All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Pretty sure that was simultaneous possession.....

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 30159
Posts: 479
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #1

I think by rule the refs actually got that right.

But so ridiculous.  Just silly ending.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 12262
Posted: #2
If this doesnt make the nfl see what a joke this is this season is going down the drain!!!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #3

This is the game that brings the real refs back.

Can you imagine Ed Hocculi at home right now?  He just popped a bottle of Crystal.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 9698
Posted: #4
STFU
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 2089
Posted: #5
It is SOOOOO silly that the two refs there disagreed....but I agree Van.....simultaneous poss is supposed to go to the Offensive player
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 16675
Posted: #6
I disagree.  Defender clearly had the ball pressed to his chest.

What about the extra point?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 12262
Posted: #7
disgraceful
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 3108
Posted: #8
Vanzack 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 2089
Posted: #9
they both had it.....but Packers player had it "more"?????....does that matter?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 6735
Posted: #10
I think you're wrong. I didn't even lose money but that was a GB interception easy peasy. 

But yes, real refs got a gift. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 38226
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

This is the game that brings the real refs back.

Can you imagine Ed Hocculi at home right now?  He just popped a bottle of Crystal.


 For sure.........this whole game was a debacle...............somewhere in between there was some good football but holy shit
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #12

I know the defender had MORE of the ball.

But the rule is simultaneous possession goes to the offense - and I think it was simultaneous possession.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 2089
Posted: #13
wow, Golden Tate pushed the shit out of that guy
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 900
Posted: #14
I didnt bet the game but the Jennings definitely should have been awarded the pick.. No simultaneous possession there
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #15

Ivey - yes - he had MORE of the ball....

Agree....

 

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 6735
Posted: #16
Should haved knocked it away. Like it's coached that would have solved it. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #17
I agree with you Van, but that was not simultaneous possession and that was evident in replay.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 518
Posted: #18
Seattle player had one hand on the ball.  How is that simultaneous possession?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #19
looked like a clear catch by jennings with tate having a hand on the ball. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 6735
Posted: #20
I'd be ashamed to win like that. 
Carroll has some balls acting like it was a great play and saying how they executed. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6768
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by FadeOnly:

I disagree.  Defender clearly had the ball pressed to his chest.

What about the extra point?

Not only did these scabs miss offensive interference with the push in the back, but this was NOT simultaneous possession, so the call was HORRENDOUS.  


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: #22

I realize they give liberties to the WR's at the end of a game, but that was a penalty that needed to be called IMO.  Crazy.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #23

That push on the defender by Tate is so funny.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2002
Posts: 11129
Posted: #24
I had sea hags. I'm still wondering why he didn't kick the fg with 4:30 left. This shit is whack but ill take the win. Loooool
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 961
Posted: #25
Exactly, just because Tate can put his hands on the ball doesn't mean he had possession 
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.