Posted:
#801
Psy ops dl. Psy ops dl.
Presidential Election
Posted:
#802
Huh? What does pay ops even meanin this context?
Since we all know rassmusen is inaccurate, why would you form and opinion on an inaccurate source. I never get it how people cry and complain about media or polling bias yet manufacture their perspective based on such well known biased sources information.
I guess I'm learning with Trump supporters tho that if they were to base their vote on reality, facts, numbers because doing so would result in their delusional point of view coming crashing down and their head exploding. So rather than Manning up an facing reality and embracing truth and trying to improve their life and America, they are instead relegated to delusions, wild conspiracy theories, angry emotional irrational thinking and misc insanity.
You would think on a serious policitcal betting thread people would make logical, rational and frankly coherent comments. But I guess trump supporters have to be true to who they are and how they think
Posted:
#803
I will give you 1, true conspiracy theory while I have a couple of minutes. WJC has a black son named Danney Williams. The mother was a prostitute in Little Rock. Bill was her only white client. This true story is completely blackballed by the MSM. I for the life of me can not make this stuff up.
Posted:
#804
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
I will give you 1, true conspiracy theory while I have a couple of minutes. WJC has a black son named Danney Williams. The mother was a prostitute in Little Rock. Bill was her only white client. This true story is completely blackballed by the MSM. I for the life of me can not make this stuff up.
I will give you 1, true conspiracy theory while I have a couple of minutes. WJC has a black son named Danney Williams. The mother was a prostitute in Little Rock. Bill was her only white client. This true story is completely blackballed by the MSM. I for the life of me can not make this stuff up.
Bill Clinton has a black son. And you know this because you saw it on Drudge? If you believe everything that you see on Drudge than Sundance must also be 100% that HRC wears a wig. Or that Trump won the first debate running away. Dude.......you are lucky that your boss only took you for $100. I am certain that due to your gullible nature he could have swindled you out of more cash. To be honest, I really believe that your boss took advantage of you. He saw an easy mark and jumped on it. Shame on him!
Posted:
#805
Correction. I saw it on infowars. The son looks more like Bill than Bill looks like Bill. I listened to the interview yesterday. Danney is Bill's son. Good interview. It is up and running at infowars.com Bill actually has a heart with his son. HRC squashed everything. Take a listen. You will not hear this from any, biased Left wing news source.
Posted:
#806
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
The following is a copy/paste from Rasmussen. It looks like the feeling of feminized American's have quit hurting after hearing the 'p' word on tape from 11 years ago.
The latest Rasmussen Reports White House Watch national telephone and online survey shows Trump with 43% support among Likely U.S. Voters to Clinton’s 41%. Yesterday, Clinton still held a four-point 43% to 39% lead over Trump, but that was down from five points on Tuesday and her biggest lead ever of seven points on Monday.
Rut Roh.......Fox News just released a poll with Clinton up by 7 points.........But the Rasmussen Poll is much more accurate Sundance. Trump definitely holds a commanding lead in this race.
Posted:
#808
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
Correction. I saw it on infowars. The son looks more like Bill than Bill looks like Bill. I listened to the interview yesterday. Danney is Bill's son. Good interview. It is up and running at infowars.com Bill actually has a heart with his son. HRC squashed everything. Take a listen. You will not hear this from any, biased Left wing news source.
https://youtu.be/i4nCBryKYF8
This is the video from infowars Sundance........I watched it per your request. People will believe what they want to believe. I can understand why you want to believe that this is true. People will have to judge for themselves I guess. BOL
Posted:
#810
The only bet worth making now on my book is whether HRC goes over 369.5 electoral votes. What do you guys think? It's +155 over -195 under. I already have over 10 units on her but thinking there is still an opportunity for more. I can't stand either candidate so I might as well profit as much as possible. Any insight?
Posted:
#811
Quote Originally Posted by SteelUbaldo:
The only bet worth making now on my book is whether HRC goes over 369.5 electoral votes. What do you guys think? It's +155 over -195 under. I already have over 10 units on her but thinking there is still an opportunity for more. I can't stand either candidate so I might as well profit as much as possible. Any insight?
The only bet worth making now on my book is whether HRC goes over 369.5 electoral votes. What do you guys think? It's +155 over -195 under. I already have over 10 units on her but thinking there is still an opportunity for more. I can't stand either candidate so I might as well profit as much as possible. Any insight?
To go over 369.5 electoral votes, HRC has to win every battleground states (OH, NV, NC, and FL) PLUS UT, AZ and GA. That will cover 373 electoral votes, it's hard but if Trump keeps imploding. However, if there are pouring sexual assaults against him it could happen.
Posted:
#812
Choose war or peace. Hillary or Trump. Hillary and Obama mean the american people great harm. They trample the constitution on a daily basis, and media talks about groping. Please take a look at this, this isn't a a joke but the mainstream media is. and the joke is on all of us.
https://www.infowars.com/putin-ally-w...e-nuclear-war/
https://www.infowars.com/putin-ally-w...e-nuclear-war/
Posted:
#813
Quote Originally Posted by SteelUbaldo:
The only bet worth making now on my book is whether HRC goes over 369.5 electoral votes. What do you guys think? It's +155 over -195 under. I already have over 10 units on her but thinking there is still an opportunity for more. I can't stand either candidate so I might as well profit as much as possible. Any insight?
The only bet worth making now on my book is whether HRC goes over 369.5 electoral votes. What do you guys think? It's +155 over -195 under. I already have over 10 units on her but thinking there is still an opportunity for more. I can't stand either candidate so I might as well profit as much as possible. Any insight?
The reward of +155 is not worth the risk of over 369.5. Under is the prudent play here if you don't mind chalk.
Posted:
#815
Quote Originally Posted by SteelUbaldo:
The only bet worth making now on my book is whether HRC goes over 369.5 electoral votes. What do you guys think? It's +155 over -195 under. I already have over 10 units on her but thinking there is still an opportunity for more. I can't stand either candidate so I might as well profit as much as possible. Any insight?
The only bet worth making now on my book is whether HRC goes over 369.5 electoral votes. What do you guys think? It's +155 over -195 under. I already have over 10 units on her but thinking there is still an opportunity for more. I can't stand either candidate so I might as well profit as much as possible. Any insight?
i wouldn't play that but i did see they have whether the R nominee gets over/under 369.5 votes. under is 20-1. of course, betting 20-1 bets is generally stupid but this is about as close to free money as it gets if you want to tie up that kind of money for a few weeks.
Posted:
#816
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
i wouldn't play that but i did see they have whether the R nominee gets over/under 369.5 votes. under is 20-1. of course, betting 20-1 bets is generally stupid but this is about as close to free money as it gets if you want to tie up that kind of money for a few weeks.
i wouldn't play that but i did see they have whether the R nominee gets over/under 369.5 votes. under is 20-1. of course, betting 20-1 bets is generally stupid but this is about as close to free money as it gets if you want to tie up that kind of money for a few weeks.
That is free money. I would do it if the election were held during the summer. Just wouldn't tie up my bankroll during football season on a-2000 bet.
Posted:
#819
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
This thing is getting uglier as days go by, there are two more women came forward to accuse Trump for sexual assaults today.
This thing is getting uglier as days go by, there are two more women came forward to accuse Trump for sexual assaults today.
Just wondering if Hillary's odds could be climbing to -1000 in very short time.
Yea........this Trump train jumped the tracks. My position was filled in at -225 and -240 over the summer. However......I probably have OCD because I need my account balance to end in an even number every tonight. So whenever I have to I will throw one dollar at HRC to get an even number. Had to do that last night. I stand to make 15 cents on that dollar bet. 
-1000 is sheer madness but we may see it. gonna have to play blackjack with that odd dollar from now on.
-1000 is sheer madness but we may see it. gonna have to play blackjack with that odd dollar from now on.
Posted:
#821
Trump attacks accusers as "unattractive."
Politico says Trump “intimated a woman who accused him of sexually assaulting her was not attractive enough to have drawn his interest, part of a broader attack on the integrity and physical appearance of multiple women who’ve come forward this week to accuse the GOP presidential nominee of sexual assault.”
https://politicalwire.com/2016/10/14/trump-attacks-accusers-as-unattractive/
Sociopaths blame their victims.
Politico says Trump “intimated a woman who accused him of sexually assaulting her was not attractive enough to have drawn his interest, part of a broader attack on the integrity and physical appearance of multiple women who’ve come forward this week to accuse the GOP presidential nominee of sexual assault.”
https://politicalwire.com/2016/10/14/trump-attacks-accusers-as-unattractive/
Sociopaths blame their victims.
Posted:
#822
Trump's war on women is absolutely insane. I think it is one thing to wage a war on women through policy, but what trump is doing has nothing to do with making America great again. Trump and his mindless followers are basically saying that because he has acted like a rapist socio-path, it is okay because others have done things and maybe try to spin his sexual assault on women as a positive.
Posted:
#823
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
after the last two losses, they were told they need to enact policies and nominate people who are more inclusive of minorities and women. the result- they nominated trump. so, i'm sure they'll figure out the problems and make the appropriate changes for next time.
after the last two losses, they were told they need to enact policies and nominate people who are more inclusive of minorities and women. the result- they nominated trump. so, i'm sure they'll figure out the problems and make the appropriate changes for next time.
This is what u know who was talking about when he said democracy sucks but its better than the rest.
BTW...Trump is verry inclusive w the women.. 
Posted:
#825
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Overall, I am feeling pretty good about my wager.
Overall, I am feeling pretty good about my wager.
I just want this to be over.
3 more weeks until payday hopefully.
Looks like you the made right call. This election had more fluctuation in odds than the last one that you called correctly also.
But similar to a future bet, it takes so long to cash that the waiting game is a part of it.
I am not planning to hedge but considering the odds on trump right now, are you?
Hot Forum Topics
