Minnesota Twins Picks
3rd in American League Central
(60 - 65)
Next Game
Mon, Aug 17
19:40 ET
ATL @ MIN Picks
MLB PicksEV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Austin Riley in the 94th percentile when estimating his home run talent.. Target Field sits at the 5th-highest elevation in Major League Baseball. High elevation often leads to more offense.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 8.5-mph in this contest, the 2nd-strongest of the day for bats.. Austin Riley has a ton of pop (94th percentile) if he makes contact, but that's never a sure thing (27.8% K%). Today, however, opposing pitcher Bailey Ober doesn't generate many whiffs (18th percentile K%) — great news for Riley.. The Minnesota Twins outfield defense projects as the 11th-worst out of all the teams on the slate today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Byron Buxton projects as the 4th-best home run batter in Major League Baseball, per the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Byron Buxton is penciled in 2nd in the lineup in this matchup.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 8.5-mph in this contest, the 2nd-strongest of the day for bats.. Hitting from the opposite that Martin Perez throws from, Byron Buxton will have the upper hand in today's game.. Byron Buxton will have the benefit of the home field advantage today, which figures to boost all of his stats.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
When it comes to his overall offensive ability, Ryan Jeffers ranks in the 94th percentile according to the leading projections (THE BAT X).. Ryan Jeffers is projected to bat 3rd on the lineup card in today's game.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 8.1-mph in this contest, the 2nd-strongest of the day for bats.. Hitting from the opposite that Martin Perez throws from, Ryan Jeffers will have the upper hand in today's game.. Home field advantage typically improves hitter metrics across the board, and Ryan Jeffers will hold that advantage in today's game.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Matt Olson projects as the 17th-best home run hitter in the league, via the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Matt Olson is projected to bat 3rd in the batting order in this game.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 8.5-mph in this contest, the 2nd-strongest of the day for bats.. Batting from the opposite that Bailey Ober throws from, Matt Olson will have an edge in today's matchup.. The Minnesota Twins outfield defense projects as the 11th-worst out of all the teams on the slate today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
According to the leading projection system (THE BAT X), Ronald Acuna Jr. ranks as the 6th-best batter in Major League Baseball.. Ronald Acuna Jr. is projected to hit 2nd in the lineup in this game.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 8.5-mph in this contest, the 2nd-strongest of the day for bats.. The Minnesota Twins outfield defense projects as the 11th-worst out of all the teams on the slate today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Mike Yastrzemski is projected to hit 6th in the lineup in this matchup.. Target Field ranks as the #25 stadium in the league for LHB home runs, per the leading projection system (THE BAT).. The 10th-deepest CF fences in MLB are found in Target Field.. Target Field has the 5th-tallest fence height (on average) among all major league parks.. This contest is projected to have the 8th-most favorable weather for pitching among all the games scheduled today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Luke Keaschall in the 95th percentile as it relates to his batting average skill.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 8.1-mph in this contest, the 2nd-strongest of the day for bats.. Batting from the opposite that Martin Perez throws from, Luke Keaschall will have an edge in today's game.. Luke Keaschall will possess the home field advantage today, which figures to boost all of his stats.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 8.5-mph in this contest, the 2nd-strongest of the day for bats.. Brooks Lee will possess the home field advantage today, which should boost all of his stats.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Drake Baldwin in the 92nd percentile when assessing his overall offensive talent.. Drake Baldwin is projected to bat 1st in the batting order in today's game.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 8.5-mph in this contest, the 2nd-strongest of the day for bats.. Hitting from the opposite that Bailey Ober throws from, Drake Baldwin will have an advantage in today's game.. The Minnesota Twins outfield defense projects as the 11th-worst out of all the teams on the slate today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Michael Harris II in the 94th percentile when estimating his batting average ability.. Michael Harris II is projected to bat 4th in the lineup in today's game.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 8.5-mph in this contest, the 2nd-strongest of the day for bats.. Michael Harris II will have the handedness advantage over Bailey Ober today.. The Minnesota Twins outfield defense projects as the 11th-worst out of all the teams on the slate today.
Consensus Picks
More ConsensusATL @ MIN · Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MONEYLINE
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
R. Lewis
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
5.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Buxton
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.05
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
0.79%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Bell
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-0.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
D. Baldwin
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
1.20
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-1.49%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Jarvis
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-1.81%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Harris II
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.18
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-2.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
A. Riley
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.97
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-2.77%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
O. Albies
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.95
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.05%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Olson
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.07
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-3.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
A. Martin
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.05%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
R. Acuna Jr.
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.18
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-4.85%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
K. Culpepper
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.82%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Yastrzemski
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.98%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
L. Keaschall
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.08%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
R. Jeffers
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
1.01
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.28%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Dubon
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.38%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
A. Riley
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.84
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
15.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Buxton
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
2.19
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
15.11%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
R. Jeffers
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
14.69%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Olson
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
2.10
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
14.61%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
R. Acuna Jr.
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
2.20
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
14.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Yastrzemski
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.82
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
11.56%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
L. Keaschall
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
11.05%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Lee
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
D. Baldwin
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
2.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
10.54%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Harris II
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
2.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
9.53%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
R. Kreidler
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.68
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
8.48%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
O. Albies
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.67%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Jarvis
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.90
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
3.31%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
A. Martin
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
3.21%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
K. Culpepper
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.82
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Buxton
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.27
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Jeffers
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.26%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Bell
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.51%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Riley
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Baldwin
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Harris II
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.19
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.64%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Olson
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.27
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-3.04%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
O. Albies
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.02%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Jarvis
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Lewis
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.77%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Dubon
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.01%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Kreidler
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Acuna Jr.
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.26
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-5.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Yastrzemski
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.62%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Martin
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
L. Keaschall
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.71%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Culpepper
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.71%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
M. Perez
(SP)
3.5 Strikeouts Thrown
3.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
0.79%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
B. Ober
(SP)
3.5 Strikeouts Thrown
3.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-0.8%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
R. Jeffers
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.66
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
19.57%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Buxton
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
18.85%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
A. Riley
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
16.63%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Olson
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
15.01%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
R. Acuna Jr.
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Yastrzemski
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.50
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
13.03%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
R. Lewis
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.66
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
12.92%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
L. Keaschall
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.51%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Harris II
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
11.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
K. Culpepper
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
9.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
O. Albies
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
9.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Lee
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.45
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
A. Martin
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.72%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
D. Baldwin
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.60
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.53%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Dubon
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.33%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
R. Kreidler
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Jarvis
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.32
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
5.84%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Riley
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.21
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
16.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Acuna Jr.
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.76
PROJECTION
+1.3
DIFFERENCE
14.72%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Olson
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.66
PROJECTION
+1.2
DIFFERENCE
14.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Jeffers
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.31
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
13.88%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Yastrzemski
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.85
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
12.34%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Bell
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.07
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
11.64%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Baldwin
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.60
PROJECTION
+1.1
DIFFERENCE
9.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Lewis
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.16
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
9.18%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Culpepper
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.64
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
L. Keaschall
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
8.14%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
O. Albies
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
8.11%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Jarvis
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.74%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Lee
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
6.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Dubon
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
3.84%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Kreidler
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
1.86%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Martin
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
1.68%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
MONEYLINE
TOTAL
SPREAD
TOTAL HITS
R. Lewis
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
5.75%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Buxton
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.05
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
0.79%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Bell
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-0.4%
EV
TOTAL HITS
D. Baldwin
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
1.20
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-1.49%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Jarvis
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-1.81%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Harris II
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.18
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-2.35%
EV
TOTAL HITS
A. Riley
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.97
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-2.77%
EV
TOTAL HITS
O. Albies
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.95
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.05%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Olson
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.07
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-3.93%
EV
TOTAL HITS
A. Martin
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.05%
EV
TOTAL HITS
R. Acuna Jr.
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.18
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-4.85%
EV
TOTAL HITS
K. Culpepper
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.82%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Yastrzemski
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.98%
EV
TOTAL HITS
L. Keaschall
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.08%
EV
TOTAL HITS
R. Jeffers
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
1.01
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.28%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Dubon
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.38%
EV
TOTAL BASES
A. Riley
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.84
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
15.6%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Buxton
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
2.19
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
15.11%
EV
TOTAL BASES
R. Jeffers
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
14.69%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Olson
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
2.10
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
14.61%
EV
TOTAL BASES
R. Acuna Jr.
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
2.20
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
14.2%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Yastrzemski
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.82
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
11.56%
EV
TOTAL BASES
L. Keaschall
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
11.05%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Lee
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.6%
EV
TOTAL BASES
D. Baldwin
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
2.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
10.54%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Harris II
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
2.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
9.53%
EV
TOTAL BASES
R. Kreidler
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.68
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
8.48%
EV
TOTAL BASES
O. Albies
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.67%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Jarvis
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.90
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
3.31%
EV
TOTAL BASES
A. Martin
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
3.21%
EV
TOTAL BASES
K. Culpepper
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.82
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Buxton
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.27
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.4%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Jeffers
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.26%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Bell
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.51%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Riley
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.6%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Baldwin
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.41%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Harris II
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.19
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.64%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Olson
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.27
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-3.04%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
O. Albies
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.02%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Jarvis
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.41%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Lewis
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.77%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Dubon
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.01%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Kreidler
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.2%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Acuna Jr.
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.26
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-5.6%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Yastrzemski
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.62%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Martin
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
L. Keaschall
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.71%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Culpepper
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.71%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
M. Perez
(SP)
3.5 Strikeouts Thrown
3.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
0.79%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
B. Ober
(SP)
3.5 Strikeouts Thrown
3.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-0.8%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
R. Jeffers
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.66
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
19.57%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Buxton
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
18.85%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
A. Riley
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
16.63%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Olson
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
15.01%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
R. Acuna Jr.
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.35%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Yastrzemski
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.50
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
13.03%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
R. Lewis
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.66
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
12.92%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
L. Keaschall
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.51%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Harris II
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
11.41%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
K. Culpepper
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
9.93%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
O. Albies
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
9.73%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Lee
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.45
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.4%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
A. Martin
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.72%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
D. Baldwin
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.60
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.53%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Dubon
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.33%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
R. Kreidler
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.93%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Jarvis
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.32
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
5.84%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Riley
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.21
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
16.37%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Acuna Jr.
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.76
PROJECTION
+1.3
DIFFERENCE
14.72%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Olson
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.66
PROJECTION
+1.2
DIFFERENCE
14.35%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Jeffers
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.31
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
13.88%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Yastrzemski
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.85
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
12.34%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Bell
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.07
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
11.64%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Baldwin
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.60
PROJECTION
+1.1
DIFFERENCE
9.89%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Lewis
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.16
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
9.18%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Culpepper
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.64
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.22%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
L. Keaschall
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
8.14%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
O. Albies
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
8.11%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Jarvis
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.74%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Lee
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
6.75%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Dubon
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
3.84%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Kreidler
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
1.86%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Martin
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
1.68%
EV
ATL @ MIN · Trends
ATL
MIN
Over
Under
Over
Under
ATL
MIN
Over
Under
ATL
MIN
Over
Under
ATL
MIN