Pretty sure that was simultaneous possession.....

Tate's "hand on the ball" does not count as possession. 

And I also won $ on the play.

That play was a joke all the way around.  Can't believe they f'ed it up even with replay.

i'm sure if we went to covers this same time last year, we'd see several threads about how games are fixed because the refs suck.  yet, because these new refs are also bad, all of the sudden the regular refs are great.  the media in this country makes people stupid. 

Tate, 100%, clearly, without a doubt, pushed off. OFFENSIVE PASS INTERFERENCE, and no one can argue that.

I lost 50 so nothing big. No way in hell did they both have it. INT and PI all day!!!!!

Now come on Vanzack, you are smarter than this. You know it was not simultaneous possession. You know the defense caught the ball and put it to his CHEST, then the offensive dude just was touching the ball. Van, you are better than this.

Huh?  Just shooting the shit over a very close play. 

The "offensive dude" had a hand on the ball when possession was gained - and then the other hand got on the ball.  I think - by rule - that is simultaneous possession.

If that hurts my reputation in the esteemed covers community, so be it.

Nah, Jennings caught it.  Jennings also caught Tate's arm which allowed Tate to later bring his other arm in to wrestle with Jennings for the ball after Jennings had both feet down in the end zone

Vanzack, was there OFFESIVE PASS INTERFERENCE on that play??/

Of course.  Posted earlier in the thread how funny it was.

 

Vanzack - either your bored and just trying to irritate people with your comments or your stupid, or you may be both.

Either way I hope the reason you have not backtracked is because in Guinea they have banned the ability to watch NFL game replays.

If you watch it you can see clearly how horrible that call was.  Horrible.  Please wake up.

there was obviously pass interference, who cares.......that's not the debate here

screenshot - https://cdn.niketalk.com/8/8e/8e14dfab_A3nCjbJCAAENHHZ.png

tell me when they first hit the ground, that Tate had non of that ball?  You can't

That screenshot doesnt show anything.

Tate sticking his arm into jennings reception is not a catch for Tate... jesus people

Instead of catching the ball Jennings should have slapped it out of the back of the endzone and we wouldnt even be having this discussion!!

bring back tje real refs ! give em everything they want ! i cant believe theese pieces of shit are going to decide who goes to the super bowl i am done with this shit ! And no i had no $ on the game

Van, how come the ref on TV said that the Def player had the ball and cradled it to his chest?

Once again. For the third time. Im going to assume all of the self proclaimed smart people of this thread cant answer this...

Please tell me if there was ever a time that Jennings had the ball when Tate didnt.

 

Pete Carroll is a total asshole.  Anybody watching this post game press conference?

Van, how come the ref on TV said that the Def player had the ball and cradled it to his chest?

Well - he is a former ref who might have an interest in making the situation better for his buddies.

He is also about 100 years old.

I dont fucking know.  It is a judgement call.  Like a ball or a strike.  I think you will hear a lot of different viewpoints on it this week.  We are taking stabs at something 15 minutes old here - give it a few hours - pretty sure you will hear intelligent debates on both sides of this one.

I have not heard ONE professional say it was simutaneous possession

yeah I don't think Jennings ever "established" possession

It was clearly intercepted. It was also clearly offensive PI. The NFL is a disgrace.

Van, Jennings was higher than Tate, he caught the ball from the very start. Can't you see that? Jennings caught/touched, the ball first, and made a full catch. Now, going down is when Tate put his hands on the ball.