are you talking about? Otherwise, it is simply your opinion that someone 'thinks' this.
No one on here that you have seen?But there are some on here that are saying it.Go to the thread,Court:trumps "Absolute Immunity" is "Absolute BS".There you will see that Uniman and A Books Nightmare are saying it.So I guess it's not just "simply my opinion that someone thinks this".

I'll ask again but you don't have to answer if it makes you uncomfortable.What are your thoughts on if all presidents should have "Absolute Immunity" to commit any crime they want?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 3239
Posted: #383

Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: @MrWhatsItToYa  The last mushroom that bet me on Trump beating Joe is no longer in this forum. That wager is still available. I'm talking to you Raiders22 & Rush. I'm smart enough to know that if I bet on Trump, I have to get two things right.  #1 Him winning the election .... and #2 Him beating the "system"...  Because  I don't know what shenanigans your party is going to pull w/ bogus votes to keep Trump from "winning" the Presidency.   Just to get to #1, we still have to work through 91 (bogus) counts against him, and threats to remove him from the ballot in several states, that are still to be resolved by the  Supreme Court.     Lots of shit to get though,.. and you DEMs have obviously put up this obstacle course for Trump for obvious reasons.
You got any proof of bogus votes that would of swayed the election results and kept trump from winning the presidency.Cause it would probably be worth some money to trump and all the other idiots who said the election was rigged.I'm sure Rudy "We've got lots of theories,but we just don't have the evidence" Giuliani would appreciate you sharing the evidence with them.

And while you are here could you also share what are the bogus counts against him,in his 91 indictments.Cause I've never heard him say why he isn't guilty,only that it's a witch hunt for them charging him.Did he not possess documents he shouldn't of had,and did he not return them when he was subpoenaed to do so?

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 34784
Posted: #384

@MrWhatsItToYa

 

Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:

Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa  Then wouldn't Texas sending them into other cities also be "supporting them"? Maybe you can make the argument they are tacitly but only because they are not in charge of deporting them, the Federal government is in charge of that.  So, if they do not want to support them they shift that to a state that wants to support them.  So, overall, no, they are not; they are shifting that support to another state.Texas is the 1st step in helping them avoid deportation,they are purposely sending them to areas that they know will help them avoid deportation.Sounds like Texas is enabling the whole situation.If Illinois paid for a bus to take their homeless to Texas to avoid the cold,wouldn't Illinois be helping them "avoid" the cold? Find me the quotes where they said this.  Otherwise, we can just go with the reasons that they give and not your speculation.By "where they said this" you are referring to my statement that "they are purposely sending them to areas",that's the part you are talking about?

No sir.

This part: they are purposely sending them to areas that they know will help them avoid deportation

peace_5

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 15326
Posted: #385

Hmmmm . It’s getting interesting in here . I can’t wait to see how this plays out . Good luck gents peace_5

wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 34784
Posted: #386

@MrWhatsItToYa

 No one on here that you have seen?But there are some on here that are saying it.Go to the thread,Court:trumps "Absolute Immunity" is "Absolute BS".There you will see that Uniman and A Books Nightmare are saying it.So I guess it's not just "simply my opinion that someone thinks this". 

I did not see them say that.  Show me the quotes you are referring to.

I'll ask again but you don't have to answer if it makes you uncomfortable.What are your thoughts on if all presidents should have "Absolute Immunity" to commit any crime they want?

You have not asked me before that I saw.  Again, I know of no rational person that has said this.  Who exactly are you referencing here that is saying this?

peace_5

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 10454
Posted: #387

Actually, Texas is NOT sending migrants, they offer them a free ride. Migrants have to agree and sign off. So saying "sending them" is not accurate. 

Texas is giving sanctuary cities just a small taste of what they are going through.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 15326
Posted: #388

You just reverse windmilled double pumped dunked right there peace_5

wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 25584
Posted: #389

@UNIMAN

 "Hey man, you want a job & a place to live with your family? Sign here."

What would you do in the same situation?

an_popcorn

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 15326
Posted: #390

That’s a loaded question . Like Dirty Harry 44 Magnum kinda loaded .

wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 15326
Posted: #391

Wall I’m just here at the same time I’m not stalking . You ever see somebody you know at the supermarket in aisle 7 near the raisins ? That’s what this is like peace_5

wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 9493
Posted: #392

In waste of time and effort, House GOP has failed to impeach homeland security secretary.  3 republicans side with all democrats to oppose resolution. Now president Biden shouldn't be impeached too.  Unlike Trump impeachments, no evidences of high crimes by Mayorkas and Biden. 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 10454
Posted: #393

@Midnight1

 

 2019; "Migrants should SURGE the border."

2021; "Everything Trump did I reversed."

2022; "The border is secure"

2024; Biden blames Trump for mess at the border.

 

By the way; New York and Chicago PROMISE to take care of migrants through their sanctuary city status, Texas promises them nothing if they get on a bus. Don't have to. And Chicago has refused to let the sanctuary city status go on the ballot and let the residents decide. I have no pitty. 

https://www.kxan.com/news/texas/texas-is-giving-migrants-these-consent-forms-before-busing-to-nyc-washington-dc/

 

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 10454
Posted: #394

Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:

In waste of time and effort, House GOP has failed to impeach homeland security secretary.  3 republicans side with all democrats to oppose resolution. Now president Biden shouldn't be impeached too.  Unlike Trump impeachments, no evidences of high crimes by Mayorkas and Biden.

It really would be a waste of time even if he was impeached as Biden would just install another liar to the the American people and this shit would continue on. We need let it play out throughout 2024 and report every migrant crime and the cost to Americans. Let it continue on, it can only get worse. 

Only then can the destroying United States party be removed from office.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 38241
Posted: #395

"....2021; "Everything Trump did I reversed."

 Classic Dementia Joe......he must've forgot about that. an_roll_laugh

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 15326
Posted: #396

There’s a lot of vitriol and combative incendiary dialogue in these exchanges . I’m not sure if I should say anything or just stay mum like the silent woman I see sitting in the first pew at Mass every Sunday that does her rosary during services . Funny enough I’m spockgato but cat got my tongue . 

wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 15326
Posted: #397

Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

"....2021; "Everything Trump did I reversed."  Classic Dementia Joe......he must've forgot about that.

Where can I bet him to not be on the ballot next election ? There seems no logical way that I can see this scenario happening . I have cared for older people . It’s easy to see the signs when you have been privy to the symptoms and characteristics . It’s not his fault but he’s unfit to lead . My bet would be that the Democratic side finds a way to “ honorably discharge “ him from his opportunity to run again .

wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 8009
Posted: #398

Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

How about untie the Ukraine goodies from this scam and make it only about the border?

 

Let's get this party started....  an_popcorn  

Time is a flat circle....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 15326
Posted: #399

There’s always a lot of talk everywhere about getting things done but nobody willing to do the hard work to actually make it happen . I figured this out when I was 7 when my friends were too lazy to build the fort that we talked about making all during recess .

wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 8009
Posted: #400

@spockgato

 Bovada has DNC 2024 POTUS Candidate listed. 

"The Field" is +275  /  Biden -400 

On the GOP side "The Field" is +850 / DJT -2500 

Time is a flat circle....
All Forums | Politics
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.