All Forums | Pro Football

New York at New England (02/05/2012)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 38562
Posts: 245
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 674
Posted: #226
i lv itttttttttttttt
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 198
Posted: #227
Yet another Super Bowl where Vegas takes the square money.......

LARGE!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2002
Posts: 2635
Posted: #228
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 235
Posted: #229
giants got LUCKY bastards
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 20863
Posted: #230
Quote Originally Posted by rekamyenoM:

Pats +14.5 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 86
Posted: #231
[Quote: Originally Posted by usmail]

NY IS NOT GOING TO WIN THIS GAME.

 

[did you mean the NY Knicks? Giants were lucky but also did not get a few calls either. But the Gmen were clearly the better team coming in.]
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #232
[Quote: Originally Posted by easypics] 

This is one of the few years betting superbowls via 8- 2 track record that I really feel uneasy picking sides. I sense a dogfight with either team winning by 4 and there lies imo best value play ,betting Giants to win between 1 - 6 pts @ 4/ 1 n' Pats to win between 1- 6 @ 7/2. 
As last year, hope little voice is as accurate nailing pretty much exact score n' sides via numerology calculations.2012 Superbowl 46 = 10 via numerology sense ,hence 1 . First thing that came to mind....Eli # 10 bet as MVP n' Mario Manningham 82 ( 10 ) for side bet fun. 



[/Quote]                   " 10 "

                            


  # 10 ELI  MVP 

 (  # 91 Tuck = 10 via numerology...  Runner up MVP ) 

GIANTS win between 1 - 6 pts @ 4 - 1    

PATS win bet. 1 - 6 pts @ 7/2     

TOTAL @ 55 +    

Yes Brady set " records "  10 for 10 TD drive ...
16 straight completions...SB record 96 yard drive....
10 - 9 Halftime lead...

In a losing cause....In a nutshell....

  Bill Belichick 

GIANTS Time of possession = 37 minutes ( lol ) 3 + 7 = 10


                         $UPER BOWL 46
                            ( 4 + 6 = 10 )

                             Coincidence ?

                                   

           GRAT$ Mon Colonel n'  all Gigante fan$ !
                        
 
                                    Bon Voyage Vue !


          " Giants don't belong in the Superbwl "


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 95
Posted: #233
Congrats to the G-MEN. They are the better team. Manning played better than Brady also. NY had a better running game and better defense. Pats need to get a running game and improve their defense if they want to win another Super Bowl. Can't expect Brady to win these games alone.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #234



           


        Just realized last post was #  235 =   Via Numerology =  ?  ?  ? 



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #235

     
    
    

   Jeeperz Creeperz


                Just realized my very last post was Posts # 1990 =  ?  ? ?

     1 + 9 + 9 = 19 = 1 + 9 =   

  lol
               

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1827
Posted: #236
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:

Here's my final final:

Giants +4.5 and under 56.5

pays +145

Good Luck Everybody!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Over and out - see you on the other side................

Now that's the way to end the year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  

See you all in September!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 483
Posted: #237
THERE IS NOTHING BETTER THAN BEING RIGHT EXCEPT BEING A WINNER    
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 612
Posted: #238
Quote Originally Posted by DJNY:

History is repeating itself this year from 2008!

2008

Patriots AF = 37 AA = 17 O/U = 11-5

Giants AF = 23 AA = 22 O/U = 8-8

2011

Patriots AF = 32 AA = 20 O/U = 11-5

Giants AF = 25 AA = 23 O/U = 8-7-1

Look at how similar these two seasons have played out.... Another interesting fact that another member brought up is the fact that the only other 2 rematches between QB's in previous superbowls resulted in the same QB winning the rematch.

Everything points to history repeating itself this superbowl...

With the Patriots less potent offence from 2008 and defense and the Giants actually improving since 2008 it is very clear. It's tough to bet against the Hood and Brady, but this game will not be a shocker like it was last time. It's already played out before so don't be fooled.

Final Prediction:

24-21 Giants- WIN

Every Q under - WIN

Under on all Gronk props- WIN

Under on National Anthem- PUSH

Under 46.5 @ +280 - WIN

 



That's how I end the season!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 90
Posted: #239
Quote Originally Posted by skinnyskins7:



Some may find this funny but in all honesty largest wager of the day will be on tails baby!...Tails never fails


Damn took the g-men and the under and still lost $ what a retarded bet that 1 was!!!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 22950
Posted: #240
Quote Originally Posted by easypics:

Quote Originally Posted by easypics:

 

This is one of the few years betting superbowls via 8- 2 track record that I really feel uneasy picking sides. I sense a dogfight with either team winning by 4 and there lies imo best value play ,betting Giants to win between 1 - 6 pts @ 4/ 1 n' Pats to win between 1- 6 @ 7/2. 
As last year, hope little voice is as accurate nailing pretty much exact score n' sides via numerology calculations.2012 Superbowl 46 = 10 via numerology sense ,hence 1 . First thing that came to mind....Eli # 10 bet as MVP n' Mario Manningham 82 ( 10 ) for side bet fun. 



[/Quote]                   " 10 "

                            


  # 10 ELI  MVP 

 (  # 91 Tuck = 10 via numerology...  Runner up MVP ) 

GIANTS win between 1 - 6 pts @ 4 - 1    

PATS win bet. 1 - 6 pts @ 7/2     

TOTAL @ 55 +    

Yes Brady set " records "  10 for 10 TD drive ...
16 straight completions...SB record 96 yard drive....
10 - 9 Halftime lead...

In a losing cause....In a nutshell....

  Bill Belichick 

GIANTS Time of possession = 37 minutes ( lol ) 3 + 7 = 10


                         $UPER BOWL 46
                            ( 4 + 6 = 10 )

                             Coincidence ?

                                   

           GRAT$ Mon Colonel n'  all Gigante fan$ !
                        
 
                                    Bon Voyage Vue !


          " Giants don't belong in the Superbwl "


G-men and Under it was Mon e-pics

I always said, in the end the cream rises to the top. Nice capping by the both of us my friend.

Gisele got a little worked up today, calling out the Patriot WR'S

Baseball right around the corner.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 86
Posted: #241
IT GOES TO SHOW YOU NUMEROLOGY DOES NOT LIE. 

MAKE SURE IT FACTORS IN WITH YOUR WAGERS.

IF NOT YOU ARE BETTING WITH HALF OF THE INFO YOU NEED TO MAKE THE PROPER BETS.

GIANTS WERE THE BETTER TEAM BUT THAT'S NOT THE SOLE REASON THEY WON THE SUPER BOWL.

IT'S ALL IN THE STORY LINE.

THAT'S 11 IN A ROW FOR ME IN THE SUPER BOWL.

CONGRATS TO MY NY GIANTS!!!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 746
Posted: #242
Scooby Dooby Vue where are you?  Giants moneyline yeah as predicted. Congrats Giants backers.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #243
Quote Originally Posted by Coloneljim:

G-men and Under it was Mon e-pics

I always said, in the end the cream rises to the top. Nice capping by the both of us my friend.

Gisele got a little worked up today, calling out the Patriot WR'S

Baseball right around the corner.

 


Yes indeed Mon Colonel...Girls from Santa Catarina are known to scratch n' claw...Reckon' In Gisele's  presence , be dropping balls too !

Baseball ?  Bettin' Posada will not hit a HR in 2012...

lol

    

If @ Calder in April give a shout... Marlins-Cardinals Fish Bowl inauguration April 3 rd will be great !


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #244
Quote Originally Posted by coverplex:

IT GOES TO SHOW YOU NUMEROLOGY DOES NOT LIE. 

MAKE SURE IT FACTORS IN WITH YOUR WAGERS.

IF NOT YOU ARE BETTING WITH HALF OF THE INFO YOU NEED TO MAKE THE PROPER BETS.

GIANTS WERE THE BETTER TEAM BUT THAT'S NOT THE SOLE REASON THEY WON THE SUPER BOWL.

IT'S ALL IN THE STORY LINE.

THAT'S 11 IN A ROW FOR ME IN THE SUPER BOWL.

CONGRATS TO MY NY GIANTS!!!!


AMEN TO THE BIG PICTURE !


 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 746
Posted: #245
Quote Originally Posted by coverplex:

IT GOES TO SHOW YOU NUMEROLOGY DOES NOT LIE. 

MAKE SURE IT FACTORS IN WITH YOUR WAGERS.

IF NOT YOU ARE BETTING WITH HALF OF THE INFO YOU NEED TO MAKE THE PROPER BETS.

GIANTS WERE THE BETTER TEAM BUT THAT'S NOT THE SOLE REASON THEY WON THE SUPER BOWL.

IT'S ALL IN THE STORY LINE.

THAT'S 11 IN A ROW FOR ME IN THE SUPER BOWL.

CONGRATS TO MY NY GIANTS!!!!

After watching 84 drop two game changing balls that were super easy catches, I have to agree with you. The Powers That Be utilize numerology and NY was the anointed team. Good call. I sent you a friend request as I have a  huge angle and would like to consult you on the numerology of it. Win win for both of us.
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.