All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Hey Guys...Tim Tebow Still Sucks

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 159654
Posts: 2856
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 2180
Posted: #2001
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

The Steelers have the #1 defense in the NFL and the Denver defense hasn’t forced a turnover in 3 weeks.  If the Steelers can score 21 points they should probably be enough.

21 are you kidding? KC just beat the Broncos with 7.     Say goodnight Alice

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 68277
Posted: #2002
Not even sure why I typed all that because all I'm going to get back is that he brought a 1-4 team to the playoffs. As if he, single-handedly won all the games.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6703
Posted: #2003
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

The only time I bring up that the defense ranks in the bottom 10 of the NFL is when people try to claim how good they are.

 

They WERE the reason why Denver is in the playoffs. I guess you are not disputing the other points I made since you avoid them altogether.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #2004
Quote Originally Posted by Sparky10191:


Look whose hedging their bet now. If Tebow doesn't suck...the next step up is decent. And you talk as if he's great. You say you don't think he's great...but you're fighting the fact that he "doesn't suck". Suck is bad. Opposite of suck is good. Decent is the lowest level of good.

You said that I can't admit when I'm wrong. If you try to spin this...there's no arguing with you. Plain and Simple. 

Also...If you can't admit that the Broncos defense is better than their rankings indicate...than you obviously are just trying to fight for the sake of fighting because you can't be wrong.

I don't care what you or the Tebow fans say. Regardless if Tebow becomes a Hall of Famer or is a backup in 2 years. You'll stand by the fact that Tebow doesn't suck and there is absolutely no arguing with you. None. And I've seen so many people go back and fourth with you and they all end up saying is that YOU are the one who can't admit that you're wrong. If you can still say that Tebow is good after what you have seen from him...than you are, I'm sorry to say, clueless.

Once again: you just flat out lie about what I said.  But I suppose that is to be expected given your situation.

Where did I say Tebow was a good QB?

 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #2005
Quote Originally Posted by gilligansisland:

21 are you kidding? KC just beat the Broncos with 7.     Say goodnight Alice

The adults were talking about the Steelers covering a game.  Go back to your coloring books.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 68277
Posted: #2006
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

Once again: you just flat out lie about what I said.  But I suppose that is to be expected given your situation.

Where did I say Tebow was a good QB?

 


Well you're arguing against the fact that he sucks so, by default, you think he's good.

But it's ok that you don't say it. Everyone knows you've been in this thread fighting it since day one so you can keep denying it to us, we all know.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6703
Posted: #2007
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

Once again: you just flat out lie about what I said.  But I suppose that is to be expected given your situation.

Where did I say Tebow was a good QB?

 

So how would you rate him as a QB? Just curious.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 68277
Posted: #2008
And what "situation" am I in? The one that now has everyone who CAN admit they were wrong, admitting it and saying that Tebow is a terrible quarterback and, well, he sucks?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #2009

Quote Originally Posted by Sparky10191:

Not even sure why I typed all that because all I'm going to get back is that he brought a 1-4 team to the playoffs. As if he, single-handedly won all the games.

Of course he didn’t.  However QBs get more credit for wins than they usually deserve and they get more blame for loses than they usually deserve.

That’s just the way of the NFL.

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 68277
Posted: #2010
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

So how would you rate him as a QB? Just curious.


Does it matter? HE wins. Not the Broncos win. TIM TEBOW wins. Nobody else factors into the wins since the defense isn't good and nobody seems to ever mention Prater.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #2011
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

 

They WERE the reason why Denver is in the playoffs. I guess you are not disputing the other points I made since you avoid them altogether.

You want a cookie for pointing out the defense helped the team win games this season?

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 68277
Posted: #2012
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

Of course he didn’t.  However QBs get more credit for wins than they usually deserve and they get more blame for loses than they usually deserve.

That’s just the way of the NFL.

 


So you have to go by the way of the NFL? Even when, time after time, I bring up games where the Broncos defense were dominant, and all the credit still goes to Tebow?

And I've even seen people blame the Broncos defense for giving up 40 to the Bills. Only looking at the box score. Probably because it makes their argument look better. Despite the fact that the defense was pretty damn good that game.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #2013
Quote Originally Posted by Sparky10191:


Well you're arguing against the fact that he sucks so, by default, you think he's good.

But it's ok that you don't say it. Everyone knows you've been in this thread fighting it since day one so you can keep denying it to us, we all know.

Because I said I don’t think he sucks that means I think he is good? Nice excuse.

Still waiting for you to point out where I claimed he was a good QB.

 

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6703
Posted: #2014
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

You want a cookie for pointing out the defense helped the team win games this season?

No, I just want to point out they are the reason Den is in the playoffs, in spite of Tebow's poor play. Obviously, you can't make a case besides pointing out one stat here and there while ignoring other glaring aspects.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #2015
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

So how would you rate him as a QB? Just curious.

Right now, probably below average as a QB.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 2180
Posted: #2016
[Quote: Originally Posted by StraightShooter]

The Steelers have the #1 defense in the NFL and the Denver defense hasn’t forced a turnover in 3 weeks.  If the Steelers can score 21 points they should probably be enough.

[/Quote

Too bad holding KC to 7 wasn't good enough.Another bad showing by the Denver D?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 970
Posted: #2017
hey sparky, shooter! can we just drop this subject please! sparky is RIGHT!!! Tebow sucks and we all saw that clear as day today!!! we all know that broncos are not the SB champs this year, they're not even going to be the conference champs. and stop bringing the broncos' defense because they too sucked!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 68277
Posted: #2018
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

Because I said I don’t think he sucks that means I think he is good? Nice excuse.

Still waiting for you to point out where I claimed he was a good QB.

 

 


It's not an excuse. It's a fact. You argue that he doesn't suck. That's good enough. You can't even twist this one. You call him a "WINNER". He may win games...but NOBODY claims someone is a "WINNER" if they think they're average.

Nice try, though.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #2019
Quote Originally Posted by Sparky10191:

And what "situation" am I in? The one that now has everyone who CAN admit they were wrong, admitting it and saying that Tebow is a terrible quarterback and, well, he sucks?

A one in which you are desperately trying to save face.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #2020
Quote Originally Posted by Sparky10191:


So you have to go by the way of the NFL? Even when, time after time, I bring up games where the Broncos defense were dominant, and all the credit still goes to Tebow?

And I've even seen people blame the Broncos defense for giving up 40 to the Bills. Only looking at the box score. Probably because it makes their argument look better. Despite the fact that the defense was pretty damn good that game.

So now you want to argue with me about what other people do? 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 31214
Posted: #2021
Quote Originally Posted by dgnerate:

hey sparky, shooter! can we just drop this subject please! sparky is RIGHT!!! Tebow sucks and we all saw that clear as day today!!! we all know that broncos are not the SB champs this year, they're not even going to be the conference champs. and stop bringing the broncos' defense because they too sucked!



 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #2022
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

No, I just want to point out they are the reason Den is in the playoffs, in spite of Tebow's poor play. Obviously, you can't make a case besides pointing out one stat here and there while ignoring other glaring aspects.

In 5 of those wins Tebow had a passer rating over 90.  I wouldn’t call that poor.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 68277
Posted: #2023
Quote Originally Posted by gilligansisland:


Too bad holding KC to 7 wasn't good enough.Another bad showing by the Denver D?


It's sad when holding SIX teams in 11 weeks under 15 points isn't good enough.

And you know what else this defense has done that's even more remarkable in those 11 weeks? 6 of those weeks they allowed 1 offensive touchdown to go along with the game against the Jets where they didn't give up one.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6703
Posted: #2024
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

Right now, probably below average as a QB.

Well, that's awfully nice of you. At the very least, below average is closer to "sucking" than "decent" unless of course, you could sub-divide them into many more smaller catagories like he's below average but 1 point above "sucking".

 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #2025

"Too bad holding KC to 7 wasn't good enough.Another bad showing by the Denver D?"

No, the defense played pretty well.

3 weeks in a row without a turnover though, IIRC.

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.