Lines dictates the game....
In the tank buddy - I laughed and laughed at this comment by you:
"....It was 35-0 at the half!....I was all smiles, butttttt, no score in the second half...Several drives inside the ten ended in fumbles....Hmmmm....Plus 4 missed field goals....."
plus 4 missed field goals..that's what did it for me.....put me over the edge......I got tears in my eyes from laughing so hard......that comment made my day...thanks.
In the tank buddy - I laughed and laughed at this comment by you:
"....It was 35-0 at the half!....I was all smiles, butttttt, no score in the second half...Several drives inside the ten ended in fumbles....Hmmmm....Plus 4 missed field goals....."
plus 4 missed field goals..that's what did it for me.....put me over the edge......I got tears in my eyes from laughing so hard......that comment made my day...thanks.
1. Lions (for some reason) fade away rest of the game offensively, why would they do that if it wasnt for fixing?
2. Cowboys would have to find something to shut down Lions offense; how would they be able to find this 'all of a sudden and magically'?
Do you honestly think, after Lions grabbed their first two touchdowns, that if they had scored another touchdown the game would have been won by them? Nope, i dont think so either, because Dallas would just respond with another touchdown somehow 'magically'. Thats how it works. But why didnt that happen then? Because they wanted the game to go under as well, so they had to COMPLETELY shut down the production from Lions after they had 2 touchdowns. Im gonna continue on this post later.
1. Lions (for some reason) fade away rest of the game offensively, why would they do that if it wasnt for fixing?
2. Cowboys would have to find something to shut down Lions offense; how would they be able to find this 'all of a sudden and magically'?
Do you honestly think, after Lions grabbed their first two touchdowns, that if they had scored another touchdown the game would have been won by them? Nope, i dont think so either, because Dallas would just respond with another touchdown somehow 'magically'. Thats how it works. But why didnt that happen then? Because they wanted the game to go under as well, so they had to COMPLETELY shut down the production from Lions after they had 2 touchdowns. Im gonna continue on this post later.
There are simply some games the house knows which side has a higher chance; I've studied line movement for quite some time...
usually there isnt much fake moves in the playoffs... Simply because they do not want to scare the public,, unless if its just that lopsided... When you see a number drop from 7 to 6 on a home favorite... Thats a bold move... And sure enough Dallas didnt cover... So they give the lead to Det the first half then the second half dallas owns,, especially if The team that is down still having to give a full touch down or 6.5 in the second half... You have to learn how to respect those moves,, usually they dont allow much time for you to think,, the public loves value i can tell you this... And sure enough they choked on that value...
And tell tale signs of this event is when a team really looks that bad in the first half,, or you have a player over reacting on an injury... Halfs are slightly trickyier,, sometimes the winning ways for the halfs is simply based on the anticipation,, because books know people want to chase... So early on you need to know where the action is and what the public will do... While other times you have to litterally take the side that does not make sense... every matchup is different as also to the chip count... but most fall into those two main categories
Well said. Totally agree w/ u
There are simply some games the house knows which side has a higher chance; I've studied line movement for quite some time...
usually there isnt much fake moves in the playoffs... Simply because they do not want to scare the public,, unless if its just that lopsided... When you see a number drop from 7 to 6 on a home favorite... Thats a bold move... And sure enough Dallas didnt cover... So they give the lead to Det the first half then the second half dallas owns,, especially if The team that is down still having to give a full touch down or 6.5 in the second half... You have to learn how to respect those moves,, usually they dont allow much time for you to think,, the public loves value i can tell you this... And sure enough they choked on that value...
And tell tale signs of this event is when a team really looks that bad in the first half,, or you have a player over reacting on an injury... Halfs are slightly trickyier,, sometimes the winning ways for the halfs is simply based on the anticipation,, because books know people want to chase... So early on you need to know where the action is and what the public will do... While other times you have to litterally take the side that does not make sense... every matchup is different as also to the chip count... but most fall into those two main categories
Well said. Totally agree w/ u
Interesting that we have some reverse line movement in the Patriots game and the Packers game. Tells you a little something on which side Vegas wants Joe Public on.....
What side they want? Coz packers line hasnt changed? They want ppl to bet on Patriots?
Interesting that we have some reverse line movement in the Patriots game and the Packers game. Tells you a little something on which side Vegas wants Joe Public on.....
What side they want? Coz packers line hasnt changed? They want ppl to bet on Patriots?
What side they want? Coz packers line hasnt changed? They want ppl to bet on Patriots?
What side they want? Coz packers line hasnt changed? They want ppl to bet on Patriots?
The problem is unless you work for a book you have no idea where the majority of the money is going. Just cause some website tells you 70% of bettors are on one side it doesnt mean thats where the money is.
What if the average bet from that 70% is $100 and the average bet on the 30% side is $1000?? That means the money is loaded on the 30% side.
You only know the percentages, you have no idea where the money is though.
The problem is unless you work for a book you have no idea where the majority of the money is going. Just cause some website tells you 70% of bettors are on one side it doesnt mean thats where the money is.
What if the average bet from that 70% is $100 and the average bet on the 30% side is $1000?? That means the money is loaded on the 30% side.
You only know the percentages, you have no idea where the money is though.
Where do you see what side the public is on / where the money is coming in?
Where do you see what side the public is on / where the money is coming in?
Just from what the local books here in Vegas are telling me. I used to work in the industry here and know a few people still working, and it's just what they're saying. Take it for what it's worth, just word of mouth
I am wondering if the small line drop was due to the extreme cold temps in the midwest this week. Colder game, could lead to lower scoring and closer contest. Although, it appears temps will be moving back up closer to normal for this time of year. Still cold though. Also, 6.5 to 6.0 isn't as major a move as say 7 to 6.5.
Just some thoughts, obviously some speculation. I'm still torn on this game, probably pass on it for wagering.
Just from what the local books here in Vegas are telling me. I used to work in the industry here and know a few people still working, and it's just what they're saying. Take it for what it's worth, just word of mouth
I am wondering if the small line drop was due to the extreme cold temps in the midwest this week. Colder game, could lead to lower scoring and closer contest. Although, it appears temps will be moving back up closer to normal for this time of year. Still cold though. Also, 6.5 to 6.0 isn't as major a move as say 7 to 6.5.
Just some thoughts, obviously some speculation. I'm still torn on this game, probably pass on it for wagering.
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
