Wasn't Fresno St -11, -11.5 and -12 a red selection? I know I played them that way because of post #33.
Thanks.
Good Luck.
Yes, technically it is at those lines, but I got it at -12.5.
So far, this system has not fared as well as last year. All of the other categories are weak, as well. If it goes really great for the balance of the bowls, then all is well. But I don't guarantee that it will do as well as I'd hoped. I'm very skeptical about the next 3 red plays.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Luckydan:
Wasn't Fresno St -11, -11.5 and -12 a red selection? I know I played them that way because of post #33.
Thanks.
Good Luck.
Yes, technically it is at those lines, but I got it at -12.5.
So far, this system has not fared as well as last year. All of the other categories are weak, as well. If it goes really great for the balance of the bowls, then all is well. But I don't guarantee that it will do as well as I'd hoped. I'm very skeptical about the next 3 red plays.
I appreciate your honesty. Why the skepticism on the 3 red plays?
Thanks.
Good question. It got me thinking and researching last years results today, and here is what I found.
Last year the "A" group was 7-1 at this half way point, ending the season at 12-3. Currently, the "A" group is 4-6 with 6 games remaining.
Last year at this point group "B" was 5-2, ending at 10-6. And currently, it is 4-1, with 7 games remaining.
So that's the reason for having 2 independent groups agree on the final pick. Only one group needs to do well at +7 net value, and the better group may switch from year to year.
BTW, while I was researching these games, I ran another "system" that I had recently used, and similar to my NFL picks...here are the picks:
UtSt
CMi
Cin
Bay
Rice
Syr
Van
Tulsa
Stan
ArSt
Only Tulsa is conflicting with a system pick, but it's a blue pick. It will be interesting to see if the remaining picks do as well.
GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by Luckydan:
I appreciate your honesty. Why the skepticism on the 3 red plays?
Thanks.
Good question. It got me thinking and researching last years results today, and here is what I found.
Last year the "A" group was 7-1 at this half way point, ending the season at 12-3. Currently, the "A" group is 4-6 with 6 games remaining.
Last year at this point group "B" was 5-2, ending at 10-6. And currently, it is 4-1, with 7 games remaining.
So that's the reason for having 2 independent groups agree on the final pick. Only one group needs to do well at +7 net value, and the better group may switch from year to year.
BTW, while I was researching these games, I ran another "system" that I had recently used, and similar to my NFL picks...here are the picks:
UtSt
CMi
Cin
Bay
Rice
Syr
Van
Tulsa
Stan
ArSt
Only Tulsa is conflicting with a system pick, but it's a blue pick. It will be interesting to see if the remaining picks do as well.
Yeah, I was really pumped for this years bowl games and overrall we are doing well, little more sketchy than last year but MUCH APPRECIATED NONE THE LESS
0
UtSt
CMi
Cin
Bay
Rice
Syr
Van
Tulsa
Stan
ArSt
Yeah, I was really pumped for this years bowl games and overrall we are doing well, little more sketchy than last year but MUCH APPRECIATED NONE THE LESS
I double checked those #'s above (calculated at 1am, haha) and found one error, corrected below, and I also looked at +3 and above net value for last year and this year. Here are the comparisons: #'s in parenthesis are mid way through bowl season.
Group "A" Group "B" "A" and "B"
(same team)
2011: +3>= 19-6 (11-3) 14-10 (8-4) 9-2 (5-0)
2012: +3>= (6-10) 9 left (10-4) 10 left (5-3) 7 left
2011: +7>= 12-3 (7-1) 10-6 (5-2) 5-1 (4-0)
2012: +7>= (4-6) 6 left (6-1) 7 left 2-0 3 left
0
I double checked those #'s above (calculated at 1am, haha) and found one error, corrected below, and I also looked at +3 and above net value for last year and this year. Here are the comparisons: #'s in parenthesis are mid way through bowl season.
Group "A" Group "B" "A" and "B"
(same team)
2011: +3>= 19-6 (11-3) 14-10 (8-4) 9-2 (5-0)
2012: +3>= (6-10) 9 left (10-4) 10 left (5-3) 7 left