My friend said last night that there are some people that believe they don't want to find a cure for cancer.
2010 film, Burzynski – Cancer is Serious Business
The 2010 film, Burzynski, Cancer is Serious Business, directed, written, edited, and narrated by Eric Merola, an art director of television commercials, describes Burzynski's use of antineoplastons and his legal clashes with government agencies and regulators.[58] The Village Voice commented that the movie "violates every basic rule of ethical filmmaking" and that by interviewing only Burzynski's supporters, the film's producer "is either unusually credulous, or doesn't understand the difference between a documentary and an advertisement".[59] Variety described the film as having the qualities of a "paranoid conspiracy theory" and likened it to the National Enquirer, adding that the film's explanatory diagrams are "simplistic to the point of idiocy". The review concluded that "despite its infotainment look, Burzynski ultimately proves convincing."[60] Prior to the debut of "Burzynski", Houston Press correspondent Craig Malisow mocked the film's lack of objectivity, characterizing it as "a puff-piece paean that cherrypicks facts and ignores any criticism", and criticized the project for presenting only Burzynski's side of the story.[61]
likened it to the National Enquirer, adding that the film's explanatory diagrams are "simplistic to the point of idiocy"2010 film, Burzynski – Cancer is Serious Business
The 2010 film, Burzynski, Cancer is Serious Business, directed, written, edited, and narrated by Eric Merola, an art director of television commercials, describes Burzynski's use of antineoplastons and his legal clashes with government agencies and regulators.[58] The Village Voice commented that the movie "violates every basic rule of ethical filmmaking" and that by interviewing only Burzynski's supporters, the film's producer "is either unusually credulous, or doesn't understand the difference between a documentary and an advertisement".[59] Variety described the film as having the qualities of a "paranoid conspiracy theory" and likened it to the National Enquirer, adding that the film's explanatory diagrams are "simplistic to the point of idiocy". The review concluded that "despite its infotainment look, Burzynski ultimately proves convincing."[60] Prior to the debut of "Burzynski", Houston Press correspondent Craig Malisow mocked the film's lack of objectivity, characterizing it as "a puff-piece paean that cherrypicks facts and ignores any criticism", and criticized the project for presenting only Burzynski's side of the story.[61]
likened it to the National Enquirer, adding that the film's explanatory diagrams are "simplistic to the point of idiocy"Maybe it's because anybody can grow it anywhere. And how do you sell that and make billions?
Maybe it's because anybody can grow it anywhere. And how do you sell that and make billions?
Cotton industry don't want hemp come back, and all the farmers don't want that . Allowing Marijuana grow will effect not just Drug company, also Cotten, Farmer , Oil , Lumber , etc. That my friend, i might call it conspiracy or looking after special intrest.
I do think it has a little to do with cancer part though.
Cotton industry don't want hemp come back, and all the farmers don't want that . Allowing Marijuana grow will effect not just Drug company, also Cotten, Farmer , Oil , Lumber , etc. That my friend, i might call it conspiracy or looking after special intrest.
I do think it has a little to do with cancer part though.
I'll give you this much... I don't know much about cancer in other countries. However, I don't understand how the U.S. government since 1974 has known that Cannabis has anti cancer properties, and yet research by many institutions gets denied federal funding because it's a schedule I drug. It's antiproliferative (it prevents the spread of cancer), it's proapoptotic (it destroys cells that are dying before they can become mutant or cancerous), and it kills cancer cells while leaving the healrhy cells untouched. Doctors all over the world know this to be fact. The cannabanoids CBD and THC are largely responsible for these characteristics. Yet we have millions of people dying of cancer every year worldwide. Why can't we the people grow a plant and use it for medicine? It's a natural plant that has never killed anyone in the history of mankind. It's never once caused cancer or any disease. There is no record of it ever happening. It has no side effects. None. Yet the chemo drugs can cost up to $30,000 for eight weeks of treatment, and the drugs kill everything in the human body. They often give people cancer, the exact illness they're trying to fight. Why isn't Cannabis being used as medicine everywhere in the world? What's the hold up? How many more millions have to die? This is genocide in every sense of the word.
Maybe it's because anybody can grow it anywhere. And how do you sell that and make billions?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We have a winner. Very well put Steel!
I'll give you this much... I don't know much about cancer in other countries. However, I don't understand how the U.S. government since 1974 has known that Cannabis has anti cancer properties, and yet research by many institutions gets denied federal funding because it's a schedule I drug. It's antiproliferative (it prevents the spread of cancer), it's proapoptotic (it destroys cells that are dying before they can become mutant or cancerous), and it kills cancer cells while leaving the healrhy cells untouched. Doctors all over the world know this to be fact. The cannabanoids CBD and THC are largely responsible for these characteristics. Yet we have millions of people dying of cancer every year worldwide. Why can't we the people grow a plant and use it for medicine? It's a natural plant that has never killed anyone in the history of mankind. It's never once caused cancer or any disease. There is no record of it ever happening. It has no side effects. None. Yet the chemo drugs can cost up to $30,000 for eight weeks of treatment, and the drugs kill everything in the human body. They often give people cancer, the exact illness they're trying to fight. Why isn't Cannabis being used as medicine everywhere in the world? What's the hold up? How many more millions have to die? This is genocide in every sense of the word.
Maybe it's because anybody can grow it anywhere. And how do you sell that and make billions?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We have a winner. Very well put Steel!
I'll give you this much... I don't know much about cancer in other countries. However, I don't understand how the U.S. government since 1974 has known that Cannabis has anti cancer properties, and yet research by many institutions gets denied federal funding because it's a schedule I drug. It's antiproliferative (it prevents the spread of cancer), it's proapoptotic (it destroys cells that are dying before they can become mutant or cancerous), and it kills cancer cells while leaving the healrhy cells untouched. Doctors all over the world know this to be fact. The cannabanoids CBD and THC are largely responsible for these characteristics. Yet we have millions of people dying of cancer every year worldwide. Why can't we the people grow a plant and use it for medicine? It's a natural plant that has never killed anyone in the history of mankind. It's never once caused cancer or any disease. There is no record of it ever happening. It has no side effects. None. Yet the chemo drugs can cost up to $30,000 for eight weeks of treatment, and the drugs kill everything in the human body. They often give people cancer, the exact illness they're trying to fight. Why isn't Cannabis being used as medicine everywhere in the world? What's the hold up? How many more millions have to die? This is genocide in every sense of the word.
Maybe it's because anybody can grow it anywhere. And how do you sell that and make billions?
I'll give you this much... I don't know much about cancer in other countries. However, I don't understand how the U.S. government since 1974 has known that Cannabis has anti cancer properties, and yet research by many institutions gets denied federal funding because it's a schedule I drug. It's antiproliferative (it prevents the spread of cancer), it's proapoptotic (it destroys cells that are dying before they can become mutant or cancerous), and it kills cancer cells while leaving the healrhy cells untouched. Doctors all over the world know this to be fact. The cannabanoids CBD and THC are largely responsible for these characteristics. Yet we have millions of people dying of cancer every year worldwide. Why can't we the people grow a plant and use it for medicine? It's a natural plant that has never killed anyone in the history of mankind. It's never once caused cancer or any disease. There is no record of it ever happening. It has no side effects. None. Yet the chemo drugs can cost up to $30,000 for eight weeks of treatment, and the drugs kill everything in the human body. They often give people cancer, the exact illness they're trying to fight. Why isn't Cannabis being used as medicine everywhere in the world? What's the hold up? How many more millions have to die? This is genocide in every sense of the word.
Maybe it's because anybody can grow it anywhere. And how do you sell that and make billions?
Weekends (handshake)
Weekends (handshake)
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 454,166
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,225
- The MLB Playoffs are here. 7,568
- NFL LOCKED IN! 102,634
- You asked for more winners- here you go 2,319
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 29,005
- Wednesday 09/30/2026 537
- ?? KBO Plays 🥎 15,726
- PART DEUX 266
- MODERATE voters say ... 34,969
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
