The easy pick of the day has got to be Denver over the Hornets. It took a while for it go through because so many people are on Denver. Could it be too easy and it's all a set up. I don't know but I'm only at W1 so there's no risk on my part. Denver for the win!!!
The easy pick of the day has got to be Denver over the Hornets. It took a while for it go through because so many people are on Denver. Could it be too easy and it's all a set up. I don't know but I'm only at W1 so there's no risk on my part. Denver for the win!!!
I have a situation that I want to bring to light. As some of you older $25 Dime Club members know. I have had my Avatars banned by Covers on 3 different occasions because they were too racy supposedly showing nudity. This has simply not been the case but Covers turned a deaf ear to my protest. I told them that there are many Avatars far more "racier" than mine. Why aren't those Avatars being penalized? The response was "we can't monitor thousands of Avatars" Now I will direct your attention to the current leader of the Survivor contest and look at that Avatar. This person is a friend of mine so I'm not being a hater but I would like consistency applied in this policy that Covers has. If its the real policy it shouldn't be applied subjectively based on whether the avatar is appealing to the powers that be. I would like everybody to email Covers and Rizz and asked them to spell out the policy plainly and to administer punishment on a more even basis. In other words why are certain Avatar's banned when crotch areas are covered while other Avatars are left up which clearly show crotch areas without being taken down. The policy needs to be clarified. For example. Tits-Ok Butts-Not ok Crotch-ok. Whatever the case may be but random use of a policy with selective enforcement. I don't think that's asking too much just a black and white clarification of the issue. Your help in resolving this long standing issue would be appreciated.
I have a situation that I want to bring to light. As some of you older $25 Dime Club members know. I have had my Avatars banned by Covers on 3 different occasions because they were too racy supposedly showing nudity. This has simply not been the case but Covers turned a deaf ear to my protest. I told them that there are many Avatars far more "racier" than mine. Why aren't those Avatars being penalized? The response was "we can't monitor thousands of Avatars" Now I will direct your attention to the current leader of the Survivor contest and look at that Avatar. This person is a friend of mine so I'm not being a hater but I would like consistency applied in this policy that Covers has. If its the real policy it shouldn't be applied subjectively based on whether the avatar is appealing to the powers that be. I would like everybody to email Covers and Rizz and asked them to spell out the policy plainly and to administer punishment on a more even basis. In other words why are certain Avatar's banned when crotch areas are covered while other Avatars are left up which clearly show crotch areas without being taken down. The policy needs to be clarified. For example. Tits-Ok Butts-Not ok Crotch-ok. Whatever the case may be but random use of a policy with selective enforcement. I don't think that's asking too much just a black and white clarification of the issue. Your help in resolving this long standing issue would be appreciated.
The easy pick of the day has got to be Denver over the Hornets. It took a while for it go through because so many people are on Denver. Could it be too easy and it's all a set up. I don't know but I'm only at W1 so there's no risk on my part. Denver for the win!!!
anytime that happens Smooth bet the opposite, those kind of picks never have won for me........never
Quote Originally Posted by smoothd20:
The easy pick of the day has got to be Denver over the Hornets. It took a while for it go through because so many people are on Denver. Could it be too easy and it's all a set up. I don't know but I'm only at W1 so there's no risk on my part. Denver for the win!!!
anytime that happens Smooth bet the opposite, those kind of picks never have won for me........never
It's just unreal bet on phil to win over toronto because all the so call expert says so, and they got they hat handed to them at home...you expert suck
It's just unreal bet on phil to win over toronto because all the so call expert says so, and they got they hat handed to them at home...you expert suck
I took your advice Booyahz and I remember this angle from last year when you promoted it! I'm thinking we're gonna have a great baseball season with all the research from last year and the angles we saw that paid off. Let's do this!!!!
Quote Originally Posted by booyahz123:
Mets won and angle still winning............. yes
I took your advice Booyahz and I remember this angle from last year when you promoted it! I'm thinking we're gonna have a great baseball season with all the research from last year and the angles we saw that paid off. Let's do this!!!!
I have a situation that I want to bring to light. As some of you older $25 Dime Club members know. I have had my Avatars banned by Covers on 3 different occasions because they were too racy supposedly showing nudity. This has simply not been the case but Covers turned a deaf ear to my protest. I told them that there are many Avatars far more "racier" than mine. Why aren't those Avatars being penalized? The response was "we can't monitor thousands of Avatars" Now I will direct your attention to the current leader of the Survivor contest and look at that Avatar. This person is a friend of mine so I'm not being a hater but I would like consistency applied in this policy that Covers has. If its the real policy it shouldn't be applied subjectively based on whether the avatar is appealing to the powers that be. I would like everybody to email Covers and Rizz and asked them to spell out the policy plainly and to administer punishment on a more even basis. In other words why are certain Avatar's banned when crotch areas are covered while other Avatars are left up which clearly show crotch areas without being taken down. The policy needs to be clarified. For example. Tits-Ok Butts-Not ok Crotch-ok. Whatever the case may be but random use of a policy with selective enforcement. I don't think that's asking too much just a black and white clarification of the issue. Your help in resolving this long standing issue would be appreciated.
Doing it now---I'll post response
Quote Originally Posted by smoothd20:
I have a situation that I want to bring to light. As some of you older $25 Dime Club members know. I have had my Avatars banned by Covers on 3 different occasions because they were too racy supposedly showing nudity. This has simply not been the case but Covers turned a deaf ear to my protest. I told them that there are many Avatars far more "racier" than mine. Why aren't those Avatars being penalized? The response was "we can't monitor thousands of Avatars" Now I will direct your attention to the current leader of the Survivor contest and look at that Avatar. This person is a friend of mine so I'm not being a hater but I would like consistency applied in this policy that Covers has. If its the real policy it shouldn't be applied subjectively based on whether the avatar is appealing to the powers that be. I would like everybody to email Covers and Rizz and asked them to spell out the policy plainly and to administer punishment on a more even basis. In other words why are certain Avatar's banned when crotch areas are covered while other Avatars are left up which clearly show crotch areas without being taken down. The policy needs to be clarified. For example. Tits-Ok Butts-Not ok Crotch-ok. Whatever the case may be but random use of a policy with selective enforcement. I don't think that's asking too much just a black and white clarification of the issue. Your help in resolving this long standing issue would be appreciated.
Thanks T99 I appreciate that. The hypocrisy of the mods is killing me. I don't want to be a killjoy but I also don't want to keep getting picked on for avatars that I deem completely in line when compared to others on this site. When confronted with this issue all they have to say is "it's impossible to monitor thousands of avatars". Well that avatar is on the front page and I'm sure everyone has noticed it hasn't been taken down.
Quote Originally Posted by T99:
Doing it now---I'll post response
Thanks T99 I appreciate that. The hypocrisy of the mods is killing me. I don't want to be a killjoy but I also don't want to keep getting picked on for avatars that I deem completely in line when compared to others on this site. When confronted with this issue all they have to say is "it's impossible to monitor thousands of avatars". Well that avatar is on the front page and I'm sure everyone has noticed it hasn't been taken down.
hot angle 
over : too late to follow you Smooth for Denver, probably better bet !
T99 fell to 8 & gets another hat 
Hot Forum Topics
