@arakias
That is fair - I will go back and read through the entire thread. I love when I see someone post their system and some of the picks are in line with what my gut tells me Keep up the great work, friend.
@arakias
That is fair - I will go back and read through the entire thread. I love when I see someone post their system and some of the picks are in line with what my gut tells me Keep up the great work, friend.
@arakias
That is fair - I will go back and read through the entire thread. I love when I see someone post their system and some of the picks are in line with what my gut tells me Keep up the great work, friend.
@Noobita
Both teams went under, so they both move to game 3.
Totals are based on Covers posted line. Rockets/Pelicans yesterday for example would be 222. If you want to make sure you're accurate with the system, check the CURRENT line on the game on covers when you're looking to lock in your wager. I've gotten a better line by a half point or full point many times.
I don't post the totals anymore because it takes me more time to check them, when you guys can easily check them too, knowing this is how they're checked.
@Noobita
Both teams went under, so they both move to game 3.
Totals are based on Covers posted line. Rockets/Pelicans yesterday for example would be 222. If you want to make sure you're accurate with the system, check the CURRENT line on the game on covers when you're looking to lock in your wager. I've gotten a better line by a half point or full point many times.
I don't post the totals anymore because it takes me more time to check them, when you guys can easily check them too, knowing this is how they're checked.
@GR8FORM
Nope. I just follow the system. That’s the beauty of it. There’s very few people in the world who make money trying to “pick them” correctly. I prefer a system based approach. No need to study, research, guess, etc... just follow what has worked over history.
@GR8FORM
Nope. I just follow the system. That’s the beauty of it. There’s very few people in the world who make money trying to “pick them” correctly. I prefer a system based approach. No need to study, research, guess, etc... just follow what has worked over history.
I’ve picked games plenty of times, started the year like 10-3 and got a bunch of flack when I switched to this (look at the first page of comments). Not sure how anyone can argue with the results at this point though. Notice all the haters who talked shit have disappeared. No one can admit when they’re wrong :D
I’ve picked games plenty of times, started the year like 10-3 and got a bunch of flack when I switched to this (look at the first page of comments). Not sure how anyone can argue with the results at this point though. Notice all the haters who talked shit have disappeared. No one can admit when they’re wrong :D
I see you’re using multiples of 3 per each unit increase. Do you have to use the multiple of 3 per each unit? For someone with a smaller bankroll starting out arbitrarily at $0.25 still leaves you at $546.75 (big wager) on a game 8. I’m intrigued by the system just don’t know if I can afford it. I guess back to the original question can this system be scaled down or does it have to be played in multiples of 3? Thanks for all the effort and bol!
I see you’re using multiples of 3 per each unit increase. Do you have to use the multiple of 3 per each unit? For someone with a smaller bankroll starting out arbitrarily at $0.25 still leaves you at $546.75 (big wager) on a game 8. I’m intrigued by the system just don’t know if I can afford it. I guess back to the original question can this system be scaled down or does it have to be played in multiples of 3? Thanks for all the effort and bol!
@BuschDood
Multiples of 3 pay for previous losses. My suggestion would be to play games 5-8 for smaller amounts but multiples of 3 if you want to be safer and less “big” action.
even 3-8 or something..
1-3-9-27-81-243
@BuschDood
Multiples of 3 pay for previous losses. My suggestion would be to play games 5-8 for smaller amounts but multiples of 3 if you want to be safer and less “big” action.
even 3-8 or something..
1-3-9-27-81-243
@BuschDood
No, I’m saying if an 8 game chase is out of your budget, only play the chase games at a certain point and above... don’t play 1-8 for a 3X increase each time.
Play 5-8 (or whatever you want). You’re not “recovering” from 1-4 losses, because you didn’t play them.
@BuschDood
No, I’m saying if an 8 game chase is out of your budget, only play the chase games at a certain point and above... don’t play 1-8 for a 3X increase each time.
Play 5-8 (or whatever you want). You’re not “recovering” from 1-4 losses, because you didn’t play them.
Cavs move to game 2, T-wolves move to game 2.
Clippers complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, Knicks complete the chase on game 2 for +1.73 units, Jazz complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, 76ers complete the chase on game 2 for +1.73 units, Pacers complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, Wizards complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, Magic complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units.
Chase is now 146-0. Bankroll is +1,760.20 units.
Cavs move to game 2, T-wolves move to game 2.
Clippers complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, Knicks complete the chase on game 2 for +1.73 units, Jazz complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, 76ers complete the chase on game 2 for +1.73 units, Pacers complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, Wizards complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, Magic complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units.
Chase is now 146-0. Bankroll is +1,760.20 units.
Todays games:
Hornets/Heat OVER - Heat are a game 1 play for 1 unit.
Lakers/Hawks OVER - Lakers are a game 3 for play 9 units, Hawks are a game 1 play for 1 unit, total units to risk is 10.
T-wolves/Cavs OVER - Twolves are a game 2 play for 3 units, Cavs are a game 2 play for 3 units, total units to risk is 6.
Kings/Pelicans OVER - Kings are a game 1 play for 1 unit.
Pistons/Nuggets OVER - Pistons are a game 2 play for 3 units.
Todays games:
Hornets/Heat OVER - Heat are a game 1 play for 1 unit.
Lakers/Hawks OVER - Lakers are a game 3 for play 9 units, Hawks are a game 1 play for 1 unit, total units to risk is 10.
T-wolves/Cavs OVER - Twolves are a game 2 play for 3 units, Cavs are a game 2 play for 3 units, total units to risk is 6.
Kings/Pelicans OVER - Kings are a game 1 play for 1 unit.
Pistons/Nuggets OVER - Pistons are a game 2 play for 3 units.
@arakias
Awesome Arakias. Been loving the chase so far, and I thank you for it.
I have however, been tweaking some stuff on my own. I go by halves, and like the Lakers for example, I reduce on the over with the units and lay some on the Laker team total.
Ive noticed that sometimes one team goes over, but then the other team lags off, thus ruining the over. Of course, this is some extra stuff on the side, when they are plenty of units at risk on 1 team and one 1 unit on the other. (I hope I made any sense.)
Nevertheless, I either win - win or win and cover the lose. Good luck everyone.
@arakias
Awesome Arakias. Been loving the chase so far, and I thank you for it.
I have however, been tweaking some stuff on my own. I go by halves, and like the Lakers for example, I reduce on the over with the units and lay some on the Laker team total.
Ive noticed that sometimes one team goes over, but then the other team lags off, thus ruining the over. Of course, this is some extra stuff on the side, when they are plenty of units at risk on 1 team and one 1 unit on the other. (I hope I made any sense.)
Nevertheless, I either win - win or win and cover the lose. Good luck everyone.
@LGG79
I got you, if the Lakers are on game 3 you feel better about their TT over than their opponents. Makes sense, just remember, half our games chase the over and half chase the under.
OOOUUUOU in that order on the 8 game chase. Either way, glad I could help!
@LGG79
I got you, if the Lakers are on game 3 you feel better about their TT over than their opponents. Makes sense, just remember, half our games chase the over and half chase the under.
OOOUUUOU in that order on the 8 game chase. Either way, glad I could help!
Lakers move to game 4, Hawks move to game 2, Twolves move to game 3, Cavs move to game 3, Kings move to game 2.
Heat complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units.
Chase is now 147-0. Bankroll is +1,761.11 units.
Lakers move to game 4, Hawks move to game 2, Twolves move to game 3, Cavs move to game 3, Kings move to game 2.
Heat complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units.
Chase is now 147-0. Bankroll is +1,761.11 units.
Todays games:
Pistons/Jazz OVER - Pistons are a game 2 play for 3 units.
Celtics/Warriors OVER - Boston is a game 3 play for 9 units, Warriors are a game 2 play for 3 units.
Todays games:
Pistons/Jazz OVER - Pistons are a game 2 play for 3 units.
Celtics/Warriors OVER - Boston is a game 3 play for 9 units, Warriors are a game 2 play for 3 units.
Boston moves to game 4, Warriors move to game 3.
Pistons complete the chase on game 2 for +1.73 units.
Chase is now 148-0. Bankroll is +1,762.84 units.
Boston moves to game 4, Warriors move to game 3.
Pistons complete the chase on game 2 for +1.73 units.
Chase is now 148-0. Bankroll is +1,762.84 units.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.