@THEMUGG LOL So you gonna actually make a contention and back up your weak retort or are you just going to lean on your big words of liberals, media, lies, slander, Biden and waste more time when you could be actually having real conversation by making effort to add to discussion?
I have.........I replied to the nonsense posted by third. If you haven't noticed, he is posting off-topic & I'm responding to his assertions, not yours. Interesting that you're not harping on him to make an effort to add to discussion. Why is that?
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@THEMUGG LOL So you gonna actually make a contention and back up your weak retort or are you just going to lean on your big words of liberals, media, lies, slander, Biden and waste more time when you could be actually having real conversation by making effort to add to discussion?
I have.........I replied to the nonsense posted by third. If you haven't noticed, he is posting off-topic & I'm responding to his assertions, not yours. Interesting that you're not harping on him to make an effort to add to discussion. Why is that?
How do you say that? He posts news summaries and his views? You might not agree with him but he has discussion and content light years ahead of your droning on with the same 5 or so key words. Go click on your username and read the rinse and repeat messages you make. You are either agreeing with one or two members and digging on liberals or you are complaining to the left members and blaming Biden. Cant you come up with more than just blaming and bashing liberals?
@THEMUGG
How do you say that? He posts news summaries and his views? You might not agree with him but he has discussion and content light years ahead of your droning on with the same 5 or so key words. Go click on your username and read the rinse and repeat messages you make. You are either agreeing with one or two members and digging on liberals or you are complaining to the left members and blaming Biden. Cant you come up with more than just blaming and bashing liberals?
@wallstreetcappers Then prove your contention and substantiate it. I did; you did not.
Right because you said so but what did you say outside that my contention was wrong and yours was right? You said that there is no way to challenge the King, so that makes you right?'
'Notice a theme here, you are personal and petty with your comments and you must be RIGHT, i dont care about being RIGHT or wrong, I am not going to say you are wrong but to you that seems to be the most important thing.
It seems you have a difficult time discussing differences and having a back and forth, that there must be a subservient and you must dictate the discussion to your terms and your requirements. That will not work with me.
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
@wallstreetcappers Then prove your contention and substantiate it. I did; you did not.
Right because you said so but what did you say outside that my contention was wrong and yours was right? You said that there is no way to challenge the King, so that makes you right?'
'Notice a theme here, you are personal and petty with your comments and you must be RIGHT, i dont care about being RIGHT or wrong, I am not going to say you are wrong but to you that seems to be the most important thing.
It seems you have a difficult time discussing differences and having a back and forth, that there must be a subservient and you must dictate the discussion to your terms and your requirements. That will not work with me.
No sir. It was not my contention at all. You brought it up. That was why I asked where you got that from. Then I simply provided you with anti-Trump legal analysis that concluded it is not. And others have said it as well. But a lot of them are pro-Trump. That is why I used his analysis. But you only have your non-legal/constitution opinion. You do not back it up with anything other than that. If this were the case, as I said, everyone would have come out and said so and got the ball rolling to stop him; they haven’t for a few reasons and I provided you the reasons.
As I have said before you have lost all credibility when it comes to Trump because you do not like him and you make everything partisan with your Far Left ideology. This does not even have to be a partisan issue. It can be a good issue to discuss no matter one’s politics. But when it comes down to not agreeing with it just because Trump is doing it — that gets old pretty quick.
At some point, you guys on the Far Left should acknowledge at least some of the good the guy has done so far, but you never do.
The Democrat in California at least came out and said you have to give Trump credit that illegals have stopped. But I am sure they will run him out of the Democrat party for that if he is not careful. It is just weird that folks hate the guy so much that they will not give credit where credit is due. They try to spin everything as a negative with him; and it is not all negative.
@wallstreetcappers
No sir. It was not my contention at all. You brought it up. That was why I asked where you got that from. Then I simply provided you with anti-Trump legal analysis that concluded it is not. And others have said it as well. But a lot of them are pro-Trump. That is why I used his analysis. But you only have your non-legal/constitution opinion. You do not back it up with anything other than that. If this were the case, as I said, everyone would have come out and said so and got the ball rolling to stop him; they haven’t for a few reasons and I provided you the reasons.
As I have said before you have lost all credibility when it comes to Trump because you do not like him and you make everything partisan with your Far Left ideology. This does not even have to be a partisan issue. It can be a good issue to discuss no matter one’s politics. But when it comes down to not agreeing with it just because Trump is doing it — that gets old pretty quick.
At some point, you guys on the Far Left should acknowledge at least some of the good the guy has done so far, but you never do.
The Democrat in California at least came out and said you have to give Trump credit that illegals have stopped. But I am sure they will run him out of the Democrat party for that if he is not careful. It is just weird that folks hate the guy so much that they will not give credit where credit is due. They try to spin everything as a negative with him; and it is not all negative.
Far Left rant, check, dislike Trump rant check, what else did you say above that is anything more than "others agree with me" and that my view is wrong? Anything at all?
Quick question.....are we at WAR, what is our EMERGENCY? The emergency that started in Jan not some rambling schtick about trade imbalances, that is not an emergency that is a farce, that is a lie that is deception to achieve a fascist power grab.
I left out California, you threw that zinger in there, that has to be your best retort it is that solid.
@Raiders22
Oy...
Far Left rant, check, dislike Trump rant check, what else did you say above that is anything more than "others agree with me" and that my view is wrong? Anything at all?
Quick question.....are we at WAR, what is our EMERGENCY? The emergency that started in Jan not some rambling schtick about trade imbalances, that is not an emergency that is a farce, that is a lie that is deception to achieve a fascist power grab.
I left out California, you threw that zinger in there, that has to be your best retort it is that solid.
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @THEMUGG LOL So you gonna actually make a contention and back up your weak retort or are you just going to lean on your big words of liberals, media, lies, slander, Biden and waste more time when you could be actually having real conversation by making effort to add to discussion?I have.........I replied to the nonsense posted by third. If you haven't noticed, he is posting off-topic & I'm responding to his assertions, not yours. Interesting that you're not harping on him to make an effort to add to discussion. Why is that?
Most of us know why. Third is a bot and anything WSC says to that "poster" will not get answered unless it's more propaganda to go with the answer. WSC knows this which is why WSC never tries to have a discussion with Third. WSC is good to harp on the right by saying the right only attacks the left. Go click on thirds name. Everything reads like left leaning propaganda and literally no discussions or original thoughts that a human would have.
@THEMUGG
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @THEMUGG LOL So you gonna actually make a contention and back up your weak retort or are you just going to lean on your big words of liberals, media, lies, slander, Biden and waste more time when you could be actually having real conversation by making effort to add to discussion?I have.........I replied to the nonsense posted by third. If you haven't noticed, he is posting off-topic & I'm responding to his assertions, not yours. Interesting that you're not harping on him to make an effort to add to discussion. Why is that?
Most of us know why. Third is a bot and anything WSC says to that "poster" will not get answered unless it's more propaganda to go with the answer. WSC knows this which is why WSC never tries to have a discussion with Third. WSC is good to harp on the right by saying the right only attacks the left. Go click on thirds name. Everything reads like left leaning propaganda and literally no discussions or original thoughts that a human would have.
@THEMUGG Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG: Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @THEMUGG LOL So you gonna actually make a contention and back up your weak retort or are you just going to lean on your big words of liberals, media, lies, slander, Biden and waste more time when you could be actually having real conversation by making effort to add to discussion?I have.........I replied to the nonsense posted by third. If you haven't noticed, he is posting off-topic & I'm responding to his assertions, not yours. Interesting that you're not harping on him to make an effort to add to discussion. Why is that? Most of us know why. Third is a bot and anything WSC says to that "poster" will not get answered unless it's more propaganda to go with the answer. WSC knows this which is why WSC never tries to have a discussion with Third. WSC is good to harp on the right by saying the right only attacks the left. Go click on thirds name. Everything reads like left leaning propaganda and literally no discussions or original thoughts that a human would have.
This post shows the IQ level of all maga's and why the country is stuck with the most awful President ever. There is no BOTS posting answers in the political section of this sports forum, but hey you keep on believing that non sense because you dont like the guys anwsers
Quote Originally Posted by BigGame90:
@THEMUGG Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG: Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @THEMUGG LOL So you gonna actually make a contention and back up your weak retort or are you just going to lean on your big words of liberals, media, lies, slander, Biden and waste more time when you could be actually having real conversation by making effort to add to discussion?I have.........I replied to the nonsense posted by third. If you haven't noticed, he is posting off-topic & I'm responding to his assertions, not yours. Interesting that you're not harping on him to make an effort to add to discussion. Why is that? Most of us know why. Third is a bot and anything WSC says to that "poster" will not get answered unless it's more propaganda to go with the answer. WSC knows this which is why WSC never tries to have a discussion with Third. WSC is good to harp on the right by saying the right only attacks the left. Go click on thirds name. Everything reads like left leaning propaganda and literally no discussions or original thoughts that a human would have.
This post shows the IQ level of all maga's and why the country is stuck with the most awful President ever. There is no BOTS posting answers in the political section of this sports forum, but hey you keep on believing that non sense because you dont like the guys anwsers
The Congressman was from California. He just happens to be the only one on the Left that has given Trump any credit.
that is a lie that is deception
Okay, this is good. Without making it partisan like you do with every single topic about Trump — explain why it is a lie and a deception. You don’t believe that is true? Nearly all on the Left acknowledge that to be true. So, why do you think it is not true and a farce?
@wallstreetcappers
The Congressman was from California. He just happens to be the only one on the Left that has given Trump any credit.
that is a lie that is deception
Okay, this is good. Without making it partisan like you do with every single topic about Trump — explain why it is a lie and a deception. You don’t believe that is true? Nearly all on the Left acknowledge that to be true. So, why do you think it is not true and a farce?
I asked you two times and that answer is also the answer to the question you just asked.
So for time number 3- Are we at war? What is the emergency that started in Jan which warrants the use of an executive order? There is no war there is no emergency thus the premise he used to usurp congress is based on a lie and is against the law.
Ok, time number 3, are you going to answer this time? No you wont...just hit me with the I am wrong and all your pocket experts are right and left this liberals that and whatever non-answer nonsense you can come up with.
@Raiders22
I asked you two times and that answer is also the answer to the question you just asked.
So for time number 3- Are we at war? What is the emergency that started in Jan which warrants the use of an executive order? There is no war there is no emergency thus the premise he used to usurp congress is based on a lie and is against the law.
Ok, time number 3, are you going to answer this time? No you wont...just hit me with the I am wrong and all your pocket experts are right and left this liberals that and whatever non-answer nonsense you can come up with.
I think he explained it very well. It is a dire situation for the USA and something needed to be done. There absolutely is an imbalance and something should be done. Even Democrats have talked about this before. That coupled with the debt the USA has and the spending problem it has, something has to be done. They have explained very well their reasoning behind this and their expectations. So, yes it can be seen as an emergency and it can be seen as a trade war. Sure, all of that is true. But the question is whether the desired results will happen from this. The other question is if not now, when do you do something about it. Because it is getting worse and worse. Then the question is if this is not what you want to do — what do you do. You cannot just continue down the path you are on. It is trickier than folks think and this is actually a unique attempt to solve three problems at once. So, we shall see what happens. As I said elsewhere, he is also on a limited time schedule, so there is a sense of urgency. But time will tell.
@wallstreetcappers
I think he explained it very well. It is a dire situation for the USA and something needed to be done. There absolutely is an imbalance and something should be done. Even Democrats have talked about this before. That coupled with the debt the USA has and the spending problem it has, something has to be done. They have explained very well their reasoning behind this and their expectations. So, yes it can be seen as an emergency and it can be seen as a trade war. Sure, all of that is true. But the question is whether the desired results will happen from this. The other question is if not now, when do you do something about it. Because it is getting worse and worse. Then the question is if this is not what you want to do — what do you do. You cannot just continue down the path you are on. It is trickier than folks think and this is actually a unique attempt to solve three problems at once. So, we shall see what happens. As I said elsewhere, he is also on a limited time schedule, so there is a sense of urgency. But time will tell.
Your answer is NO there is no emergency, thus he is breaking the law. Earlier you said that it would be tough to reverse and charge but that does not mean he is NOT breaking the law. He is going around the other branches of government using lies and deception and to me that is a crime. As I said earlier too, Trump has a long long history of distortion, lying and deception and it has cost him several businesses, it got him in legal troubles more than once and it is why NY took him to court.
There is no emergency it is nonsense and you didnt answer my question posed two times...if Biden had used the same flim flam executive order to erase student debt and give a tax credit for 20 years of payments to students saying there is an emergency that secondary education costs are out of control and it is a national emergency!!! What would your side have done if he had pulled that stunt? You would have been ranting and raving like you did during the MINI student loan attempt. This is much much worse with much worse consequences and yet since Trump is pulling the scheme you are on board. Sounds lovely.
@Raiders22
Your answer is NO there is no emergency, thus he is breaking the law. Earlier you said that it would be tough to reverse and charge but that does not mean he is NOT breaking the law. He is going around the other branches of government using lies and deception and to me that is a crime. As I said earlier too, Trump has a long long history of distortion, lying and deception and it has cost him several businesses, it got him in legal troubles more than once and it is why NY took him to court.
There is no emergency it is nonsense and you didnt answer my question posed two times...if Biden had used the same flim flam executive order to erase student debt and give a tax credit for 20 years of payments to students saying there is an emergency that secondary education costs are out of control and it is a national emergency!!! What would your side have done if he had pulled that stunt? You would have been ranting and raving like you did during the MINI student loan attempt. This is much much worse with much worse consequences and yet since Trump is pulling the scheme you are on board. Sounds lovely.
Are we at war? What's with all these state of national emergencies!!
In addition to being in a perpetual state of national emergency due to terrorist threats since Sept. 11, 2001, the United States is also under several decades-long national emergencies that President Joe Biden extended by executive order.
The orders were extended after the FBI and members of Congress have warned of increased terrorism threats in the last year and as the greatest number of illegal border crossers have been identified on the terrorist watch list under the Biden-Harris administration in U.S. history. (Self inflicted)
---On Sept. 18, Biden extended an executive order, “Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism,” for another year. It’s been extended since Sept. 23, 2001, when it was issued by former president George W. Bush.
---Biden also extended another executive order issued by former President Donald Trump on Sept. 9, 2019, “to strengthen and consolidate sanctions to combat the continuing threat posed by international terrorism and to take additional steps to deal with the national emergency.”
---On Oct. 11, Biden extended another national emergency executive order related to Colombia-based narcotics trafficking.
---On Oct. 11, Biden also extended a national emergency order related to the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
---This is after Biden in February extended a national emergency order related to Afghanistan after first issuing it on Feb. 11, 2022. It relates to “the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by” turmoil in Afghanistan after Biden relinquished control to the Taliban six months earlier.
Are we at war? What's with all these state of national emergencies!!
In addition to being in a perpetual state of national emergency due to terrorist threats since Sept. 11, 2001, the United States is also under several decades-long national emergencies that President Joe Biden extended by executive order.
The orders were extended after the FBI and members of Congress have warned of increased terrorism threats in the last year and as the greatest number of illegal border crossers have been identified on the terrorist watch list under the Biden-Harris administration in U.S. history. (Self inflicted)
---On Sept. 18, Biden extended an executive order, “Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism,” for another year. It’s been extended since Sept. 23, 2001, when it was issued by former president George W. Bush.
---Biden also extended another executive order issued by former President Donald Trump on Sept. 9, 2019, “to strengthen and consolidate sanctions to combat the continuing threat posed by international terrorism and to take additional steps to deal with the national emergency.”
---On Oct. 11, Biden extended another national emergency executive order related to Colombia-based narcotics trafficking.
---On Oct. 11, Biden also extended a national emergency order related to the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
---This is after Biden in February extended a national emergency order related to Afghanistan after first issuing it on Feb. 11, 2022. It relates to “the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by” turmoil in Afghanistan after Biden relinquished control to the Taliban six months earlier.
So back to the thread... 177,000 whole jobs wow stunning absolutely spectacular.... Democrats will win in a land slide way to go boys keep up the good work....
So back to the thread... 177,000 whole jobs wow stunning absolutely spectacular.... Democrats will win in a land slide way to go boys keep up the good work....
Are we at war? What's with all these state of national emergencies!! In addition to being in a perpetual state of national emergency due to terrorist threats since Sept. 11, 2001, the United States is also under several decades-long national emergencies that President Joe Biden extended by executive order. The orders were extended after the FBI and members of Congress have warned of increased terrorism threats in the last year and as the greatest number of illegal border crossers have been identified on the terrorist watch list under the Biden-Harris administration in U.S. history. (Self inflicted) ---On Sept. 18, Biden extended an executive order, “Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism,” for another year. It’s been extended since Sept. 23, 2001, when it was issued by former president George W. Bush. ---Biden also extended another executive order issued by former President Donald Trump on Sept. 9, 2019, “to strengthen and consolidate sanctions to combat the continuing threat posed by international terrorism and to take additional steps to deal with the national emergency.” ---On Oct. 11, Biden extended another national emergency executive order related to Colombia-based narcotics trafficking. ---On Oct. 11, Biden also extended a national emergency order related to the Democratic Republic of the Congo. ---This is after Biden in February extended a national emergency order related to Afghanistan after first issuing it on Feb. 11, 2022. It relates to “the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by” turmoil in Afghanistan after Biden relinquished control to the Taliban six months earlier.
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:
Are we at war? What's with all these state of national emergencies!! In addition to being in a perpetual state of national emergency due to terrorist threats since Sept. 11, 2001, the United States is also under several decades-long national emergencies that President Joe Biden extended by executive order. The orders were extended after the FBI and members of Congress have warned of increased terrorism threats in the last year and as the greatest number of illegal border crossers have been identified on the terrorist watch list under the Biden-Harris administration in U.S. history. (Self inflicted) ---On Sept. 18, Biden extended an executive order, “Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism,” for another year. It’s been extended since Sept. 23, 2001, when it was issued by former president George W. Bush. ---Biden also extended another executive order issued by former President Donald Trump on Sept. 9, 2019, “to strengthen and consolidate sanctions to combat the continuing threat posed by international terrorism and to take additional steps to deal with the national emergency.” ---On Oct. 11, Biden extended another national emergency executive order related to Colombia-based narcotics trafficking. ---On Oct. 11, Biden also extended a national emergency order related to the Democratic Republic of the Congo. ---This is after Biden in February extended a national emergency order related to Afghanistan after first issuing it on Feb. 11, 2022. It relates to “the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by” turmoil in Afghanistan after Biden relinquished control to the Taliban six months earlier.
@THEMUGG How do you say that? He posts news summaries and his views? You might not agree with him but he has discussion and content light years ahead of your droning on with the same 5 or so key words. Go click on your username and read the rinse and repeat messages you make. You are either agreeing with one or two members and digging on liberals or you are complaining to the left members and blaming Biden. Cant you come up with more than just blaming and bashing liberals?
Why are you only concerned with what I post? There are 5-6 of your boys that do nothing but blame/bash Trump/conservatives for a living here. Have you become numb to it? Or is it simply OK with you because it supports your viewpoint? Look at the first page of this forum.......how many have "Trump" in the title? And you're worried about me bashing libs? Third, as he always does, found some poll that supports his POV & I replied with my opinion. Perhaps you should go around to all the Trump bashers here & pose the same question.
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@THEMUGG How do you say that? He posts news summaries and his views? You might not agree with him but he has discussion and content light years ahead of your droning on with the same 5 or so key words. Go click on your username and read the rinse and repeat messages you make. You are either agreeing with one or two members and digging on liberals or you are complaining to the left members and blaming Biden. Cant you come up with more than just blaming and bashing liberals?
Why are you only concerned with what I post? There are 5-6 of your boys that do nothing but blame/bash Trump/conservatives for a living here. Have you become numb to it? Or is it simply OK with you because it supports your viewpoint? Look at the first page of this forum.......how many have "Trump" in the title? And you're worried about me bashing libs? Third, as he always does, found some poll that supports his POV & I replied with my opinion. Perhaps you should go around to all the Trump bashers here & pose the same question.
Oh I completely 100% disagree with you, if one legal course has standing then ALL of them do, a green card and visa are legal documents which have been validated from our judicial process and are used for varying purposes. If a judge order has no meaning in your view then what good is our legal process and in return the visa and green card is also invalid and if any POTUS wants to vaporize them, then per YOU it would be acceptable..per YOU.
Its a slippery slope saying that a legal order can be invalid and reversed from another branch, where do you stop with that line of thinking? Its also what stinks about POTUS pardons, I consider them to be equally as toxic.
@soup-can
Oh I completely 100% disagree with you, if one legal course has standing then ALL of them do, a green card and visa are legal documents which have been validated from our judicial process and are used for varying purposes. If a judge order has no meaning in your view then what good is our legal process and in return the visa and green card is also invalid and if any POTUS wants to vaporize them, then per YOU it would be acceptable..per YOU.
Its a slippery slope saying that a legal order can be invalid and reversed from another branch, where do you stop with that line of thinking? Its also what stinks about POTUS pardons, I consider them to be equally as toxic.
Oh to me as strongly as you give a PASS to Trump regarding his use of his fascist power grab I say the exact opposite. We are not in a state of emergency, we are a consumption based economy, we are not a manufacturing economy and have not been for decades this is due to our higher labor base and the lack of motivation from our citizens to do the kind of jobs that have been offshored for decades. We are in NO emergency, this is a power grab, fake lie and is against the law.
Saying that congress would stop a dictator is amusing it really is, nothing but pure folly on your part. The comparison of student loan emergency vs consumption based imbalance is completely the same. You see this trade imbalance since JANUARY as an emergency, I do not...many people who have suffered through higher ed inflation and higher interest rates see their personal finance as an emergency, you do not. It is completely subjective and one is no different...if you were to try and float the Bush logic (which was also false) about deporting 9-11 people and it being an overreach you would have greater support than this hilarious trade imbalance lie scheme.
@Raiders22
Oh to me as strongly as you give a PASS to Trump regarding his use of his fascist power grab I say the exact opposite. We are not in a state of emergency, we are a consumption based economy, we are not a manufacturing economy and have not been for decades this is due to our higher labor base and the lack of motivation from our citizens to do the kind of jobs that have been offshored for decades. We are in NO emergency, this is a power grab, fake lie and is against the law.
Saying that congress would stop a dictator is amusing it really is, nothing but pure folly on your part. The comparison of student loan emergency vs consumption based imbalance is completely the same. You see this trade imbalance since JANUARY as an emergency, I do not...many people who have suffered through higher ed inflation and higher interest rates see their personal finance as an emergency, you do not. It is completely subjective and one is no different...if you were to try and float the Bush logic (which was also false) about deporting 9-11 people and it being an overreach you would have greater support than this hilarious trade imbalance lie scheme.
Big difference, show me where the 5-6 go outside their group to have discussion and personally attack your group, that does not happen. There are PLENTY of members on both sides who post general media partisan nonsense and unless it becomes combative who cares? The line is drawn when the insults become member to member and that is the concern. You were not boxed or banned, you just take shots at other members and I ask what is the purpose of droning NUMBING as you said content, you really do not add any content to discussion at all. You are either hand shaking one of your side or droning on about liberals and Biden, that seems to be all you have and I asked you why that is the case?
@THEMUGG
Big difference, show me where the 5-6 go outside their group to have discussion and personally attack your group, that does not happen. There are PLENTY of members on both sides who post general media partisan nonsense and unless it becomes combative who cares? The line is drawn when the insults become member to member and that is the concern. You were not boxed or banned, you just take shots at other members and I ask what is the purpose of droning NUMBING as you said content, you really do not add any content to discussion at all. You are either hand shaking one of your side or droning on about liberals and Biden, that seems to be all you have and I asked you why that is the case?
Living in AZ for two decades I consider what you said as partisan bluster, that also is not what the dictator KING power grab is about completely. There is due process and for you to suggest that due process can be removed when the POTUS alone decides is a very poor position to have as a citizen of this country. No POTUS should be celebrated for usurping our rights and our process as a country. Trump is sliding down that dictator slope and you have followed his path because you are part of the TNC party and you agree with their narrative.
Are you really concerned about the border to the extent that you would debase and destroy due process? If so then why are you not supporting a serious investment on a very long term basis to help improve a situation you feel is deserving of destroying our due process rights? If you want the border to be sealed then seal it, we have never in the history of the country spent the time and resources to seal the border, the concept and issue is used as a power grab and vote grab we are not serious about changing the border dynamic. The investment and resource requirements are enormous and I do not see Trump plowing forward to fix the border, I do see Trump using the partisan tool to take power and validating it from this mythical boogie man like a true dictator.
@UNIMAN
Living in AZ for two decades I consider what you said as partisan bluster, that also is not what the dictator KING power grab is about completely. There is due process and for you to suggest that due process can be removed when the POTUS alone decides is a very poor position to have as a citizen of this country. No POTUS should be celebrated for usurping our rights and our process as a country. Trump is sliding down that dictator slope and you have followed his path because you are part of the TNC party and you agree with their narrative.
Are you really concerned about the border to the extent that you would debase and destroy due process? If so then why are you not supporting a serious investment on a very long term basis to help improve a situation you feel is deserving of destroying our due process rights? If you want the border to be sealed then seal it, we have never in the history of the country spent the time and resources to seal the border, the concept and issue is used as a power grab and vote grab we are not serious about changing the border dynamic. The investment and resource requirements are enormous and I do not see Trump plowing forward to fix the border, I do see Trump using the partisan tool to take power and validating it from this mythical boogie man like a true dictator.
Fascist? That is not the sign of deregulating government and privatizing business.
How exactly is it a power grab? To accomplish what? It is plainly not against the law, this is pretty much established by now.
No it is not amusing to say Congress would stop a dictator. I also think you should double check the definition of a dictator. Personal student loan debt is nowhere near the same as a national debt or trade imbalance or spending problem.
No, I do not see the trade imbalance ‘since January’ as an emergency. I see it as emergency for far longer than that. Then coupled with the spending problem and the debt problem, illegals etc. All of that constitutes a crisis that has to be dealt with at some point. It is a serious problem.
Again, if not now, when do you deal with it. If not this way, how do you deal with it. This is a very unique way to attempt to address all three problems at once. No one else has even attempted to fix these things. For sure Congress cannot be relied upon to fix them. We have seen that for sure.
@wallstreetcappers
Fascist? That is not the sign of deregulating government and privatizing business.
How exactly is it a power grab? To accomplish what? It is plainly not against the law, this is pretty much established by now.
No it is not amusing to say Congress would stop a dictator. I also think you should double check the definition of a dictator. Personal student loan debt is nowhere near the same as a national debt or trade imbalance or spending problem.
No, I do not see the trade imbalance ‘since January’ as an emergency. I see it as emergency for far longer than that. Then coupled with the spending problem and the debt problem, illegals etc. All of that constitutes a crisis that has to be dealt with at some point. It is a serious problem.
Again, if not now, when do you deal with it. If not this way, how do you deal with it. This is a very unique way to attempt to address all three problems at once. No one else has even attempted to fix these things. For sure Congress cannot be relied upon to fix them. We have seen that for sure.
Go click on thirds name. Everything reads like left leaning propaganda and literally no discussions or original thoughts that a human would have. 
Hot Forum Topics
