MLB system releases...
Playing straight dog ML, your record is 31-35
However, if you played Reverse Runline on the dog (alternate runline) - your record is 24-42
Now, I don't have historical odds for the RRL but it's fair to say that the 7 losses you would have encountered (where the dog won by a single run) would easily be wiped out by RRL wins as the odds are mostly upwards of +200.
I know you would have to apply value to your own calculations based on your dog pick, but going by simply picking dog RL vs dog ML - you should be showing a much higher unit return.
Playing straight dog ML, your record is 31-35
However, if you played Reverse Runline on the dog (alternate runline) - your record is 24-42
Now, I don't have historical odds for the RRL but it's fair to say that the 7 losses you would have encountered (where the dog won by a single run) would easily be wiped out by RRL wins as the odds are mostly upwards of +200.
I know you would have to apply value to your own calculations based on your dog pick, but going by simply picking dog RL vs dog ML - you should be showing a much higher unit return.
SN, I realised something about your dog ML plays. A lot of your dog wins are by wide margins. So, I went back and did some tracking from Jun 1st to Jul 25th.
Playing straight dog ML, your record is 31-35
However, if you played Reverse Runline on the dog (alternate runline) - your record is 24-42
Now, I don't have historical odds for the RRL but it's fair to say that the 7 losses you would have encountered (where the dog won by a single run) would easily be wiped out by RRL wins as the odds are mostly upwards of +200.
I know you would have to apply value to your own calculations based on your dog pick, but going by simply picking dog RL vs dog ML - you should be showing a much higher unit return.
good tracking...stats don't lie, this will be filtered into the unit application, and ajustments will be altered based on value, thx for the info, those playing specifically DOGS can appreciate the concept of your stat, good tool for cappin' units ![]()
SN, I realised something about your dog ML plays. A lot of your dog wins are by wide margins. So, I went back and did some tracking from Jun 1st to Jul 25th.
Playing straight dog ML, your record is 31-35
However, if you played Reverse Runline on the dog (alternate runline) - your record is 24-42
Now, I don't have historical odds for the RRL but it's fair to say that the 7 losses you would have encountered (where the dog won by a single run) would easily be wiped out by RRL wins as the odds are mostly upwards of +200.
I know you would have to apply value to your own calculations based on your dog pick, but going by simply picking dog RL vs dog ML - you should be showing a much higher unit return.
good tracking...stats don't lie, this will be filtered into the unit application, and ajustments will be altered based on value, thx for the info, those playing specifically DOGS can appreciate the concept of your stat, good tool for cappin' units ![]()
Try baseball-reference.com has all boxscore summary's for the last eight years SN
Try baseball-reference.com has all boxscore summary's for the last eight years SN
typo error on final results / 1-5-1(correct) 1-6-1(in-correct)
typo error on final results / 1-5-1(correct) 1-6-1(in-correct)
All bets are four 4 units. For some cases where closing odds were slighty under +100, the bet is still 4 units for simplicity sake.
The tracking shows +18.88 units during the tracking period for using RRL Vs ML. I've uploaded the workbook I did calculations with in case you want to have a look and see if I got everything right.
https://www.mediafire.com/download.php?ujzogjynflw
All bets are four 4 units. For some cases where closing odds were slighty under +100, the bet is still 4 units for simplicity sake.
The tracking shows +18.88 units during the tracking period for using RRL Vs ML. I've uploaded the workbook I did calculations with in case you want to have a look and see if I got everything right.
https://www.mediafire.com/download.php?ujzogjynflw
I managed to find a site with historical RRL odds (odds portal). I did the tracking again (Jun 1st to Jul 26th) and used closing ML and RRL odds from Pinnacle.
All bets are four 4 units. For some cases where closing odds were slighty under +100, the bet is still 4 units for simplicity sake.
The tracking shows +18.88 units during the tracking period for using RRL Vs ML. I've uploaded the workbook I did calculations with in case you want to have a look and see if I got everything right.
https://www.mediafire.com/download.php?ujzogjynflw
good work, with excellent research technique..After review, I find your information will filter adjustments, when cappin' applied units.. Thx for this valuablbe info, as Pinnacle is one of many 'books' I access my wagers through, 4units are a solid standard to use as a guidance table when calculating a ML solution...really good presentation on mediafire
SN
I managed to find a site with historical RRL odds (odds portal). I did the tracking again (Jun 1st to Jul 26th) and used closing ML and RRL odds from Pinnacle.
All bets are four 4 units. For some cases where closing odds were slighty under +100, the bet is still 4 units for simplicity sake.
The tracking shows +18.88 units during the tracking period for using RRL Vs ML. I've uploaded the workbook I did calculations with in case you want to have a look and see if I got everything right.
https://www.mediafire.com/download.php?ujzogjynflw
good work, with excellent research technique..After review, I find your information will filter adjustments, when cappin' applied units.. Thx for this valuablbe info, as Pinnacle is one of many 'books' I access my wagers through, 4units are a solid standard to use as a guidance table when calculating a ML solution...really good presentation on mediafire
SN
A) nothing 'reckless' here; ever.. All games are capped to win the RL, today just happens to have an abundant of qualified runline games with strong leans that just can't be overlooked, everyday is different, with different entry's...No, I could not classify my individual 'form' as slow, steady, reliable, yes, with the priority being to capture 'units' through value wagers, and eliminate juice payments(which most cappers seldom speak of, or include in their ideology....B) No, there's nothing counter productive,with the StL/LAD RL or the Under, however I do understand your insight, based on the strength of the UNDER lean, my decision was to make it a play.. What is counter productive would be to parlay these up, and place them in a high risk situation..remember, we are attaching equations to these games in the form of units, an under loss is backed, and absorbed by 12 plays..understanding the final step of the BR/RC formula: PAC(Position-AdjustmentClassification)would be the key ingredient...to participate, a capper must qualify himself..Thx for the kind words, may you prosper always, respectfully SN
A) nothing 'reckless' here; ever.. All games are capped to win the RL, today just happens to have an abundant of qualified runline games with strong leans that just can't be overlooked, everyday is different, with different entry's...No, I could not classify my individual 'form' as slow, steady, reliable, yes, with the priority being to capture 'units' through value wagers, and eliminate juice payments(which most cappers seldom speak of, or include in their ideology....B) No, there's nothing counter productive,with the StL/LAD RL or the Under, however I do understand your insight, based on the strength of the UNDER lean, my decision was to make it a play.. What is counter productive would be to parlay these up, and place them in a high risk situation..remember, we are attaching equations to these games in the form of units, an under loss is backed, and absorbed by 12 plays..understanding the final step of the BR/RC formula: PAC(Position-AdjustmentClassification)would be the key ingredient...to participate, a capper must qualify himself..Thx for the kind words, may you prosper always, respectfully SN
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
445,782
-
Tuesday 09/08/2026
977
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
253,244
-
Couple thoughts
3,952
-
9/8 POD 🔥🔥????
3,446
-
Tuesday
2,829
-
Breathtaking ....truly
20,479
-
We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever
26,699
-
Obviously the true face of the republican party
30,558
-
PART DEUX
214
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search

Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.