Then where are all of the people that were on the passenger manifest, including the Solictor General's (at the time) , Ted Olsons wife, TV political commentator, Barabra.Olson...has anyone seen her on TV lately?
MISSING SINCE 9/11/01...if you see her ANYWHERE, call the POLICE ASAP!!! THIS WILL PROVE 9/11 was a HOAX!!!!!!!!!
MISSING SINCE 9/11/01
0
No evidence that a plane hit the pentagon?
Then where are all of the people that were on the passenger manifest, including the Solictor General's (at the time) , Ted Olsons wife, TV political commentator, Barabra.Olson...has anyone seen her on TV lately?
MISSING SINCE 9/11/01...if you see her ANYWHERE, call the POLICE ASAP!!! THIS WILL PROVE 9/11 was a HOAX!!!!!!!!!
why dont you try and answer the latest question which is how do you explain the bodies that were pulled from the pentagon which happened to be the same ppl who were aboard the flight.
why dont you try and answer the latest question which is how do you explain the bodies that were pulled from the pentagon which happened to be the same ppl who were aboard the flight.
why dont you try and answer the latest question which is how do you explain the bodies that were pulled from the pentagon which happened to be the same ppl who were aboard the flight.
id love to hear the explanation to this one.
99% of whatever hit the Pentagon vanished and YOU think they pulled out bodies that were in the plane?
Give it up...You really are clueless.
0
Quote Originally Posted by steveshane67:
what does that page have to do with anything?
why dont you try and answer the latest question which is how do you explain the bodies that were pulled from the pentagon which happened to be the same ppl who were aboard the flight.
id love to hear the explanation to this one.
99% of whatever hit the Pentagon vanished and YOU think they pulled out bodies that were in the plane?
99% of whatever hit the Pentagon vanished and YOU think they pulled out bodies that were in the plane?
Give it up...You really are clueless.
so all the morticians that did all those autopsies were lying?
and
i thought it was common CT belief that airplane fuel was not hot enought to melt steel. if thats the case, how did 99% of 'whatever' hit the pentagon vanish? cant have it both ways
and
how did they find airplane wreckage on the ground outside of the pentagon? they must make the LAPD look like amatuers when it comes to planting evidence.
id love to meet you in person and debate you for $10000 on every single thing you claim happened, or didnt happen on 9/11 bc id walk away a rich man.
0
Quote Originally Posted by coldsnap55:
99% of whatever hit the Pentagon vanished and YOU think they pulled out bodies that were in the plane?
Give it up...You really are clueless.
so all the morticians that did all those autopsies were lying?
and
i thought it was common CT belief that airplane fuel was not hot enought to melt steel. if thats the case, how did 99% of 'whatever' hit the pentagon vanish? cant have it both ways
and
how did they find airplane wreckage on the ground outside of the pentagon? they must make the LAPD look like amatuers when it comes to planting evidence.
id love to meet you in person and debate you for $10000 on every single thing you claim happened, or didnt happen on 9/11 bc id walk away a rich man.
I hate to sound like a Hutch but....Show me a link where BODIES from the plane were found...That's new to me.
ALL I ASK IS.....Why is there no film shown to the public of a plane hitting the Pentagon.....
Stupidest answer yet......Maybe there was no camera on that part of the building.....AT THE PENTAGON????????
2nd stupidest answer....Why show it?
Nobody can answer that question....They just try and steer away from it by asking other questions.
Hutch got his questions to a question answered and is a no-show now......Follow his lead....Nothing you say makes sense anyway.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
i thought it was common CT belief that airplane fuel was not hot enought to melt steel. if thats the case, how did 99% of 'whatever' hit the pentagon vanish? cant have it both ways
Read that again and see if it makes sense to you....Now you are saying that the fuel was hot enough to melt and destroy everything except bodies that were found that came from the plane.
Can't have it both ways.
0
I hate to sound like a Hutch but....Show me a link where BODIES from the plane were found...That's new to me.
ALL I ASK IS.....Why is there no film shown to the public of a plane hitting the Pentagon.....
Stupidest answer yet......Maybe there was no camera on that part of the building.....AT THE PENTAGON????????
2nd stupidest answer....Why show it?
Nobody can answer that question....They just try and steer away from it by asking other questions.
Hutch got his questions to a question answered and is a no-show now......Follow his lead....Nothing you say makes sense anyway.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
i thought it was common CT belief that airplane fuel was not hot enought to melt steel. if thats the case, how did 99% of 'whatever' hit the pentagon vanish? cant have it both ways
Read that again and see if it makes sense to you....Now you are saying that the fuel was hot enough to melt and destroy everything except bodies that were found that came from the plane.
coldsnap, you are truly one stupid person incapable of simple reading comprehension.
I NEVER SAID A JET FUEL FIRE WAS HOT ENOUGH TO MELT STEEL!!!! IN FACT, SCIENCE SAYS ITS NOT. WHAT IT IS HOT ENOUGH TO DO IS SEVERLY WEAKEN THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF STEEL!!!!!!!!
the uninformed CT have been spouting for years that the WTC towers couldnt have collapsed due to a jet fuel fire bc it doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel. how a CT can claim the fire at the WTC was hot enough to melt steel but then claim the fire at the pentagon was hot enough to destroy 99% of whatever is beyond me, that is trying to have it both ways.
coroner mike wallace id the bodies link
plane wreckage photage link
witnesses link
popular mechanics did a pretty good job debunking all the CT link
im done with this thread, obviously you have more than a few screws loose and are incapable of accepting easily verifiable facts.
0
coldsnap, you are truly one stupid person incapable of simple reading comprehension.
I NEVER SAID A JET FUEL FIRE WAS HOT ENOUGH TO MELT STEEL!!!! IN FACT, SCIENCE SAYS ITS NOT. WHAT IT IS HOT ENOUGH TO DO IS SEVERLY WEAKEN THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF STEEL!!!!!!!!
the uninformed CT have been spouting for years that the WTC towers couldnt have collapsed due to a jet fuel fire bc it doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel. how a CT can claim the fire at the WTC was hot enough to melt steel but then claim the fire at the pentagon was hot enough to destroy 99% of whatever is beyond me, that is trying to have it both ways.
coroner mike wallace id the bodies link
plane wreckage photage link
witnesses link
popular mechanics did a pretty good job debunking all the CT link
im done with this thread, obviously you have more than a few screws loose and are incapable of accepting easily verifiable facts.
"coldsnap, you are truly one stupid person incapable of simple reading comprehension."
ALL I ASK IS.....Why is there no film shown to the public of a plane hitting the Pentagon.....
Nobody can answer that question....They just try and steer away from it by asking other questions.
Once again you have proven what I have said all along in my statement above in green....Maybe a pretty crayon colour can help get your attention.
Now go give Straightshooter another update in the thread where he is getting his ass handed to him ......It brightened his day....for a second. I am done asking the same ONE question over and over to you.
The correct answer is......They are hiding something and until they show actual footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon there will always be doubt....It's not the first time that your government has screwed the public....look at just about any thread in this forum.
I hope I am wrong because if it wasn't a plane..... Where did the plane and people on it go? Don't come back with a childish retort like...." So I guess you think they landed the plane somewhere and killed everyone and destroyed the plane? ].....Like some people may think....I have no answer to that.
That is why I believe they should show the footage that they are hiding from the public.
incapable of accepting easily verifiable facts.
Finding and posting a link that YOU believe in doesn't mean it is true.....There are just as many links that oppose it.
I'm glad you said you are done with this thread. Too repetitive and predictable.
0
"coldsnap, you are truly one stupid person incapable of simple reading comprehension."
ALL I ASK IS.....Why is there no film shown to the public of a plane hitting the Pentagon.....
Nobody can answer that question....They just try and steer away from it by asking other questions.
Once again you have proven what I have said all along in my statement above in green....Maybe a pretty crayon colour can help get your attention.
Now go give Straightshooter another update in the thread where he is getting his ass handed to him ......It brightened his day....for a second. I am done asking the same ONE question over and over to you.
The correct answer is......They are hiding something and until they show actual footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon there will always be doubt....It's not the first time that your government has screwed the public....look at just about any thread in this forum.
I hope I am wrong because if it wasn't a plane..... Where did the plane and people on it go? Don't come back with a childish retort like...." So I guess you think they landed the plane somewhere and killed everyone and destroyed the plane? ].....Like some people may think....I have no answer to that.
That is why I believe they should show the footage that they are hiding from the public.
incapable of accepting easily verifiable facts.
Finding and posting a link that YOU believe in doesn't mean it is true.....There are just as many links that oppose it.
I'm glad you said you are done with this thread. Too repetitive and predictable.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.