NEW Reuters poll shows trump hits all-time LOW on approval with Immigration!
Similar polls showing the same LOW approval!!!
![]()
Similar polls showing the same LOW approval!!!
![]()
Similar polls showing the same LOW approval!!!
![]()
(thanks to Midnight1 for bringing this news to light) ![]()
HEADLINES Feb 06 . . .
CNN -
[The RACIST PHUCK-in-the-Oval] shares racist video on Truth Social, depicting Obamas as apes - then removes it amid bipartisan outrage! ![]()
(thanks to Midnight1 for bringing this news to light) ![]()
HEADLINES Feb 06 . . .
CNN -
[The RACIST PHUCK-in-the-Oval] shares racist video on Truth Social, depicting Obamas as apes - then removes it amid bipartisan outrage! ![]()
[the RACIST PHUCK] had previously already hidden the Presidential portrait of Obama in an area unseen by visitors...
[the RACIST PHUCK] had previously already hidden the Presidential portrait of Obama in an area unseen by visitors...
@THEMUGG
Then you support a full fledged racist, at a bare min you just admitted to supporting a known racist. At some point you have to come with more retort than Biden and libs to excuse your awful partisan views.
@THEMUGG
Then you support a full fledged racist, at a bare min you just admitted to supporting a known racist. At some point you have to come with more retort than Biden and libs to excuse your awful partisan views.
I wonder if the racist asshole - praised/defended by other idiots - knows this is
BLACK HISTORY MONTH
I wonder if the racist asshole - praised/defended by other idiots - knows this is
BLACK HISTORY MONTH
the word "racist" means nothing anymore , the Dems have been calling each and everyone who doest agree with their garbage points "racists" , for more than a decade now +
the word "racist" means nothing anymore , the Dems have been calling each and everyone who doest agree with their garbage points "racists" , for more than a decade now +
Gaslighting by comparing false equivalence. No evidence Biden and Harris are racists. In contrast, plenty of evidences prove Trump is a white supremacist bigot.
Gaslighting by comparing false equivalence. No evidence Biden and Harris are racists. In contrast, plenty of evidences prove Trump is a white supremacist bigot.
I did? Not sure I supported Biden and how can you call Biden a racist? Lets go with your thesis though but it is 100% false, Ive been objectively critical of Biden right here numerous times but lets go with it anyway. So Biden posted racist junk against Trump when he was in his term? Harris posted racist junk against Trump during the campaign?
How do you come up with this nonsense and give such lousy retorts? It seems all you have is deflection and Biden/Libs as to any sort of discussion.
Did Trump post racist crap on his social media? Should he continue to be the POTUS being blatantly racist and quite stupid?
I did? Not sure I supported Biden and how can you call Biden a racist? Lets go with your thesis though but it is 100% false, Ive been objectively critical of Biden right here numerous times but lets go with it anyway. So Biden posted racist junk against Trump when he was in his term? Harris posted racist junk against Trump during the campaign?
How do you come up with this nonsense and give such lousy retorts? It seems all you have is deflection and Biden/Libs as to any sort of discussion.
Did Trump post racist crap on his social media? Should he continue to be the POTUS being blatantly racist and quite stupid?
@Raiders22
Come on you can do better than this. Sounds like a fraudy way Trump would package his fascist takeover. I call it unconstitutional, abusive, absurd, dangerous and in some ways communist.
So states rights is when the TNC needs that narrative but screw states rights when the TNC wants to cry election foul any time they lose..
![]()
@Raiders22
Come on you can do better than this. Sounds like a fraudy way Trump would package his fascist takeover. I call it unconstitutional, abusive, absurd, dangerous and in some ways communist.
So states rights is when the TNC needs that narrative but screw states rights when the TNC wants to cry election foul any time they lose..
![]()
@wallstreetcappers
Yessir. This is exactly what the Republicans said when your girl tried it.
I also agree with all of the antis of both parties on this. States should handle their own elections. With the exception that they should have ID, etc. to vote in the Federal elections. ![]()
@wallstreetcappers
Yessir. This is exactly what the Republicans said when your girl tried it.
I also agree with all of the antis of both parties on this. States should handle their own elections. With the exception that they should have ID, etc. to vote in the Federal elections. ![]()
@Raiders22
Who is "my girl" and how did "my girl" try it? I think "your daddy" tried it multiple times in the past by multiple daddies before your so-called "my girl" did whatever you are claiming.
I do not appreciate you making the sexist comment either, what do you mean by "my girl" exactly? Do you like me calling all the GOP doods who used the electoral college scamming and election scam crying as "your daddy"?
How would you package the concept of ONE political party controlling elections, just every day common ok stuff? Your daddy is far worse than "my girl" if we are being juvenile.
@Raiders22
Who is "my girl" and how did "my girl" try it? I think "your daddy" tried it multiple times in the past by multiple daddies before your so-called "my girl" did whatever you are claiming.
I do not appreciate you making the sexist comment either, what do you mean by "my girl" exactly? Do you like me calling all the GOP doods who used the electoral college scamming and election scam crying as "your daddy"?
How would you package the concept of ONE political party controlling elections, just every day common ok stuff? Your daddy is far worse than "my girl" if we are being juvenile.
@wallstreetcappers
It is not ‘sexist’; it is a fact. That is far kinder than what you call politicians you do not like.
Again, it was:
“For the People Act”![]()
@wallstreetcappers
It is not ‘sexist’; it is a fact. That is far kinder than what you call politicians you do not like.
Again, it was:
“For the People Act”![]()
@wallstreetcappers
To be fair, she was not the only one pushing it. She was just heading it up.
So, maybe “your ‘doods’” is more apropos. ![]()
Even autocorrect doesn’t like that. Had to try it thrice to make it stick. ![]()
@wallstreetcappers
To be fair, she was not the only one pushing it. She was just heading it up.
So, maybe “your ‘doods’” is more apropos. ![]()
Even autocorrect doesn’t like that. Had to try it thrice to make it stick. ![]()
![]()
![]()
what is it called when a political party wants to control national political elections?
![]()
@wallstreetcappers
Commonly referred to as FASCISM. (see Wikipedia: Adolf Hitler)
But both Autocracy and Totalitarianism fits as well. Perhaps even Absolute Monarchy.
The types of ideologies Jesus Christ [Liberal] would have stood against as well as all intelligent, rational, moral humans.
what is it called when a political party wants to control national political elections?
![]()
@wallstreetcappers
Commonly referred to as FASCISM. (see Wikipedia: Adolf Hitler)
But both Autocracy and Totalitarianism fits as well. Perhaps even Absolute Monarchy.
The types of ideologies Jesus Christ [Liberal] would have stood against as well as all intelligent, rational, moral humans.
Ok so you make a weak comment, I ask for detail to your sexist claim and then you reply with nothing. Explain your claim please this is attempt number two to have you explain a claim you made. Who is my girl and what did my girl do per your claim? Details, specifics, direct my girl stuff not more deflection and stupidity please.
If you want to retract that lesser initial remark then do that but if you make a claim you kinda need to explain and clarify with details or you look like your dood in making mish mash blabbering pointless meanderings.
Ok so you make a weak comment, I ask for detail to your sexist claim and then you reply with nothing. Explain your claim please this is attempt number two to have you explain a claim you made. Who is my girl and what did my girl do per your claim? Details, specifics, direct my girl stuff not more deflection and stupidity please.
If you want to retract that lesser initial remark then do that but if you make a claim you kinda need to explain and clarify with details or you look like your dood in making mish mash blabbering pointless meanderings.
@wallstreetcappers
It is not sexist. She is female, commonly referred to as ‘girl’. Just like someone you support that is a male would be referred to as your ‘guy’.
For example, Biden would be referred to as ‘your guy’ or Harris would be referred to as ‘your gal’.
Nothing bad at all was meant by it.
It is simply an internet slangy way of referring to someone that another person supports.
Similar to you using ‘dood’ as slang for ‘dude’.
It is lazy deflection to assume I am sexist. I never namecall anyone and you well know this as I have pointed it out many times before to you.
I do not resort to those things. Unlike you and many others on here.
So, why not address the EXACT issue I pointed out to you.
When the ‘lady from your party that you support’ tried it what was the EXACT difference?
Why did you NOT have a snide comment to make about it back then?
![]()
@wallstreetcappers
It is not sexist. She is female, commonly referred to as ‘girl’. Just like someone you support that is a male would be referred to as your ‘guy’.
For example, Biden would be referred to as ‘your guy’ or Harris would be referred to as ‘your gal’.
Nothing bad at all was meant by it.
It is simply an internet slangy way of referring to someone that another person supports.
Similar to you using ‘dood’ as slang for ‘dude’.
It is lazy deflection to assume I am sexist. I never namecall anyone and you well know this as I have pointed it out many times before to you.
I do not resort to those things. Unlike you and many others on here.
So, why not address the EXACT issue I pointed out to you.
When the ‘lady from your party that you support’ tried it what was the EXACT difference?
Why did you NOT have a snide comment to make about it back then?
![]()
@wallstreetcappers
clarify with details
What details do you not remember from it?
![]()
You asked what it would be called and I gave you their name for it.
If you do not remember — just go look it up and then maybe you can answer some questions about it. ![]()
@wallstreetcappers
clarify with details
What details do you not remember from it?
![]()
You asked what it would be called and I gave you their name for it.
If you do not remember — just go look it up and then maybe you can answer some questions about it. ![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.