September 11, 2001 (long read)

yes dj he is now saying that the plane that hit the pentagon was not hijacked that it flew over the pentagon and disappeared. he is stating this because dozens of eyewitnesses say the plane approached at a different angle than the official report, however I didn't hear any of them mention seeing a missile , Smdio believes a missile was fired at the pentagon - from  where or how he hasnt explained. I find it strange that these same people who were there didn't mention seeing a missile.

Some others have pointed out that the plane parts that were photographed at the scene were not from the same kind of plane as flight 77 but they haven't explained how those parts got to the sight without anyone noticing a truck driving around throwing parts on the ground.

Israel Did 911, All the Proof in the World!

 

https://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5367

How about the hundreds of eyewitnesses that did see the plane. Moreso, the debris from the plane would have reached past the first concentric ring. You do understand that the plane entered past the first ring. Think about this..a plane crashes through a shack into a building. Will the core of the plane debris be at the shack or where the plane broke apart? The Pentagon is an interesting building with each concentric ring more secure than the rest as you reach the center. The southside, also known as the Heliport facade, is the weakest entry point, a fact that the terrorists stumbled upon with luck, not with knowledge I hope. This allowed the plane to enter into the permimeter of the secondary ring, where it struck the ground and broke apart. Due to Pentagon security, this was pretty much out of the sight of the public.

good points

incredible

                                     Congressional research committee   It does not say anything about anyone testifying in front of the library of congress.   Maybe you meant something else. Or you are making things up.   You do understand what the library of congress is right?      Pretty sure you can't testify before the head librarian since he is not an elected official.

Yeah he won't answer that one because we were all able to see the hijackers on video going though security that day.

It was me.....

That is all

 

DJ,

 I differ with you on this one.  First off the Pentagon is the most secure building in the world, how could our govt not have one clear photo of the plane coming towards the building? All they have ever shown was some grainy photos where you cant make out what the object is.  Come on they probably got the best cameras in the world aimed at the building, plus all the satellites pointing at the building.

2.why was no fighter jets sent up to intercept this plane, where nothing is allowed in the air space over this building.  I mean they only had 45 minutes to get something sent upPlease there are fighter jets on call 24/7/365 with no other job but to guard the Pentagon. On top of that why no missile to shoot down this plane. Are you telling me our enemies can just jet into our country then, since we have no real defense systems guarding us.

3. Decorated air force pilots and airliner piliots have siad there is no way they could fly that airliner into the building the way the terrorists did and these terrorists were having trouble flying little single engine planes, but now they are going to fly an airliner 6 feet off the ground into the Pentagon, pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

I could go on and on, but if a person believes the bullshit story our govt is telling them, then they wont listen to anything else.

I have looked at this from both sides and honestly the govts verison is complete bullshit.

No plane hit the Pentagon and no way could planes alone make both towers come down 30 minutes apart from each other.  There has been buildings that burn for days and they never collapsed. Towers were brought down by explosives.  Traces of which were found, but i guess they got there magically.

 

The truth will never come out thou, because the real people behind all this have already more then likely eliminated the people who knew anything.

Well....

1) there are tons and tons of photos, videos, and eyewitness accounts. The problem is that we use the Trade Center comparison. Almost all of the videos taken of the planes hitting the towers are provate videos and most of them are the second strike (people were filming the fire in the first center.

2) We often get confused on the timeline of events. At the time the Pengtagon was hit, over 500 planes remained in the air and unaccounted for. The government simply had no more of indication that the Pentagon was in danger than they did that a plane would strike the downtown area of a major city. In fact, as the Pentagon was hit, jet planes were moving towards all of the major cities in the east coast. https://www.wanttoknow.info/011016nytimes

3) Actually, had the hijackers wanted to do the most damage, they would have brought the jet down on top of the Pentagon. Many theorize that was their plane.

I am not aware of any concrete evidence of explosives in the Trade Towers.

I am open to anyone who wants to discuss that smiddyo thinks the library of congress is a congressional committee.

 

1. all the photos and videos are way to grainy to make out what the object is.  Pentagon has got to have state of the art video equiptment watching that building, should have clear photos.

2.Penatgon and Whitehouse have fighter jets assigned to just protect those buildings.  On top of that, we have no missile system designed to protect those buildings.  Shit if i was north korea or Iran i would just fly rtight in then.

3.Exactly, so why did they crash where they did, especially when expert piliots said they couldnt have done that

this thread is just beaming with hope

Yet THIS is interesting to you?........... https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=35&sub=100901731 

Or starting P-Box Nation threads?  Are they beaming with hope?

Seems like the same morons who say "I gotta go fight for freedom in Afghanistan" would be the same morons who don't believe it was Al-Qaeda who attacked us. I won't/can't justify us going to the Middle east for a war, since more Mexicans/Americans have died on the border this year, but I won't disagree w/ the fact that Bin-Laden is capable of major fear here in the US....

I hope everyone watched the Discovery show about OP Restrepo, so you can see how the US gov't uses/abuses the ignorant youth in this society....It's crazy, but hell thank god (or whatever imaginary being) that I wasn't drafted, cuz it looks like Vietnam...But what do I know, I've only studied history and don't give a shit about what my Gov't "claims" is the Enemy...

Hmmm why did Clinton sell Nuclear technology "sorry missile accuracy" to China if we are so concerned about an enemy using the shit against us??? Maybe those who are so concerned about terrorists look into the spread of Nuclear technology and Klaus Fuchs since I doubt a shoe/underwear bomb really affects the common American

dimwhit   that hurt my head.   PM smiddyo and his team of lawyers you guys should be best friends.

LMAO, you called him dimwhit, that was great.

You are delusional...Get over yourself...

100%....and your point is

Hey   whats up reilly?    Good to see you make an apperance. Are you aware that smiddyo thinks the library of congress is a congressional committee?    Wow!!!!!!!!   Not much else to say after that.

[Quote: Originally Posted by smdio]

Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001.  This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in

Is that the best you can do?

[/Quote                                        BOOM!!!!!!!!!

tillyo.....I find it disturbingly odd that since you've been here at covers all you have done is post in this thread.....

 

So you might be a poster in here, who would you say you are posting as besides tillyo  

A books nightmare that is fn brilliant.    He might not get it but I do. Damn that is fight club perfect.