I think that it is very stupid to go against the 2nd best player of all time and his team that is obviously on a mission. I think it is certainly better to lay off rather than bet against greatness even if it was plus 20+. That being said, I like following Scal so much that I'm going to do it anyway!
0
I think that it is very stupid to go against the 2nd best player of all time and his team that is obviously on a mission. I think it is certainly better to lay off rather than bet against greatness even if it was plus 20+. That being said, I like following Scal so much that I'm going to do it anyway!
I think that it is very stupid to go against the 2nd best player of all time and his team that is obviously on a mission. I think it is certainly better to lay off rather than bet against greatness even if it was plus 20+. That being said, I like following Scal so much that I'm going to do it anyway!
Love him or Hate him, Covers is worth more & worth investing one's precious time in b/c of proven, very high %age winners like Scal.
Those times one might not even have a dog in the race, but having read Scal take on a contest... the match gains meaning.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SUPEREAGLE43:
I think that it is very stupid to go against the 2nd best player of all time and his team that is obviously on a mission. I think it is certainly better to lay off rather than bet against greatness even if it was plus 20+. That being said, I like following Scal so much that I'm going to do it anyway!
Love him or Hate him, Covers is worth more & worth investing one's precious time in b/c of proven, very high %age winners like Scal.
Those times one might not even have a dog in the race, but having read Scal take on a contest... the match gains meaning.
Well Scalabrine no disrespect intended but looking like another blowout and you will see a new record line against number 1 seed for game 4, for game 4 maybe Clev-18.5 to -21.5 range. Just a thought just because it's a record line it doesn't mean Clev automatically can't cover ATS. At first I thought in live betting I'll try a middle by taking Boston+19 or better but now I'm thinking I'll need Boston+24 or better cause when Clev rest most of their starters in the 4th quarter the Clev backups or bench players still will play hard so -16 means nothing cause by the 4th quarter Boston guys might also start to give up.
0
Well Scalabrine no disrespect intended but looking like another blowout and you will see a new record line against number 1 seed for game 4, for game 4 maybe Clev-18.5 to -21.5 range. Just a thought just because it's a record line it doesn't mean Clev automatically can't cover ATS. At first I thought in live betting I'll try a middle by taking Boston+19 or better but now I'm thinking I'll need Boston+24 or better cause when Clev rest most of their starters in the 4th quarter the Clev backups or bench players still will play hard so -16 means nothing cause by the 4th quarter Boston guys might also start to give up.
OK, my Cavs 1q and 1h covered, and the new line is Celtics +21. If you loved 16, you should cream on 21! Actually, I laid off the final scores, so we can still both win. Good Luck to all.
0
OK, my Cavs 1q and 1h covered, and the new line is Celtics +21. If you loved 16, you should cream on 21! Actually, I laid off the final scores, so we can still both win. Good Luck to all.