|
|
Some interesting totals data on that Gonzaga game:
Brigham Young
|
|
ALERT ALERT ALERT
14-10 is a good day considering the numerous amount of plays but I think most of us will agree that with so many plays being made, more often than not, we will see just about that average from a good capper or worse!
14/24 = 58%
Food for thought! It only makes sense to me to throw this out there for everyone to digest! The system has been proven over the past few yrs and is doing fine this year so why play so many games and end up with a worse record than the system plays which are so few and predetermined for us?
2/3 = 67%
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth unless you are an action junkie. I know most of us who are seasoned gamblers with many years of experience will agree that the odds and probability are not in our favor when we play an extensive amount of games!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me explain it another way when we consider risk and reward!
Wins: 14 x 100 = 1400
Losses: 10 x 110 (if no totals lose at 20%) = 1100
Total Amount Risked: 24 x 110 = 2640
Total Amount Earned: 1400 - 1100 = 300
The above example is a very profitable day but you risked 2640 to yield about an 11% return of 300. (300/2640=11%)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now let's do it the conservative way, which is still a gamble, but with the probabilty of a better reward and much less risk!
Wins: 2 x 300 = 600
Losses: 1 x 330 = 330
Total Amount Risked: 3 x 330 = 990
Total Amount Earned: 600 - 330 = 270
The last example also yielded a nice profit, but with much less risk and also with much more reward! We only risked 990 to yield a 27% return of 270. (270/990=27%)
We only risked 990 vs 2640 which is only 38% or risking 62% less possible loss and we were rewarded an additional 16% more profit. (990/2640=38% and 27-11=16%)
In summary, we risked 62% less money and earned 16% more profit! 
Food for thought! Chew it up and spit it out? or Chew it up and digest it?
This is just my opinion and I hope it is clear and I think have done the math correctly.
KP great work and congratulations on a well played card yesterday! Thanks again! 
FUPM 
ALERT ALERT ALERT
14-10 is a good day considering the numerous amount of plays but I think most of us will agree that with so many plays being made, more often than not, we will see just about that average from a good capper or worse!
14/24 = 58%
Food for thought! It only makes sense to me to throw this out there for everyone to digest! The system has been proven over the past few yrs and is doing fine this year so why play so many games and end up with a worse record than the system plays which are so few and predetermined for us?
2/3 = 67%
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth unless you are an action junkie. I know most of us who are seasoned gamblers with many years of experience will agree that the odds and probability are not in our favor when we play an extensive amount of games!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me explain it another way when we consider risk and reward!
Wins: 14 x 100 = 1400
Losses: 10 x 110 (if no totals lose at 20%) = 1100
Total Amount Risked: 24 x 110 = 2640
Total Amount Earned: 1400 - 1100 = 300
The above example is a very profitable day but you risked 2640 to yield about an 11% return of 300. (300/2640=11%)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now let's do it the conservative way, which is still a gamble, but with the probabilty of a better reward and much less risk!
Wins: 2 x 300 = 600
Losses: 1 x 330 = 330
Total Amount Risked: 3 x 330 = 990
Total Amount Earned: 600 - 330 = 270
The last example also yielded a nice profit, but with much less risk and also with much more reward! We only risked 990 to yield a 27% return of 270. (270/990=27%)
We only risked 990 vs 2640 which is only 38% or risking 62% less possible loss and we were rewarded an additional 16% more profit. (990/2640=38% and 27-11=16%)
In summary, we risked 62% less money and earned 16% more profit!
Food for thought! Chew it up and spit it out? or Chew it up and digest it?
This is just my opinion and I hope it is clear and I think have done the math correctly.
KP great work and congratulations on a well played card yesterday! Thanks again!
FUPM
ALERT ALERT ALERT
14-10 is a good day considering the numerous amount of plays but I think most of us will agree that with so many plays being made, more often than not, we will see just about that average from a good capper or worse!
14/24 = 58%
Food for thought! It only makes sense to me to throw this out there for everyone to digest! The system has been proven over the past few yrs and is doing fine this year so why play so many games and end up with a worse record than the system plays which are so few and predetermined for us?
2/3 = 67%
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth unless you are an action junkie. I know most of us who are seasoned gamblers with many years of experience will agree that the odds and probability are not in our favor when we play an extensive amount of games!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me explain it another way when we consider risk and reward!
Wins: 14 x 100 = 1400
Losses: 10 x 110 (if no totals lose at 20%) = 1100
Total Amount Risked: 24 x 110 = 2640
Total Amount Earned: 1400 - 1100 = 300
The above example is a very profitable day but you risked 2640 to yield about an 11% return of 300. (300/2640=11%)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now let's do it the conservative way, which is still a gamble, but with the probabilty of a better reward and much less risk!
Wins: 2 x 300 = 600
Losses: 1 x 330 = 330
Total Amount Risked: 3 x 330 = 990
Total Amount Earned: 600 - 330 = 270
The last example also yielded a nice profit, but with much less risk and also with much more reward! We only risked 990 to yield a 27% return of 270. (270/990=27%)
We only risked 990 vs 2640 which is only 38% or risking 62% less possible loss and we were rewarded an additional 16% more profit. (990/2640=38% and 27-11=16%)
In summary, we risked 62% less money and earned 16% more profit!
Food for thought! Chew it up and spit it out? or Chew it up and digest it?
This is just my opinion and I hope it is clear and I think have done the math correctly.
KP great work and congratulations on a well played card yesterday! Thanks again!
FUPM
remember kp suggested he post his pics on his own thread - but willing to discuss any games here - clem1
ALERT ALERT ALERT
14-10 is a good day considering the numerous amount of plays but I think most of us will agree that with so many plays being made, more often than not, we will see just about that average from a good capper or worse!
14/24 = 58%
Food for thought! It only makes sense to me to throw this out there for everyone to digest! The system has been proven over the past few yrs and is doing fine this year so why play so many games and end up with a worse record than the system plays which are so few and predetermined for us?
2/3 = 67%
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth unless you are an action junkie. I know most of us who are seasoned gamblers with many years of experience will agree that the odds and probability are not in our favor when we play an extensive amount of games!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me explain it another way when we consider risk and reward!
Wins: 14 x 100 = 1400
Losses: 10 x 110 (if no totals lose at 20%) = 1100
Total Amount Risked: 24 x 110 = 2640
Total Amount Earned: 1400 - 1100 = 300
The above example is a very profitable day but you risked 2640 to yield about an 11% return of 300. (300/2640=11%)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now let's do it the conservative way, which is still a gamble, but with the probabilty of a better reward and much less risk!
Wins: 2 x 300 = 600
Losses: 1 x 330 = 330
Total Amount Risked: 3 x 330 = 990
Total Amount Earned: 600 - 330 = 270
The last example also yielded a nice profit, but with much less risk and also with much more reward! We only risked 990 to yield a 27% return of 270. (270/990=27%)
We only risked 990 vs 2640 which is only 38% or risking 62% less possible loss and we were rewarded an additional 16% more profit. (990/2640=38% and 27-11=16%)
In summary, we risked 62% less money and earned 16% more profit!
Food for thought! Chew it up and spit it out? or Chew it up and digest it?
This is just my opinion and I hope it is clear and I think have done the math correctly.
KP great work and congratulations on a well played card yesterday! Thanks again!
FUPM
Established in 1995,
to KP
Hot Forum Topics
