Green Bay at Chicago (09/27/2010)
Damn Miami gave the gave away Sunday night. The Jets did not earn it. The penalties that resulted in first downs (then scores) were ridiculous. The receiver initiated contact with the DB and no helmet was contacted on one play. 2 possible INT's and just bad luck for the Fins and my wallet. I just knew if we didn;t get all the was for the TD at the end they would not get it from the 10 even with 4 downs. That's the way their luck (and play calling) went all day. I mean throwing a deep ball on 3rd and 2 in the early 4th???
So I vented, now tonight. Logic says GB so natualrally take the Bears due to key turnovers and bad calls (favoring the home team this time). Cutler will get 2 roughing the passer calls to keep scoring drives alive, and a pass interference will set them up on the 5. ![]()
Damn Miami gave the gave away Sunday night. The Jets did not earn it. The penalties that resulted in first downs (then scores) were ridiculous. The receiver initiated contact with the DB and no helmet was contacted on one play. 2 possible INT's and just bad luck for the Fins and my wallet. I just knew if we didn;t get all the was for the TD at the end they would not get it from the 10 even with 4 downs. That's the way their luck (and play calling) went all day. I mean throwing a deep ball on 3rd and 2 in the early 4th???
So I vented, now tonight. Logic says GB so natualrally take the Bears due to key turnovers and bad calls (favoring the home team this time). Cutler will get 2 roughing the passer calls to keep scoring drives alive, and a pass interference will set them up on the 5. ![]()
Green Bay - 21 Chicago - 20
Bears +3
under 46
Time for a good old fashioned black and blue divisional game. I'm taking the points with the Bears seeking revenge for last seasons home loss to the Pack. ![]()
Chicago - Under ![]()
Green Bay - 21 Chicago - 20
Bears +3
under 46
Time for a good old fashioned black and blue divisional game. I'm taking the points with the Bears seeking revenge for last seasons home loss to the Pack. ![]()
Chicago - Under ![]()
Just can't take either side ATS due to the uncertainty of BS calls so I'll lay what I've done for yrs, teased GB +4 and under 53. These teams will throw a lot I know because they won't be able to run, but I see sacks/hurries by both teams, a turnover or two close to the red zone and some FG's. 53 is lot to cover in the NFL and these teams notoriously play under 40.
GB +4 under 53 BOL ![]()
Just can't take either side ATS due to the uncertainty of BS calls so I'll lay what I've done for yrs, teased GB +4 and under 53. These teams will throw a lot I know because they won't be able to run, but I see sacks/hurries by both teams, a turnover or two close to the red zone and some FG's. 53 is lot to cover in the NFL and these teams notoriously play under 40.
GB +4 under 53 BOL ![]()
OK, so Jay Cutler has a great game against a bi-polar Dallas team and half the world has Chicago as a contender. Remember they only beat Detroit (stafford only played half game) 19-14.
Remember how bad Jay Cutler can be? Remember how bad the Bears can be? I just don't see it. Enlighten me Bears pumpers, still on the fence either GB or no play.
OK, so Jay Cutler has a great game against a bi-polar Dallas team and half the world has Chicago as a contender. Remember they only beat Detroit (stafford only played half game) 19-14.
Remember how bad Jay Cutler can be? Remember how bad the Bears can be? I just don't see it. Enlighten me Bears pumpers, still on the fence either GB or no play.
OK, so Jay Cutler has a great game against a bi-polar Dallas team and half the world has Chicago as a contender. Remember they only beat Detroit (stafford only played half game) 19-14.
Remember how bad Jay Cutler can be? Remember how bad the Bears can be? I just don't see it. Enlighten me Bears pumpers, still on the fence either GB or no play.
I think Cowboys had at least 3 turnovers, Romo 2 interceptions against Bears.
I don't see it with Bears. again, on the fence
OK, so Jay Cutler has a great game against a bi-polar Dallas team and half the world has Chicago as a contender. Remember they only beat Detroit (stafford only played half game) 19-14.
Remember how bad Jay Cutler can be? Remember how bad the Bears can be? I just don't see it. Enlighten me Bears pumpers, still on the fence either GB or no play.
I think Cowboys had at least 3 turnovers, Romo 2 interceptions against Bears.
I don't see it with Bears. again, on the fence
Can you believe it they are going to have 6 officers of the military tell the hole english speeking world that there is UFO'S Holy Shit private pile whats it coming to!! With that being said i'll take the bears---NOT!
GB Wins!![]()
Can you believe it they are going to have 6 officers of the military tell the hole english speeking world that there is UFO'S Holy Shit private pile whats it coming to!! With that being said i'll take the bears---NOT!
GB Wins!![]()
The last 2 meetings in Chicago, the total was 41 and 40. Both unders. Higher totals in GB. This one is 46. This tells me over.
GB +3
Over 46
Gl all,
Tex
The last 2 meetings in Chicago, the total was 41 and 40. Both unders. Higher totals in GB. This one is 46. This tells me over.
GB +3
Over 46
Gl all,
Tex
Line opened at 3', bet down to 3. The extra hook on open tells me road team.
The last 2 meetings in Chicago, the total was 41 and 40. Both unders. Higher totals in GB. This one is 46. This tells me over.
GB +3
Over 46
Gl all,
Tex
GB -3
Over 46
Line opened at 3', bet down to 3. The extra hook on open tells me road team.
The last 2 meetings in Chicago, the total was 41 and 40. Both unders. Higher totals in GB. This one is 46. This tells me over.
GB +3
Over 46
Gl all,
Tex
GB -3
Over 46
| › | |
| › |
Dogs were out of control yesterday going like 10-5. 9-6 were overs. Home dogs 60% for year. |
| › | |
| › |
Dogs were out of control yesterday going like 10-5. 9-6 were overs. Home dogs 60% for year. |
This is a very dynamic, balanced Green Bay offense. Rodgers should be able to distribute the ball well against a mediocre Bears pass defense. Too much offensive balance for the Bears to handle. I can't see Chicago's offense matching score for score.
This is a very dynamic, balanced Green Bay offense. Rodgers should be able to distribute the ball well against a mediocre Bears pass defense. Too much offensive balance for the Bears to handle. I can't see Chicago's offense matching score for score.
Jets won. Vegas got there money back. So that means Packers win tomorrow.
huh im confused the only 52% of public was on miami vegas won all weekend.. 10 out of 15 dogs covered and tonight will make 11!
Jets won. Vegas got there money back. So that means Packers win tomorrow.
huh im confused the only 52% of public was on miami vegas won all weekend.. 10 out of 15 dogs covered and tonight will make 11!
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,223
-
Saturday 09/19/2026
655
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
259,320
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,158
-
The Three-Day Money Train
5,527
-
PART DEUX
217
-
Trump's legacy?
25,518
-
Week 3 Money
10,925
-
Public Indicator Calculations 2026
13,930
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
23,008
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
