Thanks XYZ for your input, the line is moving back up, I am going to look into the last 5 or 6 NFC championship, and see how the over/unders went. It is just the over look easy, even at 40, wondering if it will continue to rise?
0
Thanks XYZ for your input, the line is moving back up, I am going to look into the last 5 or 6 NFC championship, and see how the over/unders went. It is just the over look easy, even at 40, wondering if it will continue to rise?
Nice picks XYZ, shoulda listened! So close on that SF/Seattle game, pretty sure you had it a 39.5, for me waiting to get the 40 for the push, was better than losing! So if lines dictate the game, for this upcoming game with the line opening for a short period of time with Seattle favored by 1-2 and now Denver at -1.5, what do you think this line is dictating?
0
Nice picks XYZ, shoulda listened! So close on that SF/Seattle game, pretty sure you had it a 39.5, for me waiting to get the 40 for the push, was better than losing! So if lines dictate the game, for this upcoming game with the line opening for a short period of time with Seattle favored by 1-2 and now Denver at -1.5, what do you think this line is dictating?
So you are thinking that this line, and the way it's jumped around is dictating a Bronco win XYZ? Or is this not a candidate as of yet. I see you are liking the Broncos, does it have much to do with the spread, the way it opened, and now moved to Denver -2.5? You think the books are playing the betters, or trying to save there fools?
0
So you are thinking that this line, and the way it's jumped around is dictating a Bronco win XYZ? Or is this not a candidate as of yet. I see you are liking the Broncos, does it have much to do with the spread, the way it opened, and now moved to Denver -2.5? You think the books are playing the betters, or trying to save there fools?
Quote:3/4's of the audience watching the game are bettors. fix the game or at least moderate the game to finish around the spread so that the ratings stay high Lol not even 3/4 of the people watching AT A CASINO SPORTSBOOK have money on it
0
Quote:3/4's of the audience watching the game are bettors. fix the game or at least moderate the game to finish around the spread so that the ratings stay high Lol not even 3/4 of the people watching AT A CASINO SPORTSBOOK have money on it
So you are thinking that this line, and the way it's jumped around is dictating a Bronco win XYZ? Or is this not a candidate as of yet. I see you are liking the Broncos, does it have much to do with the spread, the way it opened, and now moved to Denver -2.5? You think the books are playing the betters, or trying to save there fools?
I think the line move was natural... Under these circumstances,, i would take the points... I think vegas knows The public is on Denver and will be on Denver...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Gregga55:
So you are thinking that this line, and the way it's jumped around is dictating a Bronco win XYZ? Or is this not a candidate as of yet. I see you are liking the Broncos, does it have much to do with the spread, the way it opened, and now moved to Denver -2.5? You think the books are playing the betters, or trying to save there fools?
I think the line move was natural... Under these circumstances,, i would take the points... I think vegas knows The public is on Denver and will be on Denver...
They wanted Denver money, and they got it, still getting it? So Denver is the bait? Shoot man…. this game could go either way. I am thinking Seattle, with the tough D
0
They wanted Denver money, and they got it, still getting it? So Denver is the bait? Shoot man…. this game could go either way. I am thinking Seattle, with the tough D
Even if you buy into the "trap" nonsense, which I don't, why would it ever be logical to open Seattle at -1 if they anticipated Denver money?? That's like a red flag to bronco backers. Why not open the line at a friendly Denver -1 so the public thinks they are backing the "rightful favorite " on a soft line. They wouldn't set a trap to cross over a critical number like zero either, doesn't make sense. I think the spread is right on. Seattle is the better team, with a great defense. Manning has the experience, and a great offense. Weakest department on the field is Denver's defense. Total offensive rankings go as followed (espn) 5. New England 6. Seattle 7. San Diego 8. Kansas City. Broncos gave up 34, 27, 28 to ne, sd, and kc. This will actually be one of the weaker defenses Seattle will have to face this year. I expect success in Seattle run game, which will open up the play action roll out for Russ Wilson. I think he throws for around 250 with a couple tds and will be your MVP . Just my opinion
0
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:
Its called a trapVegas loves to bait...........
Even if you buy into the "trap" nonsense, which I don't, why would it ever be logical to open Seattle at -1 if they anticipated Denver money?? That's like a red flag to bronco backers. Why not open the line at a friendly Denver -1 so the public thinks they are backing the "rightful favorite " on a soft line. They wouldn't set a trap to cross over a critical number like zero either, doesn't make sense. I think the spread is right on. Seattle is the better team, with a great defense. Manning has the experience, and a great offense. Weakest department on the field is Denver's defense. Total offensive rankings go as followed (espn) 5. New England 6. Seattle 7. San Diego 8. Kansas City. Broncos gave up 34, 27, 28 to ne, sd, and kc. This will actually be one of the weaker defenses Seattle will have to face this year. I expect success in Seattle run game, which will open up the play action roll out for Russ Wilson. I think he throws for around 250 with a couple tds and will be your MVP . Just my opinion