• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL AI Predictions
      • NFL Underdogs
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

    I have a huge WRITE-UP for EVERYTHING you need to know as to why the Lakers will cover against OKC

    123 ... 91011 Next Last»
    scalabrine
    darkmandave
    sugalerongpogi
    bobmaloogatimesfive
    Sareesataka
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 17071
    Posts: 268
    123 ... 91011 Next Last»
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 4:40 AM ET #1

    I would take the time to read this. I put a lot into this for the reader and if you read it, you will have a nice side on Sunday for someone who did all the research for you. All you have to do is read for the next 8-10 minutes.

    The question is this:

    Can you find enough reason to take the Lakers with this big a spread?
    Record this year: 10-4 (with +ML's in there as well)


    I say the answer is yes.

    I posted the Lakers twice this season.

    Once was when they were on a seven game losing and they went to Boston as 7 point dogs on 1/17. They won outright by 3. That was a winning post.

    The other was against the Nets on Jason Collin's coming out night as three point dogs at home. They were coming off 9 point win against Boston, had no sense of urgency in the game and the distraction I thought the media would bring never came to fruition. Lesson learned. Back the Lakers when they are desperate or don't back them at all.

    Are they desperate here?

    Yes. 

    I know the season is lost. This isn't like the Knicks who are fighting for an eighth seed.

    But this is a franchise, that, while everyone knows it is tank mode, must show some sense of pride and solid play for the legacy of the greats of yesteryear and their fanbase.

    That was completely undone when the Clippers destroyed them for their worst loss in their history.

    But you have to realize something about that game. The Clippers have played the red-headed stepchild against the Lakers for their entire existence. They actually lost to the Lakers on opening night after all the hoopla of the coaching change and signings and the series was tied at 1-1 on the season. They really have shifted gears of late and now look like they could possibly win the WCF if things really keep going their way. The Lakers are now mired in one of the worst seasons they ever had.

    The Clippers appeared to be cognizant of this, played their best ball of the season, and the Lakers apparently had no answer for anything the Clippers did on that night. 

    It was the ultimate low for the proud franchise. 

    It was so low, the top Laker brass called in D'Antoni to review things and most likely, talk about his job status. 

    They were faced with a tough test the very next night. Go into the altitude in Denver, who just got their point guard back and are now mostly healthy (after a string of games where there were too many injuries to count), with the worst defeat ever hanging over them not even 24 hours prior. Remember, this is still a hungry Denver team who want to make something of their season after a terrible losing streak of 11 in 12. The Lakers were dead meat.

    But were they?

    They were getting +9/+11 (The number kept rising) and the books couldn't convince anyone to take them. What did they do with that number?

    They lost all three quarters, and trailed by 19 after 3. And STILL after all that, after getting beaten up for 7 consecutive quarters, they still played their starters, cut the lead below double digits and were still fighting until the horn sounded. What did that result in? A Lakers cover as they lost by 8.

    I don't care if you agree. They showed me a lot to fight back in that final quarter when they could have easily packed it in.

    So now we have OKC and we are getting +11.5 if we back the Lakers.

    Should we be afraid?

    Well on 2/13 they played OKC and guess who was in their starting lineup:

    Shawne Williams (gone from the team after a 10 day contract)
    Chris Kaman (DNP in his last 4 games)
    Steve Blake (Traded to Warriors)
    Wesley Johnson 
    Kendall Marshall

    So two of the 5 starters in that game are no longer with the team, and one was let go after a emergency signing of him in the first place (because of too many injuries!). Kaman no longer contributes.

    What happened in that game? The desperate Lakers fought tooth and nail to avoid a record setting 7th straight home loss, lead almost the entire game and gave up the lead in the late fourth to lose by 4. They obviously got inside the 10.5 they were getting that night.


    Folks that wasn't a Thunder team on the downturn either. They came into that Laker game having won FOURTEEN OF SIXTEEN and they were laying 10.5.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    I would take the time to read this. I put a lot into this for the reader and if you read it, you will have a nice side on Sunday for someone who did all the research for you. All you have to do is read for the next 8-10 minutes.

    The question is this:

    Can you find enough reason to take the Lakers with this big a spread?
    Record this year: 10-4 (with +ML's in there as well)


    I say the answer is yes.

    I posted the Lakers twice this season.

    Once was when they were on a seven game losing and they went to Boston as 7 point dogs on 1/17. They won outright by 3. That was a winning post.

    The other was against the Nets on Jason Collin's coming out night as three point dogs at home. They were coming off 9 point win against Boston, had no sense of urgency in the game and the distraction I thought the media would bring never came to fruition. Lesson learned. Back the Lakers when they are desperate or don't back them at all.

    Are they desperate here?

    Yes. 

    I know the season is lost. This isn't like the Knicks who are fighting for an eighth seed.

    But this is a franchise, that, while everyone knows it is tank mode, must show some sense of pride and solid play for the legacy of the greats of yesteryear and their fanbase.

    That was completely undone when the Clippers destroyed them for their worst loss in their history.

    But you have to realize something about that game. The Clippers have played the red-headed stepchild against the Lakers for their entire existence. They actually lost to the Lakers on opening night after all the hoopla of the coaching change and signings and the series was tied at 1-1 on the season. They really have shifted gears of late and now look like they could possibly win the WCF if things really keep going their way. The Lakers are now mired in one of the worst seasons they ever had.

    The Clippers appeared to be cognizant of this, played their best ball of the season, and the Lakers apparently had no answer for anything the Clippers did on that night. 

    It was the ultimate low for the proud franchise. 

    It was so low, the top Laker brass called in D'Antoni to review things and most likely, talk about his job status. 

    They were faced with a tough test the very next night. Go into the altitude in Denver, who just got their point guard back and are now mostly healthy (after a string of games where there were too many injuries to count), with the worst defeat ever hanging over them not even 24 hours prior. Remember, this is still a hungry Denver team who want to make something of their season after a terrible losing streak of 11 in 12. The Lakers were dead meat.

    But were they?

    They were getting +9/+11 (The number kept rising) and the books couldn't convince anyone to take them. What did they do with that number?

    They lost all three quarters, and trailed by 19 after 3. And STILL after all that, after getting beaten up for 7 consecutive quarters, they still played their starters, cut the lead below double digits and were still fighting until the horn sounded. What did that result in? A Lakers cover as they lost by 8.

    I don't care if you agree. They showed me a lot to fight back in that final quarter when they could have easily packed it in.

    So now we have OKC and we are getting +11.5 if we back the Lakers.

    Should we be afraid?

    Well on 2/13 they played OKC and guess who was in their starting lineup:

    Shawne Williams (gone from the team after a 10 day contract)
    Chris Kaman (DNP in his last 4 games)
    Steve Blake (Traded to Warriors)
    Wesley Johnson 
    Kendall Marshall

    So two of the 5 starters in that game are no longer with the team, and one was let go after a emergency signing of him in the first place (because of too many injuries!). Kaman no longer contributes.

    What happened in that game? The desperate Lakers fought tooth and nail to avoid a record setting 7th straight home loss, lead almost the entire game and gave up the lead in the late fourth to lose by 4. They obviously got inside the 10.5 they were getting that night.


    Folks that wasn't a Thunder team on the downturn either. They came into that Laker game having won FOURTEEN OF SIXTEEN and they were laying 10.5.


     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 4:41 AM ET #2

    Now please pay attention!

    What has happened to both rosters since then?

    The main roster change on the Thunder has been Westbrook replacing Jackson. Is that an upgrade? Of course! But who do you think was starting in the hottest run of the season for the Thunder? Jackson was starting in that 14 of 16 Win streak! 

    Since Westbrook has returned February 20th, the Thunder are 3-4 SU and 2-4-1 ATS! 

    Folks, we all know who the more talented PG is but we also know the issues you have to deal with when Westbrook is on the court. Some players are just better fits, despite their talent.


    Now, listen some more.

    What has happened to the Lakers roster since they lost by 4 and covered last month?

    They replaced Kaman with Pau Gasol (huge upgrade and his MRI was negative after the Nuggets game).

    They replaced Williams with Meeks (another BIG upgrade).

    They replaced Blake with Bazemore (The way Bazemore is playing, it is an upgrade). 

    They strengthened their bench by adding Xavier Henry (whether you know him or not, he is an important piece on this team). 

    They have Jordan Farmar coming off the bench (Playing VERY well of late and an upgrade).

    Also, they might have Nick Young on Sunday (Yet another upgrade) who has been sitting out with knee soreness.



    SO, what have happened to the previous two rosters? 

    The Lakers starting 5 and bench have gotten SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER since the 4 point loss to the Thunder.

    And it could be argued that the Thunder are slightly worse off at the moment as Westbrook still gets assimilated, and their record indicates that.

    SO, what did Vegas do with this line?

    With the ragtag group on 2/13 mired in a 6 game home losing streak and having lost the previous 9 of 11 SU, the books gave us 10.5.

    With all the improvements above, healthier, going 2-3 in their last 5 and 3-2 against the spread and with a huge straight up win at the Blazers (don't take that as lucky or lightly), the books are now giving the Lakers one point MORE than the last game at 11.5!

    Amazing isn't it?

    You might not think so because of that Clipper game. 

    Folks, one game does not a season make and that game is now a thing of the past for bettors like us. But not for squares. The books are forced to make the Thunder lay a huge number even on the road because of that game because right now, the squares are still pounding the Thunder side at 75%! Even laying 11.5! On the ROAD! All because of that Clipper game, which was on TNT and that had a major effect.

    To give you a sense of what kind of number this is for a home dog, after the Sixers dumped Turner and Hawes at the trading deadline and became an NBDL team, the fairly powerful Western Conference Mavericks were laying 14 to the lowest of the lowly Eastern Conference team that night. 

    Now OKC is giving the Lakers just two points less than what the Mavs gave the Sixers (who just beat the Blazers and also hit a record number of three's in their franchise history against the kings - that is, there is talent and scoring here unlike the Sixers) and this number may get to 12 by the time you wake up.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Now please pay attention!

    What has happened to both rosters since then?

    The main roster change on the Thunder has been Westbrook replacing Jackson. Is that an upgrade? Of course! But who do you think was starting in the hottest run of the season for the Thunder? Jackson was starting in that 14 of 16 Win streak! 

    Since Westbrook has returned February 20th, the Thunder are 3-4 SU and 2-4-1 ATS! 

    Folks, we all know who the more talented PG is but we also know the issues you have to deal with when Westbrook is on the court. Some players are just better fits, despite their talent.


    Now, listen some more.

    What has happened to the Lakers roster since they lost by 4 and covered last month?

    They replaced Kaman with Pau Gasol (huge upgrade and his MRI was negative after the Nuggets game).

    They replaced Williams with Meeks (another BIG upgrade).

    They replaced Blake with Bazemore (The way Bazemore is playing, it is an upgrade). 

    They strengthened their bench by adding Xavier Henry (whether you know him or not, he is an important piece on this team). 

    They have Jordan Farmar coming off the bench (Playing VERY well of late and an upgrade).

    Also, they might have Nick Young on Sunday (Yet another upgrade) who has been sitting out with knee soreness.



    SO, what have happened to the previous two rosters? 

    The Lakers starting 5 and bench have gotten SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER since the 4 point loss to the Thunder.

    And it could be argued that the Thunder are slightly worse off at the moment as Westbrook still gets assimilated, and their record indicates that.

    SO, what did Vegas do with this line?

    With the ragtag group on 2/13 mired in a 6 game home losing streak and having lost the previous 9 of 11 SU, the books gave us 10.5.

    With all the improvements above, healthier, going 2-3 in their last 5 and 3-2 against the spread and with a huge straight up win at the Blazers (don't take that as lucky or lightly), the books are now giving the Lakers one point MORE than the last game at 11.5!

    Amazing isn't it?

    You might not think so because of that Clipper game. 

    Folks, one game does not a season make and that game is now a thing of the past for bettors like us. But not for squares. The books are forced to make the Thunder lay a huge number even on the road because of that game because right now, the squares are still pounding the Thunder side at 75%! Even laying 11.5! On the ROAD! All because of that Clipper game, which was on TNT and that had a major effect.

    To give you a sense of what kind of number this is for a home dog, after the Sixers dumped Turner and Hawes at the trading deadline and became an NBDL team, the fairly powerful Western Conference Mavericks were laying 14 to the lowest of the lowly Eastern Conference team that night. 

    Now OKC is giving the Lakers just two points less than what the Mavs gave the Sixers (who just beat the Blazers and also hit a record number of three's in their franchise history against the kings - that is, there is talent and scoring here unlike the Sixers) and this number may get to 12 by the time you wake up.


     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 4:41 AM ET #3

    Another footnote. Do the Thunder play down to their competition? Sometimes YES. And the Lakers are way down there. Some of their straight up losses have come to:

    Cavs (BY TEN just recently at HOME!)
    Magic
    Nuggets
    Utah
    Nets (When they were awful)
    T-Wolves

    The Thunder simply do not have the incentive to annihilate the Lakers like the Clippers did. That makes this number quite large.

    This is a 3:30 start (and possibly daylight savings time could screw with the team traveling West as they lose two hours going West and they lose an hour for daylight savings time ). 

    Folks, this game is also on ABC which is bigger than ESPN in terms of viewers. 

    The Lakers became a national embarrassment on Thursday night at the Staples Center. Now this is their first game back home and it will be televised nationally. They HAVE to show something here to save face for the disgrace they put on only 3 days ago.

    So to sum up we get:

    1) A BOATLOAD of points (We do not have to win or even come close to winning and the Lakers showed they can backdoor a spread and keep fighting as they did when they backdoored the Nuggets)
    2) A completely revamped lineup with huge upgrades on the Lakers
    3) A much better Laker bench
    4) A Thunder team 3-4 SU since Westbrook returned
    5) A nationally televised game after the Laker brass called an emergency meeting with the head coach (remember when this happened with the Knicks with Dolan and Woodson? They won outright the very next game.)


    There is only one thing left to do and the choice is obvious. Don't let a single game EVER dictate sides in future games like the Clipper game is doing to squares.

    One last thing.

    Who are the Lakers opponents coming up?

    Thunder Sunday
    @Thunder Thursday
    @Spurs Friday! (b2b with the Spurs
    Spurs at home 3/19

    What is the most winnable game in those 4? I'll take the Thunder game right out of the gate and we get 11.5 (and possibly 12 by morning). 

    If the Lakers need to save face, it's right here right now. NOT in OKC or on a b2b with the SPURS!

    THE PICK:

    LAKERS +11.5 OVER THUNDER
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Another footnote. Do the Thunder play down to their competition? Sometimes YES. And the Lakers are way down there. Some of their straight up losses have come to:

    Cavs (BY TEN just recently at HOME!)
    Magic
    Nuggets
    Utah
    Nets (When they were awful)
    T-Wolves

    The Thunder simply do not have the incentive to annihilate the Lakers like the Clippers did. That makes this number quite large.

    This is a 3:30 start (and possibly daylight savings time could screw with the team traveling West as they lose two hours going West and they lose an hour for daylight savings time ). 

    Folks, this game is also on ABC which is bigger than ESPN in terms of viewers. 

    The Lakers became a national embarrassment on Thursday night at the Staples Center. Now this is their first game back home and it will be televised nationally. They HAVE to show something here to save face for the disgrace they put on only 3 days ago.

    So to sum up we get:

    1) A BOATLOAD of points (We do not have to win or even come close to winning and the Lakers showed they can backdoor a spread and keep fighting as they did when they backdoored the Nuggets)
    2) A completely revamped lineup with huge upgrades on the Lakers
    3) A much better Laker bench
    4) A Thunder team 3-4 SU since Westbrook returned
    5) A nationally televised game after the Laker brass called an emergency meeting with the head coach (remember when this happened with the Knicks with Dolan and Woodson? They won outright the very next game.)


    There is only one thing left to do and the choice is obvious. Don't let a single game EVER dictate sides in future games like the Clipper game is doing to squares.

    One last thing.

    Who are the Lakers opponents coming up?

    Thunder Sunday
    @Thunder Thursday
    @Spurs Friday! (b2b with the Spurs
    Spurs at home 3/19

    What is the most winnable game in those 4? I'll take the Thunder game right out of the gate and we get 11.5 (and possibly 12 by morning). 

    If the Lakers need to save face, it's right here right now. NOT in OKC or on a b2b with the SPURS!

    THE PICK:

    LAKERS +11.5 OVER THUNDER
     
    darkmandave
    darkmandave
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2013
    Posts: 2657
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 4:47 AM ET #4

    Lets go bro love the write up great job on Knicks yesterday
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Lets go bro love the write up great job on Knicks yesterday
     
    sugalerongpogi
    sugalerongpogi
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2013
    Posts: 474
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 4:49 AM ET #5

    Nice write up! Thanks Scal!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Nice write up! Thanks Scal!
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 4:49 AM ET #6

    Quote Originally Posted by darkmandave:

    Lets go bro love the write up great job on Knicks yesterday


    Knicks/Lakers....we take the shi* of the NBA and turn it into gold baby!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by darkmandave:

    Lets go bro love the write up great job on Knicks yesterday


    Knicks/Lakers....we take the shi* of the NBA and turn it into gold baby!
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 4:50 AM ET #7

    Quote Originally Posted by sugalerongpogi:

    Nice write up! Thanks Scal!
    Thanks!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by sugalerongpogi:

    Nice write up! Thanks Scal!
    Thanks!
     
    bobmaloogatimesfive
    bobmaloogatimesfive
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2013
    Posts: 9399
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 5:00 AM ET #8

    Bazemore over points prop?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Bazemore over points prop?
     
    Sareesataka
    Sareesataka
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2010
    Posts: 6142
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 5:09 AM ET #9

    As usual, outstanding analysis, scalabrine. Now I just have to find the cahonies to make a bet on the Lakers.

    GL scal, and everyone!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    As usual, outstanding analysis, scalabrine. Now I just have to find the cahonies to make a bet on the Lakers.

    GL scal, and everyone!
     
    HungerforMoney
    HungerforMoney
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 2223
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 5:24 AM ET #10

    good ideas but thunder off a lost idk man.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    good ideas but thunder off a lost idk man.
     
    midnightprowl
    midnightprowl
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2012
    Posts: 8779
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 5:25 AM ET #11

    Wow nice write up as per usual.... Win or lose i will lock 3 units with lakers 

    I kinda was thinking Miami and OKC don't cover anyway. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Wow nice write up as per usual.... Win or lose i will lock 3 units with lakers 

    I kinda was thinking Miami and OKC don't cover anyway. 
     
    MoreGeezer
    MoreGeezer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2013
    Posts: 1062
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 5:32 AM ET #12

    With you this time i think ..the thunder don't have a low post defender now,gasol will be free to make plays and pass the ball to shooters.
    Okc isn't the same without him and sefolosha...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    With you this time i think ..the thunder don't have a low post defender now,gasol will be free to make plays and pass the ball to shooters.
    Okc isn't the same without him and sefolosha...
     
    shipit_1
    shipit_1
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2010
    Posts: 1034
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 5:41 AM ET #13

       nice write up    hell I   never thought id put money on the lakers   this year  but u just convinced  me       im riding with   lets get that easy money 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
       nice write up    hell I   never thought id put money on the lakers   this year  but u just convinced  me       im riding with   lets get that easy money 
     
    Enjoi
    Enjoi
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2012
    Posts: 2767
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 6:18 AM ET #14

    Tailing you on this one Scal, loved the write-up but what's more is that OKC are 3-4 SU since losing Perkins from the line up. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Tailing you on this one Scal, loved the write-up but what's more is that OKC are 3-4 SU since losing Perkins from the line up. 
     
    eeeallenccc
    eeeallenccc
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2013
    Posts: 1084
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 6:40 AM ET #15

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     
    Tigers2013
    Tigers2013
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2013
    Posts: 924
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 6:41 AM ET #16

    Great insight.  Tailing this one to the bank for 3 units 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Great insight.  Tailing this one to the bank for 3 units 
     
    HATAD123
    HATAD123
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2014
    Posts: 5
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 6:56 AM ET #17

    Tailing this one aswell, or as we say in Sweden ''Jag ryggar denna'' ;)
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Tailing this one aswell, or as we say in Sweden ''Jag ryggar denna'' ;)
     
    specialistPT
    specialistPT
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2014
    Posts: 3
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 7:08 AM ET #18

     

    GL scal!!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

     

    GL scal!!

     
    Sinanju
    Sinanju
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2012
    Posts: 827
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 7:43 AM ET #19

    nice write-up..

    What is your say about the Total of this Game?? i'm thinking of Over... this might be a shoot-out game...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    nice write-up..

    What is your say about the Total of this Game?? i'm thinking of Over... this might be a shoot-out game...
     
    Nabooru
    Nabooru
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2011
    Posts: 3056
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 7:57 AM ET #20

    Im too scared
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Im too scared
     
    MoneyShot
    MoneyShot
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 18451
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 8:15 AM ET #21

    GL scal
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    GL scal
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 8:29 AM ET #22

    Quote Originally Posted by bobmaloogatimesfive:

    Bazemore over points prop?

    Don't worry about exotics. The good old fashioned side is there for the taking.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by bobmaloogatimesfive:

    Bazemore over points prop?

    Don't worry about exotics. The good old fashioned side is there for the taking.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 8:35 AM ET #23

    Quote Originally Posted by Sareesataka:

    As usual, outstanding analysis, scalabrine. Now I just have to find the cahonies to make a bet on the Lakers.

    GL scal, and everyone!

    No  needed. This is a mega-sized line at home. Books don't give lines this size out at home to teams not names the Sixers (or Bucks) very often. 

    And remember this is a road game with travel for the Thunder. The Clippers game was not a road game. They play their home games at a Staples too obviously. That was a bad set-up for a game vs. an arch-rival.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Sareesataka:

    As usual, outstanding analysis, scalabrine. Now I just have to find the cahonies to make a bet on the Lakers.

    GL scal, and everyone!

    No  needed. This is a mega-sized line at home. Books don't give lines this size out at home to teams not names the Sixers (or Bucks) very often. 

    And remember this is a road game with travel for the Thunder. The Clippers game was not a road game. They play their home games at a Staples too obviously. That was a bad set-up for a game vs. an arch-rival.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 8:42 AM ET #24

    Quote Originally Posted by HungerforMoney:

    good ideas but thunder off a lost idk man.

    No shame in losing to the Suns in a road game. They can beat anyone in that spot.

    Oh and I'd like to mention the vaunted Thunder D gave up 41 points to Gerald Green in that game, TWENTY FIVE in the third quarter alone (Wilt? 25x4=100) and blew a 16 point lead.

    That kinda output is pretty scary against a team that is supposed to be the best in the west. And it happened just last game.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by HungerforMoney:

    good ideas but thunder off a lost idk man.

    No shame in losing to the Suns in a road game. They can beat anyone in that spot.

    Oh and I'd like to mention the vaunted Thunder D gave up 41 points to Gerald Green in that game, TWENTY FIVE in the third quarter alone (Wilt? 25x4=100) and blew a 16 point lead.

    That kinda output is pretty scary against a team that is supposed to be the best in the west. And it happened just last game.
     
     
    oldscho0led
    oldscho0led
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 289
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2014 - 8:42 AM ET #25

    Solid write-up 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Solid write-up 
    All Forums | NBA Betting Forum
    123 ... 91011 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,019 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 251 Covers arrow
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,155 Covers arrow
    • The Three-Day Money Train 4,232 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 258,479 Covers arrow
    • Friday 09/18/2026 759 Covers arrow
    • Saturday 09/19/2026 485 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,446 Covers arrow
    • Week 3 Money 8,813 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 21,682 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.