@DeezyAZ81 Have you seen pictures of this Lance character? After you mentioned him, I googled him. Very twinkish. He looks like someone in the early stages of transitioning. I think Lance and the "trans lover" are one and the same. Doesn't matter to me, as I don't have a dog in this race but it will be interesting to see what details come out.
Yes he is nerdy, furry, gamer who has been actively trolling law enforcement on social media and discord all weekend. He is legitimately messing with the right and probably looking for a lawsuit. Fox again is already walking back his name (last night) because maybe someone told their outlet, they are being duped intentionally. That is why the network is now saying unnamed after throwing his name out there on Saturday and claiming he is boyfriend instead. Again, I am unsure of how a roommate or lover (regardless of orientation) would have any more influence than a family the shooter grew up with his entire life.
1
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
@DeezyAZ81 Have you seen pictures of this Lance character? After you mentioned him, I googled him. Very twinkish. He looks like someone in the early stages of transitioning. I think Lance and the "trans lover" are one and the same. Doesn't matter to me, as I don't have a dog in this race but it will be interesting to see what details come out.
Yes he is nerdy, furry, gamer who has been actively trolling law enforcement on social media and discord all weekend. He is legitimately messing with the right and probably looking for a lawsuit. Fox again is already walking back his name (last night) because maybe someone told their outlet, they are being duped intentionally. That is why the network is now saying unnamed after throwing his name out there on Saturday and claiming he is boyfriend instead. Again, I am unsure of how a roommate or lover (regardless of orientation) would have any more influence than a family the shooter grew up with his entire life.
To any of the Kirk followers I have a question, Why did Kirk feel it was a huge mistake” to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ? Face value it seems to me to be a horrible thing to espouse and worse to truthly believe in your mind…? Where is he coming from with this statement? Is there more to it?
I'm not a Kirk follower at all. In fact I only follow myself.
Did bother to read his statements and what he was saying, IMO, is #1. African Americans don't appear to be better off and #2. The Civil Rights act has morphed beyond what it was intended for.
For me, I think Kirk was not old enough and not from the South to remember what the Civil Rights Act accomplished. Do I agree with his statement? For the most part, NO. Yet I understand his thinking and where he was going with it. It wasn't racist but rather a logical deduction he determined.
0
Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets:
To any of the Kirk followers I have a question, Why did Kirk feel it was a huge mistake” to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ? Face value it seems to me to be a horrible thing to espouse and worse to truthly believe in your mind…? Where is he coming from with this statement? Is there more to it?
I'm not a Kirk follower at all. In fact I only follow myself.
Did bother to read his statements and what he was saying, IMO, is #1. African Americans don't appear to be better off and #2. The Civil Rights act has morphed beyond what it was intended for.
For me, I think Kirk was not old enough and not from the South to remember what the Civil Rights Act accomplished. Do I agree with his statement? For the most part, NO. Yet I understand his thinking and where he was going with it. It wasn't racist but rather a logical deduction he determined.
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem: @UNIMAN I saw that too but excluded from my post as I really want an extrapolated dialog about what truth is being denied. Certainly Fox has their bias and agenda in reporting. However, the tend to get the meat of the story correct more often (not always) than others. The often mocked NY Post is also good in this regard. However, they do what they do. Make noise, point fingers, mock, and spin their wheels and then disappear or start a new story when the story catches up (Covid, Dementia, Rittenhouse, Penny, Nicholas Sandmann, Hunter's Laptop, Jan 6, Autopen, and several others). Oh, so true. Have seen many biased Fox articles. If you have half a brain you can see through the noise. As far as disappear that's the way the world works. All media does that. I posted this one cause it's very plausable and I stuck it out there. If it turns out to be heresay then I will certainly hear it in here.
You are so gullible and easily played. No real details or evidence needed for you to run with it. Again, the orientation and lifestyle of a roommate, friend, fake trans-lover, or someone Robinson saw at the grocery store before the shooting has anything to do with this crime or what he did. It's irrelevant, except for the right who needs to try and shift blame and accountability as usual. In no other mass shooting, or assassination attempt in my lifetime have I ever heard for a governor, or media outlets try and bring up the lifestyle or sexual orientation of a roommate, lover, or partner, of a shooter or killer, except in this case because it is irrelevant. You are being played and the media and your favorite GOP politicians all know you are gullible and easily manipulated. It's actually a sad reflection of our political climate.
2
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem: @UNIMAN I saw that too but excluded from my post as I really want an extrapolated dialog about what truth is being denied. Certainly Fox has their bias and agenda in reporting. However, the tend to get the meat of the story correct more often (not always) than others. The often mocked NY Post is also good in this regard. However, they do what they do. Make noise, point fingers, mock, and spin their wheels and then disappear or start a new story when the story catches up (Covid, Dementia, Rittenhouse, Penny, Nicholas Sandmann, Hunter's Laptop, Jan 6, Autopen, and several others). Oh, so true. Have seen many biased Fox articles. If you have half a brain you can see through the noise. As far as disappear that's the way the world works. All media does that. I posted this one cause it's very plausable and I stuck it out there. If it turns out to be heresay then I will certainly hear it in here.
You are so gullible and easily played. No real details or evidence needed for you to run with it. Again, the orientation and lifestyle of a roommate, friend, fake trans-lover, or someone Robinson saw at the grocery store before the shooting has anything to do with this crime or what he did. It's irrelevant, except for the right who needs to try and shift blame and accountability as usual. In no other mass shooting, or assassination attempt in my lifetime have I ever heard for a governor, or media outlets try and bring up the lifestyle or sexual orientation of a roommate, lover, or partner, of a shooter or killer, except in this case because it is irrelevant. You are being played and the media and your favorite GOP politicians all know you are gullible and easily manipulated. It's actually a sad reflection of our political climate.
@UNIMAN Say less "If you have half a brain you can see through the noise. As far as disappear that's the way the world works. All media does that." 10000% spot on.
Except he fails to see through it.
1
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
@UNIMAN Say less "If you have half a brain you can see through the noise. As far as disappear that's the way the world works. All media does that." 10000% spot on.
You didn't answer my question, bro. Have you looked at pictures of this Lance Twiggs? Have you ever known anyone in the early stages of transition, or are you familiar with such things. If the pictures online are factually of Lance, Lance looks like someone in the early stages on transition.
For context, I don't watch Fox New, nor read their online format, nor any cable news network. If they first reported this Saturday, then I scooped him. In this very thread, I made mention of Tyler possibly being a member of the LGBTQ+ community. I made light of it, even though I actually support that community. This is based on a picture I saw posted of Tyler wearing a traditional Pride flag patch, as well as a Trans flag patch. The newest versions of the Pride flag encompasses the Trans flag but these were two seperate patches. Since Tyler doesn't look like someone transitioning, I assumed there was a mate somewhere. The small head often makes the big head do dumb shit. This is true of all men, regardless of sexual orientation.
So what was reported? A roommate, who is also a lover, who is in the early stages of transitioning. Tjis roommate is the same age as Tyler, 22. Then we have this Lance character, who is Tyler's roommate. Who is the same age, 22. And who, if the pictures are real, is a very effeminate, twinkish, apparently gay man. If you are familiar witu the early stages of transition, it starts with just being effeminate. Softened features. Growing hair out. You don't just jump on hormones. You say the existence of this character disproves the theory. I think Lance is the trans lover. All the signs are there.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
1
@DeezyAZ81
You didn't answer my question, bro. Have you looked at pictures of this Lance Twiggs? Have you ever known anyone in the early stages of transition, or are you familiar with such things. If the pictures online are factually of Lance, Lance looks like someone in the early stages on transition.
For context, I don't watch Fox New, nor read their online format, nor any cable news network. If they first reported this Saturday, then I scooped him. In this very thread, I made mention of Tyler possibly being a member of the LGBTQ+ community. I made light of it, even though I actually support that community. This is based on a picture I saw posted of Tyler wearing a traditional Pride flag patch, as well as a Trans flag patch. The newest versions of the Pride flag encompasses the Trans flag but these were two seperate patches. Since Tyler doesn't look like someone transitioning, I assumed there was a mate somewhere. The small head often makes the big head do dumb shit. This is true of all men, regardless of sexual orientation.
So what was reported? A roommate, who is also a lover, who is in the early stages of transitioning. Tjis roommate is the same age as Tyler, 22. Then we have this Lance character, who is Tyler's roommate. Who is the same age, 22. And who, if the pictures are real, is a very effeminate, twinkish, apparently gay man. If you are familiar witu the early stages of transition, it starts with just being effeminate. Softened features. Growing hair out. You don't just jump on hormones. You say the existence of this character disproves the theory. I think Lance is the trans lover. All the signs are there.
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @DeezyAZ81 Have you seen pictures of this Lance character? After you mentioned him, I googled him. Very twinkish. He looks like someone in the early stages of transitioning. I think Lance and the "trans lover" are one and the same. Doesn't matter to me, as I don't have a dog in this race but it will be interesting to see what details come out. Yes he is nerdy, furry, gamer who has been actively trolling law enforcement on social media and discord all weekend. He is legitimately messing with the right and probably looking for a lawsuit. Fox again is already walking back his name (last night) because maybe someone told their outlet, they are being duped intentionally. That is why the network is now saying unnamed after throwing his name out there on Saturday and claiming he is boyfriend instead. Again, I am unsure of how a roommate or lover (regardless of orientation) would have any more influence than a family the shooter grew up with his entire life.
You don't know how a lover has more influence over a young man than a lover? Are you serious? This can't be a serious statement.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @DeezyAZ81 Have you seen pictures of this Lance character? After you mentioned him, I googled him. Very twinkish. He looks like someone in the early stages of transitioning. I think Lance and the "trans lover" are one and the same. Doesn't matter to me, as I don't have a dog in this race but it will be interesting to see what details come out. Yes he is nerdy, furry, gamer who has been actively trolling law enforcement on social media and discord all weekend. He is legitimately messing with the right and probably looking for a lawsuit. Fox again is already walking back his name (last night) because maybe someone told their outlet, they are being duped intentionally. That is why the network is now saying unnamed after throwing his name out there on Saturday and claiming he is boyfriend instead. Again, I am unsure of how a roommate or lover (regardless of orientation) would have any more influence than a family the shooter grew up with his entire life.
You don't know how a lover has more influence over a young man than a lover? Are you serious? This can't be a serious statement.
@DeezyAZ81 You didn't answer my question, bro. Have you looked at pictures of this Lance Twiggs? Have you ever known anyone in the early stages of transition, or are you familiar with such things. If the pictures online are factually of Lance, Lance looks like someone in the early stages on transition. For context, I don't watch Fox New, nor read their online format, nor any cable news network. If they first reported this Saturday, then I scooped him. In this very thread, I made mention of Tyler possibly being a member of the LGBTQ+ community. I made light of it, even though I actually support that community. This is based on a picture I saw posted of Tyler wearing a traditional Pride flag patch, as well as a Trans flag patch. The newest versions of the Pride flag encompasses the Trans flag but these were two seperate patches. Since Tyler doesn't look like someone transitioning, I assumed there was a mate somewhere. The small head often makes the big head do dumb shit. This is true of all men, regardless of sexual orientation. So what was reported? A roommate, who is also a lover, who is in the early stages of transitioning. Tjis roommate is the same age as Tyler, 22. Then we have this Lance character, who is Tyler's roommate. Who is the same age, 22. And who, if the pictures are real, is a very effeminate, twinkish, apparently gay man. If you are familiar witu the early stages of transition, it starts with just being effeminate. Softened features. Growing hair out. You don't just jump on hormones. You say the existence of this character disproves the theory. I think Lance is the trans lover. All the signs are there.
Yes. I am not really speaking to you because you have not been keeping up with what Fox News is reporting on tv or writing. I have looked at his pictures that are out there. I also dug deeper on his social media accounts of him and his family, Intagram, Facebook, and images of his discord messages. The pictures you are likely referencing do not show transitioning in my eyes, and if you look at his recent posts as of last night, he is trolling people and the media aboutm which reinforces he is NOT trans. I am not sure if you are aware of some of this dark gaming cultures and political cultures of young dudes in their 20s these days. However, that is how many gamers dress and the guys also frequently make references to LGBTQ+ (poking fun and memes). Often these kids are more introverted and lack some of the social skills previous generations had. The kid in question looks like he is into furry kink but in no way has said or represented anything trans. Again, that is why Fox is now running the story that he is simply a Boyfriend. Again, unsubstantiated by anyone other than tabloid media. It just shows a rush to put a narrative out to somehow justify Robinson's actions. Very sad. As if, there are no conservative MAGA gay men or trans individuals. Hell Caitlyn Jenner is a open conservative MAGA Republican that ran for office in Cali. Again, it is irrelevant except for the Charlie Kirk fans and MAGAS that have to somehow make sense of all of this because it could not have possible been "one of their own".
1
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
@DeezyAZ81 You didn't answer my question, bro. Have you looked at pictures of this Lance Twiggs? Have you ever known anyone in the early stages of transition, or are you familiar with such things. If the pictures online are factually of Lance, Lance looks like someone in the early stages on transition. For context, I don't watch Fox New, nor read their online format, nor any cable news network. If they first reported this Saturday, then I scooped him. In this very thread, I made mention of Tyler possibly being a member of the LGBTQ+ community. I made light of it, even though I actually support that community. This is based on a picture I saw posted of Tyler wearing a traditional Pride flag patch, as well as a Trans flag patch. The newest versions of the Pride flag encompasses the Trans flag but these were two seperate patches. Since Tyler doesn't look like someone transitioning, I assumed there was a mate somewhere. The small head often makes the big head do dumb shit. This is true of all men, regardless of sexual orientation. So what was reported? A roommate, who is also a lover, who is in the early stages of transitioning. Tjis roommate is the same age as Tyler, 22. Then we have this Lance character, who is Tyler's roommate. Who is the same age, 22. And who, if the pictures are real, is a very effeminate, twinkish, apparently gay man. If you are familiar witu the early stages of transition, it starts with just being effeminate. Softened features. Growing hair out. You don't just jump on hormones. You say the existence of this character disproves the theory. I think Lance is the trans lover. All the signs are there.
Yes. I am not really speaking to you because you have not been keeping up with what Fox News is reporting on tv or writing. I have looked at his pictures that are out there. I also dug deeper on his social media accounts of him and his family, Intagram, Facebook, and images of his discord messages. The pictures you are likely referencing do not show transitioning in my eyes, and if you look at his recent posts as of last night, he is trolling people and the media aboutm which reinforces he is NOT trans. I am not sure if you are aware of some of this dark gaming cultures and political cultures of young dudes in their 20s these days. However, that is how many gamers dress and the guys also frequently make references to LGBTQ+ (poking fun and memes). Often these kids are more introverted and lack some of the social skills previous generations had. The kid in question looks like he is into furry kink but in no way has said or represented anything trans. Again, that is why Fox is now running the story that he is simply a Boyfriend. Again, unsubstantiated by anyone other than tabloid media. It just shows a rush to put a narrative out to somehow justify Robinson's actions. Very sad. As if, there are no conservative MAGA gay men or trans individuals. Hell Caitlyn Jenner is a open conservative MAGA Republican that ran for office in Cali. Again, it is irrelevant except for the Charlie Kirk fans and MAGAS that have to somehow make sense of all of this because it could not have possible been "one of their own".
[Quote: Originally Posted by StumpTownStu]Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @DeezyAZ81 Have you seen pictures of this Lance character? After you mentioned him, I googled him. Very twinkish. He looks like someone in the early stages of transitioning. I think Lance and the "trans lover" are one and the same. Doesn't matter to me, as I don't have a dog in this race but it will be interesting to see what details come out. Yes he is nerdy, furry, gamer who has been actively trolling law enforcement on social media and discord all weekend. He is legitimately messing with the right and probably looking for a lawsuit. Fox again is already walking back his name (last night) because maybe someone told their outlet, they are being duped intentionally. That is why the network is now saying unnamed after throwing his name out there on Saturday and claiming he is boyfriend instead. Again, I am unsure of how a roommate or lover (regardless of orientation) would have any more influence than a family the shooter grew up with his entire life. You don't know how a lover has more influence over a young man than a lover? Are you serious? This can't be a serious statement.[/Quote>
You sure he is lover? How long have they been together? Yes. I am dead serious. You realize family members (specifically parents) are the most influential political socialization agents of a young person. This is proven. You think Tyler's upbringing of 20 years with his Republican, conservative family, which put guns in his hands at 10 years old was thrown out with 1 semester of college or a very recent relationship, which no one can substantiate? Clearly, his recent unsupported relationship did not seem to shift his opinion or upbringing regarding gun use.
1
[Quote: Originally Posted by StumpTownStu]Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @DeezyAZ81 Have you seen pictures of this Lance character? After you mentioned him, I googled him. Very twinkish. He looks like someone in the early stages of transitioning. I think Lance and the "trans lover" are one and the same. Doesn't matter to me, as I don't have a dog in this race but it will be interesting to see what details come out. Yes he is nerdy, furry, gamer who has been actively trolling law enforcement on social media and discord all weekend. He is legitimately messing with the right and probably looking for a lawsuit. Fox again is already walking back his name (last night) because maybe someone told their outlet, they are being duped intentionally. That is why the network is now saying unnamed after throwing his name out there on Saturday and claiming he is boyfriend instead. Again, I am unsure of how a roommate or lover (regardless of orientation) would have any more influence than a family the shooter grew up with his entire life. You don't know how a lover has more influence over a young man than a lover? Are you serious? This can't be a serious statement.[/Quote>
You sure he is lover? How long have they been together? Yes. I am dead serious. You realize family members (specifically parents) are the most influential political socialization agents of a young person. This is proven. You think Tyler's upbringing of 20 years with his Republican, conservative family, which put guns in his hands at 10 years old was thrown out with 1 semester of college or a very recent relationship, which no one can substantiate? Clearly, his recent unsupported relationship did not seem to shift his opinion or upbringing regarding gun use.
Ok ..Sorry I misinterpreted your position in your post! I like you paid little attention to him ! I never knew he was that good at making a living playing the divide and conquer” game for his mega donors …to the tune of 12 million dollars ! At 31 that quite a haul without a formal education or mechanical aptitude…I’m sure that would have times 10 in another decade…..Not bad for just speaking thoughts in a certain direction!….Joel Osteen ,Jim Swagger sold spiritual well being & PT Barnum sensational exhibits and illusion are names of a few who played empty hands to people for millions in profit. …I’ve always favored Barnum because you usually got a physical show for your money not just smoke!….But today smoke sells …The darker the better even in a Era of education at its highest of attainability!
1
@StumpTownStu
Ok ..Sorry I misinterpreted your position in your post! I like you paid little attention to him ! I never knew he was that good at making a living playing the divide and conquer” game for his mega donors …to the tune of 12 million dollars ! At 31 that quite a haul without a formal education or mechanical aptitude…I’m sure that would have times 10 in another decade…..Not bad for just speaking thoughts in a certain direction!….Joel Osteen ,Jim Swagger sold spiritual well being & PT Barnum sensational exhibits and illusion are names of a few who played empty hands to people for millions in profit. …I’ve always favored Barnum because you usually got a physical show for your money not just smoke!….But today smoke sells …The darker the better even in a Era of education at its highest of attainability!
@StumpTownStu Ok ..Sorry I misinterpreted your position in your post! I like you paid little attention to him ! I never knew he was that good at making a living playing the divide and conquer” game for his mega donors …to the tune of 12 million dollars ! At 31 that quite a haul without a formal education or mechanical aptitude…I’m sure that would have times 10 in another decade…..Not bad for just speaking thoughts in a certain direction!….Joel Osteen ,Jim Swagger sold spiritual well being & PT Barnum sensational exhibits and illusion are names of a few who played empty hands to people for millions in profit. …I’ve always favored Barnum because you usually got a physical show for your money not just smoke!….But today smoke sells …The darker the better even in a Era of education at its highest of attainability!
I would imagine he was worth far more than 12 million. And yes, there were some deep pockets backing him.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets:
@StumpTownStu Ok ..Sorry I misinterpreted your position in your post! I like you paid little attention to him ! I never knew he was that good at making a living playing the divide and conquer” game for his mega donors …to the tune of 12 million dollars ! At 31 that quite a haul without a formal education or mechanical aptitude…I’m sure that would have times 10 in another decade…..Not bad for just speaking thoughts in a certain direction!….Joel Osteen ,Jim Swagger sold spiritual well being & PT Barnum sensational exhibits and illusion are names of a few who played empty hands to people for millions in profit. …I’ve always favored Barnum because you usually got a physical show for your money not just smoke!….But today smoke sells …The darker the better even in a Era of education at its highest of attainability!
I would imagine he was worth far more than 12 million. And yes, there were some deep pockets backing him.
@DeezyAZ81 #330. We'll see. History on covers shows if he's wrong he'll say "your right, my bad" and when you're wrong it'll be quiet. But that talk in and of itself is noise cause above all else, shouldn't have been shot by anyone.
This has to satire right? Uniman or any other far right covers member in this forum like yourself has never been wrong about anything. Like the 2020 election being rigged, January 6th, Matty Venmo Gaetz, I could go on and on of course. But I realize you must be joking.
If I am wrong, I'll gladly say hey Lance Twiggs really was Tyler Robinson's trans-woman, roommate lover. I already know you will not revisit this topic when nothing comes of it though. These threads have a way of disappearing on your side of the aisle. Seems pretty irrelevant and far-fetched with all of these unnamed sources and lack of documentation. His private relationships also have nothing to do with the crime like Ive stated numerous times, which is why no one else has been detained, arrested, or charged with anything.
1
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
@DeezyAZ81 #330. We'll see. History on covers shows if he's wrong he'll say "your right, my bad" and when you're wrong it'll be quiet. But that talk in and of itself is noise cause above all else, shouldn't have been shot by anyone.
This has to satire right? Uniman or any other far right covers member in this forum like yourself has never been wrong about anything. Like the 2020 election being rigged, January 6th, Matty Venmo Gaetz, I could go on and on of course. But I realize you must be joking.
If I am wrong, I'll gladly say hey Lance Twiggs really was Tyler Robinson's trans-woman, roommate lover. I already know you will not revisit this topic when nothing comes of it though. These threads have a way of disappearing on your side of the aisle. Seems pretty irrelevant and far-fetched with all of these unnamed sources and lack of documentation. His private relationships also have nothing to do with the crime like Ive stated numerous times, which is why no one else has been detained, arrested, or charged with anything.
@DeezyAZ81 #330. We'll see. History on covers shows if he's wrong he'll say "your right, my bad" and when you're wrong it'll be quiet. But that talk in and of itself is noise cause above all else, shouldn't have been shot by anyone.
Please link any thread or post # in the politics forum in which Uniman has said this about anything. I'll wait. This is pure comedy.
1
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
@DeezyAZ81 #330. We'll see. History on covers shows if he's wrong he'll say "your right, my bad" and when you're wrong it'll be quiet. But that talk in and of itself is noise cause above all else, shouldn't have been shot by anyone.
Please link any thread or post # in the politics forum in which Uniman has said this about anything. I'll wait. This is pure comedy.
Definitely not sure they are lovers. My whole basis of all of this was one picture I saw posted in a subreddit on Friday. What jumped out at me was the presence of a trans flag in edition to the traditional pride flag. Many recognize a pride flag. A lot less would recognize a trans flag but I do. Since he in no way looks trans, I assumed someone in his sphere of influence must be. Then I started to see reports of a lover in the early stages of transition.
Here is the rub, no pun intended. Unless someone identifies themselves, someone in the early stages on transition, a gender fluid person, or just a twink, can all look exactly the same. And this is Utah we're talking about. It could very well be that an effeminate gay man, to the people of that community, looks like what they would assume a trans person would be. Who knows but i'm of the believe that if it quacks like a duck, if it acts like a duck, if it "identifies"...
If the reports were that there was a roommate, that they were both 22, that there was some form of romantic relationship, this Lance person was his roommate, is 22, ands look to be somewhere one the homosexual spectrum. He's not some big butch bear. He's not just a regular looking kid like Tyler. I don't know how anyone can look at the pictures being circulated and say there's no way this Lance character could be considered as someone in the early stages of transitioning. Not to mention, given how unfamiliar that community is with that stuff. Not only that community but older generations in general. I'm from the Bay. If I saw that kid, I wouldn't immediately think trans. I would think it's just an effeminate gay dude. If my dad saw him, he would probably think he was trying to be a chick.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
@DeezyAZ81
Definitely not sure they are lovers. My whole basis of all of this was one picture I saw posted in a subreddit on Friday. What jumped out at me was the presence of a trans flag in edition to the traditional pride flag. Many recognize a pride flag. A lot less would recognize a trans flag but I do. Since he in no way looks trans, I assumed someone in his sphere of influence must be. Then I started to see reports of a lover in the early stages of transition.
Here is the rub, no pun intended. Unless someone identifies themselves, someone in the early stages on transition, a gender fluid person, or just a twink, can all look exactly the same. And this is Utah we're talking about. It could very well be that an effeminate gay man, to the people of that community, looks like what they would assume a trans person would be. Who knows but i'm of the believe that if it quacks like a duck, if it acts like a duck, if it "identifies"...
If the reports were that there was a roommate, that they were both 22, that there was some form of romantic relationship, this Lance person was his roommate, is 22, ands look to be somewhere one the homosexual spectrum. He's not some big butch bear. He's not just a regular looking kid like Tyler. I don't know how anyone can look at the pictures being circulated and say there's no way this Lance character could be considered as someone in the early stages of transitioning. Not to mention, given how unfamiliar that community is with that stuff. Not only that community but older generations in general. I'm from the Bay. If I saw that kid, I wouldn't immediately think trans. I would think it's just an effeminate gay dude. If my dad saw him, he would probably think he was trying to be a chick.
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem: @DeezyAZ81 #330. We'll see. History on covers shows if he's wrong he'll say "your right, my bad" and when you're wrong it'll be quiet. But that talk in and of itself is noise cause above all else, shouldn't have been shot by anyone. This has to satire right? Uniman or any other far right covers member in this forum like yourself has never been wrong about anything. Like the 2020 election being rigged, January 6th, Matty Venmo Gaetz, I could go on and on of course. But I realize you must be joking. If I am wrong, I'll gladly say hey Lance Twiggs really was Tyler Robinson's trans-woman, roommate lover. I already know you will not revisit this topic when nothing comes of it though. These threads have a way of disappearing on your side of the aisle. Seems pretty irrelevant and far-fetched with all of these unnamed sources and lack of documentation. His private relationships also have nothing to do with the crime like Ive stated numerous times, which is why no one else has been detained, arrested, or charged with anything.
Uniman isn't far right. And he has no issue admitting he is wrong. And i'll stand 10 toes behind that. Being a vocal member on the right leaning side doesn't make you far right. It would be the same for you. You aren't by any means far left but being a vocal poster on the left leaning side, someone could easily label you that. Uniman is one of the more centrist posters on this site.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem: @DeezyAZ81 #330. We'll see. History on covers shows if he's wrong he'll say "your right, my bad" and when you're wrong it'll be quiet. But that talk in and of itself is noise cause above all else, shouldn't have been shot by anyone. This has to satire right? Uniman or any other far right covers member in this forum like yourself has never been wrong about anything. Like the 2020 election being rigged, January 6th, Matty Venmo Gaetz, I could go on and on of course. But I realize you must be joking. If I am wrong, I'll gladly say hey Lance Twiggs really was Tyler Robinson's trans-woman, roommate lover. I already know you will not revisit this topic when nothing comes of it though. These threads have a way of disappearing on your side of the aisle. Seems pretty irrelevant and far-fetched with all of these unnamed sources and lack of documentation. His private relationships also have nothing to do with the crime like Ive stated numerous times, which is why no one else has been detained, arrested, or charged with anything.
Uniman isn't far right. And he has no issue admitting he is wrong. And i'll stand 10 toes behind that. Being a vocal member on the right leaning side doesn't make you far right. It would be the same for you. You aren't by any means far left but being a vocal poster on the left leaning side, someone could easily label you that. Uniman is one of the more centrist posters on this site.
@DeezyAZ81 Definitely not sure they are lovers. My whole basis of all of this was one picture I saw posted in a subreddit on Friday. What jumped out at me was the presence of a trans flag in edition to the traditional pride flag. Many recognize a pride flag. A lot less would recognize a trans flag but I do. Since he in no way looks trans, I assumed someone in his sphere of influence must be. Then I started to see reports of a lover in the early stages of transition. Here is the rub, no pun intended. Unless someone identifies themselves, someone in the early stages on transition, a gender fluid person, or just a twink, can all look exactly the same. And this is Utah we're talking about. It could very well be that an effeminate gay man, to the people of that community, looks like what they would assume a trans person would be. Who knows but i'm of the believe that if it quacks like a duck, if it acts like a duck, if it "identifies"... If the reports were that there was a roommate, that they were both 22, that there was some form of romantic relationship, this Lance person was his roommate, is 22, ands look to be somewhere one the homosexual spectrum. He's not some big butch bear. He's not just a regular looking kid like Tyler. I don't know how anyone can look at the pictures being circulated and say there's no way this Lance character could be considered as someone in the early stages of transitioning. Not to mention, given how unfamiliar that community is with that stuff. Not only that community but older generations in general. I'm from the Bay. If I saw that kid, I wouldn't immediately think trans. I would think it's just an effeminate gay dude. If my dad saw him, he would probably think he was trying to be a chick.
I am assuming we have seen very different pictures. I have not seen a single picture of Tyler or Lance Triggs with a trans or pride flag. Are you sure that is a real photo? That is not one I have seen anywhere and I have been digging. Genuinely curious. Ive seen Tyler's pics from his childhood and teenage years with this family with long rifles and at restaurants with this father wearing blue lives matter t-shirts. Only pics Ive seen of Triggs were him in a sweatshirt and pants, in a hat with gaming headset on, and with him dressed in a furry onesie. I have members in my family that are young gamers (and straight with GFs) that dress in hats, sweatshirts, and sweatpants similar to the pics Ive seen (They are not furries though haha). To me just looks like an antisocial nerd, but does not scream gay or trans, maybe a virgin? That is my perspective of course. I think we all have our biases when we see an image or someone that aligns with our views of possibly being gay but I don't get that from Triggs. I guess we will see. I am guessing from retractions that are coming out, even from Fox that this angle is bullshit to distract an audience.
1
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
@DeezyAZ81 Definitely not sure they are lovers. My whole basis of all of this was one picture I saw posted in a subreddit on Friday. What jumped out at me was the presence of a trans flag in edition to the traditional pride flag. Many recognize a pride flag. A lot less would recognize a trans flag but I do. Since he in no way looks trans, I assumed someone in his sphere of influence must be. Then I started to see reports of a lover in the early stages of transition. Here is the rub, no pun intended. Unless someone identifies themselves, someone in the early stages on transition, a gender fluid person, or just a twink, can all look exactly the same. And this is Utah we're talking about. It could very well be that an effeminate gay man, to the people of that community, looks like what they would assume a trans person would be. Who knows but i'm of the believe that if it quacks like a duck, if it acts like a duck, if it "identifies"... If the reports were that there was a roommate, that they were both 22, that there was some form of romantic relationship, this Lance person was his roommate, is 22, ands look to be somewhere one the homosexual spectrum. He's not some big butch bear. He's not just a regular looking kid like Tyler. I don't know how anyone can look at the pictures being circulated and say there's no way this Lance character could be considered as someone in the early stages of transitioning. Not to mention, given how unfamiliar that community is with that stuff. Not only that community but older generations in general. I'm from the Bay. If I saw that kid, I wouldn't immediately think trans. I would think it's just an effeminate gay dude. If my dad saw him, he would probably think he was trying to be a chick.
I am assuming we have seen very different pictures. I have not seen a single picture of Tyler or Lance Triggs with a trans or pride flag. Are you sure that is a real photo? That is not one I have seen anywhere and I have been digging. Genuinely curious. Ive seen Tyler's pics from his childhood and teenage years with this family with long rifles and at restaurants with this father wearing blue lives matter t-shirts. Only pics Ive seen of Triggs were him in a sweatshirt and pants, in a hat with gaming headset on, and with him dressed in a furry onesie. I have members in my family that are young gamers (and straight with GFs) that dress in hats, sweatshirts, and sweatpants similar to the pics Ive seen (They are not furries though haha). To me just looks like an antisocial nerd, but does not scream gay or trans, maybe a virgin? That is my perspective of course. I think we all have our biases when we see an image or someone that aligns with our views of possibly being gay but I don't get that from Triggs. I guess we will see. I am guessing from retractions that are coming out, even from Fox that this angle is bullshit to distract an audience.
Let me ask a fair question. Which is more plausible:
A) At 17 buddy said let me start on this path to orate, raise money, and swindle unprepared people to push a narrative
Or
B) Saw something wrong and started on a path to address it in what he thought was best.
Lot of points on both sides of the coin and fabric is woven from many cloths (two things can be true)
Didn't follow closely but have listened to his content and would argue he seems more genuine than the lot would grant him credit for (probably because they dont argee with /like his words).
I choose to believe (in watching his content) his underlying objective was to have people, younger, think for themselves and ask probative questions.
0
Let me ask a fair question. Which is more plausible:
A) At 17 buddy said let me start on this path to orate, raise money, and swindle unprepared people to push a narrative
Or
B) Saw something wrong and started on a path to address it in what he thought was best.
Lot of points on both sides of the coin and fabric is woven from many cloths (two things can be true)
Didn't follow closely but have listened to his content and would argue he seems more genuine than the lot would grant him credit for (probably because they dont argee with /like his words).
I choose to believe (in watching his content) his underlying objective was to have people, younger, think for themselves and ask probative questions.
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem: @DeezyAZ81 #330. We'll see. History on covers shows if he's wrong he'll say "your right, my bad" and when you're wrong it'll be quiet. But that talk in and of itself is noise cause above all else, shouldn't have been shot by anyone. Please link any thread or post # in the politics forum in which Uniman has said this about anything. I'll wait. This is pure comedy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem: @DeezyAZ81 #330. We'll see. History on covers shows if he's wrong he'll say "your right, my bad" and when you're wrong it'll be quiet. But that talk in and of itself is noise cause above all else, shouldn't have been shot by anyone. Please link any thread or post # in the politics forum in which Uniman has said this about anything. I'll wait. This is pure comedy.
#338 Also so me anything on this site I've said about any Lance outside Mr. Armstrong.
I asked you first. Once you provide your links and threads, I will honor your request. I may have assumed you and Uniman are one in the same. If I made that mistake, apologies.
1
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
#338 Also so me anything on this site I've said about any Lance outside Mr. Armstrong.
I asked you first. Once you provide your links and threads, I will honor your request. I may have assumed you and Uniman are one in the same. If I made that mistake, apologies.
@DeezyAZ81 Just did some digging. The picture I saw has been identified as a different dude altogether. That's why it hasn't been circulated.
Yeah that figures. There is so much misinformation out there, it makes it very difficult to decipher without some deep dives without the authorities actually releasing any concrete information, images, or details. There was even a rumor that the shooter was someone Kirk had debated at a college campus out there in a video, which also had to be debunked (Dude looked nothing like Robinson other than dark hair). Something released by authorities today that the only written words in a recovered note from Robinson said something like Opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, I must take the opportunity. Paraphrasing, cannot remember exact quote. There is no leftist manifesto or anything revealed yet from the actual shooter. Clearly, he is a sociopath regardless or political leanings (if any) or ideology to actually act on this. Apparently, he will not talk to any authorities, so it is possible that we never truly know the motivation, other than he obviously carried hateful feelings toward Kirk.
1
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
@DeezyAZ81 Just did some digging. The picture I saw has been identified as a different dude altogether. That's why it hasn't been circulated.
Yeah that figures. There is so much misinformation out there, it makes it very difficult to decipher without some deep dives without the authorities actually releasing any concrete information, images, or details. There was even a rumor that the shooter was someone Kirk had debated at a college campus out there in a video, which also had to be debunked (Dude looked nothing like Robinson other than dark hair). Something released by authorities today that the only written words in a recovered note from Robinson said something like Opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, I must take the opportunity. Paraphrasing, cannot remember exact quote. There is no leftist manifesto or anything revealed yet from the actual shooter. Clearly, he is a sociopath regardless or political leanings (if any) or ideology to actually act on this. Apparently, he will not talk to any authorities, so it is possible that we never truly know the motivation, other than he obviously carried hateful feelings toward Kirk.
Without the context, I could still believe Lance is someone transitioning. I could believe he is a gay man. Or I could believ neither. Without the previous context, he could be just some gamer kid like you mentioned. Nothing necessarily identifies him as being even gay.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
@DeezyAZ81
Without the context, I could still believe Lance is someone transitioning. I could believe he is a gay man. Or I could believ neither. Without the previous context, he could be just some gamer kid like you mentioned. Nothing necessarily identifies him as being even gay.
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem: #338 Also so me anything on this site I've said about any Lance outside Mr. Armstrong. I asked you first. Once you provide your links and threads, I will honor your request. I may have assumed you and Uniman are one in the same. If I made that mistake, apologies.
OK fair, see #319 of this thread. Your turn. Also the second part of your post is slanderous especially as covers logs IPs
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem: #338 Also so me anything on this site I've said about any Lance outside Mr. Armstrong. I asked you first. Once you provide your links and threads, I will honor your request. I may have assumed you and Uniman are one in the same. If I made that mistake, apologies.
OK fair, see #319 of this thread. Your turn. Also the second part of your post is slanderous especially as covers logs IPs
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.