• Forums
  • NFL Betting
  • NBA Betting
  • MLB Betting
  • NHL Betting
  • NCAAF Betting
  • NCAAB Betting
  • Soccer Betting
  • Tennis Betting
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Drop Down Caret
Covers Logo
  • Sports
    • NFL
      • NFL Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Odds
      • Prop Projections
      • Super Bowl Odds
      • Futures
      • Free Picks
      • News & Analysis
      • NFL Contest
      • Super Bowl
      • Injuries
      • Teams
      • Players
      • Standings
      • Statistics
      • Weather
      • League Trends
      • Print Sheets
    • NCAAF
      • NCAAF Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Odds
      • Futures
      • Free Picks
      • News & Analysis
      • NCAAF Contest
      • Bowl Game Odds
      • Injuries
      • Teams
      • Players
      • Standings
      • Statistics
      • Weather
      • League Trends
      • Print Sheets
    • NBA
      • NBA Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Odds
      • Prop Projections
      • Futures
      • Free Picks
      • News & Analysis
      • NBA Contest
      • NBA Finals
      • Injuries
      • Teams
      • Players
      • Standings
      • Referees
      • Statistics
      • League Trends
      • Print Sheets
    • NCAAB
      • NCAAB Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Odds
      • Futures
      • Free Picks
      • News & Analysis
      • NCAAB Contest
      • March Madness
      • Injuries
      • Teams
      • Players
      • Standings
      • Statistics
      • League Trends
      • Print Sheets
    • MLB
      • MLB Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Odds
      • Prop Projections
      • Futures
      • Free Picks
      • News & Analysis
      • MLB Contest
      • World Series
      • Injuries
      • Teams
      • Players
      • Standings
      • Statistics
      • Weather
      • Umpires
      • League Trends
      • Print Sheets
    • NHL
      • NHL Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Odds
      • Prop Projections
      • Futures
      • Free Picks
      • News & Analysis
      • NHL Contest
      • Stanley Cup
      • Injuries
      • Teams
      • Players
      • Standings
      • Referees
      • Statistics
      • Trends
      • Print Sheets
    • Soccer
      • MLS
        • MLS Home
        • Odds
        • News & Analysis
        • Teams
        • Betting Sites
      • Champions League
        • Champions League Home
        • Odds
        • News & Analysis
        • Teams
        • Betting Sites
      • Premier League
        • Premier League Home
        • Odds
        • News & Analysis
        • Teams
        • Betting Sites
    • UFC
      • UFC Home
      • Odds
      • News & Analysis
    • WNBA
      • WNBA Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Odds
      • Free Picks
      • News & Analysis
      • WNBA Contest
      • Injuries
      • Teams
      • Players
      • Standings
      • Statistics
      • League Trends
    • CFL
      • CFL Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Odds
      • Free Picks
      • News & Analysis
      • CFL Contest
      • Teams
      • Standings
      • League Trends
    • Golf
      • Golf Home
      • Golf Odds
      • Masters Odds
      • PGA Championship Odds
      • US Open Odds
      • British Open Odds
      • Ryder Cup Odds
      • Golf Picks
  • Odds
    • All Odds
    • NFL
    • NCAAF
    • NBA
    • NCAAB
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Golf
    • Soccer Odds
      • MLS Odds
      • Champions League Odds
      • Premier League Odds
    • UFC
    • WNBA
    • CFL
    • Election Odds
    • Futures
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
  • Picks
    • All Picks
    • NFL
    • NBA
    • NHL
    • MLB
    • NCAAF
    • NCAAB
    • Golf
    • WNBA
    • CFL
    • User Picks
    • Team User Picks
    • Consensus Picks
      • All Consensus Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • CFL
      • WNBA
      • Consensus FAQ
      • Public Money
  • Betting
    • US Betting Sites
      US Betting
      Sites
      Canada Betting Sites
      Canada Betting Sites
    • Sportsbook Reviews
      • Reviews
      • bet365
      • BetMGM
      • Caesars Sportsbook
      • DraftKings
      • Fanatics Sportsbook
      • FanDuel
    • States
      • US Legal Tracker
      • Revenue Tracker
      • Arizona
      • Arkansas
      • California
      • Colorado
      • Connecticut
      • DC
      • Florida
      • Georgia
      • Illinois
      • Indiana
      • Iowa
      • Kansas
      • Kentucky
      • Louisiana
      • Maine
      • Maryland
      • Massachusetts
      • Michigan
      • Mississippi
      • Nevada
      • New Hampshire
      • New Jersey
      • New York
      • North Carolina
      • Ohio
      • Oregon
      • Pennsylvania
      • Tennessee
      • Texas
      • Vermont
      • Virginia
      • West Virginia
      • Wyoming
    • Provinces
      • Alberta
      • British Columbia
      • Manitoba
      • Quebec (English)
      • Quebec (francais)
      • New Brunswick
      • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • Northwest Territories
      • Nova Scotia
      • Nunavut
      • Ontario
      • Prince Edward Island
      • Saskatchewan
      • Yukon
    • Betting Sites By Sport
      • Baseball
      • Basketball
      • Boxing Betting Sites
      • College Football
      • F1
      • Football
      • Super Bowl
      • Golf
      • Hockey
      • Horse Racing
      • March Madness
      • Soccer
      • UFC Betting Sites
      • World Cup
    • Betting Apps
      • Sports Betting Apps
      • Canada Sports Betting Apps
      • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Illinois Sports Betting Apps
      • Kentucky Sports Betting Apps
      • Maryland Sports Betting Apps
      • Massachusetts Sports Betting Apps
      • Michigan Sports Betting Apps
      • New Jersey Sports Betting Apps
      • New York Sports Betting Apps
      • North Carolina Sports Betting Apps
      • Ohio Sports Betting Apps
      • Pennsylvania Sports Betting Apps
      • Virginia Sports Betting Apps
    • Rest of World
      • UK
      • South Korea
      • International
    • Betting Guides
      • All Guides
      • Glossary
      • Betting Calculators
        • Odds Converter
        • Parlay Calculator
      • Futures Betting Guide
      • Moneyline Betting Guide
      • Over/Under Betting Guide
      • Parlay Betting Guide
      • Point Spread Betting Guide
      • Prop Betting Guide
      • Sports Betting Guides
        • How To Bet On Sports Guide
        • NFL Betting Guide
        • NHL Betting Guide
        • NBA Betting Guide
        • MLB Betting Guide
        • NCAAB Betting Guide
        • NCAAF Betting Guide
        • Golf Betting Guide
        • Tennis Betting Guide
      • Teaser Betting Guide
    • Betting News
      • All News
      • Industry News
      • Podcasts
      • Covers Videos
      • Covers Writers
      • Daily Promos
    • Online Casinos
      • US Online Casinos
      • Canada Online Casinos
      • Ontario Online Casinos
      • Best Sweepstakes Casinos
  • Promos
    • Sportsbook Promos
    • Canada Sportsbook Promos
    • Bonuses By Sportsbook
      • 1xBet Promo Code
      • 888sport Promo Code
      • bet365 Bonus Code
      • BET99 Promo Code
      • Betfred Promo Code
      • BetMGM Bonus Code
      • BetRivers Bonus Code
      • BetVictor Promo Code
      • Betway Bonus Code
      • Borgata Promo Code
      • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
      • DraftKings Promo Code
      • ESPN BET Promo Code
      • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
      • FanDuel Promo Code
      • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
      • NorthStar Bets Promo Code
      • Sports Interaction Promo
      • Stake Promo Code
      • TonyBet Bonus Code
    • Bonuses By Region
      • Arkansas Promos
      • Arizona Promos
      • Colorado Promos
      • Connecticut Promos
      • DC Promos
      • Illinois Promos
      • Indiana Promos
      • Iowa Promos
      • Kansas Promos
      • Kentucky Promos
      • Louisiana Promos
      • Maine Promos
      • Maryland Promos
      • Massachusetts Promos
      • Michigan Promos
      • New Jersey Promos
      • New York Promos
      • North Carolina Promos
      • Ohio Promos
      • Pennsylvania Promos
      • Tennessee Promos
      • Vermont Promos
      • Virginia Promos
      • West Virginia Promos
      • Wyoming Promos
    • Casino Promos
      • bet365 Casino Bonus Code
      • BetRivers Casino Promo Code
      • Betway Casino Promo Code
      • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
      • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
      • DraftKings Casino Promo Code
      • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
      • Wheel of Fortune Casino Bonus Code
    • Sweepstakes Promos
      • Chanced Bonus Code
      • Fortune Coins Bonus Code
      • Funrize Promo Code
      • Golden Hearts Games Promo Code
      • Hello Millions Casino Bonus Code
      • High 5 Casino Bonus Code
      • LuckyBird Promo Code
      • McLuck Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Pulsz Promo Code
      • Stake US Promo Code
      • WOW Vegas Promo Code
  • Contests
    • Free Daily Contests
    • Contests Home
    • My Contests
    • Streak Survivor
    • King of Covers
    • Ultimate Race
    • Office Pools
    • Leaderboard
      • League Money Leaders
      • Team Money Leaders
      • Public Money
  • Forum
    • All Forums
    • NFL Betting Forum
    • NBA Betting Forum
    • MLB Betting Forum
    • NHL Betting Forum
    • NCAAF Betting Forum
    • NCAAB Betting Forum
    • Soccer Betting Forum
    • Help Forum
    • General Discussion Forum
    • Forum Guidelines
    • Forum FAQ
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NCAAF
    • NBA
    • NCAAB
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Soccer
    • UFC
    • WNBA
    • CFL
    • Golf
  • Odds
    • All Odds
    • NFL
    • NCAAF
    • NBA
    • NCAAB
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Golf
    • Soccer Odds
    • UFC
    • WNBA
    • CFL
    • Election Odds
    • Futures
  • Picks
    • All Picks
    • NFL
    • NBA
    • NHL
    • MLB
    • NCAAF
    • NCAAB
    • Golf
    • WNBA
    • CFL
    • User Picks
    • Team User Picks
    • Consensus Picks
  • Prop Projections
    • NFL
    • NBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
  • Betting
    • US Betting Sites
      US Betting
      Sites
      Canada Betting Sites
      Canada Betting
      Sites
    • Sportsbook Reviews
    • States
    • Provinces
    • Betting Sites By Sport
    • Betting Apps
    • Rest of World
    • Betting Guides
    • Betting News
    • Online Casinos
  • Promos
    • Sportsbook Promos
    • Canada Sportsbook Promos
    • Bonuses By Sportsbook
    • Bonuses By Region
    • Casino Promos
    • Sweepstakes Promos
  • Contests
    • Free Daily Contests
    • Contests Home
    • My Contests
    • Streak Survivor
    • King of Covers
    • Ultimate Race
    • Office Pools
    • Leaderboard
  • Forum
    • All Forums
    • NFL Betting Forum
    • NBA Betting Forum
    • MLB Betting Forum
    • NHL Betting Forum
    • NCAAF Betting Forum
    • NCAAB Betting Forum
    • Soccer Betting Forum
    • Help Forum
    • General Discussion Forum
    • Forum Guidelines
    • Forum FAQ
Covers Account
Log in Create account
Back
Premier League
  • Premier League Home
  • Odds
  • News & Analysis
  • Teams
  • Betting Sites
Back
Champions League
  • Champions League Home
  • Odds
  • News & Analysis
  • Teams
  • Betting Sites
Back
MLS
  • MLS Home
  • Odds
  • News & Analysis
  • Teams
  • Betting Sites
Back
By Sportsbook
  • 1xBet Promo Code
  • 888sport Promo Code
  • bet365 Bonus Code
  • BET99 Promo Code
  • Betfred Promo Code
  • BetMGM Bonus Code
  • BetRivers Bonus Code
  • BetVictor Promo Code
  • Betway Bonus Code
  • Borgata Promo Code
  • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
  • DraftKings Promo Code
  • ESPN BET Promo Code
  • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
  • FanDuel Promo Code
  • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
  • NorthStar Bets Promo Code
  • Sports Interaction Promo
  • Stake Promo Code
  • TonyBet Bonus Code
Back
By Region
  • Arkansas Promos
  • Arizona Promos
  • Colorado Promos
  • Connecticut Promos
  • DC Promos
  • Illinois Promos
  • Indiana Promos
  • Iowa Promos
  • Kansas Promos
  • Kentucky Promos
  • Louisiana Promos
  • Maine Promos
  • Maryland Promos
  • Massachusetts Promos
  • Michigan Promos
  • New Jersey Promos
  • New York Promos
  • North Carolina Promos
  • Ohio Promos
  • Pennsylvania Promos
  • Tennessee Promos
  • Vermont Promos
  • Virginia Promos
  • West Virginia Promos
  • Wyoming Promos
Back
Betting Calculators
  • Odds Converter
  • Parlay Calculator
Back
Sports Betting Guides
  • How To Bet On Sports Guide
  • NFL Betting Guide
  • NHL Betting Guide
  • NBA Betting Guide
  • MLB Betting Guide
  • NCAAB Betting Guide
  • NCAAF Betting Guide
  • Golf Betting Guide
  • Tennis Betting Guide
Back
Sportsbook Promos
  • BetMGM Promo
  • Caesars Promo
  • DraftKings Promo
  • FanDuel Promo
Back
Sign up Promos
  • Sportsbook Bonuses 101
Back
NHL
  • NHL Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Odds
  • Prop Projections
  • Futures
  • Free Picks
  • News & Analysis
  • NHL Contest
  • Stanley Cup
  • Injuries
  • Teams
  • Players
  • Standings
  • Referees
  • Statistics
  • Trends
  • Print Sheets
Back
NBA
  • NBA Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Odds
  • Prop Projections
  • Futures
  • Free Picks
  • News & Analysis
  • NBA Contest
  • NBA Finals
  • Injuries
  • Teams
  • Players
  • Standings
  • Referees
  • Statistics
  • League Trends
  • Print Sheets
Back
UFC
  • UFC Home
  • Odds
  • News & Analysis
Back
CFL
  • CFL Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Odds
  • Free Picks
  • News & Analysis
  • CFL Contest
  • Teams
  • Standings
  • League Trends
Back
NFL
  • NFL Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Odds
  • Prop Projections
  • Super Bowl Odds
  • Futures
  • Free Picks
  • News & Analysis
  • NFL Contest
  • Super Bowl
  • Injuries
  • Teams
  • Players
  • Standings
  • Statistics
  • Weather
  • League Trends
  • Print Sheets
Back
Golf
  • Golf Home
  • Golf Odds
  • Masters Odds
  • PGA Championship Odds
  • US Open Odds
  • British Open Odds
  • Ryder Cup Odds
  • Golf Picks
Back
MLB
  • MLB Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Odds
  • Prop Projections
  • Futures
  • Free Picks
  • News & Analysis
  • MLB Contest
  • World Series
  • Injuries
  • Teams
  • Players
  • Standings
  • Statistics
  • Weather
  • Umpires
  • League Trends
  • Print Sheets
Back
Soccer
  • MLS
  • Champions League
  • Premier League
Back
WNBA
  • WNBA Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Odds
  • Free Picks
  • News & Analysis
  • WNBA Contest
  • Injuries
  • Teams
  • Players
  • Standings
  • Statistics
  • League Trends
Back
NCAAB
  • NCAAB Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Odds
  • Futures
  • Free Picks
  • News & Analysis
  • NCAAB Contest
  • March Madness
  • Injuries
  • Teams
  • Players
  • Standings
  • Statistics
  • League Trends
  • Print Sheets
Back
NCAAF
  • NCAAF Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Odds
  • Futures
  • Free Picks
  • News & Analysis
  • NCAAF Contest
  • Bowl Game Odds
  • Injuries
  • Teams
  • Players
  • Standings
  • Statistics
  • Weather
  • League Trends
  • Print Sheets
Back
Free Picks
  • All Picks
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • NCAAF
  • NCAAB
  • Golf
  • WNBA
  • CFL
  • User Picks
  • Team User Picks
Back
Consensus Picks
  • All Consensus Picks
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • NCAAF
  • NCAAB
  • CFL
  • WNBA
  • Consensus FAQ
  • Public Money
Back
Sportsbook Reviews
  • Reviews
  • bet365
  • BetMGM
  • Caesars Sportsbook
  • DraftKings
  • Fanatics Sportsbook
  • FanDuel
Back
Legal States
  • US Legal Tracker
  • Revenue Tracker
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • DC
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Kansas
  • Kentucky
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Mississippi
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • North Carolina
  • Ohio
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Vermont
  • Virginia
  • West Virginia
  • Wyoming
Back
Legal Provinces
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Manitoba
  • Quebec (English)
  • Quebec (francais)
  • New Brunswick
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Northwest Territories
  • Nova Scotia
  • Nunavut
  • Ontario
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Saskatchewan
  • Yukon
Back
By Sportsbook
  • 1xBet Promo Code
  • 888sport Promo Code
  • bet365 Bonus Code
  • BET99 Promo Code
  • Betfred Promo Code
  • BetMGM Bonus Code
  • BetRivers Bonus Code
  • BetVictor Promo Code
  • Betway Bonus Code
  • Borgata Promo Code
  • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
  • DraftKings Promo Code
  • ESPN BET Promo Code
  • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
  • FanDuel Promo Code
  • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
  • NorthStar Bets Promo Code
  • Sports Interaction Promo
  • Stake Promo Code
  • TonyBet Bonus Code
Back
By Region
  • Arkansas Promos
  • Arizona Promos
  • Colorado Promos
  • Connecticut Promos
  • DC Promos
  • Illinois Promos
  • Indiana Promos
  • Iowa Promos
  • Kansas Promos
  • Kentucky Promos
  • Louisiana Promos
  • Maine Promos
  • Maryland Promos
  • Massachusetts Promos
  • Michigan Promos
  • New Jersey Promos
  • New York Promos
  • North Carolina Promos
  • Ohio Promos
  • Pennsylvania Promos
  • Tennessee Promos
  • Vermont Promos
  • Virginia Promos
  • West Virginia Promos
  • Wyoming Promos
Back
By Sport
  • Baseball
  • Basketball
  • Boxing Betting Sites
  • College Football
  • F1
  • Football
  • Super Bowl
  • Golf
  • Hockey
  • Horse Racing
  • March Madness
  • Soccer
  • UFC Betting Sites
  • World Cup
Back
Betting Guides
  • All Guides
  • Glossary
  • Betting Calculators
  • Futures Betting Guide
  • Moneyline Betting Guide
  • Over/Under Betting Guide
  • Parlay Betting Guide
  • Point Spread Betting Guide
  • Prop Betting Guide
  • Sports Betting Guides
  • Teaser Betting Guide
Back
Betting News
  • All News
  • Industry News
  • Podcasts
  • Covers Videos
  • Covers Writers
  • Daily Promos
Back
Betting Apps
  • Sports Betting Apps
  • Canada Sports Betting Apps
  • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
  • Illinois Sports Betting Apps
  • Kentucky Sports Betting Apps
  • Maryland Sports Betting Apps
  • Massachusetts Sports Betting Apps
  • Michigan Sports Betting Apps
  • New Jersey Sports Betting Apps
  • New York Sports Betting Apps
  • North Carolina Sports Betting Apps
  • Ohio Sports Betting Apps
  • Pennsylvania Sports Betting Apps
  • Virginia Sports Betting Apps
Back
Online Casinos
  • US Online Casinos
  • Canada Online Casinos
  • Ontario Online Casinos
  • Best Sweepstakes Casinos
Back
Rest of World
  • UK
  • South Korea
  • International
Back
Betting News
  • All News
  • Industry News
  • Podcasts
  • Covers Videos
  • Covers Writers
  • Daily Promos
Back
Betting Guides
  • All Guides
  • Glossary
  • Betting Calculators
  • Futures Betting Guide
  • Moneyline Betting Guide
  • Over/Under Betting Guide
  • Parlay Betting Guide
  • Point Spread Betting Guide
  • Prop Betting Guide
  • Sports Betting Guides
  • Teaser Betting Guide
Back
Casino Reviews
  • Casino Reviews
  • 888 Casino
  • Bally Casino
  • bet365 Casino
  • BetMGM Casino
  • BetRivers Casino
  • Betway Casino
  • Borgata Casino
  • Caesars Casino
  • DraftKings Casino
  • FanDuel Casino
  • Golden Nugget Online Casino
  • Hard Rock Casino
  • PartyCasino
  • PlayStar Casino
  • Tropicana Casino
  • Wheel of Fortune Casino
Back
US Casinos
  • Online Casino Arizona
  • Online Casino California
  • Connecticut Online Casinos
  • Online Casino Florida
  • Online Casino Illinois
  • Michigan Online Casino
  • NJ Online Casino
  • Online Casino NY
  • Ohio Online Casino
  • PA Online Casino
  • Online Casino Texas
  • Online Casino Virginia
  • WV Online Casino
  • Real Money Slots
  • Casino Apps
Back
Canada Casino
  • Alberta Online Casino
  • BC Online Casino
  • Online Casino Ontario
  • Online Slots
  • Casino Apps
Back
Promos By Casino
  • bet365 Casino Bonus Code
  • BetRivers Casino Promo Code
  • Betway Casino Promo Code
  • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
  • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
  • DraftKings Casino Promo Code
  • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
  • Wheel of Fortune Casino Bonus Code
Back
Casino Apps
  • US Casino Apps
  • Canada Casino Apps
Back
Casino Bonuses
  • US
  • Casino Bonuses
  • Free Spins Casinos
  • No-Deposit Bonus Casinos
  • $1 Deposit Bonus
  • $5 Deposit Bonus
  • Canada
  • Casino Bonuses
  • Free Spins No-Deposit
  • Free Spins for $1 Casinos
  • No-Deposit Bonus Casinos
  • $1 Deposit Casinos
  • $5 Deposit Casinos
Back
Online Slots
  • US Online Slots
  • Canada Online Slots
Back
Sweepstakes Casinos
  • Chanced Bonus Code
  • Fortune Coins Bonus Code
  • Funrize Promo Code
  • Golden Hearts Games Promo Code
  • Hello Millions Casino Bonus Code
  • High 5 Casino Bonus Code
  • LuckyBird Promo Code
  • McLuck Promo Code
  • ProphetX Promo Code
  • Pulsz Promo Code
  • Stake US Promo Code
  • WOW Vegas Promo Code
Back
Rest of World
  • Online Casinos
  • Online Casino India
  • Online Casino Ireland
  • Online Casino NZ
  • Online Casino Philippines
  • Online Casino South Africa
  • Online Casino UK
Back
Crypto Casinos
  • Crypto Casinos
  • Bitcoin Casinos
Back
Crypto Bonus Codes
  • Crypto Bonuses
  • 7Bit Casino bonus code
  • BC.GAME Casino bonus code
  • BitStarz Casino bonus code
Back
Soccer Odds
  • MLS Odds
  • Champions League Odds
  • Premier League Odds
Back
Futures
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • MLB
  • NHL
  • NCAAB
  • NCAAF
Back
Leaderboard
  • League Money Leaders
  • Team Money Leaders
  • Public Money
All Forums | General Discussion

September 11, 2001 (long read)

«First Previous 545556 ... 616263 Next Last»
Skubishack
Spitfire15
ABooksNightmare
slikstiks99
HutchEmAll
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 50322
Posts: 1555
«First Previous 545556 ... 616263 Next Last»
 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 10:16 PM ET #1326

Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:




All of the bolded/enlarged text above really needs citations to be taken seriously.

You'll find much info here...

https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&geopolitics_and_9/11=isi&startpos=100

...and this will help you also.

https://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/9-11_video

You will see what you choose to see but you will see the truth if you know how to spot it.

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:




All of the bolded/enlarged text above really needs citations to be taken seriously.

You'll find much info here...

https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&geopolitics_and_9/11=isi&startpos=100

...and this will help you also.

https://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/9-11_video

You will see what you choose to see but you will see the truth if you know how to spot it.

 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 10:24 PM ET #1327

Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:



The one about the head of the ISI being at the White House is a new one, never heard that one before.

September 4-11, 2001: ISI Director Visits Washington for Mysterious Meetings

sEL('1626004942-19515','19515') September 9, 2001), unspecified officials at the White House and the Pentagon, and his “most important meeting” with Marc Grossman, US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. The article suggests, “[O]f course, Osama bin Laden” could be the focus of some discussions. Prophetically, the article adds, “What added interest to his visit is the history of such visits. Last time [his] predecessor was [in Washington], the domestic [Pakistani] politics turned topsy-turvy within days.” [News (Islamabad), 9/10/2001] This is a reference to the Musharraf coup just after an ISI Director’s visit on October 12, 1999 (see October 12, 1999).

Entity Tags: US Department of Defense, Marc Grossman, National Security Council, Osama bin Laden, George J. Tenet, Mahmood Ahmed

Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

September 9, 2001: CIA Director Meets ISI Director about Bin Laden Issue

sEL('1626004942-20384','20384') September 4-11, 2001), meets with CIA Director George Tenet. In his 2007 book, Tenet will claim that he “tried to press” Mahmood to do something about Taliban support for bin Laden, since the Pakistani government has been supporting the Taliban since its creation in 1994. But Mahmood was supposedly “immovable when it came to the Taliban and al-Qaeda.” Tenet will say that Mahmood’s sole suggestion was the US should try bribing key Taliban officials to get them to turn over bin Laden. However, “even then he made it clear that neither he nor his service would have anything to do with the effort, not even to the extent of advising us whom we might approach.” [Tenet, 2007, pp. 141-142]

Entity Tags: George J. Tenet, Taliban, Osama bin Laden, Mahmood Ahmed

Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

For more information than you've ever known...

https://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

I also recommend you watch...

https://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/9-11_video

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:



The one about the head of the ISI being at the White House is a new one, never heard that one before.

September 4-11, 2001: ISI Director Visits Washington for Mysterious Meetings

sEL('1626004942-19515','19515') September 9, 2001), unspecified officials at the White House and the Pentagon, and his “most important meeting” with Marc Grossman, US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. The article suggests, “[O]f course, Osama bin Laden” could be the focus of some discussions. Prophetically, the article adds, “What added interest to his visit is the history of such visits. Last time [his] predecessor was [in Washington], the domestic [Pakistani] politics turned topsy-turvy within days.” [News (Islamabad), 9/10/2001] This is a reference to the Musharraf coup just after an ISI Director’s visit on October 12, 1999 (see October 12, 1999).

Entity Tags: US Department of Defense, Marc Grossman, National Security Council, Osama bin Laden, George J. Tenet, Mahmood Ahmed

Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

September 9, 2001: CIA Director Meets ISI Director about Bin Laden Issue

sEL('1626004942-20384','20384') September 4-11, 2001), meets with CIA Director George Tenet. In his 2007 book, Tenet will claim that he “tried to press” Mahmood to do something about Taliban support for bin Laden, since the Pakistani government has been supporting the Taliban since its creation in 1994. But Mahmood was supposedly “immovable when it came to the Taliban and al-Qaeda.” Tenet will say that Mahmood’s sole suggestion was the US should try bribing key Taliban officials to get them to turn over bin Laden. However, “even then he made it clear that neither he nor his service would have anything to do with the effort, not even to the extent of advising us whom we might approach.” [Tenet, 2007, pp. 141-142]

Entity Tags: George J. Tenet, Taliban, Osama bin Laden, Mahmood Ahmed

Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

For more information than you've ever known...

https://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

I also recommend you watch...

https://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/9-11_video

 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 10:27 PM ET #1328

ISI Director Lt. Gen. Mahmood Ahmed visits Washington for the second time. On September 10, a Pakistani newspaper reports on his trip so far. It says his visit has “triggered speculation about the agenda of his mysterious meetings at the Pentagon and National Security Council” as well as meetings with CIA Director Tenet (see September 9, 2001), unspecified officials at the White House and the Pentagon, and his “most important meeting” with Marc Grossman, US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. The article suggests, “[O]f course, Osama bin Laden” could be the focus of some discussions. Prophetically, the article adds, “What added interest to his visit is the history of such visits. Last time [his] predecessor was [in Washington], the domestic [Pakistani] politics turned topsy-turvy within days.” [News (Islamabad), 9/10/2001] This is a reference to the Musharraf coup just after an ISI Director’s visit on October 12, 1999 (see October 12, 1999).
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
ISI Director Lt. Gen. Mahmood Ahmed visits Washington for the second time. On September 10, a Pakistani newspaper reports on his trip so far. It says his visit has “triggered speculation about the agenda of his mysterious meetings at the Pentagon and National Security Council” as well as meetings with CIA Director Tenet (see September 9, 2001), unspecified officials at the White House and the Pentagon, and his “most important meeting” with Marc Grossman, US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. The article suggests, “[O]f course, Osama bin Laden” could be the focus of some discussions. Prophetically, the article adds, “What added interest to his visit is the history of such visits. Last time [his] predecessor was [in Washington], the domestic [Pakistani] politics turned topsy-turvy within days.” [News (Islamabad), 9/10/2001] This is a reference to the Musharraf coup just after an ISI Director’s visit on October 12, 1999 (see October 12, 1999).
 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 10:27 PM ET #1329

Pakistani ISI Director Gen. Mahmood Ahmed, who is visiting Washington (see September 4-11, 2001), meets with CIA Director George Tenet. In his 2007 book, Tenet will claim that he “tried to press” Mahmood to do something about Taliban support for bin Laden, since the Pakistani government has been supporting the Taliban since its creation in 1994. But Mahmood was supposedly “immovable when it came to the Taliban and al-Qaeda.” Tenet will say that Mahmood’s sole suggestion was the US should try bribing key Taliban officials to get them to turn over bin Laden. However, “even then he made it clear that neither he nor his service would have anything to do with the effort, not even to the extent of advising us whom we might approach.” [Tenet, 2007, pp. 141-142]
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Pakistani ISI Director Gen. Mahmood Ahmed, who is visiting Washington (see September 4-11, 2001), meets with CIA Director George Tenet. In his 2007 book, Tenet will claim that he “tried to press” Mahmood to do something about Taliban support for bin Laden, since the Pakistani government has been supporting the Taliban since its creation in 1994. But Mahmood was supposedly “immovable when it came to the Taliban and al-Qaeda.” Tenet will say that Mahmood’s sole suggestion was the US should try bribing key Taliban officials to get them to turn over bin Laden. However, “even then he made it clear that neither he nor his service would have anything to do with the effort, not even to the extent of advising us whom we might approach.” [Tenet, 2007, pp. 141-142]
 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:01 PM ET #1330

Re: despite much evedence showing they had been forewarned long in advance.

Read this especially towards the date... 9/11

https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&complete_911_timeline_key_events=complete_911_timeline_key_warnings

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

Re: despite much evedence showing they had been forewarned long in advance.

Read this especially towards the date... 9/11

https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&complete_911_timeline_key_events=complete_911_timeline_key_warnings

 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:04 PM ET #1331

Re: Many military and government official were told to change all travel plans and not to fly commercial during that time.

There is more but here is just one... It's from the link above.

Before September 11, 2001: Tenet Said to Warn Congresspeople about Imminent Attack on the US

sEL('1626004942-9784','9784') Ike Skelton. [Source: Publicity photo]On the morning of 9/11, David Welna, National Public Radio’s Congressional correspondent, will say, “I spoke with Congressman Ike Skelton—a Democrat from Missouri and a member of the Armed Services Committee—who said that just recently the Director of the CIA [George Tenet] warned that there could be an attack—an imminent attack—on the United States of this nature. So this is not entirely unexpected.” More details, such as when Tenet said this, who else he may have said it to, and so forth, remain unknown. [NPR, 9/11/2001]

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

Re: Many military and government official were told to change all travel plans and not to fly commercial during that time.

There is more but here is just one... It's from the link above.

Before September 11, 2001: Tenet Said to Warn Congresspeople about Imminent Attack on the US

sEL('1626004942-9784','9784') Ike Skelton. [Source: Publicity photo]On the morning of 9/11, David Welna, National Public Radio’s Congressional correspondent, will say, “I spoke with Congressman Ike Skelton—a Democrat from Missouri and a member of the Armed Services Committee—who said that just recently the Director of the CIA [George Tenet] warned that there could be an attack—an imminent attack—on the United States of this nature. So this is not entirely unexpected.” More details, such as when Tenet said this, who else he may have said it to, and so forth, remain unknown. [NPR, 9/11/2001]

 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:14 PM ET #1332

You can easily find the rest... just keep looking at all the resources. The truth is out there but in bits and pieces everywhere. And where there is no answer... it's due to refusal to be open and honest regarding the issues by those involved.

Bush, Cheney, and others simply avoided giving answer and stonewalled those who asked the proper questions. If you watch all the interviews and press conferences you will see it in action.

Dirt and most likely blood also on all thier hands.

I do not spend much time on this but wish I had 24/7 to work on this event and it's coverup/whitehousewashing.

The jackers did what they did but there was much more to it than just a bunck of idiots jacking planes. You have to dig deep under the surface and don't believe the political hype from anyone.

We wil most likely never know the complete truth however we can keep digging for as long as it takes.

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

You can easily find the rest... just keep looking at all the resources. The truth is out there but in bits and pieces everywhere. And where there is no answer... it's due to refusal to be open and honest regarding the issues by those involved.

Bush, Cheney, and others simply avoided giving answer and stonewalled those who asked the proper questions. If you watch all the interviews and press conferences you will see it in action.

Dirt and most likely blood also on all thier hands.

I do not spend much time on this but wish I had 24/7 to work on this event and it's coverup/whitehousewashing.

The jackers did what they did but there was much more to it than just a bunck of idiots jacking planes. You have to dig deep under the surface and don't believe the political hype from anyone.

We wil most likely never know the complete truth however we can keep digging for as long as it takes.

 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:29 PM ET #1333

Quote Originally Posted by swahili:

I also think it's possible that with all the money the jackers recieved they might have thought they were just jacking the planes and that maybe the "powers that be" took control by remote to finish them off. I have seen some profiling done on the jackers last days that did not suggest they were on a suiside mission at all.


wow a whole new theory -- the planes were flown into the buildings by remote control ! --- Smdio what  say you now?  the plane did hit the pentagon -- and it was flown by remote control !! ....off course however according to you

You can start by reading this... good luck in your pursuit of the truth.

https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box_204.html

You can maybe find the episode online.

Not all can be true but you must look under every rock.

Keep an open mind and Keep digging for the truth and let the pieces fall into place by themselves.

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Quote Originally Posted by swahili:

I also think it's possible that with all the money the jackers recieved they might have thought they were just jacking the planes and that maybe the "powers that be" took control by remote to finish them off. I have seen some profiling done on the jackers last days that did not suggest they were on a suiside mission at all.


wow a whole new theory -- the planes were flown into the buildings by remote control ! --- Smdio what  say you now?  the plane did hit the pentagon -- and it was flown by remote control !! ....off course however according to you

You can start by reading this... good luck in your pursuit of the truth.

https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box_204.html

You can maybe find the episode online.

Not all can be true but you must look under every rock.

Keep an open mind and Keep digging for the truth and let the pieces fall into place by themselves.

 
Spitfire15
Spitfire15
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 13407
Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:32 PM ET #1334

It's still December 7th, and covers has this dated as being updated on the 8th... what's up with that? 
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
It's still December 7th, and covers has this dated as being updated on the 8th... what's up with that? 
 
ABooksNightmare
ABooksNightmare
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 24822
Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:34 PM ET #1335

let's keep this thread at the top

 

Der licious

COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

let's keep this thread at the top

 

Der licious

 
Spitfire15
Spitfire15
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 13407
Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:35 PM ET #1336

Skubi bringing the links
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Skubi bringing the links
 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 12:01 AM ET #1337

Re: Which is another reason that we were told ALL FOUR black boxes became the first 4 black boxes in history to NEVER be found after a land crash.

"Additional evidence of a cover-up arose when Ventura questioned FBI counter-terrorism expert Jack Cloonan, who stated rhetorically, “Does the U.S. government do things in the dead of night that they don’t want seen in the light of day? Of course they do.”

Then, when told that September 11 may be the first time ever in the history of recorded flight where four black boxes completely vanished, Cloonan replied, “So what?”

Airline investigative expert Dave Leppard also acknowledged that he’d never once been at a crash site where the black boxes (actually orange) had not been discovered. He then proceeded to describe how these very distinct, bright orange boxes made out of titanium are virtually indestructible. “The odds are almost zero percent that they’re not found,” he concluded."

Full link... you can find the episode online.

https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box_204.html

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

Re: Which is another reason that we were told ALL FOUR black boxes became the first 4 black boxes in history to NEVER be found after a land crash.

"Additional evidence of a cover-up arose when Ventura questioned FBI counter-terrorism expert Jack Cloonan, who stated rhetorically, “Does the U.S. government do things in the dead of night that they don’t want seen in the light of day? Of course they do.”

Then, when told that September 11 may be the first time ever in the history of recorded flight where four black boxes completely vanished, Cloonan replied, “So what?”

Airline investigative expert Dave Leppard also acknowledged that he’d never once been at a crash site where the black boxes (actually orange) had not been discovered. He then proceeded to describe how these very distinct, bright orange boxes made out of titanium are virtually indestructible. “The odds are almost zero percent that they’re not found,” he concluded."

Full link... you can find the episode online.

https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box_204.html

 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 12:06 AM ET #1338

Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

Re: Which is another reason that we were told ALL FOUR black boxes became the first 4 black boxes in history to NEVER be found after a land crash.

"Additional evidence of a cover-up arose when Ventura questioned FBI counter-terrorism expert Jack Cloonan, who stated rhetorically, “Does the U.S. government do things in the dead of night that they don’t want seen in the light of day? Of course they do.”

Then, when told that September 11 may be the first time ever in the history of recorded flight where four black boxes completely vanished, Cloonan replied, “So what?”

Airline investigative expert Dave Leppard also acknowledged that he’d never once been at a crash site where the black boxes (actually orange) had not been discovered. He then proceeded to describe how these very distinct, bright orange boxes made out of titanium are virtually indestructible. “The odds are almost zero percent that they’re not found,” he concluded."

Full link... you can find the episode online.

https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box_204.html

"Investigators found fingernail-sized shards of bone to identify the victims, yet we’re to believe that all four black boxes are still missing?” [The four six-ton engines from flights 11 and 175 also vanished, according to the government.—Ed.]

Mike Bellone, who worked at Ground Zero for 257 straight days, actually saw one of the recovered boxes three to four weeks after the WTC collapses, and personally witnessed the FBI loading this equipment onto a tractor-trailer. He also referred to New York City firefighter Nicholas Demasi, who claims to have been present when “locaters” found two other boxes.

Why hasn’t the public been made aware of these groundbreaking developments? Ventura stated pointblank, “Government officials knowingly destroyed all the evidence at that crime scene. They got rid of every shred of evidence. They melted it down, built ships out of it, or put it on a boat to China.”

What little else remains is stored at the mysterious Hanger 17 at New York’s JFK Airport. Absolutely no one is allowed access to this evidence."

From the same article about the episode of Ventura's TV show.

Link to the article is above.

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

Re: Which is another reason that we were told ALL FOUR black boxes became the first 4 black boxes in history to NEVER be found after a land crash.

"Additional evidence of a cover-up arose when Ventura questioned FBI counter-terrorism expert Jack Cloonan, who stated rhetorically, “Does the U.S. government do things in the dead of night that they don’t want seen in the light of day? Of course they do.”

Then, when told that September 11 may be the first time ever in the history of recorded flight where four black boxes completely vanished, Cloonan replied, “So what?”

Airline investigative expert Dave Leppard also acknowledged that he’d never once been at a crash site where the black boxes (actually orange) had not been discovered. He then proceeded to describe how these very distinct, bright orange boxes made out of titanium are virtually indestructible. “The odds are almost zero percent that they’re not found,” he concluded."

Full link... you can find the episode online.

https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box_204.html

"Investigators found fingernail-sized shards of bone to identify the victims, yet we’re to believe that all four black boxes are still missing?” [The four six-ton engines from flights 11 and 175 also vanished, according to the government.—Ed.]

Mike Bellone, who worked at Ground Zero for 257 straight days, actually saw one of the recovered boxes three to four weeks after the WTC collapses, and personally witnessed the FBI loading this equipment onto a tractor-trailer. He also referred to New York City firefighter Nicholas Demasi, who claims to have been present when “locaters” found two other boxes.

Why hasn’t the public been made aware of these groundbreaking developments? Ventura stated pointblank, “Government officials knowingly destroyed all the evidence at that crime scene. They got rid of every shred of evidence. They melted it down, built ships out of it, or put it on a boat to China.”

What little else remains is stored at the mysterious Hanger 17 at New York’s JFK Airport. Absolutely no one is allowed access to this evidence."

From the same article about the episode of Ventura's TV show.

Link to the article is above.

 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 12:10 AM ET #1339

Journalist Dave Lindorff next weighed in by recounting a meeting he had with NTSB officials. After inquiring whether the FBI had secured these devices, he was asked, “Do you want the real answer, or the official answer?” An official then disclosed that all four boxes were in the FBI’s possession. Lindorff summarized the great trick played on us.

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Journalist Dave Lindorff next weighed in by recounting a meeting he had with NTSB officials. After inquiring whether the FBI had secured these devices, he was asked, “Do you want the real answer, or the official answer?” An official then disclosed that all four boxes were in the FBI’s possession. Lindorff summarized the great trick played on us.

 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 12:21 AM ET #1340

Re: those buildings contained information they wanted destroyed and plenty of valuables they flat out stole from the vaults also. Even the buildings new owners cashed in by doubling his insurance a few days before 9/11 and having them put an extra claus in there for acts of terror.

 

To begin with...You can find what you need here. Good Luck as you seek the truth.

https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insurance-scam.htm

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

Re: those buildings contained information they wanted destroyed and plenty of valuables they flat out stole from the vaults also. Even the buildings new owners cashed in by doubling his insurance a few days before 9/11 and having them put an extra claus in there for acts of terror.

 

To begin with...You can find what you need here. Good Luck as you seek the truth.

https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insurance-scam.htm

 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 12:30 AM ET #1341

Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

Re: those buildings contained information they wanted destroyed and plenty of valuables they flat out stole from the vaults also. Even the buildings new owners cashed in by doubling his insurance a few days before 9/11 and having them put an extra claus in there for acts of terror.

 

To begin with...You can find what you need here. Good Luck as you seek the truth.

https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insurance-scam.htm

https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insurance-scam.htm

https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread492237/pg1

This info should give you a legitimate head start to finding the answers you never even knew about regarding this issue.

Good Luck.

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

Re: those buildings contained information they wanted destroyed and plenty of valuables they flat out stole from the vaults also. Even the buildings new owners cashed in by doubling his insurance a few days before 9/11 and having them put an extra claus in there for acts of terror.

 

To begin with...You can find what you need here. Good Luck as you seek the truth.

https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insurance-scam.htm

https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insurance-scam.htm

https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread492237/pg1

This info should give you a legitimate head start to finding the answers you never even knew about regarding this issue.

Good Luck.

 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 12:47 AM ET #1342

Re: We had AF planes nearby but they were told to sit while other from much farther away were told to take off and find the flights.

Complete 911 Timeline

United Airlines Flight 93

https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?day_of_9/11=ua93&timeline=complete_911_timeline

You can find info on EACH of the four flights here. Good Luck in seeking the truth.

 

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

Re: We had AF planes nearby but they were told to sit while other from much farther away were told to take off and find the flights.

Complete 911 Timeline

United Airlines Flight 93

https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?day_of_9/11=ua93&timeline=complete_911_timeline

You can find info on EACH of the four flights here. Good Luck in seeking the truth.

 

 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 1:02 AM ET #1343

Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

Re: We had AF planes nearby but they were told to sit while other from much farther away were told to take off and find the flights.

Complete 911 Timeline

United Airlines Flight 93

https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?day_of_9/11=ua93&timeline=complete_911_timeline

You can find info on EACH of the four flights here. Good Luck in seeking the truth.

 

Also...

"On Sept. 11, the normal scramble-approval procedure was for an FAA official to contact the National Military Command Center (NMCC) and request Pentagon air support. Someone in the NMCC would call Norad's command center and ask about availability of aircraft, then seek approval from the Defense Secretary--Donald H. Rumsfeld--to launch fighters." - Aviation Week (06/03/02)

9/11 Tapes Reveal Ground Personnel Muffled Attacks

"What’s more, the decades-old procedure for a quick response by the nation’s air defense had been changed in June of 2001. Now, instead of NORAD’s military commanders being able to issue the command to launch fighter jets, approval had to be sought from the civilian Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld. This change is extremely significant, because Mr. Rumsfeld claims to have been "out of the loop" nearly the entire morning of 9/11. He isn’t on the record as having given any orders that morning. In fact, he didn’t even go to the White House situation room; he had to walk to the window of his office in the Pentagon to see that the country’s military headquarters was in flames.
Mr. Rumsfeld claimed at a previous commission hearing that protection against attack inside the homeland was not his responsibility. It was, he said, "a law-enforcement issue."
Why, in that case, did he take onto himself the responsibility of approving NORAD’s deployment of fighter planes?" - New York Observer (06/21/04) [Reprinted at:  dangerouscitizen.com]

 

 

https://killtown.911review.org/oddities/911.html

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

Re: We had AF planes nearby but they were told to sit while other from much farther away were told to take off and find the flights.

Complete 911 Timeline

United Airlines Flight 93

https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?day_of_9/11=ua93&timeline=complete_911_timeline

You can find info on EACH of the four flights here. Good Luck in seeking the truth.

 

Also...

"On Sept. 11, the normal scramble-approval procedure was for an FAA official to contact the National Military Command Center (NMCC) and request Pentagon air support. Someone in the NMCC would call Norad's command center and ask about availability of aircraft, then seek approval from the Defense Secretary--Donald H. Rumsfeld--to launch fighters." - Aviation Week (06/03/02)

9/11 Tapes Reveal Ground Personnel Muffled Attacks

"What’s more, the decades-old procedure for a quick response by the nation’s air defense had been changed in June of 2001. Now, instead of NORAD’s military commanders being able to issue the command to launch fighter jets, approval had to be sought from the civilian Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld. This change is extremely significant, because Mr. Rumsfeld claims to have been "out of the loop" nearly the entire morning of 9/11. He isn’t on the record as having given any orders that morning. In fact, he didn’t even go to the White House situation room; he had to walk to the window of his office in the Pentagon to see that the country’s military headquarters was in flames.
Mr. Rumsfeld claimed at a previous commission hearing that protection against attack inside the homeland was not his responsibility. It was, he said, "a law-enforcement issue."
Why, in that case, did he take onto himself the responsibility of approving NORAD’s deployment of fighter planes?" - New York Observer (06/21/04) [Reprinted at:  dangerouscitizen.com]

 

 

https://killtown.911review.org/oddities/911.html

 
Skubishack
Skubishack
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 14624
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 2:04 AM ET #1344

Re: They had even scheduled an excersize regarding a plane attack on the Towers for the same day.

All links I had for this have been inactivated including NORADs original timeline for what happened on 9/11. I will continue to look for it.

If you need any further questions answered feel free to ask. I think I've covered all your previous questions here.

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

Re: They had even scheduled an excersize regarding a plane attack on the Towers for the same day.

All links I had for this have been inactivated including NORADs original timeline for what happened on 9/11. I will continue to look for it.

If you need any further questions answered feel free to ask. I think I've covered all your previous questions here.

 
slikstiks99
slikstiks99
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 6621
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 2:31 AM ET #1345

Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

Re: They had even scheduled an excersize regarding a plane attack on the Towers for the same day.

All links I had for this have been inactivated including NORADs original timeline for what happened on 9/11. I will continue to look for it.

If you need any further questions answered feel free to ask. I think I've covered all your previous questions here.



Nice string of posts. That laundry list of anomalies is a smoking gun. It is 10 times more illogical to think all of those things happened by chance than to believe the official story. It's just way too much to just explain away.

Added evidence is the government's failure to investigate this matter properly, most resounding, THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION's complete lack of cooperation and accountability during the investigation.

Hell they would even let GWB talk to investigators because someone thought he was too stupid and would let something out of the bag, whatever that might be.
Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

Re: They had even scheduled an excersize regarding a plane attack on the Towers for the same day.

All links I had for this have been inactivated including NORADs original timeline for what happened on 9/11. I will continue to look for it.

If you need any further questions answered feel free to ask. I think I've covered all your previous questions here.

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

Re: They had even scheduled an excersize regarding a plane attack on the Towers for the same day.

All links I had for this have been inactivated including NORADs original timeline for what happened on 9/11. I will continue to look for it.

If you need any further questions answered feel free to ask. I think I've covered all your previous questions here.



Nice string of posts. That laundry list of anomalies is a smoking gun. It is 10 times more illogical to think all of those things happened by chance than to believe the official story. It's just way too much to just explain away.

Added evidence is the government's failure to investigate this matter properly, most resounding, THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION's complete lack of cooperation and accountability during the investigation.

Hell they would even let GWB talk to investigators because someone thought he was too stupid and would let something out of the bag, whatever that might be.
Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

Re: They had even scheduled an excersize regarding a plane attack on the Towers for the same day.

All links I had for this have been inactivated including NORADs original timeline for what happened on 9/11. I will continue to look for it.

If you need any further questions answered feel free to ask. I think I've covered all your previous questions here.

 
HutchEmAll
HutchEmAll
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 10:57 AM ET #1346

The dogs were removed due to the fact that it would have been highly likely that they would have found the detonators before September 11th.

_____________

More made up stuff.  If you would ACTUALLY DO SOME RESEARCH, you'd know

They had been put on two weeks earlier because of phoned-in threats. The unusual thing is that they had been on extra duty for those two weeks, not that they were pulled off.

 

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
The dogs were removed due to the fact that it would have been highly likely that they would have found the detonators before September 11th.

_____________

More made up stuff.  If you would ACTUALLY DO SOME RESEARCH, you'd know

They had been put on two weeks earlier because of phoned-in threats. The unusual thing is that they had been on extra duty for those two weeks, not that they were pulled off.

 

 
HutchEmAll
HutchEmAll
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 11:13 AM ET #1347

I suppose the government got to this guy, too:

 

“Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C.

 

"I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

I suppose the government got to this guy, too:

 

“Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C.

 

"I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"

 
slikstiks99
slikstiks99
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 6621
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 11:27 AM ET #1348

Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

I suppose the government got to this guy, too:

 

“Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C.

 

"I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"



Did they find the black boxes of the planes? Its hard to doubt that a plane hit the pentagon. It is strange how long it took to produce an image of a plane hitting the pentagon. But if they found the black boxes then it is good enough for me.

There are still way too many convenient explanations for the official story. And good'ole tower 7 just falling from fire. No sir.

 
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

I suppose the government got to this guy, too:

 

“Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C.

 

"I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"



Did they find the black boxes of the planes? Its hard to doubt that a plane hit the pentagon. It is strange how long it took to produce an image of a plane hitting the pentagon. But if they found the black boxes then it is good enough for me.

There are still way too many convenient explanations for the official story. And good'ole tower 7 just falling from fire. No sir.

 
 
HutchEmAll
HutchEmAll
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 11:27 AM ET #1349

Does this sound like testimony from people who would want to protect the government if they were the ones responsible for the attack on the pentagon.  And does this make you think a missile or a jet hit the pentagon?  Missiles don't utilize jet fuel morons.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A12652-2004Sep10?language=printer

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

Does this sound like testimony from people who would want to protect the government if they were the ones responsible for the attack on the pentagon.  And does this make you think a missile or a jet hit the pentagon?  Missiles don't utilize jet fuel morons.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A12652-2004Sep10?language=printer

 
 
HutchEmAll
HutchEmAll
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 11:29 AM ET #1350

Quote Originally Posted by slikstiks99:



Did they find the black boxes of the planes? Its hard to doubt that a plane hit the pentagon. It is strange how long it took to produce an image of a plane hitting the pentagon. But if they found the black boxes then it is good enough for me.

There are still way too many convenient explanations for the official story. And good'ole tower 7 just falling from fire. No sir.

 

Read the quote again....he says he found the black box. 

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User

Quote Originally Posted by slikstiks99:



Did they find the black boxes of the planes? Its hard to doubt that a plane hit the pentagon. It is strange how long it took to produce an image of a plane hitting the pentagon. But if they found the black boxes then it is good enough for me.

There are still way too many convenient explanations for the official story. And good'ole tower 7 just falling from fire. No sir.

 

Read the quote again....he says he found the black box. 

All Forums | General Discussion
«First Previous 545556 ... 616263 Next Last»

Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

  • Tracking thread 96,162 Covers arrow
  • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 33,049 Covers arrow
  • Friday 05/09/2025 809 Covers arrow
  • $$$ April 28th @ction $$$ 12,441 Covers arrow
  • Anyone Tracking Scoring Drought System? 8,779 Covers arrow
  • Obviously the true face of the republican party 16,515 Covers arrow
  • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 11,442 Covers arrow
  • NBA PLAYOFF TIME .....................2025...... 11,891 Covers arrow
  • Parlay Time 14,412 Covers arrow
  • New MLB 2025 thread after completing the first Doubling the Bankroll Cycle 4,808 Covers arrow

Warning - External Link

Report User

Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Delete Post

Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

Remove Thread

Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

Scan Results

Login/Register

Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.

Search


Loading…

Loading…

About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Join our community today
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
19+
Gambling can be addictive, please play responsibly.
18+
Responsible Gaming
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.