- winners of 8 of 9 and playing well against good teams.... I have a helluva a lot of respect for how Florida has progressed and become a bona fide Top 10 team.... this matchup is usually close and Kentucky won at home
-this game might get turbocharged with some end to end action
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Play #8 - Kentucky +13.5 x HALF U
Play #9 - OVER 154.5 x HALF U
- winners of 8 of 9 and playing well against good teams.... I have a helluva a lot of respect for how Florida has progressed and become a bona fide Top 10 team.... this matchup is usually close and Kentucky won at home
-this game might get turbocharged with some end to end action
What the hell happened to Va Tech, they were up 6 early in 2nd half then I went into the store and came out about 25 min later and they were down 22. Wow.
0
What the hell happened to Va Tech, they were up 6 early in 2nd half then I went into the store and came out about 25 min later and they were down 22. Wow.
Gonzaga to win by 3- 6 pts winning margin on Bet365 x 1U @ +425
Gonzaga to win by 7 -9 pts winning margin x HALF U @+750
Santa Clara to win by 1-2 pts winning margin $20 @ +1200
Gonzaga to win by 1-2 pts inning margin $20 @ +800
This should be a dandy game...... SANTA CLARA at home is an animal and they will stay in this game I bet ($190) on it .....if Zaga wins by 10 or more, call it a bad read and just eat it
Alabama Under 168.5 x 1U
- SC won't hack and foul in the second half unless they are close and if they are then the total is pretty low I surmise.....final score will be like 95 - 68 or something like that ....maybe 90 - 74
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Gonzaga to win by 3- 6 pts winning margin on Bet365 x 1U @ +425
Gonzaga to win by 7 -9 pts winning margin x HALF U @+750
Santa Clara to win by 1-2 pts winning margin $20 @ +1200
Gonzaga to win by 1-2 pts inning margin $20 @ +800
This should be a dandy game...... SANTA CLARA at home is an animal and they will stay in this game I bet ($190) on it .....if Zaga wins by 10 or more, call it a bad read and just eat it
Alabama Under 168.5 x 1U
- SC won't hack and foul in the second half unless they are close and if they are then the total is pretty low I surmise.....final score will be like 95 - 68 or something like that ....maybe 90 - 74
I just took Ohio St +5.5 in game play for HALF U as well..... they are monsters at home vs comparable competition and I think these teams are ...big test for Virginia coming into a BIG10 tough home court
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
I just took Ohio St +5.5 in game play for HALF U as well..... they are monsters at home vs comparable competition and I think these teams are ...big test for Virginia coming into a BIG10 tough home court
Not sure how to place: Tennessee, Kentucky, St.Mary's, Miami Ohio, Texas ....there are more but the cream of the crop lately and finishing strongly are the ones above in the Top 20
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Feb 14 TOP TEAMS update:
TOP 4 Especially have: > Best Size, Talent, Full court Cohesion mix
Not sure how to place: Tennessee, Kentucky, St.Mary's, Miami Ohio, Texas ....there are more but the cream of the crop lately and finishing strongly are the ones above in the Top 20
Sparty should be on that Top 20 list and tied with Louisville .... I don't like how they start a game and are chasing good teams to try to get back into a match. This will haunt them in NCAAB tourney
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Sparty should be on that Top 20 list and tied with Louisville .... I don't like how they start a game and are chasing good teams to try to get back into a match. This will haunt them in NCAAB tourney
There are just not enough points to chew on taking the DOG in the Siena - Marist contest....
-these two play tight games under 130 pts regularly and with both teams on a losing streak, I would suspect they rely on what gave them success and that is playing tight basketball with fundamentals with what coaches tend to stress in pre-game and practices leading up to a match where you are on a losing streak
Play #4 > Marist - Siena Under 133.5 x HALF U
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
There are just not enough points to chew on taking the DOG in the Siena - Marist contest....
-these two play tight games under 130 pts regularly and with both teams on a losing streak, I would suspect they rely on what gave them success and that is playing tight basketball with fundamentals with what coaches tend to stress in pre-game and practices leading up to a match where you are on a losing streak
Play #5 - Merrimack +3 x 1U - I also think the ML is a good gamble but have too many plays open
-Merrimack won the first matchup and is on a long win streak now playing better teams and winning on the road
-Merrimack can smother the outside shot and that is what Quinn relies on > 3 pt success but they have to face the #19 best 3 point defense to accomplish their offensive goals on some set plays
-this is a very strong DOUBLE FADE and I like it even better with a matchup scope included
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Play #5 - Merrimack +3 x 1U - I also think the ML is a good gamble but have too many plays open
-Merrimack won the first matchup and is on a long win streak now playing better teams and winning on the road
-Merrimack can smother the outside shot and that is what Quinn relies on > 3 pt success but they have to face the #19 best 3 point defense to accomplish their offensive goals on some set plays
-this is a very strong DOUBLE FADE and I like it even better with a matchup scope included
All yesterday from 3 pm through the evening, I could not access this site....I had 2-3 more plays that I hit 2 of them for nice profits and one that cacked late but was only a HALF U
I have done my SOS last update.
I am almost done my last ranking update and it will be the last one as not much will move from this point too much.
I have my pts scored on offense and pts allowed on defense updated ready for matchup analysis through tourneys.
Next, I am placing all teams in SOS ranking (my whole chart of 365).
Each team will then be ranked within rank levels I used during the season to sift them and using a point system based on the following criteria to match them up and determine who moves on:
1. SOS rank divided by 2 - one thing I have noticed, the teams with higher SOS that have improved their rank by 100 pts or more have actually played better through the season with tougher competition...the cream rises to the situation and I don't want this high number to over dominate the avg.
2. 3 pt shooting % rank
3. 3 pt shooting defense % rank
4. FT shooting % rank
5. Offensive rebounding rank
6. Defending hoop = FG% allowed on defense
Then avg out their ranks to get an overall score and rank them > re-arrange ALL teams on a final spreadsheet to be ready for NCAAB tourney and I don't put much stock in Conference Tourney games UNLESS the team has to fight to get to the NCAAB tourney as a double team or a shocker to make it which happens every year
I will be posting plays here and there and recording results on my Conference and Non Conference lists (last two weekends had games that were Non Conf) but the real work is being ready to press on certain matchups in the NCAAB tourney
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
All yesterday from 3 pm through the evening, I could not access this site....I had 2-3 more plays that I hit 2 of them for nice profits and one that cacked late but was only a HALF U
I have done my SOS last update.
I am almost done my last ranking update and it will be the last one as not much will move from this point too much.
I have my pts scored on offense and pts allowed on defense updated ready for matchup analysis through tourneys.
Next, I am placing all teams in SOS ranking (my whole chart of 365).
Each team will then be ranked within rank levels I used during the season to sift them and using a point system based on the following criteria to match them up and determine who moves on:
1. SOS rank divided by 2 - one thing I have noticed, the teams with higher SOS that have improved their rank by 100 pts or more have actually played better through the season with tougher competition...the cream rises to the situation and I don't want this high number to over dominate the avg.
2. 3 pt shooting % rank
3. 3 pt shooting defense % rank
4. FT shooting % rank
5. Offensive rebounding rank
6. Defending hoop = FG% allowed on defense
Then avg out their ranks to get an overall score and rank them > re-arrange ALL teams on a final spreadsheet to be ready for NCAAB tourney and I don't put much stock in Conference Tourney games UNLESS the team has to fight to get to the NCAAB tourney as a double team or a shocker to make it which happens every year
I will be posting plays here and there and recording results on my Conference and Non Conference lists (last two weekends had games that were Non Conf) but the real work is being ready to press on certain matchups in the NCAAB tourney
Neutral court record will also be noted..... that can be a biggie when analyzing stats too....but I won't take that into account UNTIL AFTER the conference tourneys and just before I fill out brackets for NCAAB. Some tourneys like NIT and CBB have home courts used in early rounds
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Neutral court record will also be noted..... that can be a biggie when analyzing stats too....but I won't take that into account UNTIL AFTER the conference tourneys and just before I fill out brackets for NCAAB. Some tourneys like NIT and CBB have home courts used in early rounds
Play #1 - parlay > Bethune ML 1.4 x Iowa St ML 1.66 = +132 x 2U
- if Houston can beat Iowa St on their home court with their defense and offensive movement/rabid crowd and the best 3 pt shooter in college who is hot again and shooting from everywhere and off balance too........then I tip my hat to Houston who then could be a TOP 3 legit team!!
-Bethune beat Jackson St by over 35 pts in their first match, have played a stronger SOS and have scored more on avg and given up less points..... I highly doubt Jackson St shoots lights out and holds down this team who just lost a terrible but close game
Play #2 - parlay > Bethune 1.4 x Iowa St Over 135 @1.9 x 1U > pays +166
-Houston will have to score to have a shot at winning and know that Sampson as a coach and his players that he recruits love the challenge of taking on a team that everyone tells them they cannot beat them on the road in their building .....and that is what people are saying about this game
- I see foul shots and 3 pt shots made being the difference in this game to push it over to 72 -65 type of score .....maybe 74 - 69
These are my two main plays but I will shop for some more for a HALF U if I feel they can have a very strong chance of covering....
Cougars /Cyclones is much watch TV .....just like the Devils - Wolverines later this week ....OMG basketball!!!!
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Monday card:
Play #1 - parlay > Bethune ML 1.4 x Iowa St ML 1.66 = +132 x 2U
- if Houston can beat Iowa St on their home court with their defense and offensive movement/rabid crowd and the best 3 pt shooter in college who is hot again and shooting from everywhere and off balance too........then I tip my hat to Houston who then could be a TOP 3 legit team!!
-Bethune beat Jackson St by over 35 pts in their first match, have played a stronger SOS and have scored more on avg and given up less points..... I highly doubt Jackson St shoots lights out and holds down this team who just lost a terrible but close game
Play #2 - parlay > Bethune 1.4 x Iowa St Over 135 @1.9 x 1U > pays +166
-Houston will have to score to have a shot at winning and know that Sampson as a coach and his players that he recruits love the challenge of taking on a team that everyone tells them they cannot beat them on the road in their building .....and that is what people are saying about this game
- I see foul shots and 3 pt shots made being the difference in this game to push it over to 72 -65 type of score .....maybe 74 - 69
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.