It’s a sad state of affairs in here with all this political dialogue so let’s just talk about Lisa Bonet again instead for a second .
Agreed ?
Good .
Honey doll just don’t got enough meat on the bones for big Papi though you feel me ?
You ever see how Mickey Rourke devoured her carnal soul in Angel Heart ? 3 toothpicks and 4 feathers wrapped together by a rubber band got more thickness than bae . Can’t have it like that . I don’t wanna be drillin’ like Bruce Willis in outer space from Armegeddon from the backside on baby girl and hear one of her ribs snap .
You dig it ?
Now if she had that rumpcheek thunderbutt extravaganza that home girl on 227 had then we all good . But that voice ! Forget it ! It would shrivel my pecker with the acoustic frequency that it was on . And she made too many dumb faces for me and what not . Down bottom lady was all bombs and bazookas but up top ?
straight Urkel yo . Not for me .
and by the way what the fuck happened to Mickey Rourke’s face ? God damn . Homeboy was the top captain elixir that could quench all the skeezers needs back in the day . But now he looks like a cross between Ellen Degeneres and a clinched fist , mixed with a little bit of what I would imagine Hillary Clinton’s cunnnt looks like .
you feel me ?
am I a little out of bounds in my analysis ? Does he look a little more like an anal cyst ? Please enlighten me . Is he under demonic possession ? Inscribe your assumptions if you feel the flavor and motivation fellas . Thanks .
and by the way , good morning 
It's not improbable to think that something like that has taken place...don't get me wrong, he has had some issues and some of the attacks do have validity, but he has endured quite a bit even before he was nominated for president and it has continued through to current times....they, whoever they are, have been afraid of this guy for so long that it has become a habit I think and they just can't stop....
I see what you did there and may not be too far fetched to think of that reasoning...
So many inaccuracies and lies in this post. Trump was indeed sued and lost $5 million dollars in a civil rape case (Or call it sexual assault by New York law). He was then sued for defamation following his civil case because he could not take his L and just $hut the F up about Carroll.
You seem to be making a lot of assumptions about the situation.
Im guessing covers is glitching out again because my posts are not posting. 
What makes you think no one noticed Trump assaulting Carroll in the dressing room? Because no one reported it to authorities? It is a known fact that witnesses and bystanders often do not report crimes or do not want to get involved in situations or crimes that do not directly involve them. Hell have you heard about all of the young women getting punched in the face and knocked out in broad daylight by random men with tons of onlookers and bystanders around who choose not to help or get involved? that $hit happens all of the time. Now couple in the fact that Trump was very recognizable and one of well known NYC celebs in the 80s and 90s like you say. It is not hard to believe that no none would want to say or report him even if they did see or hear the incident because of fear of retaliation. Most times, others do not want to get involved.
This is also pre cell phone, pre social media, so there were very limited outlets for getting that info out.
Lastly, in the deposition, Trump thought that Carroll was his ex wife when shown a picture of himself and Carroll pictured together, which shows there was some attraction there decades ago. Look, I am no Carroll fan, but it is not hard to believe he was convicted in the civil rape trial for doing to Carroll exactly what he was caught on tape bragging about (Grabbing em by the...). The blind defense for a complete scumbag by so many is baffling to me. But again, he was indeed convicted of rape (or sexual assault, whatever the legal term) in New York against Carroll.
Well, people around here interchange rape for sexual assault and they really are two completely different things...Trump was not convicted of rape, that is a fact. He was, however, convicted of sexual assault. So, when people like you and others keep calling someone a rapists that is completely inaccurate and should be pointed out just as you try to do when you think your boy is getting the short end..
By definition, rape generally refers to the offense of having forcible sexual intercourse with another person without the consent of the victim.
By definition, sexual assault is intentionally making physical contact with the intimate body parts of another person, and doing so without that person’s consent.
They are close but as you can see completely different. I know you guys are trying to set a narrative that Trump is a rapists, but he was not convicted of that. Had he been convicted of that he would be in jail right now. He was convicted of sexual assault which, by law, is completely different and carries its own separate legal term and punishment.
So I would say if you are tying to keep it legit, call it what it is and not what you narrate it to be...I believe that is Stumps issue, as well as others.....
I can give two shits but I don't think it is comedic to spread false rumors which you and your team so blatantly call out others for doing so just setting the record straight...
Now, go bash Trump all you want, but at least speak accurately if you are trying to prove some point..
not only am I saying let’s address the elephant in the room , let’s kill it , barbecue it , add some kimchi to it , and then sell that motherfucker out of our Korean fusion food truck because ……
how the fuck can a moderator that hates Trump effectively and fairly moderator a politics forum ?
It’s impossible . And he’s proven that . Terrible job by him in that forum . In other forums he does a good job . So Get it together pal . And Stop selling yourself short . Your ethics are going bankrupt this way . I hate to see a man lose his integrity in such a demeaning fashion . There’s still time . Follow the truth . It’s a conflict of interest . Call Flynt .
[@ ABooksNightmare]
Clearly, the criminal justice system is not your specialty. Because Trump is not in prison right now, does not mean he did not rape Carroll. What the $uck are you talking about?
The case was a civil case not a criminal case, which is why he is not in prison, not because of your claim that he didn't do it. There was no criminal case for various reasons. Yet, you have the nerve to tell someone else to get the facts straight? 
Secondly, you are hilarious. Being a sexual assaulter or abuser as the judge claimed is so much better than being a rapist.
You need to go read the judge's transcript from the case before making your biased and clueless statements. The judge said that by the narrow definition as it applies to the case it was sexual abuse rather than rape.
The judge also said the verdict did not mean that Carroll “failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’ Indeed ... the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
The lengths some of you morons go to in order to defend this sicko is fascinating. You know nothing about the case and another defender in this thread acted like this civil rape case did not even take place. Amazing. Keep your orange God on the pedestal. Carry on sheep.
Yea ok...the ruler of everything
Trump was convicted of rape so let's keep saying that when it did not happen
You're the best
I gave you the definition so keep calling it what you want but it is in fact not accurate
So who is clueless again...just stop dude you embarrass yourself...Trump was not convicted of rape and you are falsely spreading lies and are now embarrassed that I had to point it out to you...here's your article even...a lesser degree of sexual assault...wow
https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-carroll-trial-fe68259a4b98bb3947d42af9ec83d7db
And It's quoted: The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse.
these people here
and there's that defending saying again
I am a man of the truth and you are spreading lies...I gave you the benefit in your first post and gave you the definition and told you what he was convicted of but now you are just clueless and claim I am but the proof is out there...Trump did not get convicted of rape at all so to say that is completely false...completely....just like telling everyone Joe has dementia is wrong without a diagnosis...completely wrong...you are saying something that is not the truth and continue to lie as if it is true...that is delusional...trump was convicted only of sexual assault not rape...pure facts....
@ ABooksNightmare
You are a complete moron. I did not say he was convicted of rape. I said sexual assault. It was technically sexual abuse, so you are actually wrong again. Do you have trouble reading? Then I gave you the judges quotes from the civil trial. In which he actually says it does not mean he did not rape Carroll. Here I'll bold it for you since you cannot read.
The judge also said the verdict did not mean that Carroll “failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’ Indeed ... the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Now Fat man worshipper...Tell me again how you seem to know more about the law than the judge in the case, Mr. fact teller.
Geezus you are brain dead. Do you think it's better that you are defending a convicted "sexual abuser" as opposed to a "rapist" by your definition.?
Do you understand how dumb you sound?
You are one of the same idiots trolling in politics claiming Biden is pedophile and sexual abuser when he has been charged with nothing, so tell me how that is factual as well??
yea I'm the moron...you said it right there that he was convicted of rape..you said it multiple times but I'm the moron
Wow...
Just wow....my whole argument was he was not convicted of rape and you were saying he was but I'm in the wrong
Delusional dude...you said it and I countered it...Trump was in fact never convicted of rape as you claim to say and then lied and denied you said it...what a liar...you got caught dude and then lied about it and then try to make me sound like I'm wrong
You're wrong and you are a liar...keep spreading false narratives
calling people morons when he himself just got caught
Trump was never convicted of rape dude...give it up...he was on trial for whatever you want to call it but he was ONLY convicted of sexual assault not rape...there is a huge difference yet everyone else is a moron
this is hilarious
no one was even talking about the name of the trial..nice spin dude
deezy missed a spin class and got caught
spreading false narratives
tries to spin but doesn't have a quarter for the spin cycle
Straight nutcase you are
You are moron and liar that cannot read. I have now said three times in this thread that Trump was NOOOTTTT convicted of Rape, but Sexual Abuse. However, that does not mean he did not rape Carroll. His conviction just does not read rape. The judge in the case says the verdict in fact proves that he did but due to the narrow scope of the meaning in legal terms that is not what his conviction read. Are you seriously this braindead or just some weird troll?? You are living proof that the education system has failed.
From the Judge
The judge also said the verdict did not mean that Carroll “failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’ Indeed ... the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Is reading comprehension not your thing????
I have said three times Trump was not convicted of rape, but sexual abuse. I actually said sexual assault, which is also wrong.
If you are going to quote me, quote me fully. Don't go halfway. "But again, he was indeed convicted of rape (or sexual assault, whatever the legal term) in New York against Carroll."
You are a sociopath for real. In another thread in the PB you are calling OJ (The Juice) a murderer, yet he was found innocent and exonerated in the criminal justice system, which pretty much exposes you for the fool and hypocrite that you are.
You have different rules for Trump because you love and worship your Orange God. That is all this really comes down to.
Guy is praising a sexual assaulter and abuser and trying to claim that it is all good because it's not technically rape according to him.
This is amusing stuff for real.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
