@unplucked_gem
My evaluation is about the words and actions of the individual not the partisan affiliation. Ive been critical of MANY on the DNC side when their words/actions are deserving of commentary where I do not recall you having anything to say about the words and actions of your chosen leader, instead you toss out a comment about confliction, flexibility and reason...aka deflection.
Trump was in office, prior to him being in office he was critical because that is his nature, being critical and evaluating is not the problem it is the claims and abuses he makes, THAT is the problem. You cannot say that if you were in office XYZ does not happen or would be resolved in a day, you cannot suggest that you would not take actions the way someone else did and then take WORSE actions yourself, this is hypocrisy in its most pure definition.
Notice something peculiar to the TNC braindead group, Trump does something which is atrocious, he is a hypocrite in the process and deserves a slap down for his toxic past comments and criticisms, notice that the DNC commentary are about his actions and decisions and are absolutely NOTHING compared to the method and words that Trump, used and USES today. Who goes on their owned social media to communicate to the country and to continue to politically abuse other people? Trump does..this is not the way you communicate and create unity in this country it is the way you divide and destroy to gain power.
Wrong is not that things happen based on situation or position, wrong is how you berate other people before, during and after and while IN the position. Wrong is being a hypocrite and still thinking for some deranged reason that when things happen to Trump it is OK and there are deflecting validations, but when something LESSER happens to others it is scorch earth rabid dog attacking and THAT is valid and acceptable.
I know you will deflect till the cows come home or better yet make a personal insult and act like there are too many words to read, I suggest you do not stoop to insults because I wont put up with it ever again from you or others on your side.
@wallstreetcappers
Wrong is not that things happen based on situation or position, wrong is how you berate other people before, during and after and while IN the position. Wrong is being a hypocrite and still thinking for some deranged reason that when things happen to Trump it is OK and there are deflecting validations, but when something LESSER happens to others it is scorch earth rabid dog attacking and THAT is valid and acceptable.
I know you will deflect till the cows come home or better yet make a personal insult and act like there are too many words to read, I suggest you do not stoop to insults because I wont put up with it ever again from you or others on your side.
Really well-said. 
@THEMUGG
So a deflect to another topic and blame Biden for illegals move huh? Biden gave money away and yet this admin does what? Is Trump running a balanced budget or are deficits going higher under Trump? Ive addressed this many times, no politician wants to run a balanced budget so my choice given this reality is to spend on social programs domestically and the negative nuances that come with this reality versus spending on wars, weapons and invasions.
I did not say Biden is transparent, your retort to the follies of Trump is to blame and deflect to Biden, and you did it in two consecutive messages, that is not the way you address a point by blaming someone else. Get back to the topic and find a better answer than to deflect and divert.
The B-2 stealth bombers used to attack the Fordow nuclear enrichment plant are equipped with toilets, microwaves and usually a cooler for snacks to make life more comfortable for the pilots who were stuck in the cockpit for the 37-hour trip from Missouri to Iran and back.
Pilots for these types of aircraft are trained to endure long, grueling flights, with past crews bringing cots aboard or even full camping pads
It better have a toilet ..or it would pretty messy up in here.
Deflect what?
Very clearly articulated thoughts in clear, concise, and non meandering post.
Now since you made it personal, I'll offer the follwing:
I am not the only one who has mentioned excessively long posts that weave many points into one circular argument.
You are the only one who routinely seems to take issue with my interactions. Further, you grind your axe with many. Its only that your partisan views mirror theirs that you're agreed with or tolerated.
I work in sales for DEFENSE and I can tell you they are not “that nice”.. Don’t get me wrong , they are better/nicer than your run of the mill fighter jet BUT it’s still cramped quarters. I’ve never actually seen the inside of one of these ( in person ) but I’ve seen pics of “certain” parts that may pertain to what I sale .. from what I’ve seen , I would say more cramped than a sub..From my understanding they do have a portable type toilet.. on that note , what if they had to release the “waste” in flight 
..hopefully it’s over a ocean , if not , you will get a pudding shower
@wallstreetcappers
"I wont put up with it ever again from you or others on your side."
If I were a moderator, i'd probably pharse it "either side".
Also, please don't come here to talk about a topic and use your administrative powers to threaten members
"I suggest you do not stoop to insults because I wont put up with it ever again from you or others on your side."
As you've suggested in the past, with your history why would you come in Slims thread and make trouble....just bad form all around.
@superbeets
I work in sales for DEFENSE and I can tell you they are not “that nice”.. Don’t get me wrong , they are better/nicer than your run of the mill fighter jet BUT it’s still cramped quarters. I’ve never actually seen the inside of one of these ( in person ) but I’ve seen pics of “certain” parts that may pertain to what I sale .. from what I’ve seen , I would say more cramped than a sub..From my understanding they do have a portable type toilet.. on that note , what if they had to release the “waste” in flight ..hopefully it’s over a ocean , if not , you will get a pudding shower
I was hoping that they released their blue ice at the bombing site......a real bombs away...
Allow me Edison, you are one kool-aid drinking fool that seems to think we think you are nothing but a deluded never due mind. Of that you are correct. Pick Up a history book and read till you get it. Quit listening to whatever it is you are listening to. Unhook for a week from all except your own thoughts. I heard from reliable sources you may poke your head out of the rabbit hole if applied. Good luck to you.
With positions about the bombings and politicians flip flopping stated and established, it'd be advantageous to table for 30 days to see what comes to fruition.
But here's my prediction:
1) Iran spouts off a few missiles in a last gasp of a dying empire
2) The leader doesn't make it at the hands of US, but likely Isreal.
Haven't quite worked out what happens after that, but no one is carrying the torch as Isreal wont let that happen.
Well see.
@wallstreetcappers
"instead you toss out a comment about confliction, flexibility and reason...aka deflection."
Wait, I missed this.
So me feeling based on their rhetoric and past actions Iran having nuclear capability isn't such a great idea, but i think its messed up for nuclear powers to decide (and act) their future isn't confliction but deflection?
Confliction:
1) the act or state of conflicting or clashing;
2) the state of being full of opposing or conflicting emotions or impulses.
Delflecting:
1) to turn (something) aside especially from a straight course or fixed direction
So, I think you're wrong cause my course is fixed in Iran not having nuclear capability but having clashing emotions.
@unplucked_gem
The only issue of mod value is you making personal remarks, that is it. If you cannot handle a message more than a few lines then quit engaging with me. The mod power stuff is so stale, had I really done what you suggested there would be several lost long ago for breaking the rules.
You like to mix rules and partisan topics when the exact reverse is really true. One partisan side has never been able to control their messages and resort to personal attacks much more than the other and when I say your group I say those who resort to personal attacks and insults. I leave the party association up to you but for sure there has always been linkage to which political pile personally insults more than another. All sides make politician based insults and that is allowed to a further extent than member to member is. I dont care what party you like if you break member to member rules you will likely find consequence. If you feel a member has broken a rule and especially if a member has broken a rule unprovoked with NO involvement from the other side, please report it. We review every report sent but weigh the report with the member reporting it, the history of the member reporting it on the member they are reporting. These big words mean we weigh out all the history and evidence not just that one of you guys is trying to make a point by sending a report which is not valid.
@wallstreetcappers
I disagree.
Slims thread isn't the place to address. I'll just find the US address for accepting service as I have the Ireland address and the Halifax address and covers and I can discuss terms of use, user agreements, and any contracts or subsequent breaches.
We promise to be consistent and fair in any disputes that arise within the forum, and will try to keep any bans/suspensions/censorship to an acceptable minimum.
We will not engage in any unfounded personal attacks on other people or websites. We cannot promise the same for other members, but if they do decide to engage in such behavior, we will take the appropriate actions
Make this about me all you want, the receipts of your past words, boxings, and bannings tell a different tale.
In fulfilling the aforementioned covers.com promise, you're an abject failure as a moderator and use your powers to punish those who disagree with you often when no rules violation exists.
Thats a legitimate argument and calling it stale seems like deflection to me
@unplucked_gem
Im saying you use it as an excuse in a retort versus only dealing with topic based content. You fall back on bad mod or too many words because you either cannot or do not want to actually address the topic and content alone.
If my words are too much for you then do not reply and engage with me, I do not insult your style or your wording I only take issue with your deflection and contention IF that is the case.
You can throw the mod card all you want and as I mentioned with so many words you can also send in a legit user report which will be looked at and decided if you are with clean hands and have a valid issue trying to HELP the site or if you are just throwing darts trying to get other members in trouble. Most user reports are retorts and attempts to get others in trouble when the are involved and responsible and are rule breakers themselves, those rarely get attention.
Maybe it's a little campsite style John. Maybe it's literally, "Can you hand me the toilet?"
I get a kick out of the fact we're using those things. They were amazing to a child in the 90s. Spaced age in design.The stuff of action movies. We didn't call them B-2s. They were simply Stealth Bombers. You would rarely hear about us actually using them though. Maybe we were all along. Northrop Grummen is currently working on it's next gen successor.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
