Democrats Gina Hinojosa and Vikki Goodwin have defeated Texas’ Republican incumbents, according to CNN, giving gambling supporters a new negotiating environment and removing a Senate leader whose opposition had helped block sports betting and casino legalization.
- Goodwin backed a public vote on casinos and sports betting, offering a different approach to Senate consideration.
- Hinojosa had not offered a specific gambling framework and voted against the 2023 sports betting amendment.
- Legalization still requires two-thirds approval in both legislative chambers and support from Texas voters.
Hinojosa beat Greg Abbott for governor, while Goodwin was elected on a separate ballot, defeating Dan Patrick for lieutenant governor. Goodwin’s support for a public gambling vote provided the clearest opening in midterm odds, though neither victory authorized sportsbooks or casinos.
Texas remains the second-most populous state without legal sports betting and the largest without full-scale Las Vegas-style commercial casinos. The Democratic sweep changes the leadership entering the January 2027 legislative session, but leaves advocates needing a coalition capable of advancing a constitutional amendment. The shift also comes amid a Texas Senate odds flip.
Goodwin’s victory changed the Senate approach
Goodwin has supported putting Texas online casinos and online sports betting before voters, framing the question around personal freedom and Texans’ ability to decide whether gambling should be available at home.
She has also expressed interest in a broader casino discussion rather than identifying particular locations and operators at the outset. That position offered room for expansion but left licensing, taxation, and the scope of development unresolved.
Her victory removes Patrick’s requirement that gambling legislation secure support from a majority of Senate Republicans before receiving consideration. Advocates had been unable to meet that condition despite extensive lobbying and support from some lawmakers.
The change matters because Texas’ lieutenant governor held unusually broad legislative power. The officeholder presided over the Senate, appointed committee members, and referred legislation to committees, giving Goodwin substantial influence over how proposals would be considered.
That willingness to facilitate debate represented an opening rather than a guarantee of passage. Senators would still have to agree on whether to authorize gambling and which framework to support.
Enjoying Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account

Midterm Election Battleground States Odds
Senate control races and Governors’ Mansion races across America will come down to key battleground states. With statewide races heating up everywhere, many key states have plenty of interesting races.
- 2026 Midterm Election odds
- Alaska Midterm Odds
- Florida Midterm Odds
- Georgia Midterm Odds
- Iowa Midterm Odds
- Maine Midterm Odds
- Michigan Midterm Odds
- Texas Midterm Odds
Follow this space for the most recent news and market probabilities.
Hinojosa’s position left questions unresolved
Hinojosa’s victory does not establish the same clear gambling-policy shift.
Her campaign has emphasized schools and household affordability without offering a specific casino development or sportsbook licensing proposal. She has also voted against the sports betting constitutional amendment that passed the House in 2023.
That vote does not establish opposition to every possible legalization framework. It does mean supporters could not treat the Democratic sweep as an endorsement of a particular gambling package.
Abbott has previously expressed openness to online sports betting in Texas before raising broader concerns about gambling. Replacing him changes the negotiating partner in the governor’s office without settling which proposal the incoming administration would support.
The recent legislative record illustrated the remaining difficulties. The Senate did not take up the House’s 2023 sports betting proposal, and another push stalled in 2025. Sportsbook operators and casino developers had failed to turn sustained interest into an agreement.
A gambling constitutional amendment would require two-thirds approval in both legislative chambers before reaching voters. Legislative control and the positions of individual lawmakers would remain consequential, with neither statewide winner able to bypass that threshold. See the latest Texas midterm odds for the broader political landscape surrounding the legislative races.
The governor could not veto the resolution proposing an amendment, though implementing legislation would require separate consideration.
For gambling supporters, the Democratic sweep removes an important leadership obstacle. The incoming administration's place in the broader national political picture can be viewed alongside US presidential election odds. The next test is whether Goodwin’s willingness to entertain a public vote could become a proposal lawmakers will advance and Texans will approve.






