Posted:
#101
I don't post plays on public forums.
STILL
STILL
Matrixx only has 88k in wagers not counting juice going
Posted:
#104
Quote Originally Posted by SecondAgain:
I don't post plays on public forums. I posted plays on a part of Covers that no longer exists, and I had a winning record. Many people here read them, and some even saw i had over 100 units in play in one night in the golf (for >25 units profit).
I don't have to prove jackshit to anybody. I know how well I do, the only other person that is aware of my profit is my girlfriend. Faceless people on an internet forum are not high on the list of people who I have to impress
I don't post plays on public forums. I posted plays on a part of Covers that no longer exists, and I had a winning record. Many people here read them, and some even saw i had over 100 units in play in one night in the golf (for >25 units profit).
I don't have to prove jackshit to anybody. I know how well I do, the only other person that is aware of my profit is my girlfriend. Faceless people on an internet forum are not high on the list of people who I have to impress
POST OF THE YEAR!!!!!!!!!!
And the fact that he has over 7600 posts on a public forum just takes the cake.
Posted:
#109
Quote Originally Posted by SecondAgain:
That is correct. I posted plays in a part of Covers in a forum frequented by the guys i know. A number of guys here can verify that, including mods
That is correct. I posted plays in a part of Covers in a forum frequented by the guys i know. A number of guys here can verify that, including mods
Wish I had the password to the secret underground club that used to exist on Covers but doesn't anymore. I'll contact Congress and see if we can get a public hearing and evaluate the evidence of such said secret forum.
Posted:
#111
Quote Originally Posted by Seahawk97:
I posted plays on a part of Covers that no longer exists,
I posted plays on a part of Covers that no longer exists,He did.
And I guess you feel left out? Is it because you have a 2002 join date and was'nt invited to the party?
Seriously... you should back off.
You have no idea what you are "laughing" about.
Funny thing is, you've been here for 6 years and I have no idea who you are or what purpose you serve? So I guess we could all laugh at you too...
Go back to the "main" forums seahawk.....
Posted:
#112
Quote Originally Posted by NONEED4LUCK:
cd329
here's to ownership of your new title
Noneed, you should change your name to "DADDYS LITTLE SILVER SPOON"
Its become very clear now. I would bet that you dont even go to work at daddys dealership and that he just gives you an allowance every week to keep your stupid ass away from the place. probably pays for all your weekly gambling losses. 9500 posts in one year, you got some life there pal, lmfaooooooooooooooo. Dont worry kid some day daddy will let you come by the shop and take out the trash for the real workers
Posted:
#115
Quote Originally Posted by Seahawk97:
Wish I had the password to the secret underground club that used to exist on Covers but doesn't anymore. I'll contact Congress and see if we can get a public hearing and evaluate the evidence of such said secret forum.
Wish I had the password to the secret underground club that used to exist on Covers but doesn't anymore. I'll contact Congress and see if we can get a public hearing and evaluate the evidence of such said secret forum.
Seahawk, make sure you have your decoder ring on, lolllllllllllll. Isnt it amazing how all the guys who always say they are winning so much cash are always the guys who arent posting plays? These are all the same guys who bang supermodels daily and leave thousand dollar tips at restaurants. Seahawk, dont waste your time with these clowns
Posted:
#117
Quote Originally Posted by SecondAgain:
Just like his previous visits, seahawks is getting embarrased by the box again
Just like his previous visits, seahawks is getting embarrased by the box again
Secondagain, you sure do spend alot of time hanging out in the box for a bigtime winning gambler. I would have never thought a winner like yourself would spend so much time here. I guess its tough to spend monoply money at the clubs.
Posted:
#122
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
Noneed, you should change your name to "DADDYS LITTLE SILVER SPOON"
Its become very clear now. I would bet that you dont even go to work at daddys dealership and that he just gives you an allowance every week to keep your stupid ass away from the place. probably pays for all your weekly gambling losses. 9500 posts in one year, you got some life there pal, lmfaooooooooooooooo. Dont worry kid some day daddy will let you come by the shop and take out the trash for the real workers
i will give you +1000 odds on that.
Posted:
#123
I have a question about the Kelly Criterion, how do you calculate the probability of the team winning when there are many variables to a game (is it always 50/50)? Here's a site that talks about the flaws of kelly crierion, but I'm just posting this site to get some feedback from the people using this system.
Posted:
#125
Quote Originally Posted by kevk87:
I have a question about the Kelly Criterion, how do you calculate the probability of the team winning when there are many variables to a game (is it always 50/50)? Here's a site that talks about the flaws of kelly crierion, but I'm just posting this site to get some feedback from the people using this system.
I have a question about the Kelly Criterion, how do you calculate the probability of the team winning when there are many variables to a game (is it always 50/50)? Here's a site that talks about the flaws of kelly crierion, but I'm just posting this site to get some feedback from the people using this system.
Firstly, determining the probability is subjective.
Secondly, the article you linked to is a crock of shit (no offence). Dusty maths means nothing, there is a reason he asks you to reshuffle after 60 turns and not the complete 2 decks. Tha was written by a guy selling a book and his services.
I will take the opinion of Nobel winning mathematicians thank you
This is not shady maths
Hot Forum Topics
