Posted:
#101
Quote Originally Posted by BetFriends:
You're an idiot. 'Fading the public' and following imaginary sharps on 'line movement' is a long-term 50% capping strategy -- because you're making decisions on something that doesn't actually exist.
Don't tell someone who actually handicaps the game of football that they need to learn how to factor in non-existent elements.
I guarantee you've never tracked your public/sharp RLM results over the course of one or more seasons, because if you'd had you'd have discovered the 100% reliable ZERO effect it has on any long-term records.
Watching RLM movement and fading who you think 'the public' is on is the same as factoring in which star signs are in orbit on the night of your bets.
No wonder your name is 'fadeORdie' and you're in the penalty box. If a 'public' does exist, it consists solely of idiots like you who make up 95% of the clueless sheep on boards like this.
Dafuq outta here calling a proven capper 'average at best' with your clueless Consesus % Looking Azz.
seen a billion different posts and comments about "fading the public joes/squares" here and other forums......am still yet to see an actual tracked,documented thread with posted plays based solely on parameters relating to % of bets and line movement.....no-one has the slightest feckin clue how much money is on teams in any given game or why the hell the line may have shifted..and we dont even know how accurate(if at all) these % figures are that are released to the public.
.....me and suuma had a good laugh about this last week,the times he has posted plays based on his feckin hair-brained "theories" he has gotten absolutely CRUSHED...non-stop stream of losers,hehe....talkin bout how hes got the "script" before the games and the "actors" just never seemed to co-operate,haha. 
Hot Forum Topics
