• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 7
      NFL Week 7
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    Very impressed with Melania

    «First Previous 123
    bowlslit
    Ktrain
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 1932
    Posts: 60
    «First Previous 123
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Aug. 2, 2016 - 1:56 AM ET #51

    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    Saw the movie and read the book. How about you? Ever notice that the movie doesn't exactly follow the book? Is that really your response? Did I watch a movie? That's your rebuttal? That's sad. 

    You don't think the Bush regime tried to reach for reasons to invade iraq.

    You brought up the names of Kyle and Tillman with zero merit pertaining to the argument. 



    Actually, you must have forgotten the part in his book where he said his unit stumbled on a 55 gallon drum of biological warfare chemical. ( chapter 4 )

    Paraphrasing...."whoever said there were no wmds found in Iraq must have been referring to nuclear weapons"

    Smfh
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    Saw the movie and read the book. How about you? Ever notice that the movie doesn't exactly follow the book? Is that really your response? Did I watch a movie? That's your rebuttal? That's sad. 

    You don't think the Bush regime tried to reach for reasons to invade iraq.

    You brought up the names of Kyle and Tillman with zero merit pertaining to the argument. 



    Actually, you must have forgotten the part in his book where he said his unit stumbled on a 55 gallon drum of biological warfare chemical. ( chapter 4 )

    Paraphrasing...."whoever said there were no wmds found in Iraq must have been referring to nuclear weapons"

    Smfh
     
    Ktrain
    Ktrain
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 6580
    Posted: Aug. 2, 2016 - 11:19 AM ET #52

    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


    Actually, you must have forgotten the part in his book where he said his unit stumbled on a 55 gallon drum of biological warfare chemical. ( chapter 4 )

    Paraphrasing...."whoever said there were no wmds found in Iraq must have been referring to nuclear weapons"

    Smfh

    Like I said before, I'll refer back to where the very wikipedia report you posted said that if there were any chemical weapons, they were the equivalent of of household cleaners and didn't represent any significant danger. 

    Theoretically, you or I could get a 55 gallon drum and throw some cleaning products in it. Doesn't justify a war. 

    I'm glad you updated this thread though. I saw a few of the pics from that spread of her with another woman from back in the day and I must say.....

    .....      

    Now I know that two attractive women being naked with each other isn't your sort of thing (to each their own right?). I know it's not the missionary position, with the lights off and a picture of Jesus in the corner over looking the whole thing that you're used to. But for some people, it's a nice change of pace in the political spectrum. 

    I can't believe no one mentioned this first because it's been a few days now. I must say, I am very impressed with Melania Trump as well. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


    Actually, you must have forgotten the part in his book where he said his unit stumbled on a 55 gallon drum of biological warfare chemical. ( chapter 4 )

    Paraphrasing...."whoever said there were no wmds found in Iraq must have been referring to nuclear weapons"

    Smfh

    Like I said before, I'll refer back to where the very wikipedia report you posted said that if there were any chemical weapons, they were the equivalent of of household cleaners and didn't represent any significant danger. 

    Theoretically, you or I could get a 55 gallon drum and throw some cleaning products in it. Doesn't justify a war. 

    I'm glad you updated this thread though. I saw a few of the pics from that spread of her with another woman from back in the day and I must say.....

    .....      

    Now I know that two attractive women being naked with each other isn't your sort of thing (to each their own right?). I know it's not the missionary position, with the lights off and a picture of Jesus in the corner over looking the whole thing that you're used to. But for some people, it's a nice change of pace in the political spectrum. 

    I can't believe no one mentioned this first because it's been a few days now. I must say, I am very impressed with Melania Trump as well. 
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Aug. 4, 2016 - 1:19 AM ET #53

    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    Like I said before, I'll refer back to where the very wikipedia report you posted said that if there were any chemical weapons, they were the equivalent of of household cleaners and didn't represent any significant danger. 

    Theoretically, you or I could get a 55 gallon drum and throw some cleaning products in it. Doesn't justify a war. 

    I'm glad you updated this thread though. I saw a few of the pics from that spread of her with another woman from back in the day and I must say.....

    .....      

    Now I know that two attractive women being naked with each other isn't your sort of thing (to each their own right?). I know it's not the missionary position, with the lights off and a picture of Jesus in the corner over looking the whole thing that you're used to. But for some people, it's a nice change of pace in the political spectrum. 

    I can't believe no one mentioned this first because it's been a few days now. I must say, I am very impressed with Melania Trump as well. 

    Ktrain, you can't make this shlt up. First you get all butt hurt when I portray Kyle and Tillman as heroes...then you basically call Kyle an idiot by saying in essence he doesn't know what he's talking about when he STUMBLED onto a huge drum of chemical agent. You think he's gonna make a big deal about a barrel of Snuggle fabric softener or simple green? Smfh
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    Like I said before, I'll refer back to where the very wikipedia report you posted said that if there were any chemical weapons, they were the equivalent of of household cleaners and didn't represent any significant danger. 

    Theoretically, you or I could get a 55 gallon drum and throw some cleaning products in it. Doesn't justify a war. 

    I'm glad you updated this thread though. I saw a few of the pics from that spread of her with another woman from back in the day and I must say.....

    .....      

    Now I know that two attractive women being naked with each other isn't your sort of thing (to each their own right?). I know it's not the missionary position, with the lights off and a picture of Jesus in the corner over looking the whole thing that you're used to. But for some people, it's a nice change of pace in the political spectrum. 

    I can't believe no one mentioned this first because it's been a few days now. I must say, I am very impressed with Melania Trump as well. 

    Ktrain, you can't make this shlt up. First you get all butt hurt when I portray Kyle and Tillman as heroes...then you basically call Kyle an idiot by saying in essence he doesn't know what he's talking about when he STUMBLED onto a huge drum of chemical agent. You think he's gonna make a big deal about a barrel of Snuggle fabric softener or simple green? Smfh
     
    Ktrain
    Ktrain
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 6580
    Posted: Aug. 6, 2016 - 9:45 AM ET #54

    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


    Ktrain, you can't make this shlt up. First you get all butt hurt when I portray Kyle and Tillman as heroes...then you basically call Kyle an idiot by saying in essence he doesn't know what he's talking about when he STUMBLED onto a huge drum of chemical agent. You think he's gonna make a big deal about a barrel of Snuggle fabric softener or simple green? Smfh

    With all due respect to his memory, explain to me what qualifications Kyle has to determine whether or not a 55 gallon drum he came across has biological grade weapons? 

    I know he did a lot and learned a lot in his time in the Navy, I don't remember him becoming an expert in chemicals, specifically to be used as weapons, being one of them. 

    Stop with the red herring fallacy as well. I never called, or tried to call, Kyle an idiot. Questioning someones credentials isn't the same as calling them an idiot. 

    Keep ignoring the fact that I'm using the very source that you provided too. Keep deflecting from that one. 

    Btw, you're using the "can't make this sh!t up" catch phrase incorrectly. You're supposed to use it like Scalabrine uses it. In the form of "You can't make this sh!t up folks!!!". Not including me in the sentence, like you're phrasing it directly at me. I'm starting to feel bad for you old man. 

    Also, show me where I get "all butt hurt" when you claim you portrayed Kyle and Tillman as heroes? Show me that one. I got upset because you needlessly dragged their names into this debate when they had nothing to do with it. Tell me again why you brought their names into this debate? What purpose did that serve? 



    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


    Ktrain, you can't make this shlt up. First you get all butt hurt when I portray Kyle and Tillman as heroes...then you basically call Kyle an idiot by saying in essence he doesn't know what he's talking about when he STUMBLED onto a huge drum of chemical agent. You think he's gonna make a big deal about a barrel of Snuggle fabric softener or simple green? Smfh

    With all due respect to his memory, explain to me what qualifications Kyle has to determine whether or not a 55 gallon drum he came across has biological grade weapons? 

    I know he did a lot and learned a lot in his time in the Navy, I don't remember him becoming an expert in chemicals, specifically to be used as weapons, being one of them. 

    Stop with the red herring fallacy as well. I never called, or tried to call, Kyle an idiot. Questioning someones credentials isn't the same as calling them an idiot. 

    Keep ignoring the fact that I'm using the very source that you provided too. Keep deflecting from that one. 

    Btw, you're using the "can't make this sh!t up" catch phrase incorrectly. You're supposed to use it like Scalabrine uses it. In the form of "You can't make this sh!t up folks!!!". Not including me in the sentence, like you're phrasing it directly at me. I'm starting to feel bad for you old man. 

    Also, show me where I get "all butt hurt" when you claim you portrayed Kyle and Tillman as heroes? Show me that one. I got upset because you needlessly dragged their names into this debate when they had nothing to do with it. Tell me again why you brought their names into this debate? What purpose did that serve? 



     
    Ktrain
    Ktrain
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 6580
    Posted: Aug. 6, 2016 - 9:49 AM ET #55

    C'mon Bowl, show some love for Melania in those pictures!

         
    Reply
    C'mon Bowl, show some love for Melania in those pictures!

         
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Aug. 8, 2016 - 12:13 AM ET #56

    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    With all due respect to his memory, explain to me what qualifications Kyle has to determine whether or not a 55 gallon drum he came across has biological grade weapons? 

    I know he did a lot and learned a lot in his time in the Navy, I don't remember him becoming an expert in chemicals, specifically to be used as weapons, being one of them. 

    Stop with the red herring fallacy as well. I never called, or tried to call, Kyle an idiot. Questioning someones credentials isn't the same as calling them an idiot. 

    Keep ignoring the fact that I'm using the very source that you provided too. Keep deflecting from that one. 

      




    You don't get it and I'm not shocked. 

    You bring up the mutual site we sourced....my bold text speaks for itself in previous posts. It says, that Iraq had shown intent to maintain the ability and infrastructure to develop WMD's as soon as the attention was off of them.

    You didn't call Kyle an idiot directly...but saying he isn't qualified to tell the difference between chlorine, simple green and biological chemicals is basically calling him an idiot with the back of your hand. YOU, ME and everyone in this forum but Da Rel are smart enough to tell the difference. Only there are a small handful of us in here with the integrity to tell the truth. You. clearly have an ax to grind and showed that you can't see things objectively based on the Zimmerman experience...I digress.

    You reference things from my link but only give credence to information that YOU cherry picked while disregarding stuff that I quoted first....which can't be ignored....unless you have an ax to grind....I already digressed.....no sense in re-digressing.

    I guess sense you don't have an active relationship with common sense you require everyone to have proper credentials to give credence to the obvious.

    Do you need to have a plumber to tell you when your toilet is overflowing? Do you need to call the gas company to tell you that you have a gas leak?
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    With all due respect to his memory, explain to me what qualifications Kyle has to determine whether or not a 55 gallon drum he came across has biological grade weapons? 

    I know he did a lot and learned a lot in his time in the Navy, I don't remember him becoming an expert in chemicals, specifically to be used as weapons, being one of them. 

    Stop with the red herring fallacy as well. I never called, or tried to call, Kyle an idiot. Questioning someones credentials isn't the same as calling them an idiot. 

    Keep ignoring the fact that I'm using the very source that you provided too. Keep deflecting from that one. 

      




    You don't get it and I'm not shocked. 

    You bring up the mutual site we sourced....my bold text speaks for itself in previous posts. It says, that Iraq had shown intent to maintain the ability and infrastructure to develop WMD's as soon as the attention was off of them.

    You didn't call Kyle an idiot directly...but saying he isn't qualified to tell the difference between chlorine, simple green and biological chemicals is basically calling him an idiot with the back of your hand. YOU, ME and everyone in this forum but Da Rel are smart enough to tell the difference. Only there are a small handful of us in here with the integrity to tell the truth. You. clearly have an ax to grind and showed that you can't see things objectively based on the Zimmerman experience...I digress.

    You reference things from my link but only give credence to information that YOU cherry picked while disregarding stuff that I quoted first....which can't be ignored....unless you have an ax to grind....I already digressed.....no sense in re-digressing.

    I guess sense you don't have an active relationship with common sense you require everyone to have proper credentials to give credence to the obvious.

    Do you need to have a plumber to tell you when your toilet is overflowing? Do you need to call the gas company to tell you that you have a gas leak?
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Aug. 8, 2016 - 12:18 AM ET #57

    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

    I hope you know how to read mr KTRAIN

    Time for that tiny brain of yours to go to work.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

    Despite being unable to get a new resolution authorizing force and citing section 3 of the Joint Resolution passed by the U.S. Congress,[9] President George W. Bush asserted peaceful measures could not disarm Iraq of the weapons he alleged it to have and launched a second Gulf War. Later U.S.-led inspections found out that Iraq had earlier ceased active WMD production and stockpiling. The report also found that Iraq had worked covertly to maintain the intellectual and physical capacity to produce WMDs and intended to restart production once sanctions were lifted.[10]

    In 2015 it was learned that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction had not been fully accounted for by UN inspections.[11]Ten years after, Operation Avarice was declassified and it was learned that there were stockpiles of warheads and rockets containing degraded chemical agents similar to those used in the Iran-Iraq War. From 2005 through 2006 military intelligence discovered that the weapons—many in poor condition, some empty or containing nonlethal liquid, but others containing sarin with unexpectedly high purity—were in the possession of one Iraqi individual who remained anonymous. Operation Avarice, headed by army intelligence and the CIA, involved the discreet purchase of the weapons from the unidentified individual to keep them off the black market.


    Since you obviously missed it the first time I posted it. Must be that piss poor reading comprehension again. The Democrats didn't throw enough money at you to get your Reading comprehension scores up when you were in school. Maybe your teachers were underpaid....
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

    I hope you know how to read mr KTRAIN

    Time for that tiny brain of yours to go to work.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

    Despite being unable to get a new resolution authorizing force and citing section 3 of the Joint Resolution passed by the U.S. Congress,[9] President George W. Bush asserted peaceful measures could not disarm Iraq of the weapons he alleged it to have and launched a second Gulf War. Later U.S.-led inspections found out that Iraq had earlier ceased active WMD production and stockpiling. The report also found that Iraq had worked covertly to maintain the intellectual and physical capacity to produce WMDs and intended to restart production once sanctions were lifted.[10]

    In 2015 it was learned that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction had not been fully accounted for by UN inspections.[11]Ten years after, Operation Avarice was declassified and it was learned that there were stockpiles of warheads and rockets containing degraded chemical agents similar to those used in the Iran-Iraq War. From 2005 through 2006 military intelligence discovered that the weapons—many in poor condition, some empty or containing nonlethal liquid, but others containing sarin with unexpectedly high purity—were in the possession of one Iraqi individual who remained anonymous. Operation Avarice, headed by army intelligence and the CIA, involved the discreet purchase of the weapons from the unidentified individual to keep them off the black market.


    Since you obviously missed it the first time I posted it. Must be that piss poor reading comprehension again. The Democrats didn't throw enough money at you to get your Reading comprehension scores up when you were in school. Maybe your teachers were underpaid....
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Aug. 8, 2016 - 12:22 AM ET #58

    Since..not sense. meh
    Reply
    Since..not sense. meh
     
    Ktrain
    Ktrain
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 6580
    Posted: Aug. 8, 2016 - 11:58 AM ET #59

    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


    You don't get it and I'm not shocked. 

    You bring up the mutual site we sourced....my bold text speaks for itself in previous posts. It says, that Iraq had shown intent to maintain the ability and infrastructure to develop WMD's as soon as the attention was off of them.

    You didn't call Kyle an idiot directly...but saying he isn't qualified to tell the difference between chlorine, simple green and biological chemicals is basically calling him an idiot with the back of your hand. YOU, ME and everyone in this forum but Da Rel are smart enough to tell the difference. Only there are a small handful of us in here with the integrity to tell the truth. You. clearly have an ax to grind and showed that you can't see things objectively based on the Zimmerman experience...I digress.

    You reference things from my link but only give credence to information that YOU cherry picked while disregarding stuff that I quoted first....which can't be ignored....unless you have an ax to grind....I already digressed.....no sense in re-digressing.

    I guess sense you don't have an active relationship with common sense you require everyone to have proper credentials to give credence to the obvious.

    Do you need to have a plumber to tell you when your toilet is overflowing? Do you need to call the gas company to tell you that you have a gas leak?

    Speaking of plumbers, do you ever get nervous when the plumber comes to your place while the wifey is home alone? Do you get flashbacks of Bill with Monica and a cigar? 

    Let's go ahead and ask others of it's an insult to say that Kyle is unqualified to determine what a biological weapon is. He's also unqualified to fix a helicopter, is that insulting him too? To say someone is unqualified to perform a task or determine something isn't an insult. Your logic is beyond terrible. 

    You claim I'm insulting Kyle because you know he isn't qualified to determine what's a biological weapon and what isn't. You claim you read the book, which chapter did he say he became a scientist qualified to determine what is and is not a biological or chemical weapon? 

    Actually, I like this game. Let's play it some more. I was in Afghanistan in 2005-2006. I saw a 55 gallon drum. I heard from someone I deem to be a credible source that it was chemicals intended for use in weapons. Boom, now Afghanistan has weapons of mass destruction....and I was told it came from Bowlslit's house. We should invade and kill everyone. 

    I'm starting to warm up to your logic Bowl, there might be something to it! 

      

    Most of your last few posts are regurgitating the same two paragraphs, the only two paragraphs, from your source that helps your stance. The rest are just ad hom attacks about reading comprehension, which is really ironic since the rest of your own source contradicts your position in this argument.

    Anyways, this debate is getting kinda boring. I think it's time to move on unless you can provide something of substance other than those two paragraphs, which really aren't even that solid anyways, or some other war heroes that didn't even support Iraq either. 

    Especially if you aren't even going to address the pics of Melania.

        

     
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


    You don't get it and I'm not shocked. 

    You bring up the mutual site we sourced....my bold text speaks for itself in previous posts. It says, that Iraq had shown intent to maintain the ability and infrastructure to develop WMD's as soon as the attention was off of them.

    You didn't call Kyle an idiot directly...but saying he isn't qualified to tell the difference between chlorine, simple green and biological chemicals is basically calling him an idiot with the back of your hand. YOU, ME and everyone in this forum but Da Rel are smart enough to tell the difference. Only there are a small handful of us in here with the integrity to tell the truth. You. clearly have an ax to grind and showed that you can't see things objectively based on the Zimmerman experience...I digress.

    You reference things from my link but only give credence to information that YOU cherry picked while disregarding stuff that I quoted first....which can't be ignored....unless you have an ax to grind....I already digressed.....no sense in re-digressing.

    I guess sense you don't have an active relationship with common sense you require everyone to have proper credentials to give credence to the obvious.

    Do you need to have a plumber to tell you when your toilet is overflowing? Do you need to call the gas company to tell you that you have a gas leak?

    Speaking of plumbers, do you ever get nervous when the plumber comes to your place while the wifey is home alone? Do you get flashbacks of Bill with Monica and a cigar? 

    Let's go ahead and ask others of it's an insult to say that Kyle is unqualified to determine what a biological weapon is. He's also unqualified to fix a helicopter, is that insulting him too? To say someone is unqualified to perform a task or determine something isn't an insult. Your logic is beyond terrible. 

    You claim I'm insulting Kyle because you know he isn't qualified to determine what's a biological weapon and what isn't. You claim you read the book, which chapter did he say he became a scientist qualified to determine what is and is not a biological or chemical weapon? 

    Actually, I like this game. Let's play it some more. I was in Afghanistan in 2005-2006. I saw a 55 gallon drum. I heard from someone I deem to be a credible source that it was chemicals intended for use in weapons. Boom, now Afghanistan has weapons of mass destruction....and I was told it came from Bowlslit's house. We should invade and kill everyone. 

    I'm starting to warm up to your logic Bowl, there might be something to it! 

      

    Most of your last few posts are regurgitating the same two paragraphs, the only two paragraphs, from your source that helps your stance. The rest are just ad hom attacks about reading comprehension, which is really ironic since the rest of your own source contradicts your position in this argument.

    Anyways, this debate is getting kinda boring. I think it's time to move on unless you can provide something of substance other than those two paragraphs, which really aren't even that solid anyways, or some other war heroes that didn't even support Iraq either. 

    Especially if you aren't even going to address the pics of Melania.

        

     
     
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Aug. 8, 2016 - 6:32 PM ET #60

    Ktrain, many people could be smart enough to tell if a barrel of stuff in a 3rd world country is for cleaning windows or causing boils on ones skin or on cilia within the body. Correctly identifiing is not necessarily needed to know if you've got harmless shlt, bad shlt or extremely bad shlt. Maybe you aren't as observant as most...okay.

    I may not be qualified to work on a helicopter but I can probably give significant details about how to operate one and several flight controls. I could certainly be qualified to switch out landing gear or other minor tasks. 
    Reply
    Ktrain, many people could be smart enough to tell if a barrel of stuff in a 3rd world country is for cleaning windows or causing boils on ones skin or on cilia within the body. Correctly identifiing is not necessarily needed to know if you've got harmless shlt, bad shlt or extremely bad shlt. Maybe you aren't as observant as most...okay.

    I may not be qualified to work on a helicopter but I can probably give significant details about how to operate one and several flight controls. I could certainly be qualified to switch out landing gear or other minor tasks. 
    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 123

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Patriots vs Bears in-game live TNF 1,959
    • Thursday 10/22/2026 937
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 109,723
    • Thursday”s POD 2,892
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 27,074
    • Patriots@Bears discussion 3,645
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,674
    • Week 8 Money 7,856
    • Republicans push back against the lunatic Trump and his team of liars. 23,327
    • MLB World Series game 1: Keep Riding The Rays 1,157

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.