Posted:
#226
i lv itttttttttttttt
0
New York at New England (02/05/2012)
Posted:
#232
[Quote: Originally Posted by easypics]
Bill Belichick
This is one of the few years betting superbowls via 8- 2 track record that I really feel uneasy picking sides. I sense a dogfight with either team winning by 4 and there lies imo best value play ,betting Giants to win between 1 - 6 pts @ 4/ 1 n' Pats to win between 1- 6 @ 7/2.
As last year, hope little voice is as accurate nailing pretty much exact score n' sides via numerology calculations.2012 Superbowl 46 = 10 via numerology sense ,hence 1 . First thing that came to mind....Eli # 10 bet as MVP n' Mario Manningham 82 ( 10 ) for side bet fun.
[/Quote] " 10 "
# 10 ELI MVP 
( # 91 Tuck = 10 via numerology... Runner up MVP )
GIANTS win between 1 - 6 pts @ 4 - 1
PATS win bet. 1 - 6 pts @ 7/2 
TOTAL @ 55 + 
Yes Brady set " records " 10 for 10 TD drive ...
16 straight completions...SB record 96 yard drive....
10 - 9 Halftime lead...
In a losing cause....In a nutshell....
Bill Belichick GIANTS Time of possession = 37 minutes ( lol ) 3 + 7 = 10
$UPER BOWL 46
( 4 + 6 = 10 )
Coincidence ?
GRAT$ Mon Colonel n' all Gigante fan$ !
Bon Voyage Vue !
" Giants don't belong in the Superb
wl "
wl "0
Posted:
#238
Quote Originally Posted by DJNY:
History is repeating itself this year from 2008!
2008
Patriots AF = 37 AA = 17 O/U = 11-5
Giants AF = 23 AA = 22 O/U = 8-8
2011
Patriots AF = 32 AA = 20 O/U = 11-5
Giants AF = 25 AA = 23 O/U = 8-7-1
Look at how similar these two seasons have played out.... Another interesting fact that another member brought up is the fact that the only other 2 rematches between QB's in previous superbowls resulted in the same QB winning the rematch.
Everything points to history repeating itself this superbowl...
With the Patriots less potent offence from 2008 and defense and the Giants actually improving since 2008 it is very clear. It's tough to bet against the Hood and Brady, but this game will not be a shocker like it was last time. It's already played out before so don't be fooled.
Final Prediction:
24-21 Giants- WIN
Every Q under - WIN
Under on all Gronk props- WIN
Under on National Anthem- PUSH
Under 46.5 @ +280 - WIN
That's how I end the season!
0
Posted:
#240
Quote Originally Posted by easypics:
Quote Originally Posted by easypics:
Bill Belichick
G-men and Under it was Mon e-pics This is one of the few years betting superbowls via 8- 2 track record that I really feel uneasy picking sides. I sense a dogfight with either team winning by 4 and there lies imo best value play ,betting Giants to win between 1 - 6 pts @ 4/ 1 n' Pats to win between 1- 6 @ 7/2.
As last year, hope little voice is as accurate nailing pretty much exact score n' sides via numerology calculations.2012 Superbowl 46 = 10 via numerology sense ,hence 1 . First thing that came to mind....Eli # 10 bet as MVP n' Mario Manningham 82 ( 10 ) for side bet fun.
[/Quote] " 10 "
# 10 ELI MVP
( # 91 Tuck = 10 via numerology... Runner up MVP )
GIANTS win between 1 - 6 pts @ 4 - 1
PATS win bet. 1 - 6 pts @ 7/2
TOTAL @ 55 +
Yes Brady set " records " 10 for 10 TD drive ...
16 straight completions...SB record 96 yard drive....
10 - 9 Halftime lead...
In a losing cause....In a nutshell....
Bill Belichick GIANTS Time of possession = 37 minutes ( lol ) 3 + 7 = 10
$UPER BOWL 46
( 4 + 6 = 10 )
Coincidence ?
GRAT$ Mon Colonel n' all Gigante fan$ !
Bon Voyage Vue !
" Giants don't belong in the Superbwl "
wl "
I always said, in the end the cream rises to the top. Nice capping by the both of us my friend. 
Gisele got a little worked up today, calling out the Patriot WR'S
Baseball right around the corner.
0
Posted:
#241
IT GOES TO SHOW YOU NUMEROLOGY DOES NOT LIE.
MAKE SURE IT FACTORS IN WITH YOUR WAGERS.
IF NOT YOU ARE BETTING WITH HALF OF THE INFO YOU NEED TO MAKE THE PROPER BETS.
GIANTS WERE THE BETTER TEAM BUT THAT'S NOT THE SOLE REASON THEY WON THE SUPER BOWL.
IT'S ALL IN THE STORY LINE.
THAT'S 11 IN A ROW FOR ME IN THE SUPER BOWL.
CONGRATS TO MY NY GIANTS!!!!
0
Posted:
#243
Quote Originally Posted by Coloneljim:
G-men and Under it was Mon e-pics
G-men and Under it was Mon e-pics
I always said, in the end the cream rises to the top. Nice capping by the both of us my friend.
Gisele got a little worked up today, calling out the Patriot WR'S
Baseball right around the corner.
Yes indeed Mon Colonel...Girls from Santa Catarina are known to scratch n' claw...Reckon' In Gisele's presence , be dropping balls too !
Baseball ? Bettin' Posada will not hit a HR in 2012...
lol
If @ Calder in April give a shout... Marlins-Cardinals Fish Bowl inauguration April 3 rd will be great !
0
Posted:
#244
Quote Originally Posted by coverplex:
IT GOES TO SHOW YOU NUMEROLOGY DOES NOT LIE.
IT GOES TO SHOW YOU NUMEROLOGY DOES NOT LIE.
MAKE SURE IT FACTORS IN WITH YOUR WAGERS.
IF NOT YOU ARE BETTING WITH HALF OF THE INFO YOU NEED TO MAKE THE PROPER BETS.
GIANTS WERE THE BETTER TEAM BUT THAT'S NOT THE SOLE REASON THEY WON THE SUPER BOWL.
IT'S ALL IN THE STORY LINE.
THAT'S 11 IN A ROW FOR ME IN THE SUPER BOWL.
CONGRATS TO MY NY GIANTS!!!!
AMEN TO THE BIG PICTURE !
0
Posted:
#245
Quote Originally Posted by coverplex:
IT GOES TO SHOW YOU NUMEROLOGY DOES NOT LIE.
IT GOES TO SHOW YOU NUMEROLOGY DOES NOT LIE.
MAKE SURE IT FACTORS IN WITH YOUR WAGERS.
IF NOT YOU ARE BETTING WITH HALF OF THE INFO YOU NEED TO MAKE THE PROPER BETS.
GIANTS WERE THE BETTER TEAM BUT THAT'S NOT THE SOLE REASON THEY WON THE SUPER BOWL.
IT'S ALL IN THE STORY LINE.
THAT'S 11 IN A ROW FOR ME IN THE SUPER BOWL.
CONGRATS TO MY NY GIANTS!!!!
After watching 84 drop two game changing balls that were super easy catches, I have to agree with you. The Powers That Be utilize numerology and NY was the anointed team. Good call. I sent you a friend request as I have a huge angle and would like to consult you on the numerology of it. Win win for both of us.
0
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.