Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
I can understand how some people theorize that Flight 93 was shot down. I don't think the facts bear that out, particulalry the phone calls made (which could only have been made by the flight traveling under roughly 10,000 feet, which supports the official version of events).
But I don't understand the Pentagon missle theory unless you believe that the entire 9/11 event was one big conspiracy. Was the idea that fabricating a plane flying into the Pentagon the thing that would really push us into war?
Outside of that, let's think about this..
1) OBL admitted orchestrating it.
2) We know who the hijackers were. Pilots and flight attendants contacted authorities after hijacking. Are truthers suggesting that they were plants of the US government to act as the fall guys?
3) Why war in Afghan? If it was a vast conspiracy under the Operation Northwoods auspice, why not a country like Iraq. War in Afghan didn't provide us any strategic assistance in terms of location, oil, etc.
4) I understand the argument that our government has lied. But this isn't akin to JFK conspiracy which could've been carried out by a very select few. Rather, think of the hundreds, maybe thousands of people that would have been involved. Yet, outside of wild theories, there are no verifiable facts to support, and what is the motivation? (Yes, I realize that Operation Northwoods was about a reason to attack Cuba, but that was based on strategic means because of Cuba's proximity...again, Afghan is not comparable).
official version? check out FIREMEN FOR 911 TRUTH compare their version to the "OFFICIAL' version, hundreds of firemen are swearing that those towers were EXPLODING while they were in them and the govt. says they are all lying.
would a plane attack push us into a war? perhaps not, however it will and did generate the support needed to go to war.
OBL admitted it,...why wouldnt he? why wouldnt he take credit for the worst attack on america since pearl harbor?
pilots and attendants knew who the hi-jackers were? how? they dont carry a passenger list in their pockets.
why afghanistan and not iraq? uhh, we did go to war with iraq, thats why the commanders on the ground afghanistan kept stepping down, because in their own words, they were not willing to risk the lives of our troops for no other reason than "OIL"!
you say you you "understand that our govt. lied"
well a cover-up is defined as omitting,distorting, or LIEING about the facts.
so you would be more likely to think that all the police, firemen, rescue workers, and civilians that were in those buildings that claim there were explosions are lieing, and the 9-11 commission that says there were NO EXPLOSIONS is telling the truth?
what possible reason can you give me for these beliefs?
like i said, check out "firemen for 9-11 truth", and you'll see the director of emergency services for the WTC tell his version of what happened in building 7 (the one that wasnt touched) how there was an EXPLOSION as he and another worker reached the 6th floor escaping the building, and how when fire fighters finally found them and led them out, kept telling them not to look down, because they were stepping on the bodies of the people that had been killed in the explosion, and how he was told that if he told that story again he would lose his job, and how he eventually did tell his story again and 2 weeks before it was released he died of unknown causes. check it out for yourselves
USA - USA - USA. 
Hot Forum Topics
