• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | General Discussion

    September 11, 2001 (long read)

    «First Previous 545556 ... 616263 Next Last»
    Skubishack
    Spitfire15
    ABooksNightmare
    slikstiks99
    HutchEmAll
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 50324
    Posts: 1555
    «First Previous 545556 ... 616263 Next Last»
     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 10:16 PM ET #1326

    Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:




    All of the bolded/enlarged text above really needs citations to be taken seriously.

    You'll find much info here...

    https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&geopolitics_and_9/11=isi&startpos=100

    ...and this will help you also.

    https://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/9-11_video

    You will see what you choose to see but you will see the truth if you know how to spot it.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:




    All of the bolded/enlarged text above really needs citations to be taken seriously.

    You'll find much info here...

    https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&geopolitics_and_9/11=isi&startpos=100

    ...and this will help you also.

    https://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/9-11_video

    You will see what you choose to see but you will see the truth if you know how to spot it.

     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 10:24 PM ET #1327

    Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:



    The one about the head of the ISI being at the White House is a new one, never heard that one before.

    September 4-11, 2001: ISI Director Visits Washington for Mysterious Meetings

    sEL('1626004942-19515','19515') September 9, 2001), unspecified officials at the White House and the Pentagon, and his “most important meeting” with Marc Grossman, US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. The article suggests, “[O]f course, Osama bin Laden” could be the focus of some discussions. Prophetically, the article adds, “What added interest to his visit is the history of such visits. Last time [his] predecessor was [in Washington], the domestic [Pakistani] politics turned topsy-turvy within days.” [News (Islamabad), 9/10/2001] This is a reference to the Musharraf coup just after an ISI Director’s visit on October 12, 1999 (see October 12, 1999).

    Entity Tags: US Department of Defense, Marc Grossman, National Security Council, Osama bin Laden, George J. Tenet, Mahmood Ahmed

    Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

    September 9, 2001: CIA Director Meets ISI Director about Bin Laden Issue

    sEL('1626004942-20384','20384') September 4-11, 2001), meets with CIA Director George Tenet. In his 2007 book, Tenet will claim that he “tried to press” Mahmood to do something about Taliban support for bin Laden, since the Pakistani government has been supporting the Taliban since its creation in 1994. But Mahmood was supposedly “immovable when it came to the Taliban and al-Qaeda.” Tenet will say that Mahmood’s sole suggestion was the US should try bribing key Taliban officials to get them to turn over bin Laden. However, “even then he made it clear that neither he nor his service would have anything to do with the effort, not even to the extent of advising us whom we might approach.” [Tenet, 2007, pp. 141-142]

    Entity Tags: George J. Tenet, Taliban, Osama bin Laden, Mahmood Ahmed

    Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

    For more information than you've ever known...

    https://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

    I also recommend you watch...

    https://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/9-11_video

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:



    The one about the head of the ISI being at the White House is a new one, never heard that one before.

    September 4-11, 2001: ISI Director Visits Washington for Mysterious Meetings

    sEL('1626004942-19515','19515') September 9, 2001), unspecified officials at the White House and the Pentagon, and his “most important meeting” with Marc Grossman, US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. The article suggests, “[O]f course, Osama bin Laden” could be the focus of some discussions. Prophetically, the article adds, “What added interest to his visit is the history of such visits. Last time [his] predecessor was [in Washington], the domestic [Pakistani] politics turned topsy-turvy within days.” [News (Islamabad), 9/10/2001] This is a reference to the Musharraf coup just after an ISI Director’s visit on October 12, 1999 (see October 12, 1999).

    Entity Tags: US Department of Defense, Marc Grossman, National Security Council, Osama bin Laden, George J. Tenet, Mahmood Ahmed

    Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

    September 9, 2001: CIA Director Meets ISI Director about Bin Laden Issue

    sEL('1626004942-20384','20384') September 4-11, 2001), meets with CIA Director George Tenet. In his 2007 book, Tenet will claim that he “tried to press” Mahmood to do something about Taliban support for bin Laden, since the Pakistani government has been supporting the Taliban since its creation in 1994. But Mahmood was supposedly “immovable when it came to the Taliban and al-Qaeda.” Tenet will say that Mahmood’s sole suggestion was the US should try bribing key Taliban officials to get them to turn over bin Laden. However, “even then he made it clear that neither he nor his service would have anything to do with the effort, not even to the extent of advising us whom we might approach.” [Tenet, 2007, pp. 141-142]

    Entity Tags: George J. Tenet, Taliban, Osama bin Laden, Mahmood Ahmed

    Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

    For more information than you've ever known...

    https://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

    I also recommend you watch...

    https://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/9-11_video

     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 10:27 PM ET #1328

    ISI Director Lt. Gen. Mahmood Ahmed visits Washington for the second time. On September 10, a Pakistani newspaper reports on his trip so far. It says his visit has “triggered speculation about the agenda of his mysterious meetings at the Pentagon and National Security Council” as well as meetings with CIA Director Tenet (see September 9, 2001), unspecified officials at the White House and the Pentagon, and his “most important meeting” with Marc Grossman, US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. The article suggests, “[O]f course, Osama bin Laden” could be the focus of some discussions. Prophetically, the article adds, “What added interest to his visit is the history of such visits. Last time [his] predecessor was [in Washington], the domestic [Pakistani] politics turned topsy-turvy within days.” [News (Islamabad), 9/10/2001] This is a reference to the Musharraf coup just after an ISI Director’s visit on October 12, 1999 (see October 12, 1999).
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    ISI Director Lt. Gen. Mahmood Ahmed visits Washington for the second time. On September 10, a Pakistani newspaper reports on his trip so far. It says his visit has “triggered speculation about the agenda of his mysterious meetings at the Pentagon and National Security Council” as well as meetings with CIA Director Tenet (see September 9, 2001), unspecified officials at the White House and the Pentagon, and his “most important meeting” with Marc Grossman, US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. The article suggests, “[O]f course, Osama bin Laden” could be the focus of some discussions. Prophetically, the article adds, “What added interest to his visit is the history of such visits. Last time [his] predecessor was [in Washington], the domestic [Pakistani] politics turned topsy-turvy within days.” [News (Islamabad), 9/10/2001] This is a reference to the Musharraf coup just after an ISI Director’s visit on October 12, 1999 (see October 12, 1999).
     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 10:27 PM ET #1329

    Pakistani ISI Director Gen. Mahmood Ahmed, who is visiting Washington (see September 4-11, 2001), meets with CIA Director George Tenet. In his 2007 book, Tenet will claim that he “tried to press” Mahmood to do something about Taliban support for bin Laden, since the Pakistani government has been supporting the Taliban since its creation in 1994. But Mahmood was supposedly “immovable when it came to the Taliban and al-Qaeda.” Tenet will say that Mahmood’s sole suggestion was the US should try bribing key Taliban officials to get them to turn over bin Laden. However, “even then he made it clear that neither he nor his service would have anything to do with the effort, not even to the extent of advising us whom we might approach.” [Tenet, 2007, pp. 141-142]
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Pakistani ISI Director Gen. Mahmood Ahmed, who is visiting Washington (see September 4-11, 2001), meets with CIA Director George Tenet. In his 2007 book, Tenet will claim that he “tried to press” Mahmood to do something about Taliban support for bin Laden, since the Pakistani government has been supporting the Taliban since its creation in 1994. But Mahmood was supposedly “immovable when it came to the Taliban and al-Qaeda.” Tenet will say that Mahmood’s sole suggestion was the US should try bribing key Taliban officials to get them to turn over bin Laden. However, “even then he made it clear that neither he nor his service would have anything to do with the effort, not even to the extent of advising us whom we might approach.” [Tenet, 2007, pp. 141-142]
     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:01 PM ET #1330

    Re: despite much evedence showing they had been forewarned long in advance.

    Read this especially towards the date... 9/11

    https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&complete_911_timeline_key_events=complete_911_timeline_key_warnings

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Re: despite much evedence showing they had been forewarned long in advance.

    Read this especially towards the date... 9/11

    https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&complete_911_timeline_key_events=complete_911_timeline_key_warnings

     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:04 PM ET #1331

    Re: Many military and government official were told to change all travel plans and not to fly commercial during that time.

    There is more but here is just one... It's from the link above.

    Before September 11, 2001: Tenet Said to Warn Congresspeople about Imminent Attack on the US

    sEL('1626004942-9784','9784') Ike Skelton. [Source: Publicity photo]On the morning of 9/11, David Welna, National Public Radio’s Congressional correspondent, will say, “I spoke with Congressman Ike Skelton—a Democrat from Missouri and a member of the Armed Services Committee—who said that just recently the Director of the CIA [George Tenet] warned that there could be an attack—an imminent attack—on the United States of this nature. So this is not entirely unexpected.” More details, such as when Tenet said this, who else he may have said it to, and so forth, remain unknown. [NPR, 9/11/2001]

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Re: Many military and government official were told to change all travel plans and not to fly commercial during that time.

    There is more but here is just one... It's from the link above.

    Before September 11, 2001: Tenet Said to Warn Congresspeople about Imminent Attack on the US

    sEL('1626004942-9784','9784') Ike Skelton. [Source: Publicity photo]On the morning of 9/11, David Welna, National Public Radio’s Congressional correspondent, will say, “I spoke with Congressman Ike Skelton—a Democrat from Missouri and a member of the Armed Services Committee—who said that just recently the Director of the CIA [George Tenet] warned that there could be an attack—an imminent attack—on the United States of this nature. So this is not entirely unexpected.” More details, such as when Tenet said this, who else he may have said it to, and so forth, remain unknown. [NPR, 9/11/2001]

     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:14 PM ET #1332

    You can easily find the rest... just keep looking at all the resources. The truth is out there but in bits and pieces everywhere. And where there is no answer... it's due to refusal to be open and honest regarding the issues by those involved.

    Bush, Cheney, and others simply avoided giving answer and stonewalled those who asked the proper questions. If you watch all the interviews and press conferences you will see it in action.

    Dirt and most likely blood also on all thier hands.

    I do not spend much time on this but wish I had 24/7 to work on this event and it's coverup/whitehousewashing.

    The jackers did what they did but there was much more to it than just a bunck of idiots jacking planes. You have to dig deep under the surface and don't believe the political hype from anyone.

    We wil most likely never know the complete truth however we can keep digging for as long as it takes.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    You can easily find the rest... just keep looking at all the resources. The truth is out there but in bits and pieces everywhere. And where there is no answer... it's due to refusal to be open and honest regarding the issues by those involved.

    Bush, Cheney, and others simply avoided giving answer and stonewalled those who asked the proper questions. If you watch all the interviews and press conferences you will see it in action.

    Dirt and most likely blood also on all thier hands.

    I do not spend much time on this but wish I had 24/7 to work on this event and it's coverup/whitehousewashing.

    The jackers did what they did but there was much more to it than just a bunck of idiots jacking planes. You have to dig deep under the surface and don't believe the political hype from anyone.

    We wil most likely never know the complete truth however we can keep digging for as long as it takes.

     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:29 PM ET #1333

    Quote Originally Posted by swahili:

    I also think it's possible that with all the money the jackers recieved they might have thought they were just jacking the planes and that maybe the "powers that be" took control by remote to finish them off. I have seen some profiling done on the jackers last days that did not suggest they were on a suiside mission at all.


    wow a whole new theory -- the planes were flown into the buildings by remote control ! --- Smdio what  say you now?  the plane did hit the pentagon -- and it was flown by remote control !! ....off course however according to you

    You can start by reading this... good luck in your pursuit of the truth.

    https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box_204.html

    You can maybe find the episode online.

    Not all can be true but you must look under every rock.

    Keep an open mind and Keep digging for the truth and let the pieces fall into place by themselves.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by swahili:

    I also think it's possible that with all the money the jackers recieved they might have thought they were just jacking the planes and that maybe the "powers that be" took control by remote to finish them off. I have seen some profiling done on the jackers last days that did not suggest they were on a suiside mission at all.


    wow a whole new theory -- the planes were flown into the buildings by remote control ! --- Smdio what  say you now?  the plane did hit the pentagon -- and it was flown by remote control !! ....off course however according to you

    You can start by reading this... good luck in your pursuit of the truth.

    https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box_204.html

    You can maybe find the episode online.

    Not all can be true but you must look under every rock.

    Keep an open mind and Keep digging for the truth and let the pieces fall into place by themselves.

     
    Spitfire15
    Spitfire15
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 13407
    Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:32 PM ET #1334

    It's still December 7th, and covers has this dated as being updated on the 8th... what's up with that? 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    It's still December 7th, and covers has this dated as being updated on the 8th... what's up with that? 
     
    ABooksNightmare
    ABooksNightmare
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 26633
    Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:34 PM ET #1335

    let's keep this thread at the top

     

    Der licious

    COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    let's keep this thread at the top

     

    Der licious

     
    Spitfire15
    Spitfire15
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 13407
    Posted: Dec. 7, 2010 - 11:35 PM ET #1336

    Skubi bringing the links
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Skubi bringing the links
     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 12:01 AM ET #1337

    Re: Which is another reason that we were told ALL FOUR black boxes became the first 4 black boxes in history to NEVER be found after a land crash.

    "Additional evidence of a cover-up arose when Ventura questioned FBI counter-terrorism expert Jack Cloonan, who stated rhetorically, “Does the U.S. government do things in the dead of night that they don’t want seen in the light of day? Of course they do.”

    Then, when told that September 11 may be the first time ever in the history of recorded flight where four black boxes completely vanished, Cloonan replied, “So what?”

    Airline investigative expert Dave Leppard also acknowledged that he’d never once been at a crash site where the black boxes (actually orange) had not been discovered. He then proceeded to describe how these very distinct, bright orange boxes made out of titanium are virtually indestructible. “The odds are almost zero percent that they’re not found,” he concluded."

    Full link... you can find the episode online.

    https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box_204.html

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Re: Which is another reason that we were told ALL FOUR black boxes became the first 4 black boxes in history to NEVER be found after a land crash.

    "Additional evidence of a cover-up arose when Ventura questioned FBI counter-terrorism expert Jack Cloonan, who stated rhetorically, “Does the U.S. government do things in the dead of night that they don’t want seen in the light of day? Of course they do.”

    Then, when told that September 11 may be the first time ever in the history of recorded flight where four black boxes completely vanished, Cloonan replied, “So what?”

    Airline investigative expert Dave Leppard also acknowledged that he’d never once been at a crash site where the black boxes (actually orange) had not been discovered. He then proceeded to describe how these very distinct, bright orange boxes made out of titanium are virtually indestructible. “The odds are almost zero percent that they’re not found,” he concluded."

    Full link... you can find the episode online.

    https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box_204.html

     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 12:06 AM ET #1338

    Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

    Re: Which is another reason that we were told ALL FOUR black boxes became the first 4 black boxes in history to NEVER be found after a land crash.

    "Additional evidence of a cover-up arose when Ventura questioned FBI counter-terrorism expert Jack Cloonan, who stated rhetorically, “Does the U.S. government do things in the dead of night that they don’t want seen in the light of day? Of course they do.”

    Then, when told that September 11 may be the first time ever in the history of recorded flight where four black boxes completely vanished, Cloonan replied, “So what?”

    Airline investigative expert Dave Leppard also acknowledged that he’d never once been at a crash site where the black boxes (actually orange) had not been discovered. He then proceeded to describe how these very distinct, bright orange boxes made out of titanium are virtually indestructible. “The odds are almost zero percent that they’re not found,” he concluded."

    Full link... you can find the episode online.

    https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box_204.html

    "Investigators found fingernail-sized shards of bone to identify the victims, yet we’re to believe that all four black boxes are still missing?” [The four six-ton engines from flights 11 and 175 also vanished, according to the government.—Ed.]

    Mike Bellone, who worked at Ground Zero for 257 straight days, actually saw one of the recovered boxes three to four weeks after the WTC collapses, and personally witnessed the FBI loading this equipment onto a tractor-trailer. He also referred to New York City firefighter Nicholas Demasi, who claims to have been present when “locaters” found two other boxes.

    Why hasn’t the public been made aware of these groundbreaking developments? Ventura stated pointblank, “Government officials knowingly destroyed all the evidence at that crime scene. They got rid of every shred of evidence. They melted it down, built ships out of it, or put it on a boat to China.”

    What little else remains is stored at the mysterious Hanger 17 at New York’s JFK Airport. Absolutely no one is allowed access to this evidence."

    From the same article about the episode of Ventura's TV show.

    Link to the article is above.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

    Re: Which is another reason that we were told ALL FOUR black boxes became the first 4 black boxes in history to NEVER be found after a land crash.

    "Additional evidence of a cover-up arose when Ventura questioned FBI counter-terrorism expert Jack Cloonan, who stated rhetorically, “Does the U.S. government do things in the dead of night that they don’t want seen in the light of day? Of course they do.”

    Then, when told that September 11 may be the first time ever in the history of recorded flight where four black boxes completely vanished, Cloonan replied, “So what?”

    Airline investigative expert Dave Leppard also acknowledged that he’d never once been at a crash site where the black boxes (actually orange) had not been discovered. He then proceeded to describe how these very distinct, bright orange boxes made out of titanium are virtually indestructible. “The odds are almost zero percent that they’re not found,” he concluded."

    Full link... you can find the episode online.

    https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box_204.html

    "Investigators found fingernail-sized shards of bone to identify the victims, yet we’re to believe that all four black boxes are still missing?” [The four six-ton engines from flights 11 and 175 also vanished, according to the government.—Ed.]

    Mike Bellone, who worked at Ground Zero for 257 straight days, actually saw one of the recovered boxes three to four weeks after the WTC collapses, and personally witnessed the FBI loading this equipment onto a tractor-trailer. He also referred to New York City firefighter Nicholas Demasi, who claims to have been present when “locaters” found two other boxes.

    Why hasn’t the public been made aware of these groundbreaking developments? Ventura stated pointblank, “Government officials knowingly destroyed all the evidence at that crime scene. They got rid of every shred of evidence. They melted it down, built ships out of it, or put it on a boat to China.”

    What little else remains is stored at the mysterious Hanger 17 at New York’s JFK Airport. Absolutely no one is allowed access to this evidence."

    From the same article about the episode of Ventura's TV show.

    Link to the article is above.

     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 12:10 AM ET #1339

    Journalist Dave Lindorff next weighed in by recounting a meeting he had with NTSB officials. After inquiring whether the FBI had secured these devices, he was asked, “Do you want the real answer, or the official answer?” An official then disclosed that all four boxes were in the FBI’s possession. Lindorff summarized the great trick played on us.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Journalist Dave Lindorff next weighed in by recounting a meeting he had with NTSB officials. After inquiring whether the FBI had secured these devices, he was asked, “Do you want the real answer, or the official answer?” An official then disclosed that all four boxes were in the FBI’s possession. Lindorff summarized the great trick played on us.

     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 12:21 AM ET #1340

    Re: those buildings contained information they wanted destroyed and plenty of valuables they flat out stole from the vaults also. Even the buildings new owners cashed in by doubling his insurance a few days before 9/11 and having them put an extra claus in there for acts of terror.

     

    To begin with...You can find what you need here. Good Luck as you seek the truth.

    https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insurance-scam.htm

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Re: those buildings contained information they wanted destroyed and plenty of valuables they flat out stole from the vaults also. Even the buildings new owners cashed in by doubling his insurance a few days before 9/11 and having them put an extra claus in there for acts of terror.

     

    To begin with...You can find what you need here. Good Luck as you seek the truth.

    https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insurance-scam.htm

     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 12:30 AM ET #1341

    Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

    Re: those buildings contained information they wanted destroyed and plenty of valuables they flat out stole from the vaults also. Even the buildings new owners cashed in by doubling his insurance a few days before 9/11 and having them put an extra claus in there for acts of terror.

     

    To begin with...You can find what you need here. Good Luck as you seek the truth.

    https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insurance-scam.htm

    https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insurance-scam.htm

    https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread492237/pg1

    This info should give you a legitimate head start to finding the answers you never even knew about regarding this issue.

    Good Luck.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

    Re: those buildings contained information they wanted destroyed and plenty of valuables they flat out stole from the vaults also. Even the buildings new owners cashed in by doubling his insurance a few days before 9/11 and having them put an extra claus in there for acts of terror.

     

    To begin with...You can find what you need here. Good Luck as you seek the truth.

    https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insurance-scam.htm

    https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insurance-scam.htm

    https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread492237/pg1

    This info should give you a legitimate head start to finding the answers you never even knew about regarding this issue.

    Good Luck.

     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 12:47 AM ET #1342

    Re: We had AF planes nearby but they were told to sit while other from much farther away were told to take off and find the flights.

    Complete 911 Timeline

    United Airlines Flight 93

    https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?day_of_9/11=ua93&timeline=complete_911_timeline

    You can find info on EACH of the four flights here. Good Luck in seeking the truth.

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Re: We had AF planes nearby but they were told to sit while other from much farther away were told to take off and find the flights.

    Complete 911 Timeline

    United Airlines Flight 93

    https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?day_of_9/11=ua93&timeline=complete_911_timeline

    You can find info on EACH of the four flights here. Good Luck in seeking the truth.

     

     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 1:02 AM ET #1343

    Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

    Re: We had AF planes nearby but they were told to sit while other from much farther away were told to take off and find the flights.

    Complete 911 Timeline

    United Airlines Flight 93

    https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?day_of_9/11=ua93&timeline=complete_911_timeline

    You can find info on EACH of the four flights here. Good Luck in seeking the truth.

     

    Also...

    "On Sept. 11, the normal scramble-approval procedure was for an FAA official to contact the National Military Command Center (NMCC) and request Pentagon air support. Someone in the NMCC would call Norad's command center and ask about availability of aircraft, then seek approval from the Defense Secretary--Donald H. Rumsfeld--to launch fighters." - Aviation Week (06/03/02)

    9/11 Tapes Reveal Ground Personnel Muffled Attacks

    "What’s more, the decades-old procedure for a quick response by the nation’s air defense had been changed in June of 2001. Now, instead of NORAD’s military commanders being able to issue the command to launch fighter jets, approval had to be sought from the civilian Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld. This change is extremely significant, because Mr. Rumsfeld claims to have been "out of the loop" nearly the entire morning of 9/11. He isn’t on the record as having given any orders that morning. In fact, he didn’t even go to the White House situation room; he had to walk to the window of his office in the Pentagon to see that the country’s military headquarters was in flames.
    Mr. Rumsfeld claimed at a previous commission hearing that protection against attack inside the homeland was not his responsibility. It was, he said, "a law-enforcement issue."
    Why, in that case, did he take onto himself the responsibility of approving NORAD’s deployment of fighter planes?" - New York Observer (06/21/04) [Reprinted at:  dangerouscitizen.com]

     

     

    https://killtown.911review.org/oddities/911.html

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

    Re: We had AF planes nearby but they were told to sit while other from much farther away were told to take off and find the flights.

    Complete 911 Timeline

    United Airlines Flight 93

    https://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?day_of_9/11=ua93&timeline=complete_911_timeline

    You can find info on EACH of the four flights here. Good Luck in seeking the truth.

     

    Also...

    "On Sept. 11, the normal scramble-approval procedure was for an FAA official to contact the National Military Command Center (NMCC) and request Pentagon air support. Someone in the NMCC would call Norad's command center and ask about availability of aircraft, then seek approval from the Defense Secretary--Donald H. Rumsfeld--to launch fighters." - Aviation Week (06/03/02)

    9/11 Tapes Reveal Ground Personnel Muffled Attacks

    "What’s more, the decades-old procedure for a quick response by the nation’s air defense had been changed in June of 2001. Now, instead of NORAD’s military commanders being able to issue the command to launch fighter jets, approval had to be sought from the civilian Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld. This change is extremely significant, because Mr. Rumsfeld claims to have been "out of the loop" nearly the entire morning of 9/11. He isn’t on the record as having given any orders that morning. In fact, he didn’t even go to the White House situation room; he had to walk to the window of his office in the Pentagon to see that the country’s military headquarters was in flames.
    Mr. Rumsfeld claimed at a previous commission hearing that protection against attack inside the homeland was not his responsibility. It was, he said, "a law-enforcement issue."
    Why, in that case, did he take onto himself the responsibility of approving NORAD’s deployment of fighter planes?" - New York Observer (06/21/04) [Reprinted at:  dangerouscitizen.com]

     

     

    https://killtown.911review.org/oddities/911.html

     
    Skubishack
    Skubishack
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 14624
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 2:04 AM ET #1344

    Re: They had even scheduled an excersize regarding a plane attack on the Towers for the same day.

    All links I had for this have been inactivated including NORADs original timeline for what happened on 9/11. I will continue to look for it.

    If you need any further questions answered feel free to ask. I think I've covered all your previous questions here.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Re: They had even scheduled an excersize regarding a plane attack on the Towers for the same day.

    All links I had for this have been inactivated including NORADs original timeline for what happened on 9/11. I will continue to look for it.

    If you need any further questions answered feel free to ask. I think I've covered all your previous questions here.

     
    slikstiks99
    slikstiks99
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 6697
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 2:31 AM ET #1345

    Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

    Re: They had even scheduled an excersize regarding a plane attack on the Towers for the same day.

    All links I had for this have been inactivated including NORADs original timeline for what happened on 9/11. I will continue to look for it.

    If you need any further questions answered feel free to ask. I think I've covered all your previous questions here.



    Nice string of posts. That laundry list of anomalies is a smoking gun. It is 10 times more illogical to think all of those things happened by chance than to believe the official story. It's just way too much to just explain away.

    Added evidence is the government's failure to investigate this matter properly, most resounding, THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION's complete lack of cooperation and accountability during the investigation.

    Hell they would even let GWB talk to investigators because someone thought he was too stupid and would let something out of the bag, whatever that might be.
    Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

    Re: They had even scheduled an excersize regarding a plane attack on the Towers for the same day.

    All links I had for this have been inactivated including NORADs original timeline for what happened on 9/11. I will continue to look for it.

    If you need any further questions answered feel free to ask. I think I've covered all your previous questions here.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

    Re: They had even scheduled an excersize regarding a plane attack on the Towers for the same day.

    All links I had for this have been inactivated including NORADs original timeline for what happened on 9/11. I will continue to look for it.

    If you need any further questions answered feel free to ask. I think I've covered all your previous questions here.



    Nice string of posts. That laundry list of anomalies is a smoking gun. It is 10 times more illogical to think all of those things happened by chance than to believe the official story. It's just way too much to just explain away.

    Added evidence is the government's failure to investigate this matter properly, most resounding, THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION's complete lack of cooperation and accountability during the investigation.

    Hell they would even let GWB talk to investigators because someone thought he was too stupid and would let something out of the bag, whatever that might be.
    Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:

    Re: They had even scheduled an excersize regarding a plane attack on the Towers for the same day.

    All links I had for this have been inactivated including NORADs original timeline for what happened on 9/11. I will continue to look for it.

    If you need any further questions answered feel free to ask. I think I've covered all your previous questions here.

     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 10:57 AM ET #1346

    The dogs were removed due to the fact that it would have been highly likely that they would have found the detonators before September 11th.

    _____________

    More made up stuff.  If you would ACTUALLY DO SOME RESEARCH, you'd know

    They had been put on two weeks earlier because of phoned-in threats. The unusual thing is that they had been on extra duty for those two weeks, not that they were pulled off.

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The dogs were removed due to the fact that it would have been highly likely that they would have found the detonators before September 11th.

    _____________

    More made up stuff.  If you would ACTUALLY DO SOME RESEARCH, you'd know

    They had been put on two weeks earlier because of phoned-in threats. The unusual thing is that they had been on extra duty for those two weeks, not that they were pulled off.

     

     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 11:13 AM ET #1347

    I suppose the government got to this guy, too:

     

    “Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C.

     

    "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I suppose the government got to this guy, too:

     

    “Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C.

     

    "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"

     
    slikstiks99
    slikstiks99
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 6697
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 11:27 AM ET #1348

    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

    I suppose the government got to this guy, too:

     

    “Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C.

     

    "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"



    Did they find the black boxes of the planes? Its hard to doubt that a plane hit the pentagon. It is strange how long it took to produce an image of a plane hitting the pentagon. But if they found the black boxes then it is good enough for me.

    There are still way too many convenient explanations for the official story. And good'ole tower 7 just falling from fire. No sir.

     
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

    I suppose the government got to this guy, too:

     

    “Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C.

     

    "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"



    Did they find the black boxes of the planes? Its hard to doubt that a plane hit the pentagon. It is strange how long it took to produce an image of a plane hitting the pentagon. But if they found the black boxes then it is good enough for me.

    There are still way too many convenient explanations for the official story. And good'ole tower 7 just falling from fire. No sir.

     
     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 11:27 AM ET #1349

    Does this sound like testimony from people who would want to protect the government if they were the ones responsible for the attack on the pentagon.  And does this make you think a missile or a jet hit the pentagon?  Missiles don't utilize jet fuel morons.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A12652-2004Sep10?language=printer

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Does this sound like testimony from people who would want to protect the government if they were the ones responsible for the attack on the pentagon.  And does this make you think a missile or a jet hit the pentagon?  Missiles don't utilize jet fuel morons.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A12652-2004Sep10?language=printer

     
     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2010 - 11:29 AM ET #1350

    Quote Originally Posted by slikstiks99:



    Did they find the black boxes of the planes? Its hard to doubt that a plane hit the pentagon. It is strange how long it took to produce an image of a plane hitting the pentagon. But if they found the black boxes then it is good enough for me.

    There are still way too many convenient explanations for the official story. And good'ole tower 7 just falling from fire. No sir.

     

    Read the quote again....he says he found the black box. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by slikstiks99:



    Did they find the black boxes of the planes? Its hard to doubt that a plane hit the pentagon. It is strange how long it took to produce an image of a plane hitting the pentagon. But if they found the black boxes then it is good enough for me.

    There are still way too many convenient explanations for the official story. And good'ole tower 7 just falling from fire. No sir.

     

    Read the quote again....he says he found the black box. 

    All Forums | General Discussion
    «First Previous 545556 ... 616263 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 445,719 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 09/08/2026 974 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 253,209 Covers arrow
    • Couple thoughts 3,318 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 2,611 Covers arrow
    • Breathtaking ....truly 20,478 Covers arrow
    • We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 26,696 Covers arrow
    • Obviously the true face of the republican party 30,554 Covers arrow
    • 9/8 POD 🔥🔥???? 2,260 Covers arrow
    • pg mlb 2026 season thread 6,320 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.