• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Pro Football

    Seattle at Denver (02/02/2014)

    «First Previous 111213 ... 151617 Next Last»
    Mikeee369
    pando
    forkball
    BDCurve
    Xyberz
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 60347
    Posts: 409
    «First Previous 111213 ... 151617 Next Last»
     
    Mikeee369
    Mikeee369
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 23
    Posted: Jan. 31, 2014 - 7:43 PM ET #251

    With the exception of the Chinese New Year's indicating it is the year of the Horse, My take is that all factors favor the Seahawks. I am mixed on the total though. My mind says Under but my hunch is Over....Good Luck to all...
    Reply
    With the exception of the Chinese New Year's indicating it is the year of the Horse, My take is that all factors favor the Seahawks. I am mixed on the total though. My mind says Under but my hunch is Over....Good Luck to all...
     
    pando
    pando
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 23
    Posted: Jan. 31, 2014 - 7:58 PM ET #252

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    God....my head is spinning trying to pick a winner on this game. I can see Peyton having a huge game, but I can see Lynch and Seattle controlling the clock and keeping Manning off the field. Before the AFC/NFC title games, the books had this game slated at Sea -2.5 along with the spreads on the other 3 possibilities. Seattle was going to open at -4 vs. New England while SF/Den was slated as a pick. So what does all this mean? The 5 point swing on the projected line and the current lines seems to suggest Seattle is the value play? But bet against Manning? ......just a tough game to cap no matter how much you like either side.


    Denver faced tough offenses all year and they were 7th against the rush (Seattle was 8th). Denver can pull their linebackers in on 1st and 2nd down to stop Lynch, Seattle won't be able to do that. I don't see how Moreno doesn't run for more yards than Lynch. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    God....my head is spinning trying to pick a winner on this game. I can see Peyton having a huge game, but I can see Lynch and Seattle controlling the clock and keeping Manning off the field. Before the AFC/NFC title games, the books had this game slated at Sea -2.5 along with the spreads on the other 3 possibilities. Seattle was going to open at -4 vs. New England while SF/Den was slated as a pick. So what does all this mean? The 5 point swing on the projected line and the current lines seems to suggest Seattle is the value play? But bet against Manning? ......just a tough game to cap no matter how much you like either side.


    Denver faced tough offenses all year and they were 7th against the rush (Seattle was 8th). Denver can pull their linebackers in on 1st and 2nd down to stop Lynch, Seattle won't be able to do that. I don't see how Moreno doesn't run for more yards than Lynch. 
     
    Mikeee369
    Mikeee369
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 23
    Posted: Jan. 31, 2014 - 8:02 PM ET #253

    Quote Originally Posted by MissNBA:

    I'll take the under at half 
      Bunny Girl you and I look to be made for each other !!!
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by MissNBA:

    I'll take the under at half 
      Bunny Girl you and I look to be made for each other !!!
     
    forkball
    forkball
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2009
    Posts: 566
    Posted: Jan. 31, 2014 - 8:47 PM ET #254

    Quote Originally Posted by Xyberz:


    Seattle played mostly "medicore" offenses that had good defenses.  Look at how many good offenses they've played compared to Denver.  You have to score to win games.  You defense can typically only slow down an offense and they've only shut out 1 team this year, and sadly it's the other Manning.  That was no surprise to anyone, probably to even Eli himself.  Other than that they haven't been able to shut out anyone.  You think they're gonna shut out Denver?  I'd put money on the chances of Denver being able to shut out Seattle before Seattle can shut out Denver.

    Seattle shut the Saints down twice.  Game 2 score does not reflect as the Saints were held to 7 until Seattle's D let up late in that game because it was over.  Bottom line, Denver's best win was against Pats, a beaten up Patriot team at that
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Xyberz:


    Seattle played mostly "medicore" offenses that had good defenses.  Look at how many good offenses they've played compared to Denver.  You have to score to win games.  You defense can typically only slow down an offense and they've only shut out 1 team this year, and sadly it's the other Manning.  That was no surprise to anyone, probably to even Eli himself.  Other than that they haven't been able to shut out anyone.  You think they're gonna shut out Denver?  I'd put money on the chances of Denver being able to shut out Seattle before Seattle can shut out Denver.

    Seattle shut the Saints down twice.  Game 2 score does not reflect as the Saints were held to 7 until Seattle's D let up late in that game because it was over.  Bottom line, Denver's best win was against Pats, a beaten up Patriot team at that
     
    BDCurve
    BDCurve
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2013
    Posts: 29
    Posted: Jan. 31, 2014 - 9:45 PM ET #255

    Xyberz your posts about the SB is so full of holes starting with pointing out a west coast team going east. It's for the championship son, that won't matter. Amateurish buddy .
    Reply
    Xyberz your posts about the SB is so full of holes starting with pointing out a west coast team going east. It's for the championship son, that won't matter. Amateurish buddy .
     
    BDCurve
    BDCurve
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2013
    Posts: 29
    Posted: Jan. 31, 2014 - 9:47 PM ET #256

    Seattle will win outright. Fast, nasty aggressive D. They will score too, thanks to Harvin who will open things up for them. Hawks 30-24.
    Reply
    Seattle will win outright. Fast, nasty aggressive D. They will score too, thanks to Harvin who will open things up for them. Hawks 30-24.
     
    Xyberz
    Xyberz
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 551
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 12:21 AM ET #257

    Quote Originally Posted by BDCurve:

    Xyberz your posts about the SB is so full of holes starting with pointing out a west coast team going east. It's for the championship son, that won't matter. Amateurish buddy .

    You really gonna call me out son?  Did you even bother researching that fact?  Well I DID and it's a STATISTICAL FACT.  I didn't say it will be a huge deciding factor for this game now did I?  But it could help and every little edge is important, especially in a game like the Superbowl.

    Think before you talk son, before you get schooled...
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by BDCurve:

    Xyberz your posts about the SB is so full of holes starting with pointing out a west coast team going east. It's for the championship son, that won't matter. Amateurish buddy .

    You really gonna call me out son?  Did you even bother researching that fact?  Well I DID and it's a STATISTICAL FACT.  I didn't say it will be a huge deciding factor for this game now did I?  But it could help and every little edge is important, especially in a game like the Superbowl.

    Think before you talk son, before you get schooled...
     
    Xyberz
    Xyberz
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 551
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 12:34 AM ET #258

    Quote Originally Posted by forkball:


    Seattle shut the Saints down twice.  Game 2 score does not reflect as the Saints were held to 7 until Seattle's D let up late in that game because it was over.  Bottom line, Denver's best win was against Pats, a beaten up Patriot team at that

    Seattle beat the Saints twice huh?  You failed to mention that they were IN Seattle for both games.  That gives them a 1 point advantage in the spread alone.  They're a powerhouse home team that lost 2 on the road and one at home.  Everyone knows that it'd be a girl to beat Seattle in Seattle, but guess what?  The Superbowl AIN'T in Seattle.  No "12th Man" here.  It's all the way on the other side of the country.  

    Yes, I understand they already played NY in NY, but they're playing against a sad disappointment of a team called the Giants.  Completely unimpressive. 

    P.S.  The cold affects both teams and the advantage in the cold this year goes to Denver considering they're in one of the coldest damn states in the country.  When was the last time you heard of snow blizzards in Seattle?  Exactly, that's what I thought.   What's the coldest temperature that Seattle has played in?  How bout Denver?  18 degrees cold enough considering that it won't be as cold during game time in the SB?  In that weather they laid the smackdown on the Titans putting up 51 points.  

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by forkball:


    Seattle shut the Saints down twice.  Game 2 score does not reflect as the Saints were held to 7 until Seattle's D let up late in that game because it was over.  Bottom line, Denver's best win was against Pats, a beaten up Patriot team at that

    Seattle beat the Saints twice huh?  You failed to mention that they were IN Seattle for both games.  That gives them a 1 point advantage in the spread alone.  They're a powerhouse home team that lost 2 on the road and one at home.  Everyone knows that it'd be a girl to beat Seattle in Seattle, but guess what?  The Superbowl AIN'T in Seattle.  No "12th Man" here.  It's all the way on the other side of the country.  

    Yes, I understand they already played NY in NY, but they're playing against a sad disappointment of a team called the Giants.  Completely unimpressive. 

    P.S.  The cold affects both teams and the advantage in the cold this year goes to Denver considering they're in one of the coldest damn states in the country.  When was the last time you heard of snow blizzards in Seattle?  Exactly, that's what I thought.   What's the coldest temperature that Seattle has played in?  How bout Denver?  18 degrees cold enough considering that it won't be as cold during game time in the SB?  In that weather they laid the smackdown on the Titans putting up 51 points.  

     
    Xyberz
    Xyberz
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 551
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 12:35 AM ET #259

    stupid system won't even let you say "b@tch". 
    Reply
    stupid system won't even let you say "b@tch". 
     
    Telefrog
    Telefrog
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2004
    Posts: 14
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 12:43 AM ET #260

    OMG guys-leave your egos at the door.  We're all on the same side here-to win money.  Like many of you have said-who cares who your favorite player and/or team is.  Just give us some feedback on who you like and why.  None of us know for sure obviously so leave the emotion out of it.

    Ok, so here is my pick.  I love Peyton so much and I have my Broncos boxers on as I type this.  JK…that's called sarcasm:)  

    I like Denver for one reason-Peyton has 5 receivers and the know how to exploit Seattle's very good D.  If the temp stays in the low 40's to high 30's than I think Peyton will have just enough to beat them.  Not to mention-Seattle is not the same team away from home-their crowd and the calls they get help them a lot.  Obviously, at the SB it will be a bunch of quiet corporate types so they won't have that advantage.

    I will say with the weather looking to be a non factor that favors Peyton as well and the OVER large.

    GLA!!!!  I live in Vegas and I can tell you many of the guys I consider to be sharps are all over Denver and LOVE all the media hype on Seattle.  Denver is favored for a reason so don't forget that either.

    Reply
    OMG guys-leave your egos at the door.  We're all on the same side here-to win money.  Like many of you have said-who cares who your favorite player and/or team is.  Just give us some feedback on who you like and why.  None of us know for sure obviously so leave the emotion out of it.

    Ok, so here is my pick.  I love Peyton so much and I have my Broncos boxers on as I type this.  JK…that's called sarcasm:)  

    I like Denver for one reason-Peyton has 5 receivers and the know how to exploit Seattle's very good D.  If the temp stays in the low 40's to high 30's than I think Peyton will have just enough to beat them.  Not to mention-Seattle is not the same team away from home-their crowd and the calls they get help them a lot.  Obviously, at the SB it will be a bunch of quiet corporate types so they won't have that advantage.

    I will say with the weather looking to be a non factor that favors Peyton as well and the OVER large.

    GLA!!!!  I live in Vegas and I can tell you many of the guys I consider to be sharps are all over Denver and LOVE all the media hype on Seattle.  Denver is favored for a reason so don't forget that either.

     
    future213
    future213
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2013
    Posts: 15
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 12:45 AM ET #261

    SEA AND UNDER. 
    Reply
    SEA AND UNDER. 
     
    H8_40whiners
    H8_40whiners
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2014
    Posts: 1
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 2:28 AM ET #262

    Broncos half
    Seahawks game
    Over 47 1/2

    SEAHAWKS ML!!!!
    Reply
    Broncos half
    Seahawks game
    Over 47 1/2

    SEAHAWKS ML!!!!
     
    lovegame2013
    lovegame2013
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 530
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 3:09 AM ET #263

    seahawks all game ....... go hawks nock down peyton manning and shut down Denver O for me ...... go hawks.......
    Reply
    seahawks all game ....... go hawks nock down peyton manning and shut down Denver O for me ...... go hawks.......
     
    mybestbetdotcom
    mybestbetdotcom
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2013
    Posts: 57
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 4:53 AM ET #264

    Denver wins by less than a touchdown.  I plan on taking them moneyline as I think the hook will get anyone on -2.5 Denver.   Teasing Seahawks +9.5 & over 47.5 as well.  
    Reply
    Denver wins by less than a touchdown.  I plan on taking them moneyline as I think the hook will get anyone on -2.5 Denver.   Teasing Seahawks +9.5 & over 47.5 as well.  
     
    mybestbetdotcom
    mybestbetdotcom
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2013
    Posts: 57
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 4:55 AM ET #265

    Correction..... Over 42.5 w hawkes +9.5
    Reply
    Correction..... Over 42.5 w hawkes +9.5
     
    Vin-Vegas
    Vin-Vegas
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2011
    Posts: 10
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 10:21 AM ET #266

    These are two of the very best teams in the league and their contrasting styles make for an incredibly intriguing matchup. Both #1 seeds, Seattle boasting (statistically) the best defense in the NFL. Denver will field (statistically) the best offense by a team and quarterback in NFL history. So where to start...


    Seattle had the easiest schedule vs pocket QBs out of any team in the NFL! That truly helped their defensive numbers. At home SEA lost to Palmer (pocket passer) and Beat Kaep (30th passing attack) twice, They also beat Brees twice (who was awful on the road in '13: 12 TDs -9 INTs vs 27 TDs -3 INTs at home), and beat perhaps the worst collection of pocket QBs ever assembled; Henne, Fitzpatrick, Glennon, Ponder, Clemens...YIKES…Every D looked good vs those backup-quality QBs! On the road the Seahawks pass D beat Matt Ryan (with no Julio Jones and a hobbled Roddy White), Cam Newton (29th passing O), Schaub (who was dreadful in 2013 ), Palmer (split), Clemens, & Eli (who was atrocious this season & led the NFL in INTs). They lost to Kaep...and the one legit pocket passer Seattle faced on the road ALL SEASON was Andrew Luck, who LIT 'EM UP during a 4th QT comeback...in obvious passing situations! Don't get me wrong, The Seahawks DO have a good defense & secondary...but their schedule was so easy vs lousy pocket passers, they became a bit overrated. Truth is, Seattle plays a TON of Cover 3 (zone coverage) and that bodes well for Denver. The Seahawks D did not face an Offense, QB or receiving core like this ALL YEAR. Denvers' outstanding offensive play starts up front with an excellent O-Line and of course a brilliant quarterback that exploits softs spots in zone-coverage, burns teams that Blitz and picks Defenses apart pre-snap! Especially D's that repeatedly run the same formation (like Seattle's cover 3). Edge Denver.

    On the flip, Denver gets a pretty good amount of pressure on QBs with a stout and underrated front seven. This does not bode well for Seattle, as they have struggled with pass protection all year including in the playoffs.  Denvers' front 7 also gives the Broncos an very good Run D that's held teams to 64.5 yards a game on the ground in the postseason. Seattle's strength is running the ball, but their best chance to beat Denver is to pass on them. Russell Wilson’s passing game has declined however, completing only 58% of his passes and barely topping the 200-yard mark just twice in his last six games. Manning-led Broncos teams are 12-2 straight up and 10-4 against the spread in games they held opponents to 200 or less passing yards. Edge Denver

    As for "Defense Wins Championships"...that was very true in yester-year...Teams with the better D have won 39 of 47 Super Bowls. Unfortunately for tradition...rules & times have changed. Teams with the better D are just 2-5 straight up & 1-6 against the spread the last 7 Super Bowls. The trend is now, teams with the hot QBs win championships. See last year's SB for instance: San Francisco and their #1 D vs Baltimore's 27th ranked D...with a hot Flacco. I'll take Denver's embarrassing array of weapons on offense with a hot Manning!

    DEN-2 

    Follow me on Twitter @vin_vegas
    Reply

    These are two of the very best teams in the league and their contrasting styles make for an incredibly intriguing matchup. Both #1 seeds, Seattle boasting (statistically) the best defense in the NFL. Denver will field (statistically) the best offense by a team and quarterback in NFL history. So where to start...


    Seattle had the easiest schedule vs pocket QBs out of any team in the NFL! That truly helped their defensive numbers. At home SEA lost to Palmer (pocket passer) and Beat Kaep (30th passing attack) twice, They also beat Brees twice (who was awful on the road in '13: 12 TDs -9 INTs vs 27 TDs -3 INTs at home), and beat perhaps the worst collection of pocket QBs ever assembled; Henne, Fitzpatrick, Glennon, Ponder, Clemens...YIKES…Every D looked good vs those backup-quality QBs! On the road the Seahawks pass D beat Matt Ryan (with no Julio Jones and a hobbled Roddy White), Cam Newton (29th passing O), Schaub (who was dreadful in 2013 ), Palmer (split), Clemens, & Eli (who was atrocious this season & led the NFL in INTs). They lost to Kaep...and the one legit pocket passer Seattle faced on the road ALL SEASON was Andrew Luck, who LIT 'EM UP during a 4th QT comeback...in obvious passing situations! Don't get me wrong, The Seahawks DO have a good defense & secondary...but their schedule was so easy vs lousy pocket passers, they became a bit overrated. Truth is, Seattle plays a TON of Cover 3 (zone coverage) and that bodes well for Denver. The Seahawks D did not face an Offense, QB or receiving core like this ALL YEAR. Denvers' outstanding offensive play starts up front with an excellent O-Line and of course a brilliant quarterback that exploits softs spots in zone-coverage, burns teams that Blitz and picks Defenses apart pre-snap! Especially D's that repeatedly run the same formation (like Seattle's cover 3). Edge Denver.

    On the flip, Denver gets a pretty good amount of pressure on QBs with a stout and underrated front seven. This does not bode well for Seattle, as they have struggled with pass protection all year including in the playoffs.  Denvers' front 7 also gives the Broncos an very good Run D that's held teams to 64.5 yards a game on the ground in the postseason. Seattle's strength is running the ball, but their best chance to beat Denver is to pass on them. Russell Wilson’s passing game has declined however, completing only 58% of his passes and barely topping the 200-yard mark just twice in his last six games. Manning-led Broncos teams are 12-2 straight up and 10-4 against the spread in games they held opponents to 200 or less passing yards. Edge Denver

    As for "Defense Wins Championships"...that was very true in yester-year...Teams with the better D have won 39 of 47 Super Bowls. Unfortunately for tradition...rules & times have changed. Teams with the better D are just 2-5 straight up & 1-6 against the spread the last 7 Super Bowls. The trend is now, teams with the hot QBs win championships. See last year's SB for instance: San Francisco and their #1 D vs Baltimore's 27th ranked D...with a hot Flacco. I'll take Denver's embarrassing array of weapons on offense with a hot Manning!

    DEN-2 

    Follow me on Twitter @vin_vegas
     
    Vin-Vegas
    Vin-Vegas
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2011
    Posts: 10
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 10:23 AM ET #267

    Here are some high percentage prop bets:

    Broncos' 3 longest drives this year came in the postseason vs SD & NE, lasting 7:01, 7:50 & 7:52. DEN dominated time of possession (over 35 min) in both wins. The Seahawks postseason offense has been erratic. Denver Wins Time of possession -115

    Denver's offense forced 14 pass interference calls, tied for most in the league & also drew 9 defensive holding penalties..another NFL high. Seattle's D was flagged for pass interference 13 times...tied for the most in NFL & whistled for defensive holding 11 times…again, tied for the most! Denvers was also one of the least penalized offenses in the NFL. Safe to say with Seattles' aggressive style & both team's penalty data, Denver will get more calls. SEAHAWKS HAVE MORE PENALTY YARDAGE -120

    WR Decker has a nice matchup on the left side vs Cover 3 Zone or vs Maxwell 1 on 1. Decker Over 61.5 Yards & Over 4.5 REC

    TE Julius Thomas could get lit up on a seam route. But he'll have plenty of opportunities to make plays. J. Thomas Over 50.5 Yards & Over 4.5 REC 

    WR Doug Baldwin will continue his trend of being Wilson's favorite most reliable target. Baldwin OVER 40.5 Rec yards 

    RB Montee Ball has productively been cutting into Moreno's snaps. I Like that trend to continue. Ball OVER 32.5 rush yards

    RB Moreno will have some opportunities as a receiver out of the backfield vs Seahawks cover 3 . Moreno OVER 24.5 Rec Yards

    WR Harvin will be featured in the passing game including bubble screens to get him into open space. Harvin OVER 45 Rec yards

    I'll take (this season's) QB Peyton Manning OVER 286.5 passing yards... anytime, vs anyone, anywhere! Which explains why I'm betting it here!

    RB Lynch is not know as a receiver, but against Denver, there will be opportunities. OVER 13.5 Rec yards OVER 1.5 Rec

    Best of luck to all!
    I'm an NFL Handicapper that lives in Las Vegas. Follow me on Twitter @vin_vegas 
    Reply
    Here are some high percentage prop bets:

    Broncos' 3 longest drives this year came in the postseason vs SD & NE, lasting 7:01, 7:50 & 7:52. DEN dominated time of possession (over 35 min) in both wins. The Seahawks postseason offense has been erratic. Denver Wins Time of possession -115

    Denver's offense forced 14 pass interference calls, tied for most in the league & also drew 9 defensive holding penalties..another NFL high. Seattle's D was flagged for pass interference 13 times...tied for the most in NFL & whistled for defensive holding 11 times…again, tied for the most! Denvers was also one of the least penalized offenses in the NFL. Safe to say with Seattles' aggressive style & both team's penalty data, Denver will get more calls. SEAHAWKS HAVE MORE PENALTY YARDAGE -120

    WR Decker has a nice matchup on the left side vs Cover 3 Zone or vs Maxwell 1 on 1. Decker Over 61.5 Yards & Over 4.5 REC

    TE Julius Thomas could get lit up on a seam route. But he'll have plenty of opportunities to make plays. J. Thomas Over 50.5 Yards & Over 4.5 REC 

    WR Doug Baldwin will continue his trend of being Wilson's favorite most reliable target. Baldwin OVER 40.5 Rec yards 

    RB Montee Ball has productively been cutting into Moreno's snaps. I Like that trend to continue. Ball OVER 32.5 rush yards

    RB Moreno will have some opportunities as a receiver out of the backfield vs Seahawks cover 3 . Moreno OVER 24.5 Rec Yards

    WR Harvin will be featured in the passing game including bubble screens to get him into open space. Harvin OVER 45 Rec yards

    I'll take (this season's) QB Peyton Manning OVER 286.5 passing yards... anytime, vs anyone, anywhere! Which explains why I'm betting it here!

    RB Lynch is not know as a receiver, but against Denver, there will be opportunities. OVER 13.5 Rec yards OVER 1.5 Rec

    Best of luck to all!
    I'm an NFL Handicapper that lives in Las Vegas. Follow me on Twitter @vin_vegas 
     
    forkball
    forkball
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2009
    Posts: 566
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 11:12 AM ET #268

    Quote Originally Posted by Vin-Vegas:

    These are two of the very best teams in the league and their contrasting styles make for an incredibly intriguing matchup. Both #1 seeds, Seattle boasting (statistically) the best defense in the NFL. Denver will field (statistically) the best offense by a team and quarterback in NFL history. So where to start...


    Seattle had the easiest schedule vs pocket QBs out of any team in the NFL! That truly helped their defensive numbers. At home SEA lost to Palmer (pocket passer) and Beat Kaep (30th passing attack) twice, They also beat Brees twice (who was awful on the road in '13: 12 TDs -9 INTs vs 27 TDs -3 INTs at home), and beat perhaps the worst collection of pocket QBs ever assembled; Henne, Fitzpatrick, Glennon, Ponder, Clemens...YIKES…Every D looked good vs those backup-quality QBs! On the road the Seahawks pass D beat Matt Ryan (with no Julio Jones and a hobbled Roddy White), Cam Newton (29th passing O), Schaub (who was dreadful in 2013 ), Palmer (split), Clemens, & Eli (who was atrocious this season & led the NFL in INTs). They lost to Kaep...and the one legit pocket passer Seattle faced on the road ALL SEASON was Andrew Luck, who LIT 'EM UP during a 4th QT comeback...in obvious passing situations! Don't get me wrong, The Seahawks DO have a good defense & secondary...but their schedule was so easy vs lousy pocket passers, they became a bit overrated. Truth is, Seattle plays a TON of Cover 3 (zone coverage) and that bodes well for Denver. The Seahawks D did not face an Offense, QB or receiving core like this ALL YEAR. Denvers' outstanding offensive play starts up front with an excellent O-Line and of course a brilliant quarterback that exploits softs spots in zone-coverage, burns teams that Blitz and picks Defenses apart pre-snap! Especially D's that repeatedly run the same formation (like Seattle's cover 3). Edge Denver.

    On the flip, Denver gets a pretty good amount of pressure on QBs with a stout and underrated front seven. This does not bode well for Seattle, as they have struggled with pass protection all year including in the playoffs.  Denvers' front 7 also gives the Broncos an very good Run D that's held teams to 64.5 yards a game on the ground in the postseason. Seattle's strength is running the ball, but their best chance to beat Denver is to pass on them. Russell Wilson’s passing game has declined however, completing only 58% of his passes and barely topping the 200-yard mark just twice in his last six games. Manning-led Broncos teams are 12-2 straight up and 10-4 against the spread in games they held opponents to 200 or less passing yards. Edge Denver

    As for "Defense Wins Championships"...that was very true in yester-year...Teams with the better D have won 39 of 47 Super Bowls. Unfortunately for tradition...rules & times have changed. Teams with the better D are just 2-5 straight up & 1-6 against the spread the last 7 Super Bowls. The trend is now, teams with the hot QBs win championships. See last year's SB for instance: San Francisco and their #1 D vs Baltimore's 27th ranked D...with a hot Flacco. I'll take Denver's embarrassing array of weapons on offense with a hot Manning!

    DEN-2 

    Follow me on Twitter @vin_vegas

    Six out of the last eight games were against top ten defenses, this is why Wilson struggled, however, they went 6-2 in those games.  Denver faced a top ten defense once all season.  You mentioned Seattle's easy schedule, I'd argue Denver's was clearly easier and therefore those offensive numbers are inflated as a result.  Case in point, Denver scored 24 and 26 against the Pats and Bolts in the playoffs, hardly spectacular against above average defenses.  I would also make a case for the 49ers and the Saints against Denver.  But Denver didn't play those two squads did they?  Seattle did and posted a 4-1 record against them this year scoring 126 points for an average of 25 points per game.  That said, the turf and conditions favor Seattle.  Manning in temps under 35 problematic.  The media and the public jumping all over Denver...priceless!


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Vin-Vegas:

    These are two of the very best teams in the league and their contrasting styles make for an incredibly intriguing matchup. Both #1 seeds, Seattle boasting (statistically) the best defense in the NFL. Denver will field (statistically) the best offense by a team and quarterback in NFL history. So where to start...


    Seattle had the easiest schedule vs pocket QBs out of any team in the NFL! That truly helped their defensive numbers. At home SEA lost to Palmer (pocket passer) and Beat Kaep (30th passing attack) twice, They also beat Brees twice (who was awful on the road in '13: 12 TDs -9 INTs vs 27 TDs -3 INTs at home), and beat perhaps the worst collection of pocket QBs ever assembled; Henne, Fitzpatrick, Glennon, Ponder, Clemens...YIKES…Every D looked good vs those backup-quality QBs! On the road the Seahawks pass D beat Matt Ryan (with no Julio Jones and a hobbled Roddy White), Cam Newton (29th passing O), Schaub (who was dreadful in 2013 ), Palmer (split), Clemens, & Eli (who was atrocious this season & led the NFL in INTs). They lost to Kaep...and the one legit pocket passer Seattle faced on the road ALL SEASON was Andrew Luck, who LIT 'EM UP during a 4th QT comeback...in obvious passing situations! Don't get me wrong, The Seahawks DO have a good defense & secondary...but their schedule was so easy vs lousy pocket passers, they became a bit overrated. Truth is, Seattle plays a TON of Cover 3 (zone coverage) and that bodes well for Denver. The Seahawks D did not face an Offense, QB or receiving core like this ALL YEAR. Denvers' outstanding offensive play starts up front with an excellent O-Line and of course a brilliant quarterback that exploits softs spots in zone-coverage, burns teams that Blitz and picks Defenses apart pre-snap! Especially D's that repeatedly run the same formation (like Seattle's cover 3). Edge Denver.

    On the flip, Denver gets a pretty good amount of pressure on QBs with a stout and underrated front seven. This does not bode well for Seattle, as they have struggled with pass protection all year including in the playoffs.  Denvers' front 7 also gives the Broncos an very good Run D that's held teams to 64.5 yards a game on the ground in the postseason. Seattle's strength is running the ball, but their best chance to beat Denver is to pass on them. Russell Wilson’s passing game has declined however, completing only 58% of his passes and barely topping the 200-yard mark just twice in his last six games. Manning-led Broncos teams are 12-2 straight up and 10-4 against the spread in games they held opponents to 200 or less passing yards. Edge Denver

    As for "Defense Wins Championships"...that was very true in yester-year...Teams with the better D have won 39 of 47 Super Bowls. Unfortunately for tradition...rules & times have changed. Teams with the better D are just 2-5 straight up & 1-6 against the spread the last 7 Super Bowls. The trend is now, teams with the hot QBs win championships. See last year's SB for instance: San Francisco and their #1 D vs Baltimore's 27th ranked D...with a hot Flacco. I'll take Denver's embarrassing array of weapons on offense with a hot Manning!

    DEN-2 

    Follow me on Twitter @vin_vegas

    Six out of the last eight games were against top ten defenses, this is why Wilson struggled, however, they went 6-2 in those games.  Denver faced a top ten defense once all season.  You mentioned Seattle's easy schedule, I'd argue Denver's was clearly easier and therefore those offensive numbers are inflated as a result.  Case in point, Denver scored 24 and 26 against the Pats and Bolts in the playoffs, hardly spectacular against above average defenses.  I would also make a case for the 49ers and the Saints against Denver.  But Denver didn't play those two squads did they?  Seattle did and posted a 4-1 record against them this year scoring 126 points for an average of 25 points per game.  That said, the turf and conditions favor Seattle.  Manning in temps under 35 problematic.  The media and the public jumping all over Denver...priceless!


     
    forkball
    forkball
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2009
    Posts: 566
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 12:29 PM ET #269

    Quote Originally Posted by best_bets:

    With a defense that good the Seahawks should not have lost even one game this year.

    Actually, when you look at Seattle's three loses, the Arizona game was lost on a kick return self induced fumble at the 15 which resulted in an Arizona td a few plays later.  Then the phantom ball hit the ground call ruled interception resulted in game over.  Nice job instant replay....

    The 49er loss came with no time left on the clock after Gore finally got loose to set up the game ending field goal , otherwise that game belonged to Seattle.

    And finally, Wilson threw a pick in the end zone to lose on the last play of the game against the Colts.  

    I would argue that the Seahawks were close to going undefeated this year, however the ball can bounce in mysterious ways.  
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by best_bets:

    With a defense that good the Seahawks should not have lost even one game this year.

    Actually, when you look at Seattle's three loses, the Arizona game was lost on a kick return self induced fumble at the 15 which resulted in an Arizona td a few plays later.  Then the phantom ball hit the ground call ruled interception resulted in game over.  Nice job instant replay....

    The 49er loss came with no time left on the clock after Gore finally got loose to set up the game ending field goal , otherwise that game belonged to Seattle.

    And finally, Wilson threw a pick in the end zone to lose on the last play of the game against the Colts.  

    I would argue that the Seahawks were close to going undefeated this year, however the ball can bounce in mysterious ways.  
     
    Sleedog420
    Sleedog420
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2014
    Posts: 8
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 2:31 PM ET #270

    go packers

    Reply
    go packers

     
    Sleedog420
    Sleedog420
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2014
    Posts: 8
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 2:32 PM ET #271

    from espn...
    When the #1 Defense has played in the Super Bowl, those defensive-led squads are 12-3 SU.
    #1 Offenses in SB History are 10-8 SU.
    Most comparable SB to me is the 2008 - David Tyree game NYG/NE.  The Patriots were so sick offensively, the best of all time at that point.  However, NYG got a lot of pressue and got immobile Brady off his spot.

    Same trend has repeated in several recent super bowls
    2002 Patriots beat Rams 20-17
    2003 Bucs beat Raiders 48-21
    2006 Steelers beat Seahawks 21-10
    2009 Steelers beat Cardinals 27-23

    If history is any guide, Seattle should be the favorite to win.
    Reply
    from espn...
    When the #1 Defense has played in the Super Bowl, those defensive-led squads are 12-3 SU.
    #1 Offenses in SB History are 10-8 SU.
    Most comparable SB to me is the 2008 - David Tyree game NYG/NE.  The Patriots were so sick offensively, the best of all time at that point.  However, NYG got a lot of pressue and got immobile Brady off his spot.

    Same trend has repeated in several recent super bowls
    2002 Patriots beat Rams 20-17
    2003 Bucs beat Raiders 48-21
    2006 Steelers beat Seahawks 21-10
    2009 Steelers beat Cardinals 27-23

    If history is any guide, Seattle should be the favorite to win.
     
    Sleedog420
    Sleedog420
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2014
    Posts: 8
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 2:38 PM ET #272

    Bill Polian said his heart is with Peyton but all the key stats favor Sea.  He added Denver really should have Dumerville and Von Miller in this game but due to a clerical error and injury Russ Wilson and his ability to move will be tough for Denv to stop.
    Reply
    Bill Polian said his heart is with Peyton but all the key stats favor Sea.  He added Denver really should have Dumerville and Von Miller in this game but due to a clerical error and injury Russ Wilson and his ability to move will be tough for Denv to stop.
     
    saint22
    saint22
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2013
    Posts: 33
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 3:03 PM ET #273

    Denver -2
    Under 48
    Denver d is gonna show up big27-17 DenverDenver
    Reply
    Denver -2
    Under 48
    Denver d is gonna show up big27-17 DenverDenver
     
    Blackballer
    Blackballer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2013
    Posts: 1754
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 5:07 PM ET #274

    Not many words or lot of blablabla: Seattle Seahawks +2
    Reply
    Not many words or lot of blablabla: Seattle Seahawks +2
     
     
    DJNY
    DJNY
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2005
    Posts: 618
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2014 - 5:37 PM ET #275

    Seattle 1H
    Broncos -2
    Broncos -10.5
    Peyton 2h passing yard total over 1h 
    Reply
    Seattle 1H
    Broncos -2
    Broncos -10.5
    Peyton 2h passing yard total over 1h 
    All Forums | Pro Football
    «First Previous 111213 ... 151617 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 450,489
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 265,141
    • Rams vs Broncos in game live SNF 2,721
    • Sunday 09/27/2026 504
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 101,970
    • HELP PLEASE 1,578
    • PART DEUX 222
    • Sunday 3,128
    • Mike Trout Strikeouts 7,134
    • King of Covers Winner List 12,241

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.