Posted:
#1426
Hello SN
What you have for today??
Thanks
0
MLB system releases...
Posted:
#1430
[Quote: Originally Posted by sports_Network]
MLB system releases Thursday 07/23/09 Base_Runs formula...
Braves+120 RL...loss
Yankees-130 RL...win
WhiteSox+180 RL...win
Cardinals+122 RL...win*
Tigers-115 ML...loss
BlueJays-150 ML...loss
PIT/ARI UNDER 8...loss
MIN/LAA UNDER 9...loss
eightPACformulared
projected ratio: 6/8 75%
SN
FINAL RESULTS:
3-5
units: +4.2
*as previously recommended, all RL wagers are played to the "final score" of rain-shortened games, where as the Push is 'waived'....SN
0
Posted:
#1432
Some tough odds yesterday. (-200 to -300 stuff lol). I parlayed 3 RL's and came out with a win (NYY, PHI, ARI). Took the NYY play from you, and checked if the others didn't go against your picks. 
I have you at +24.16 units for those four RL plays. I plan to go back over the thread to do the precise units for RL, ML, and totals, but my impression is that most of the profits are in the RL plays, and that you may be giving something back for the totals. My impression, before checking the numbers, is also that the RL's may be good enough to parlay.
I have you at +24.16 units for those four RL plays. I plan to go back over the thread to do the precise units for RL, ML, and totals, but my impression is that most of the profits are in the RL plays, and that you may be giving something back for the totals. My impression, before checking the numbers, is also that the RL's may be good enough to parlay.
0
Posted:
#1433
Hi SN
I'd like to add to DarkHorse's comments regarding the total plays.
Tracking the results you've had since Jul 1st this month, your total plays have been eating a lot of the profits away. Most profitable were RL by a fair distance (these included some unlucky losses where the team won but only by a run), followed by the 5 innings plays and then ML.
I didn't want to bring it up as I didn't want to come off as offensive or ungrateful for the great work that you've put in so far. Besides, I remember a nice run you put in on under plays not so long ago - so perhaps this is just a prolonged blip.
I'd like to add to DarkHorse's comments regarding the total plays.
Tracking the results you've had since Jul 1st this month, your total plays have been eating a lot of the profits away. Most profitable were RL by a fair distance (these included some unlucky losses where the team won but only by a run), followed by the 5 innings plays and then ML.
I didn't want to bring it up as I didn't want to come off as offensive or ungrateful for the great work that you've put in so far. Besides, I remember a nice run you put in on under plays not so long ago - so perhaps this is just a prolonged blip.
0
Posted:
#1434
I just did the RL plays for up until 5/31/09. When the odds where minus (-110 etc), they were 6-0. When the odds where +170 or higher, they were 0-3. In between, they were 13-7.
So, based on this small sample size, the RL plays were 19-7 when the odds didn't exceed +170. This equals 73%, and is certainly strong enough for parlays (including open parlays and round robins).
The first play was posted on 4/30, so this is really just a month worth. Based on 8 units per RL play, the profit was an astonishing 95.2 units.
So, based on this small sample size, the RL plays were 19-7 when the odds didn't exceed +170. This equals 73%, and is certainly strong enough for parlays (including open parlays and round robins).
The first play was posted on 4/30, so this is really just a month worth. Based on 8 units per RL play, the profit was an astonishing 95.2 units.
0
Posted:
#1435
Quote Originally Posted by snyder9:
Hi SN
I'd like to add to DarkHorse's comments regarding the total plays.
Tracking the results you've had since Jul 1st this month, your total plays have been eating a lot of the profits away. Most profitable were RL by a fair distance (these included some unlucky losses where the team won but only by a run), followed by the 5 innings plays and then ML.
I didn't want to bring it up as I didn't want to come off as offensive or ungrateful for the great work that you've put in so far. Besides, I remember a nice run you put in on under plays not so long ago - so perhaps this is just a prolonged blip.
Hi SN
I'd like to add to DarkHorse's comments regarding the total plays.
Tracking the results you've had since Jul 1st this month, your total plays have been eating a lot of the profits away. Most profitable were RL by a fair distance (these included some unlucky losses where the team won but only by a run), followed by the 5 innings plays and then ML.
I didn't want to bring it up as I didn't want to come off as offensive or ungrateful for the great work that you've put in so far. Besides, I remember a nice run you put in on under plays not so long ago - so perhaps this is just a prolonged blip.
Your far from offensive, and let's not use the word ungateful; on the contrary..your tracking is correct, after going 18-3 and bottoming out at 26-5 on UNDER play before going into regression(after the All-Star break) the trend has produced offensive dominance of late, with the only explanation being,"that's baseball" with adjustments that have to be made to cordinate, and coincide with the flow of the season...I am a firm advocate of the Progession/RegressionTheorm in MLB handicapping(streaks) understanding adjustments have to be made is step one, making those adjustments to a successful formula comes down to trial, and error, while competing to gain the winning edge..The RL is, and always will be the 'key' to value, and successful MLB cappin'..SN
0
Posted:
#1439
MLB system releases Friday 07/24/09 Base_Runs formula...
Tigers+124 RL (Verlander)
Rockies+172 RL
Astros+120 ML
Braves-119 ML
Pirates+110 ML
BlueJays-138 ML
Reds+155 5innings (Harang)
StL/PHI UNDER 9
OAK/NYY UNDER 9
CWS/DET OVER 9.5 (Bonine/Colon)
TEX/KC UNDER 8
MIN/LAA UNDER 9
twelvePACformulated
projected ratio: 9/12 75%
SN
0
Posted:
#1440
Quote Originally Posted by sevenleighton:
Projected Scores for games on 7/24/2009
Balt 1.69459; Bost 4.018051 Under 9.5
Tampa Bay 2.49537 Toronto 1.76794 Under 7.5
Mets 1.5869 Houston 5.77997 Hous RL
Texas 3.89178 Kansas City 3.86336 Tex RL
Florida 3.18274 Dodgers 2.2924 Under 7.5
Oakland 1.92691 Yankeess 9.76085 Yankee RL
Atlanta 3.0231 Milwaukee 4.9878 Milw RL
Ticket #9649817
Wager 49.00 Win Possibility 2678.15
0
Posted:
#1441
capping rates in the low-to-mid 60's (SN may actually be better than that) are rare and exceptional. Takes a lot of wins to achieve >60%. takes some repeated losses to sink to <70%. But 60+, money management, and good timing as to line movement (very tough this season) are what scores best. And,yet, it still leaves much of the result to chance -- no way around it...
0
Posted:
#1442
Quote Originally Posted by toft33:
capping rates in the low-to-mid 60's (SN may actually be better than that) are rare and exceptional. Takes a lot of wins to achieve >60%. takes some repeated losses to sink to <70%. But 60+, money management, and good timing as to line movement (very tough this season) are what scores best. And,yet, it still leaves much of the result to chance -- no way around it...
I totally agree, since even though we all strive to hit that 100% in al of our wagers, this idea is definitely a dream, since in reality anything can happen in a game, and isn't betting the same as life? All one BIG Gamble?
0
Posted:
#1443
Quote Originally Posted by toft33:
capping rates in the low-to-mid 60's (SN may actually be better than that) are rare and exceptional. Takes a lot of wins to achieve >60%. takes some repeated losses to sink to <70%. But 60+, money management, and good timing as to line movement (very tough this season) are what scores best. And,yet, "it still leaves much of the result to chance" -- no way around it...
Bullseye 
0
Posted:
#1444
Quote Originally Posted by sevenleighton:
I totally agree, since even though we all strive to hit that 100% in al of our wagers, this idea is definitely a dream, since in reality "anything can happen in a game", and isn't betting the same as life? All one BIG Gamble?
another Bullseye, with true insight
0
Posted:
#1446
Quote Originally Posted by mikkii10:
iam just going to throw this out there for some thoughts can the run line help pick the winner of games SU can that kind of capping be helpfull in some ways if you know what iam mean .In reailty the R/L you pick your team has to win if your on the + side of things
most definately SN
0
Posted:
#1447
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
I agree with SN and to give you an additional insight into the concept of Betting....If you calculate all of your formula (making sure you have your ()+-/ in the right spots) then these tools can only give you a rough outline of the projected scores. When utilizing your formula's and taking into consideration of human error, weather condition, home field advantage, and even away advantage (since some teams do play alot better on the road then at home) you can judge...or have a closer idea of the outcome
most definately SN
0
Posted:
#1448
Based on 8 unit RL plays (which may not be the exactly as suggested, but hopefully is close enough)
Until end of May: RL plays: 19-10 (+95.2 units)
July to date: RL plays: 26-23 (+99.76 units)
June was out of tune. The month started out poorly, and didn't catch up, possibly due to IL play from 6/12 to 6/28. RL record: 22-36 (-56.88 units).
Total RL record to date: 67-69 (+138.08 units).
Until end of May: RL plays: 19-10 (+95.2 units)
July to date: RL plays: 26-23 (+99.76 units)
June was out of tune. The month started out poorly, and didn't catch up, possibly due to IL play from 6/12 to 6/28. RL record: 22-36 (-56.88 units).
Total RL record to date: 67-69 (+138.08 units).
0
Posted:
#1449
Quote Originally Posted by DarkHorse21:
Based on 8 unit RL plays (which may not be the exactly as suggested, but hopefully is close enough)
Until end of May: RL plays: 19-10 (+95.2 units)
July to date: RL plays: 26-23 (+99.76 units)
June was out of tune. The month started out poorly, and didn't catch up, possibly due to IL play from 6/12 to 6/28. RL record: 22-36 (-56.88 units).
Total RL record to date: 67-69 (+138.08 units).
Based on 8 unit RL plays (which may not be the exactly as suggested, but hopefully is close enough)
Until end of May: RL plays: 19-10 (+95.2 units)
July to date: RL plays: 26-23 (+99.76 units)
June was out of tune. The month started out poorly, and didn't catch up, possibly due to IL play from 6/12 to 6/28. RL record: 22-36 (-56.88 units).
Total RL record to date: 67-69 (+138.08 units).
eight units are the equated value placed on the RL when playing the PAC...Your research clearly indicates that RL value +138units overpowers it's own win ratio 67-69 (49.26%) stats don't lie. GOOD JOB...informative to runline players, and those grasping concept to the effects of handicapping, and applying units correctly
0
Posted:
#1450
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
How do waive the push of RL games?
Thanks in advance.
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
MLB system releases Thursday 07/23/09 Base_Runs formula...
Braves+120 RL...loss
Yankees-130 RL...win
WhiteSox+180 RL...win
Cardinals+122 RL...win*
Tigers-115 ML...loss
BlueJays-150 ML...loss
PIT/ARI UNDER 8...loss
MIN/LAA UNDER 9...loss
eightPACformulared
projected ratio: 6/8 75%
SN
FINAL RESULTS:
3-5
units: +4.2
*as previously recommended, all RL wagers are played to the "final score" of rain-shortened games, where as the Push is 'waived'....SN
How do waive the push of RL games?
Thanks in advance.
0
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.