• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL AI Predictions
      • NFL Underdogs
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Pro Football

    New York at New England (02/05/2012)

    «First Previous 234 ... 8910 Next Last»
    pando
    Fishman13
    BreakaBookie
    Spytheweb
    usmail
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 38566
    Posts: 245
    «First Previous 234 ... 8910 Next Last»
     
    pando
    pando
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 23
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2012 - 7:12 PM ET #26

    I picked the Giants + 3.5 on my website handicappingwinners.com where I am 70% in the playoffs and 60% for the year (on spot plays). My early analysis is on the site but I'll have my complete analysis by Friday. I think the line could drop below 3. The line is based on how the bookmakers think the general public will bet, but the actual line, based on each team's strengths, match ups, stats, etc., tshould be either even or the Giants favored by 1 to 2 points. The Giants have more speed, and a better defense.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I picked the Giants + 3.5 on my website handicappingwinners.com where I am 70% in the playoffs and 60% for the year (on spot plays). My early analysis is on the site but I'll have my complete analysis by Friday. I think the line could drop below 3. The line is based on how the bookmakers think the general public will bet, but the actual line, based on each team's strengths, match ups, stats, etc., tshould be either even or the Giants favored by 1 to 2 points. The Giants have more speed, and a better defense.
     
    Fishman13
    Fishman13
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2009
    Posts: 78
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2012 - 7:51 PM ET #27

    Judging by my man, cryptonite we call him............... he loves Gmen and stands to collect 10g. The last time he won there was no such thing as football. Sorry Eli and co. the fickled finger of fate has been pointed directly at you.  If I had to make a play....

     

    PATRIOTS ML.  

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Judging by my man, cryptonite we call him............... he loves Gmen and stands to collect 10g. The last time he won there was no such thing as football. Sorry Eli and co. the fickled finger of fate has been pointed directly at you.  If I had to make a play....

     

    PATRIOTS ML.  

     
    BreakaBookie
    BreakaBookie
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 1743
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2012 - 11:47 PM ET #28

    Now that the dust has settled...... a few words....

    I am still happy about my 49ers pick..... I trust my logic of the home field advantage and better defense playing in those rainy conditions..... I feel if I go with that formula I'll win more than lose, and I have won more than lost over my capping career...... the only place obviously I was wrong was the special teams advantage that I thought SF had..... I was under the impression that Ted Ginn would play, and it turned out he was a bigger loss than could've been predicted..... Weatherford had a great game as did the Giants coverage teams.... hats off to them....

    In my opinion, sheer will and playoff experience won that football game..... to not turn the ball over against a defense like that is more than very impressive, it's unbelievable..... The toughness of Eli Manning getting his ass kicked the entire game and still kept fighting was actually inspiring.... and that's coming from a Jets fan.... (by the way that pass to bradshaw when he escaped the sack was insane for a non-mobile qb)


    on to this game....


    I can't believe the line opeend at 3.5


    I don't think this is even going to be a game.....


    after playing the SF defense, the Giants offense is going to be comfortably scoring at will..... this game they will actually be able to run the ball......


    I think the Giants win by a comfortable margin.....


    hell I don't think it's even going to be a game.....


    it's an early lean, but I just think the Giants beat the Pats when they were playing terrible football..... now they are playing great football and are healthy..... not to mention that have always matched up well against the Pats....  how is this line 3.5?



    GL TO ALL!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Now that the dust has settled...... a few words....

    I am still happy about my 49ers pick..... I trust my logic of the home field advantage and better defense playing in those rainy conditions..... I feel if I go with that formula I'll win more than lose, and I have won more than lost over my capping career...... the only place obviously I was wrong was the special teams advantage that I thought SF had..... I was under the impression that Ted Ginn would play, and it turned out he was a bigger loss than could've been predicted..... Weatherford had a great game as did the Giants coverage teams.... hats off to them....

    In my opinion, sheer will and playoff experience won that football game..... to not turn the ball over against a defense like that is more than very impressive, it's unbelievable..... The toughness of Eli Manning getting his ass kicked the entire game and still kept fighting was actually inspiring.... and that's coming from a Jets fan.... (by the way that pass to bradshaw when he escaped the sack was insane for a non-mobile qb)


    on to this game....


    I can't believe the line opeend at 3.5


    I don't think this is even going to be a game.....


    after playing the SF defense, the Giants offense is going to be comfortably scoring at will..... this game they will actually be able to run the ball......


    I think the Giants win by a comfortable margin.....


    hell I don't think it's even going to be a game.....


    it's an early lean, but I just think the Giants beat the Pats when they were playing terrible football..... now they are playing great football and are healthy..... not to mention that have always matched up well against the Pats....  how is this line 3.5?



    GL TO ALL!

     
    Spytheweb
    Spytheweb
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2003
    Posts: 954
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2012 - 11:56 PM ET #29

    "The loss of Andre Carter could be perilous in that regard, as they won't be able to count on one of their most disruptive forces on the season."

    "
    The New England Patriots cruised to a 13-3 record on their way to the AFC's top seed, but Tim Britton of the Providence Journal uncovered a disquieting fact for Pats fans: the team only played two games against franchises that finished with winning records, and lost them both -- to theSteelers in Pittsburgh and at home against the Giants."

    Plus Nicks didn't play when the Giants ended the Pats 31 game home winning streak in Nov.

    The wrong team is favored. Giants 34-NE 24

    BTW easypics, SF went 1-13 on 3rd down.
    Good teams win games, Great teams cover the spread!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    "The loss of Andre Carter could be perilous in that regard, as they won't be able to count on one of their most disruptive forces on the season."

    "
    The New England Patriots cruised to a 13-3 record on their way to the AFC's top seed, but Tim Britton of the Providence Journal uncovered a disquieting fact for Pats fans: the team only played two games against franchises that finished with winning records, and lost them both -- to theSteelers in Pittsburgh and at home against the Giants."

    Plus Nicks didn't play when the Giants ended the Pats 31 game home winning streak in Nov.

    The wrong team is favored. Giants 34-NE 24

    BTW easypics, SF went 1-13 on 3rd down.
     
    usmail
    usmail
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 626
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 1:28 AM ET #30

    MOST MONEY ON GIANT AND UNDER.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    MOST MONEY ON GIANT AND UNDER.
     
    aceofspades88
    aceofspades88
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2011
    Posts: 29
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 3:33 AM ET #31

    In there first match up when they played they did not have there leading rusher Bradshaw and there reciever Hakeem Nicks. This whole revenge factor for Brady is non sense thats what I have been hearing. They are 2 teams that want to win Bad. I can see this line moveing to 2.5 or even 2 by game time. I really feel that the Giants should be favored but vegas sets the line to where people are putting the money not on which team is the strongest. Both of these teams got into the superbowl with a little luck but whats that saying it sometime better to be a little lucky then good. I will post more when it gets closer to game time. As of right now Giants +3
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    In there first match up when they played they did not have there leading rusher Bradshaw and there reciever Hakeem Nicks. This whole revenge factor for Brady is non sense thats what I have been hearing. They are 2 teams that want to win Bad. I can see this line moveing to 2.5 or even 2 by game time. I really feel that the Giants should be favored but vegas sets the line to where people are putting the money not on which team is the strongest. Both of these teams got into the superbowl with a little luck but whats that saying it sometime better to be a little lucky then good. I will post more when it gets closer to game time. As of right now Giants +3
     
    p-99
    p-99
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 84
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 4:30 AM ET #32

    My first post on page one contains facts pertained  to most games, but one thing has just dawned on me was that on every supper bowl  games the early public favorite usually won because big money came pouring in @ the final minutes.

    GLTA

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    My first post on page one contains facts pertained  to most games, but one thing has just dawned on me was that on every supper bowl  games the early public favorite usually won because big money came pouring in @ the final minutes.

    GLTA

     
    NoBetNoWin
    NoBetNoWin
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 569
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 6:42 AM ET #33

    Brady will need a healthy Gronk in the shootout type of game this is going to be.  If he is a step slow with the injury, that will put even more pressure on Brady.  The Giants front four will be gettin after it!!!  Also remember, Brady loves to take advantage of blitzes.  Problem is the Giants only need to rush 4.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Brady will need a healthy Gronk in the shootout type of game this is going to be.  If he is a step slow with the injury, that will put even more pressure on Brady.  The Giants front four will be gettin after it!!!  Also remember, Brady loves to take advantage of blitzes.  Problem is the Giants only need to rush 4.
     
    easypics
    easypics
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2008
    Posts: 2635
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 7:10 AM ET #34

    Quote Originally Posted by Spytheweb:

    "The loss of Andre Carter could be perilous in that regard, as they won't be able to count on one of their most disruptive forces on the season."

    "
    The New England Patriots cruised to a 13-3 record on their way to the AFC's top seed, but Tim Britton of the Providence Journal uncovered a disquieting fact for Pats fans: the team only played two games against franchises that finished with winning records, and lost them both -- to theSteelers in Pittsburgh and at home against the Giants."

    Plus Nicks didn't play when the Giants ended the Pats 31 game home winning streak in Nov.

    The wrong team is favored. Giants 34-NE 24

    BTW easypics, SF went 1-13 on 3rd down.



                   Frisco went 0 - 9  via 3rd down conv. in Reg. play

             +
                                        
              1 - 4  in OT

           D
                             
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Spytheweb:

    "The loss of Andre Carter could be perilous in that regard, as they won't be able to count on one of their most disruptive forces on the season."

    "
    The New England Patriots cruised to a 13-3 record on their way to the AFC's top seed, but Tim Britton of the Providence Journal uncovered a disquieting fact for Pats fans: the team only played two games against franchises that finished with winning records, and lost them both -- to theSteelers in Pittsburgh and at home against the Giants."

    Plus Nicks didn't play when the Giants ended the Pats 31 game home winning streak in Nov.

    The wrong team is favored. Giants 34-NE 24

    BTW easypics, SF went 1-13 on 3rd down.



                   Frisco went 0 - 9  via 3rd down conv. in Reg. play

             +
                                        
              1 - 4  in OT

           D
                             
     
    easypics
    easypics
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2008
    Posts: 2635
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 7:29 AM ET #35

    Quote Originally Posted by BreakaBookie:

    Now that the dust has settled...... a few words....

    I am still happy   ? about my 49ers pick..... I trust my logic of the home field advantage and better defense   ?  playing in those rainy conditions..... I feel if I go with that formula I'll win more than lose, and I have won more than lost over my capping career...... the only place obviously I was wrong was the special teams advantage that I thought SF had..... I was under  lol the impression that Ted Ginn would play, and it turned out he was a bigger loss than could've been predicted..... Weatherford had a great game as did the Giants coverage teams.... hats off to them....

    In my opinion, sheer will and (  DEFENSE AND QB ) and playoff experience won that football game..... lol


    Sorry Break...

    Gotta Break your balls.

                                                   

                 "Better Defense" ?

    How many Giants 3rd down conversions to Frisco's ?

    How difficult and rare  to shutdown a team down to deuce points in the playoffs , 
    especially vs  gunslingin' QB Matty Ice ?

                                              
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by BreakaBookie:

    Now that the dust has settled...... a few words....

    I am still happy   ? about my 49ers pick..... I trust my logic of the home field advantage and better defense   ?  playing in those rainy conditions..... I feel if I go with that formula I'll win more than lose, and I have won more than lost over my capping career...... the only place obviously I was wrong was the special teams advantage that I thought SF had..... I was under  lol the impression that Ted Ginn would play, and it turned out he was a bigger loss than could've been predicted..... Weatherford had a great game as did the Giants coverage teams.... hats off to them....

    In my opinion, sheer will and (  DEFENSE AND QB ) and playoff experience won that football game..... lol


    Sorry Break...

    Gotta Break your balls.

                                                   

                 "Better Defense" ?

    How many Giants 3rd down conversions to Frisco's ?

    How difficult and rare  to shutdown a team down to deuce points in the playoffs , 
    especially vs  gunslingin' QB Matty Ice ?

                                              
     
    BreakaBookie
    BreakaBookie
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 1743
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 10:26 AM ET #36

    Quote Originally Posted by easypics:


    Sorry Break...

    Gotta Break your balls.

                                                   

                 "Better Defense" ?

    How many Giants 3rd down conversions to Frisco's ?

    How difficult and rare  to shutdown a team down to deuce points in the playoffs , 
    especially vs  gunslingin' QB Matty Ice ?

                                              


    Giants offense is much better than the 49ers offense.... that was a given....

    which defense played better?

    it's debateable....


    which defense was better going into that game?

    49ers all year.... that's all I meant....

    back to this game.....


    listen to the list of qbs that Brady beat since the Giants Loss..

    Mark Sanchez twice
    Tyler Palko
    Vince Young
    Dan Orlovsky
    Rex Grossman
    Tim Tebow twice
    Matt Moore
    Ryan Fitzpatrick


    I still don't understand this line

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by easypics:


    Sorry Break...

    Gotta Break your balls.

                                                   

                 "Better Defense" ?

    How many Giants 3rd down conversions to Frisco's ?

    How difficult and rare  to shutdown a team down to deuce points in the playoffs , 
    especially vs  gunslingin' QB Matty Ice ?

                                              


    Giants offense is much better than the 49ers offense.... that was a given....

    which defense played better?

    it's debateable....


    which defense was better going into that game?

    49ers all year.... that's all I meant....

    back to this game.....


    listen to the list of qbs that Brady beat since the Giants Loss..

    Mark Sanchez twice
    Tyler Palko
    Vince Young
    Dan Orlovsky
    Rex Grossman
    Tim Tebow twice
    Matt Moore
    Ryan Fitzpatrick


    I still don't understand this line

     
    easypics
    easypics
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2008
    Posts: 2635
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 12:22 PM ET #37

    Hey Break,


    Believe me, Gonna be a double when we hook on 34 th st. !


      Ironically , you list weak QB's / Teams  highlighting Pats cream puff schedule ect.


    YET 

    For some odd ball gangreeneous reason  lol
    You seem unwilling  to grasp similarity between Frisco's n' Pats creampuff schedule .

    No doubt Frisco's D is good but CMON Man ! ! ! 


    Hard not to look good n' beef up defensive stats n' sending some to the pro bowl beating up on these  :

    Seahawks 2 X
    Rams 2 X
    Cardinals 2 X
    Browns 1 X 
    Bucs 1 X

    ( Indisputably NFL's weakest division )

    Fact is , Saints exposed Frisco's defensive flaw at a most unfortunate time for Harbaugh giving Giants  a winning blue print ...As much as A. Smith showed tremendous poise, Eli took care of business in a QB mismatch.

    About the line....

    Waiting for your conspiracy theory...lol

    Line makes no sense .

    Vegas coup ?

    Something aint right.

    However  IMO Total is right on @ 55

    To be continued...lol



     


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Hey Break,


    Believe me, Gonna be a double when we hook on 34 th st. !


      Ironically , you list weak QB's / Teams  highlighting Pats cream puff schedule ect.


    YET 

    For some odd ball gangreeneous reason  lol
    You seem unwilling  to grasp similarity between Frisco's n' Pats creampuff schedule .

    No doubt Frisco's D is good but CMON Man ! ! ! 


    Hard not to look good n' beef up defensive stats n' sending some to the pro bowl beating up on these  :

    Seahawks 2 X
    Rams 2 X
    Cardinals 2 X
    Browns 1 X 
    Bucs 1 X

    ( Indisputably NFL's weakest division )

    Fact is , Saints exposed Frisco's defensive flaw at a most unfortunate time for Harbaugh giving Giants  a winning blue print ...As much as A. Smith showed tremendous poise, Eli took care of business in a QB mismatch.

    About the line....

    Waiting for your conspiracy theory...lol

    Line makes no sense .

    Vegas coup ?

    Something aint right.

    However  IMO Total is right on @ 55

    To be continued...lol



     


     
    phillies926
    phillies926
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 103
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 1:05 PM ET #38

    Quote Originally Posted by easypics:

    Hey Break,


    Believe me, Gonna be a double when we hook on 34 th st. !


      Ironically , you list weak QB's / Teams  highlighting Pats cream puff schedule ect.


    YET 

    For some odd ball gangreeneous reason  lol
    You seem unwilling  to grasp similarity between Frisco's n' Pats creampuff schedule .

    No doubt Frisco's D is good but CMON Man ! ! ! 


    Hard not to look good n' beef up defensive stats n' sending some to the pro bowl beating up on these  :

    Seahawks 2 X
    Rams 2 X
    Cardinals 2 X
    Browns 1 X 
    Bucs 1 X

    ( Indisputably NFL's weakest division )

    Fact is , Saints exposed Frisco's defensive flaw at a most unfortunate time for Harbaugh giving Giants  a winning blue print ...As much as A. Smith showed tremendous poise, Eli took care of business in a QB mismatch.

    About the line....

    Waiting for your conspiracy theory...lol

    Line makes no sense .

    Vegas coup ?

    Something aint right.

    However  IMO Total is right on @ 55

    To be continued...lol



     


    Don't forget the Giants lost to Washington twice (Very crappy team) and to the Seahawks at home as a huge favorite. They also lost to Philly and San Fran. I was liking the Giants when I first saw this line but the Giant love is getting out of hand. Vegas and the public has been backing the Giants for weeks but they still have a line of Giants getting 3. Something smells fishy on this line. If the Giant love keeps pouring in I am gonna have to take the PATS LARGEEEEE. Gotta see injury report on Gronkowski first though.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by easypics:

    Hey Break,


    Believe me, Gonna be a double when we hook on 34 th st. !


      Ironically , you list weak QB's / Teams  highlighting Pats cream puff schedule ect.


    YET 

    For some odd ball gangreeneous reason  lol
    You seem unwilling  to grasp similarity between Frisco's n' Pats creampuff schedule .

    No doubt Frisco's D is good but CMON Man ! ! ! 


    Hard not to look good n' beef up defensive stats n' sending some to the pro bowl beating up on these  :

    Seahawks 2 X
    Rams 2 X
    Cardinals 2 X
    Browns 1 X 
    Bucs 1 X

    ( Indisputably NFL's weakest division )

    Fact is , Saints exposed Frisco's defensive flaw at a most unfortunate time for Harbaugh giving Giants  a winning blue print ...As much as A. Smith showed tremendous poise, Eli took care of business in a QB mismatch.

    About the line....

    Waiting for your conspiracy theory...lol

    Line makes no sense .

    Vegas coup ?

    Something aint right.

    However  IMO Total is right on @ 55

    To be continued...lol



     


    Don't forget the Giants lost to Washington twice (Very crappy team) and to the Seahawks at home as a huge favorite. They also lost to Philly and San Fran. I was liking the Giants when I first saw this line but the Giant love is getting out of hand. Vegas and the public has been backing the Giants for weeks but they still have a line of Giants getting 3. Something smells fishy on this line. If the Giant love keeps pouring in I am gonna have to take the PATS LARGEEEEE. Gotta see injury report on Gronkowski first though.

     
    phillies926
    phillies926
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 103
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 1:10 PM ET #39

    Easy,

    They also got absolutely waxed in New Orleans and the NFC Least (Eagles fan here) was not a great division. Hell wasn't even a good division this year. Also, got to take into consideration that the Pats have never lost to the same team twice in one year. Also, take into consideration that the GMen were playing big public underdog in Super Bowl 42 and look how that turned out. Also, (not enough pick evidence yet) almost everytime the expert predictions on wagerline is 90% or greater on one side it almost always loses. All I am saying is tread carefully.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Easy,

    They also got absolutely waxed in New Orleans and the NFC Least (Eagles fan here) was not a great division. Hell wasn't even a good division this year. Also, got to take into consideration that the Pats have never lost to the same team twice in one year. Also, take into consideration that the GMen were playing big public underdog in Super Bowl 42 and look how that turned out. Also, (not enough pick evidence yet) almost everytime the expert predictions on wagerline is 90% or greater on one side it almost always loses. All I am saying is tread carefully.

     
    FleshGordun
    FleshGordun
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 915
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 1:50 PM ET #40

    Thinking the difference in this game is the NYG def. front. The team that generates preassure to the QB wins this game.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Thinking the difference in this game is the NYG def. front. The team that generates preassure to the QB wins this game.
     
    vue21849
    vue21849
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 5051
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 2:28 PM ET #41

        Until Mr. Williams 2 screwups, the fact remains the 49 ers had the lead 14-10 until aprox. 8 minutes in the 4 quarter and would have won the game. BUT they didn't- so congrats to Spytheweb & Easy Pics. I further retract my previous statements that the Giants don't belong in the playoffs/The Giants are not SB material.  I am still perplexed whether the G-Men had a late season resurgeance, or merely a 5 game win streak. I still have not capped this contest, so I am not committing at this time.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
        Until Mr. Williams 2 screwups, the fact remains the 49 ers had the lead 14-10 until aprox. 8 minutes in the 4 quarter and would have won the game. BUT they didn't- so congrats to Spytheweb & Easy Pics. I further retract my previous statements that the Giants don't belong in the playoffs/The Giants are not SB material.  I am still perplexed whether the G-Men had a late season resurgeance, or merely a 5 game win streak. I still have not capped this contest, so I am not committing at this time.
     
    wackycracker
    wackycracker
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2010
    Posts: 483
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 2:36 PM ET #42

    PERSONALLY ---RIGHT NOW I'M WONDERING ABOUT THE PRO BOWL AND HOW TO CAP THAT ONE----NFC-4 LOOKS GOOD BUT THE OVER IS HIGH.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    PERSONALLY ---RIGHT NOW I'M WONDERING ABOUT THE PRO BOWL AND HOW TO CAP THAT ONE----NFC-4 LOOKS GOOD BUT THE OVER IS HIGH.
     
    phillies926
    phillies926
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 103
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 2:40 PM ET #43

    Quote Originally Posted by FleshGordun:

    Thinking the difference in this game is the NYG def. front. The team that generates preassure to the QB wins this game.

    Counter-Point: The 49ers clearly put more pressure on Eli then the GMen did on Alex Smith. The better WB and team that made fewer mistakes won. Look at the stats. Eli threw the ball 60 times and was sacked a few times and knocked down over 20 times. He was pressured 33% of the time.

    To your point: The Patriots struggle to get a pass rush on opposing QB's and that is a serious liability vs Eli Manning as he goes through his receiver progressions very well. This could be trouble for a thin, underwhelming secondary such as the Patriots.

    As of today I would take the Gmen and the under but that depends on Gronkowski's status for the super bowl (looked like pollard rolled his ankle pretty good on the various replays) and the publics perception of the game come Super Bowl Sunday. Thinkink I will fade the public which will definitely be leaning the over (thus the under pick) and will fade whatever side the majority is leaning towards. GLTA

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by FleshGordun:

    Thinking the difference in this game is the NYG def. front. The team that generates preassure to the QB wins this game.

    Counter-Point: The 49ers clearly put more pressure on Eli then the GMen did on Alex Smith. The better WB and team that made fewer mistakes won. Look at the stats. Eli threw the ball 60 times and was sacked a few times and knocked down over 20 times. He was pressured 33% of the time.

    To your point: The Patriots struggle to get a pass rush on opposing QB's and that is a serious liability vs Eli Manning as he goes through his receiver progressions very well. This could be trouble for a thin, underwhelming secondary such as the Patriots.

    As of today I would take the Gmen and the under but that depends on Gronkowski's status for the super bowl (looked like pollard rolled his ankle pretty good on the various replays) and the publics perception of the game come Super Bowl Sunday. Thinkink I will fade the public which will definitely be leaning the over (thus the under pick) and will fade whatever side the majority is leaning towards. GLTA

     
    pando
    pando
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 23
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 3:30 PM ET #44

    I think aceofspades stole his analysis from my website, geez.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I think aceofspades stole his analysis from my website, geez.
     
    easypics
    easypics
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2008
    Posts: 2635
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 6:05 PM ET #45

    Quote Originally Posted by phillies926:

    Don't forget the Giants lost to Washington twice (Very crappy team) and to the Seahawks at home as a huge favorite. They also lost to Philly and San Fran. I was liking the Giants when I first saw this line but the Giant love is getting out of hand. Vegas and the public has been backing the Giants for weeks but they still have a line of Giants getting 3. Something smells fishy on this line. If the Giant love keeps pouring in I am gonna have to take the PATS LARGEEEEE. Gotta see injury report on Gronkowski first though.


    Back in 2007 Giants inexplicably lost @ home late in the season to deadskins while fighting for a playoff spot... Barely beat a sad Dolphin team @ Wembley...I was there n' declared no phuckin' way Blue are going far...Next thing I know, I'm in Arizona,xxxxxx pass locked n' loaded heavy on Blue + 9 pts + ML ...Go figure....

    Get the drift ? History does repeat itself.

    It really does NOT matter who you beat or lose to in the regular season when you're playing for the crown...( unless relative to  rematch siuation as Frisco Fiasco or Lucas Field showdown )

    BOL


    This game is too easy to cap ...Line is suspect...does'nt add up.


    Just saying.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by phillies926:

    Don't forget the Giants lost to Washington twice (Very crappy team) and to the Seahawks at home as a huge favorite. They also lost to Philly and San Fran. I was liking the Giants when I first saw this line but the Giant love is getting out of hand. Vegas and the public has been backing the Giants for weeks but they still have a line of Giants getting 3. Something smells fishy on this line. If the Giant love keeps pouring in I am gonna have to take the PATS LARGEEEEE. Gotta see injury report on Gronkowski first though.


    Back in 2007 Giants inexplicably lost @ home late in the season to deadskins while fighting for a playoff spot... Barely beat a sad Dolphin team @ Wembley...I was there n' declared no phuckin' way Blue are going far...Next thing I know, I'm in Arizona,xxxxxx pass locked n' loaded heavy on Blue + 9 pts + ML ...Go figure....

    Get the drift ? History does repeat itself.

    It really does NOT matter who you beat or lose to in the regular season when you're playing for the crown...( unless relative to  rematch siuation as Frisco Fiasco or Lucas Field showdown )

    BOL


    This game is too easy to cap ...Line is suspect...does'nt add up.


    Just saying.


     
    easypics
    easypics
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2008
    Posts: 2635
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 6:17 PM ET #46

    Quote Originally Posted by phillies926:

    Easy,

    They also got absolutely waxed in New Orleans and the NFC Least (Eagles fan here) was not a great division. Hell wasn't even a good division this year. Also, got to take into consideration that the Pats have never lost to the same team twice in one year. Also, take into consideration that the GMen were playing big public underdog in Super Bowl 42 and look how that turned out. Also, (not enough pick evidence yet) almost everytime the expert predictions on wagerline is 90% or greater on one side it almost always loses. All I am saying is tread carefully.


    Giants always get " waxed " in New Orleans ! 

    Tell you one thing...

    Next year's  Super Bowl is in New Orleans  n' if  Brees n ' team stays healthy, I'm jumpin' all over Saints future's bet to win it all ASAP.

    3 times the charm after losing on playoff road to Seahawks n' Frisco ?

      Breezin' through 2012 schedule securing home field...

     13 - 3 could do it.

        $   

    Hoping for 5 - 1  


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by phillies926:

    Easy,

    They also got absolutely waxed in New Orleans and the NFC Least (Eagles fan here) was not a great division. Hell wasn't even a good division this year. Also, got to take into consideration that the Pats have never lost to the same team twice in one year. Also, take into consideration that the GMen were playing big public underdog in Super Bowl 42 and look how that turned out. Also, (not enough pick evidence yet) almost everytime the expert predictions on wagerline is 90% or greater on one side it almost always loses. All I am saying is tread carefully.


    Giants always get " waxed " in New Orleans ! 

    Tell you one thing...

    Next year's  Super Bowl is in New Orleans  n' if  Brees n ' team stays healthy, I'm jumpin' all over Saints future's bet to win it all ASAP.

    3 times the charm after losing on playoff road to Seahawks n' Frisco ?

      Breezin' through 2012 schedule securing home field...

     13 - 3 could do it.

        $   

    Hoping for 5 - 1  


     
    Buddhabud
    Buddhabud
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 452
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2012 - 7:58 PM ET #47

    Quote Originally Posted by phillies926:

    Easy,

    They also got absolutely waxed in New Orleans and the NFC Least (Eagles fan here) was not a great division. Hell wasn't even a good division this year. Also, got to take into consideration that the Pats have never lost to the same team twice in one year. Also, take into consideration that the GMen were playing big public underdog in Super Bowl 42 and look how that turned out. Also, (not enough pick evidence yet) almost everytime the expert predictions on wagerline is 90% or greater on one side it almost always loses. All I am saying is tread carefully.

    If you think that this is the same Giants team that lost to Washington and Seahawks you have lost your mind
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by phillies926:

    Easy,

    They also got absolutely waxed in New Orleans and the NFC Least (Eagles fan here) was not a great division. Hell wasn't even a good division this year. Also, got to take into consideration that the Pats have never lost to the same team twice in one year. Also, take into consideration that the GMen were playing big public underdog in Super Bowl 42 and look how that turned out. Also, (not enough pick evidence yet) almost everytime the expert predictions on wagerline is 90% or greater on one side it almost always loses. All I am saying is tread carefully.

    If you think that this is the same Giants team that lost to Washington and Seahawks you have lost your mind
     
    Watson785
    Watson785
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 185
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2012 - 12:21 AM ET #48

    For me it all boils down to Brady's performance last week against the Ravens.  If Brady's game had been a 'Brady game' then I would take the Giants and the points in the SB....BUT Brady had a bad game last week and he RARELY has 2 bad games in a row. 

    Pats will roll and Brady will get the MVP.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    For me it all boils down to Brady's performance last week against the Ravens.  If Brady's game had been a 'Brady game' then I would take the Giants and the points in the SB....BUT Brady had a bad game last week and he RARELY has 2 bad games in a row. 

    Pats will roll and Brady will get the MVP.
     
    Fishman13
    Fishman13
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2009
    Posts: 78
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2012 - 12:38 AM ET #49

    First off - let's just recap:

    Baltimore = sure handed Lee Evans drops the game winner, and then Billy Cundiff misses a chip shot that would of at least meant O.T......

    San Francisco = a rookie returner muffs not one but 2 punts! One goes for the go ahead TD, while the other is the game winner in O,T.!!!

    In my opinion, due to a dropped pass and a couple of special teams mistakes the 2 best teams are not playing in the Superbowl this year - but am I bitter? Nahh..........

     

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    First off - let's just recap:

    Baltimore = sure handed Lee Evans drops the game winner, and then Billy Cundiff misses a chip shot that would of at least meant O.T......

    San Francisco = a rookie returner muffs not one but 2 punts! One goes for the go ahead TD, while the other is the game winner in O,T.!!!

    In my opinion, due to a dropped pass and a couple of special teams mistakes the 2 best teams are not playing in the Superbowl this year - but am I bitter? Nahh..........

     

     

     
     
    hanyrd
    hanyrd
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2011
    Posts: 6
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2012 - 1:21 AM ET #50

    It's been four years and both teams' rosters have changed significantly, but the fundamental philosophies of each organization remain unchanged.  The Giants balanced offense can hang with New England if by chance it becomes a shootout.  The more likely scenario is the Giants winning a low-scoring game led by their Defensive Line.  The NE passing game is all about protection and timing.  The Giants never-ending wave of QB-attacking defensive lineman will rattle Brady the entire game and Eli will do what needs to be done to get the win.  For what it's worth, I'm not a fan of either team.  Just callin' what I see.

    Giants ML LARGE!

    Under 1st half 27.5 LARGE!

    Under 55 LARGE!

    Giants ML and Under 55 Parlay.

    I know it's easy to say four years after the fact, but I was all over the Giants ML and the under then, and I like both plays even better this year!

    GLTA

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    It's been four years and both teams' rosters have changed significantly, but the fundamental philosophies of each organization remain unchanged.  The Giants balanced offense can hang with New England if by chance it becomes a shootout.  The more likely scenario is the Giants winning a low-scoring game led by their Defensive Line.  The NE passing game is all about protection and timing.  The Giants never-ending wave of QB-attacking defensive lineman will rattle Brady the entire game and Eli will do what needs to be done to get the win.  For what it's worth, I'm not a fan of either team.  Just callin' what I see.

    Giants ML LARGE!

    Under 1st half 27.5 LARGE!

    Under 55 LARGE!

    Giants ML and Under 55 Parlay.

    I know it's easy to say four years after the fact, but I was all over the Giants ML and the under then, and I like both plays even better this year!

    GLTA

    All Forums | Pro Football
    «First Previous 234 ... 8910 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 448,997 Covers arrow
    • Friday 09/18/2026 756 Covers arrow
    • The Three-Day Money Train 3,810 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 258,377 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 219 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,818 Covers arrow
    • We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 29,069 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 21,176 Covers arrow
    • NCAA WEEK 3 ***Click here for GREATNESS*** 6,480 Covers arrow
    • Week 3 Money 5,497 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.