Databases are fully updated. I will be periodically running and publishing this week's sheets as I find time during the day today. At first glance I'm liking a lot of favorites. Hopefully that's a good sign as the market shifts away from it's current rate of cashing underdogs blindly at 61% (70-45 on the season). I would even consider endorsing a blind bet on all the favorites this week... well maybe not... let's see what the data says...
Databases are fully updated. I will be periodically running and publishing this week's sheets as I find time during the day today. At first glance I'm liking a lot of favorites. Hopefully that's a good sign as the market shifts away from it's current rate of cashing underdogs blindly at 61% (70-45 on the season). I would even consider endorsing a blind bet on all the favorites this week... well maybe not... let's see what the data says...
Databases are fully updated. I will be periodically running and publishing this week's sheets as I find time during the day today. At first glance I'm liking a lot of favorites. Hopefully that's a good sign as the market shifts away from it's current rate of cashing underdogs blindly at 61% (70-45 on the season). I would even consider endorsing a blind bet on all the favorites this week... well maybe not... let's see what the data says...
thanks ,but somehow i can only see KC- SanDiego game
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:
Databases are fully updated. I will be periodically running and publishing this week's sheets as I find time during the day today. At first glance I'm liking a lot of favorites. Hopefully that's a good sign as the market shifts away from it's current rate of cashing underdogs blindly at 61% (70-45 on the season). I would even consider endorsing a blind bet on all the favorites this week... well maybe not... let's see what the data says...
thanks ,but somehow i can only see KC- SanDiego game
Agree on the favorites. I feel like I must be missing something, but I absolutely love Atlanta in this spot. I have to imagine Dallas is a bit deflated after that tough lose to the Giants and Atlanta is really strong at home. The one dog I do like (and it looks like your spreadsheet supports this) is the Bucs.
Agree on the favorites. I feel like I must be missing something, but I absolutely love Atlanta in this spot. I have to imagine Dallas is a bit deflated after that tough lose to the Giants and Atlanta is really strong at home. The one dog I do like (and it looks like your spreadsheet supports this) is the Bucs.
I wish I could run a sheet on Bama - LSU this weekend... because it's freaking ridiculous that Bama is -9.5 point favorites on the road in death valley against a team that is 5-0 at home and 7-1 on the season who by the way ranks #5 in the country. Got to imagine that there's line value on LSU, but you never know.. Bama is unreal.
I wish I could run a sheet on Bama - LSU this weekend... because it's freaking ridiculous that Bama is -9.5 point favorites on the road in death valley against a team that is 5-0 at home and 7-1 on the season who by the way ranks #5 in the country. Got to imagine that there's line value on LSU, but you never know.. Bama is unreal.
Really appreciate the time you put into making all this data and putting it out for everyone to benifit. THANK YOU.....
That being said I cannot view any of the files, get to the page and it says the games but then "no description" next to them and when you click on the games its blank inside.... This was the case for last weeks games as well... Do you know if it is a problem with safari or using a mac? Just wondering if you have had other people with same issue..... Thanks again..
Hey si1ly,
Really appreciate the time you put into making all this data and putting it out for everyone to benifit. THANK YOU.....
That being said I cannot view any of the files, get to the page and it says the games but then "no description" next to them and when you click on the games its blank inside.... This was the case for last weeks games as well... Do you know if it is a problem with safari or using a mac? Just wondering if you have had other people with same issue..... Thanks again..
I wish I could run a sheet on Bama - LSU this weekend... because it's freaking ridiculous that Bama is -9.5 point favorites on the road in death valley against a team that is 5-0 at home and 7-1 on the season who by the way ranks #5 in the country. Got to imagine that there's line value on LSU, but you never know.. Bama is unreal.
Game scares me a bit though because LSU is Bama without an offense...... Even at home don't see how that gets em points against best D in FBS..... All that being said I don't like 9.5 either but am certainly going to enjoy a nice Under bet on this game, gonna be brutal to watch as humans are crushed beneath 2 meat grinders
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:
I wish I could run a sheet on Bama - LSU this weekend... because it's freaking ridiculous that Bama is -9.5 point favorites on the road in death valley against a team that is 5-0 at home and 7-1 on the season who by the way ranks #5 in the country. Got to imagine that there's line value on LSU, but you never know.. Bama is unreal.
Game scares me a bit though because LSU is Bama without an offense...... Even at home don't see how that gets em points against best D in FBS..... All that being said I don't like 9.5 either but am certainly going to enjoy a nice Under bet on this game, gonna be brutal to watch as humans are crushed beneath 2 meat grinders
Just have to decide if this is another week for parody? Or is it time for the cream to rise to the top? Look at it just in terms of power rankings:
#32 @ #23
#4 @ #28
#2 @ #24
#30 @ #3
#18 @ #8
#16 @ #11
Looking at it this way and I'm tempted to throw out Atlanta right away.. despite the statistical line value. Chicago, Denver and Houston look particularly good. Giants and Chargers are both a little closer match-ups in terms of talent, but they both own home field.
Favorites that I'm looking at:
KC @ SD
CHI @ TEN
DEN @ CIN
BUF @ HOU
PIT @ NYG
DAL @ ATL
Just have to decide if this is another week for parody? Or is it time for the cream to rise to the top? Look at it just in terms of power rankings:
#32 @ #23
#4 @ #28
#2 @ #24
#30 @ #3
#18 @ #8
#16 @ #11
Looking at it this way and I'm tempted to throw out Atlanta right away.. despite the statistical line value. Chicago, Denver and Houston look particularly good. Giants and Chargers are both a little closer match-ups in terms of talent, but they both own home field.
Really appreciate the time you put into making all this data and putting it out for everyone to benifit. THANK YOU.....
That being said I cannot view any of the files, get to the page and it says the games but then "no description" next to them and when you click on the games its blank inside.... This was the case for last weeks games as well... Do you know if it is a problem with safari or using a mac? Just wondering if you have had other people with same issue..... Thanks again..
The files are adobe PDF's hosted in a Google drive folder. I don't have a mac so I don't know how safari handles them on a laptop or desktop. My wife's iPad doesn't seem to have any issue opening them in Safari though. Try downloading the Google chrome browser maybe? Since I'm hosting in Google drive, I would think Google chrome would have the necessary plug-ins included to view the files. Maybe you need an adobe reader downloaded?
Quote Originally Posted by BadGnOmens:
Hey si1ly,
Really appreciate the time you put into making all this data and putting it out for everyone to benifit. THANK YOU.....
That being said I cannot view any of the files, get to the page and it says the games but then "no description" next to them and when you click on the games its blank inside.... This was the case for last weeks games as well... Do you know if it is a problem with safari or using a mac? Just wondering if you have had other people with same issue..... Thanks again..
The files are adobe PDF's hosted in a Google drive folder. I don't have a mac so I don't know how safari handles them on a laptop or desktop. My wife's iPad doesn't seem to have any issue opening them in Safari though. Try downloading the Google chrome browser maybe? Since I'm hosting in Google drive, I would think Google chrome would have the necessary plug-ins included to view the files. Maybe you need an adobe reader downloaded?
The files are adobe PDF's hosted in a Google drive folder. I don't have a mac so I don't know how safari handles them on a laptop or desktop. My wife's iPad doesn't seem to have any issue opening them in Safari though. Try downloading the Google chrome browser maybe? Since I'm hosting in Google drive, I would think Google chrome would have the necessary plug-ins included to view the files. Maybe you need an adobe reader downloaded?
I am on a macbook right now using safari, with adobe and am able to view them fine. Maybe check to make sure your adobe is installed ok.
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:
The files are adobe PDF's hosted in a Google drive folder. I don't have a mac so I don't know how safari handles them on a laptop or desktop. My wife's iPad doesn't seem to have any issue opening them in Safari though. Try downloading the Google chrome browser maybe? Since I'm hosting in Google drive, I would think Google chrome would have the necessary plug-ins included to view the files. Maybe you need an adobe reader downloaded?
I am on a macbook right now using safari, with adobe and am able to view them fine. Maybe check to make sure your adobe is installed ok.
When will you start posting in the Hoops Forum? :) Any leans for opening night tomorrow?
I'll be over there in about a month. I did a lot of research in the offseason and I made some changes to my models to reflect my findings. I used to be a firm believer in the four factors, but it turns out that they don't mean shit. It doesn't matter how well you rebound, or your turnover differential or your free throw rate. One simple thing matters: how well do you shoot and how well do you defend the shot. Everything else is superficial. Sure having fewer turnovers and having more rebounds can give you more possessions in a game and higher probability shot attempts.. but ultimately it still boils down to how well you convert those attempts and how well you prevent your opponent from converting them. Basically, if you can determine which team will attempt the most high probability shots AND make a higher percentage of them then their opponent, you can cap a basketball game. I've converted this simple finding into a mathematical model to predict these variables and determine an expected winning percentage and margin of victory from them. I need at least a month of current season data to start drawing relevant conclusions. I'll poke my head in from time to time until the sheets are ready, then I'll publish daily through May.
Quote Originally Posted by doy15:
Hi si1ly,
When will you start posting in the Hoops Forum? :) Any leans for opening night tomorrow?
I'll be over there in about a month. I did a lot of research in the offseason and I made some changes to my models to reflect my findings. I used to be a firm believer in the four factors, but it turns out that they don't mean shit. It doesn't matter how well you rebound, or your turnover differential or your free throw rate. One simple thing matters: how well do you shoot and how well do you defend the shot. Everything else is superficial. Sure having fewer turnovers and having more rebounds can give you more possessions in a game and higher probability shot attempts.. but ultimately it still boils down to how well you convert those attempts and how well you prevent your opponent from converting them. Basically, if you can determine which team will attempt the most high probability shots AND make a higher percentage of them then their opponent, you can cap a basketball game. I've converted this simple finding into a mathematical model to predict these variables and determine an expected winning percentage and margin of victory from them. I need at least a month of current season data to start drawing relevant conclusions. I'll poke my head in from time to time until the sheets are ready, then I'll publish daily through May.
Just have to decide if this is another week for parody? Or is it time for the cream to rise to the top? Look at it just in terms of power rankings:
#32 @ #23
#4 @ #28
#2 @ #24
#30 @ #3
#18 @ #8
#16 @ #11
Looking at it this way and I'm tempted to throw out Atlanta right away.. despite the statistical line value. Chicago, Denver and Houston look particularly good. Giants and Chargers are both a little closer match-ups in terms of talent, but they both own home field.
i feel a lot better now
early sunday i've locked in houston -9.5 for my biggest play of the year, as my raw numbers have houston winning by 22 and i figured the line should be around -14
then i see houston re-open at -12.0 and it got immediately hammered down to -10.5 and now even -10.0 i just don't get it.
same goes for chicago i've locked them in at -4.5 and thought i made a nice deal as i have them winning by double digits next thing i see it get's bet down to -3.5
i mean... seriously... what's there to like about buffalo and tennessee?!
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:
Favorites that I'm looking at:
KC @ SD
CHI @ TEN
DEN @ CIN
BUF @ HOU
PIT @ NYG
DAL @ ATL
Just have to decide if this is another week for parody? Or is it time for the cream to rise to the top? Look at it just in terms of power rankings:
#32 @ #23
#4 @ #28
#2 @ #24
#30 @ #3
#18 @ #8
#16 @ #11
Looking at it this way and I'm tempted to throw out Atlanta right away.. despite the statistical line value. Chicago, Denver and Houston look particularly good. Giants and Chargers are both a little closer match-ups in terms of talent, but they both own home field.
i feel a lot better now
early sunday i've locked in houston -9.5 for my biggest play of the year, as my raw numbers have houston winning by 22 and i figured the line should be around -14
then i see houston re-open at -12.0 and it got immediately hammered down to -10.5 and now even -10.0 i just don't get it.
same goes for chicago i've locked them in at -4.5 and thought i made a nice deal as i have them winning by double digits next thing i see it get's bet down to -3.5
i mean... seriously... what's there to like about buffalo and tennessee?!
early sunday i've locked in houston -9.5 for my biggest play of the year, as my raw numbers have houston winning by 22 and i figured the line should be around -14
then i see houston re-open at -12.0 and it got immediately hammered down to -10.5 and now even -10.0 i just don't get it.
same goes for chicago i've locked them in at -4.5 and thought i made a nice deal as i have them winning by double digits next thing i see it get's bet down to -3.5
i mean... seriously... what's there to like about buffalo and tennessee?!
Next to nothing. #30th ranked team and the #28th ranked team both playing top 5 competition.
Quote Originally Posted by cpsn:
i feel a lot better now
early sunday i've locked in houston -9.5 for my biggest play of the year, as my raw numbers have houston winning by 22 and i figured the line should be around -14
then i see houston re-open at -12.0 and it got immediately hammered down to -10.5 and now even -10.0 i just don't get it.
same goes for chicago i've locked them in at -4.5 and thought i made a nice deal as i have them winning by double digits next thing i see it get's bet down to -3.5
i mean... seriously... what's there to like about buffalo and tennessee?!
Next to nothing. #30th ranked team and the #28th ranked team both playing top 5 competition.