Who the hell knows, I dont know..but I do believe some of what I read and saw regarding the other buildings going down soon after without being initially effected.
___________
Go the WTC section of the link I posted. It's all explained there. It makes 100% perfect sense. The stuff you hear from the CT's is selective "reporting" and only reporting things that support their claims. They leave out the stuff that provides the whole explanation. And they don't have any hard evidence....it's all what people thought they heard and thought they saw. None of the forensics support anything they claim is the case. None.
Go the WTC section of the link I posted. It's all explained there. It makes 100% perfect sense. The stuff you hear from the CT's is selective "reporting" and only reporting things that support their claims. They leave out the stuff that provides the whole explanation. And they don't have any hard evidence....it's all what people thought they heard and thought they saw. None of the forensics support anything they claim is the case. None.
"The absence of evidence is the surest sign that the conspiracy is working"
how can a fire from 120th floor affect the whole building.... obviously there were explosives in the garage and every 20th floor in order for it to collapse.
If a plane hit a building in that manner, don't you think there were be reverberations in other parts of the building? All this stuff is explained if you would bother to read it. You just hear what you want to believe.
The CT's wonder why the south building collapses first even though the north building had been burning longer. Here is the explanation. The funniest part is how CT's don't think that fire could cause a building to collapse. Then why do they fireproof them (see his last point). It's hilarious. 
Several factors are involved here.
1) Because the south tower was struck closer to a corner, the forces on the damaged area may have been more uneven than in the north tower, which was struck head-on and fairly centered. We've seen how the top of the south tower tilted sharply towards its damaged side as it fell.
2) Flight 175 was traveling at approximately 550 mph when it struck the south tower,, far faster than flight 11 when it hit the north tower the additional kinetic energy it carried may have done more damage to structural members and fire protection.
3) The south tower was hit at a point much lower than the north, and had far more weight bearing on the damaged areas: in terms of square footage, the equivalent of the entire Chicago Citigroup Center (right) on top of a weakened, off-center base.
4) The fire protection on the south tower steel was only half as thick (3.4" or 2 cm) as the insulation in the north tower. Source (interesting side note to CTists; if skyscrapers can't be brought down by fire alone, why do they fireproof them?)
Once again, ignorance. Everyone says that the building owner told them to blow it. Well, "pull it" is never a term used in demolition (look it up). It is used to pull firefighters from a building, though. And look at this EVIDENCE of the people who were there and saw the building. They expected it to come down long before it came down. 
It's actually called "Loose Change" and they selectively report. Not ONE structural engineer supports their claim. NOT ONE. Go to the link I provided and read some of the hundreds of questions that they answer. They can't even get something as simple as an engine comparison right (see pentagon link).
I have read every one of those links (sublinks of the one I posted) in their entirety and spent hours and hours of research on this. All you need to do is to read them to see how utterly irresponsble (and completely wrong) the CT's are. It is frightening that some people actually believe that B.S....including a former governor of MN, Jesse Ventura. 
So I guess if you want to be grouped in the same pile of idiots that he belongs to, feel free to continue to believe the government did it.
All the conspiracy theory group can take comfort the fact, that they are in good company with "The Islamic Rose theory" ...
“I do believe that it’s the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics that World Trade Center tower 7—building 7, which collapsed in on itself—it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved. World Trade Center 7. World Trade [Center] 1 and 2 got hit by planes—7, miraculously, the first time in history, steel was melted by fire. It is physically impossible.”
Rosie O’Donnell, from The View
Steel melts at about 2,750 degrees Fahrenheit—but it loses strength at temperatures as low as 400 F. When temperatures break 1000 degrees F, steel loses nearly 50 percent of its strength. ...steel is made with fire ............
Why won't our elected officials and/or our president respond to peer reviewed scientific evidence that those buildings had explosives in them?
Wake up people! If buildings are gonna fall cause of a plane and fire then it doesn't mean every last computer, chair, desk, etc. etc etc gets obliterated to dust and buildings fall straight down. Bullshit.
9/11 is an inside job
Why won't our elected officials and/or our president respond to peer reviewed scientific evidence that those buildings had explosives in them?
Wake up people! If buildings are gonna fall cause of a plane and fire then it doesn't mean every last computer, chair, desk, etc. etc etc gets obliterated to dust and buildings fall straight down. Bullshit.
9/11 is an inside job
I completely agree.
Those planes hitting the building were a diversion to the government agents walking into the trade center and burning every lasgt computer, chair, desk, etc. etc. so that they could blame it on the airplane crashing into the building.
Amazing that the government has hidden this for so long.
I completely agree.
Those planes hitting the building were a diversion to the government agents walking into the trade center and burning every lasgt computer, chair, desk, etc. etc. so that they could blame it on the airplane crashing into the building.
Amazing that the government has hidden this for so long.
That day was a diversion to take our civil liberties away. That day is an excuse for the war on terror, which is a never ending war they have created.
That day was an opportunity for the men behind the curtain to plow forward with their agenda. Kissenger is always referring to "a catastrophe being anything but an opportunity."
That day I will never forget.
That day was a diversion to take our civil liberties away. That day is an excuse for the war on terror, which is a never ending war they have created.
That day was an opportunity for the men behind the curtain to plow forward with their agenda. Kissenger is always referring to "a catastrophe being anything but an opportunity."
That day I will never forget.
And this was set in place by arranging for planes to crash into buildings as opposed to simply arranging for a bombing in times square.
Amazing who much smarter they are than we. 
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
