Took half my position at -165. I agree with Van that lots can happen between now and then, but my gut says it's more likely something on Trump's side that happens to send this thing back to the -300 range. His news conference today was so unhinged that I wonder how he'll hold up emotionally under the onslaught that's heading his way. He takes things very personally and that isn't attractive in a presidential aspirant. He looked pretty crazy. Add that to the math and this is a very attractive bet. BTW this thread is not so different from the Obama-Romney thread of 4 years ago. Emotions got out of control on Covers and wishful thinking ruled the day (remember "unskewed" polling?). Once the Dems coalesce behind Clinton, she should show a significant advantage over Trump (8% I'm guessing). That will change the betting odds considerably. Maybe we see better numbers after the GOP convention but I don't know. Of course, Trump has a chance to win. That's why it's called gambling, but I think Van's 10-1 shot is about right.
Presidential Election
Took half my position at -165. I agree with Van that lots can happen between now and then, but my gut says it's more likely something on Trump's side that happens to send this thing back to the -300 range. His news conference today was so unhinged that I wonder how he'll hold up emotionally under the onslaught that's heading his way. He takes things very personally and that isn't attractive in a presidential aspirant. He looked pretty crazy. Add that to the math and this is a very attractive bet. BTW this thread is not so different from the Obama-Romney thread of 4 years ago. Emotions got out of control on Covers and wishful thinking ruled the day (remember "unskewed" polling?). Once the Dems coalesce behind Clinton, she should show a significant advantage over Trump (8% I'm guessing). That will change the betting odds considerably. Maybe we see better numbers after the GOP convention but I don't know. Of course, Trump has a chance to win. That's why it's called gambling, but I think Van's 10-1 shot is about right.
Took half my position at -165. I agree with Van that lots can happen between now and then, but my gut says it's more likely something on Trump's side that happens to send this thing back to the -300 range. His news conference today was so unhinged that I wonder how he'll hold up emotionally under the onslaught that's heading his way. He takes things very personally and that isn't attractive in a presidential aspirant. He looked pretty crazy. Add that to the math and this is a very attractive bet. BTW this thread is not so different from the Obama-Romney thread of 4 years ago. Emotions got out of control on Covers and wishful thinking ruled the day (remember "unskewed" polling?). Once the Dems coalesce behind Clinton, she should show a significant advantage over Trump (8% I'm guessing). That will change the betting odds considerably. Maybe we see better numbers after the GOP convention but I don't know. Of course, Trump has a chance to win. That's why it's called gambling, but I think Van's 10-1 shot is about right.
Is this it? What happened to covers.... I have two bet's on the Republican VP - Marco Rubio +1200 and Newt Gingrich +3000. Marco Rubio because as we all know Florida is a huge swing state and he is going to need the Hispanic vote and Newt Gingrich because Trump estimates he needs 1 billion in funding. Most of the Republican Party's wealthiest contributor's (Koch brother's and other's) are focusing on the smaller election's (senate and house nominations) and are not going to be contributing $$$ to the presidency. Rumor has it Sheldon Adelson would be willing to give north of $100 million to the Trump campaign -- in 2012 Adelson was a major benefactor of Newt. Newt would be adding some legitimacy + much needed $$$'s.
Good luck Vanzack! I have Hillary at -150 earlier this year.
Is this it? What happened to covers.... I have two bet's on the Republican VP - Marco Rubio +1200 and Newt Gingrich +3000. Marco Rubio because as we all know Florida is a huge swing state and he is going to need the Hispanic vote and Newt Gingrich because Trump estimates he needs 1 billion in funding. Most of the Republican Party's wealthiest contributor's (Koch brother's and other's) are focusing on the smaller election's (senate and house nominations) and are not going to be contributing $$$ to the presidency. Rumor has it Sheldon Adelson would be willing to give north of $100 million to the Trump campaign -- in 2012 Adelson was a major benefactor of Newt. Newt would be adding some legitimacy + much needed $$$'s.
Good luck Vanzack! I have Hillary at -150 earlier this year.
In the hours after the FBI report is made public I think you will have a shot at HRC +1000 before she is taken off the board
Yup yup. That's why Demos trying to capitalize now on Trump U case. Bernie will get destroyed (tho he has a progressive following that's gaining momentum). Indictment coming--I trust our fabled institutions to do this.
In the hours after the FBI report is made public I think you will have a shot at HRC +1000 before she is taken off the board
Yup yup. That's why Demos trying to capitalize now on Trump U case. Bernie will get destroyed (tho he has a progressive following that's gaining momentum). Indictment coming--I trust our fabled institutions to do this.
Yup yup. That's why Demos trying to capitalize now on Trump U case. Bernie will get destroyed (tho he has a progressive following that's gaining momentum). Indictment coming--I trust our fabled institutions to do this.
It's pretty asinine for the GOP or any GOP supporter to desire an indictment before the convention.
If that happens, clearly Hillary's delegates would have to jump ship and nominate Bernie.
And there isn't a single poll that has Trump beating Bernie. Not one.
You'd be sealing your own fate if it happened.
Yup yup. That's why Demos trying to capitalize now on Trump U case. Bernie will get destroyed (tho he has a progressive following that's gaining momentum). Indictment coming--I trust our fabled institutions to do this.
It's pretty asinine for the GOP or any GOP supporter to desire an indictment before the convention.
If that happens, clearly Hillary's delegates would have to jump ship and nominate Bernie.
And there isn't a single poll that has Trump beating Bernie. Not one.
You'd be sealing your own fate if it happened.
It's pretty asinine for the GOP or any GOP supporter to desire an indictment before the convention.
If that happens, clearly Hillary's delegates would have to jump ship and nominate Bernie.
And there isn't a single poll that has Trump beating Bernie. Not one.
You'd be sealing your own fate if it happened.
It's pretty asinine for the GOP or any GOP supporter to desire an indictment before the convention.
If that happens, clearly Hillary's delegates would have to jump ship and nominate Bernie.
And there isn't a single poll that has Trump beating Bernie. Not one.
You'd be sealing your own fate if it happened.
Clinton now at -200 after the Hillary takedown on 6/2.
now -220. the speech definitely effected the betting markets. for the short term at least.
Clinton now at -200 after the Hillary takedown on 6/2.
now -220. the speech definitely effected the betting markets. for the short term at least.
Yup yup. That's why Demos trying to capitalize now on Trump U case. Bernie will get destroyed (tho he has a progressive following that's gaining momentum). Indictment coming--I trust our fabled institutions to do this.
It's pretty asinine for the GOP or any GOP supporter to desire an indictment before the convention.
If that happens, clearly Hillary's delegates would have to jump ship and nominate Bernie.
And there isn't a single poll that has Trump beating Bernie. Not one.
You'd be sealing your own fate if it happened.
Can't see a socialist beating Trump. Can't say I've seen a poll. Only probability index has Trump 90% to beat Bernie. "Sealing my own fate"? My god how melodramatic!
Yup yup. That's why Demos trying to capitalize now on Trump U case. Bernie will get destroyed (tho he has a progressive following that's gaining momentum). Indictment coming--I trust our fabled institutions to do this.
It's pretty asinine for the GOP or any GOP supporter to desire an indictment before the convention.
If that happens, clearly Hillary's delegates would have to jump ship and nominate Bernie.
And there isn't a single poll that has Trump beating Bernie. Not one.
You'd be sealing your own fate if it happened.
Can't see a socialist beating Trump. Can't say I've seen a poll. Only probability index has Trump 90% to beat Bernie. "Sealing my own fate"? My god how melodramatic!
now -220. the speech definitely effected the betting markets. for the short term at least.
now -250 in what had to be the most inept week of presidential campaigning in the history of the republic. -300 soon?
now -220. the speech definitely effected the betting markets. for the short term at least.
now -250 in what had to be the most inept week of presidential campaigning in the history of the republic. -300 soon?
Im still on the sidelines. Waiting for Rep convention. Then I will be betting Clinton.
van:
Much respect for your analytical and thorough approach to these opportunities. Any thoughts you can share as to the odds you see for a Hillary indictment ? If she is indicted, do you think she'd try to stay in the race ? Thanks very much.
Im still on the sidelines. Waiting for Rep convention. Then I will be betting Clinton.
van:
Much respect for your analytical and thorough approach to these opportunities. Any thoughts you can share as to the odds you see for a Hillary indictment ? If she is indicted, do you think she'd try to stay in the race ? Thanks very much.
now -250 in what had to be the most inept week of presidential campaigning in the history of the republic. -300 soon?
off the board at Sportsbook.
-290 at BetOnline
-340 at Bovada
what a week for Clinton.
now -250 in what had to be the most inept week of presidential campaigning in the history of the republic. -300 soon?
off the board at Sportsbook.
-290 at BetOnline
-340 at Bovada
what a week for Clinton.
off the board at Sportsbook.
-290 at BetOnline
-340 at Bovada
what a week for Clinton.
off the board at Sportsbook.
-290 at BetOnline
-340 at Bovada
what a week for Clinton.
Hey, buddy! How the heck are you? Liking my -165. At least for now. Maybe take another bite after the GOP convention unless it's too expensive. Trump coming apart in the meantime.
Hey, buddy! How the heck are you? Liking my -165. At least for now. Maybe take another bite after the GOP convention unless it's too expensive. Trump coming apart in the meantime.
Hey, buddy! How the heck are you? Liking my -165. At least for now. Maybe take another bite after the GOP convention unless it's too expensive. Trump coming apart in the meantime.
Hey, buddy! How the heck are you? Liking my -165. At least for now. Maybe take another bite after the GOP convention unless it's too expensive. Trump coming apart in the meantime.
Trump had the worst week of any candidate since the Dukakis tank incident. maybe since the dan quayle/lloyd benson debate. let's see what the polls do. could go to -400
Trump had the worst week of any candidate since the Dukakis tank incident. maybe since the dan quayle/lloyd benson debate. let's see what the polls do. could go to -400
Judging by these tweets, you clinton backers are feeling pretty giddy.
Judging by these tweets, you clinton backers are feeling pretty giddy.
I agree that this is, and should be, about gambling. That means VALUE. For instance, the Cleveland NBA series line before the series began was at +185. They are now at +600. Why ? All GS has done is hold serve-----home court victories. Do I think the Cavaliers win it all ? Probably not. But what is the right price ? I think that 6-1 is generous on the Cavaliers. What price would you take on Trump to see it as good value ?
I agree that this is, and should be, about gambling. That means VALUE. For instance, the Cleveland NBA series line before the series began was at +185. They are now at +600. Why ? All GS has done is hold serve-----home court victories. Do I think the Cavaliers win it all ? Probably not. But what is the right price ? I think that 6-1 is generous on the Cavaliers. What price would you take on Trump to see it as good value ?
I agree that this is, and should be, about gambling. That means VALUE. For instance, the Cleveland NBA series line before the series began was at +185. They are now at +600. Why ? All GS has done is hold serve-----home court victories. Do I think the Cavaliers win it all ? Probably not. But what is the right price ? I think that 6-1 is generous on the Cavaliers. What price would you take on Trump to see it as good value ?
I agree that this is, and should be, about gambling. That means VALUE. For instance, the Cleveland NBA series line before the series began was at +185. They are now at +600. Why ? All GS has done is hold serve-----home court victories. Do I think the Cavaliers win it all ? Probably not. But what is the right price ? I think that 6-1 is generous on the Cavaliers. What price would you take on Trump to see it as good value ?
Appreciate the reply.
Currently, both my books are at 220/180, although interestingly enough, they no longer offer Clinton versus Trump. They both offer only Democrat versus Republican. I just wonder whether this is hedging the possibility of an indictment.
Appreciate the reply.
Currently, both my books are at 220/180, although interestingly enough, they no longer offer Clinton versus Trump. They both offer only Democrat versus Republican. I just wonder whether this is hedging the possibility of an indictment.
Appreciate the reply.
Currently, both my books are at 220/180, although interestingly enough, they no longer offer Clinton versus Trump. They both offer only Democrat versus Republican. I just wonder whether this is hedging the possibility of an indictment.
Appreciate the reply.
Currently, both my books are at 220/180, although interestingly enough, they no longer offer Clinton versus Trump. They both offer only Democrat versus Republican. I just wonder whether this is hedging the possibility of an indictment.
i would say the odds of a dem administration indicting the dem nominee probably aren't much, if any, different from a republican administration doing it.
i would say the odds of a dem administration indicting the dem nominee probably aren't much, if any, different from a republican administration doing it.
Hot Forum Topics
- Thursday 10/22/2026 936
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,953
- Patriots vs Bears in-game live TNF 1,954
- NFL LOCKED IN! 109,720
- Thursday”s POD 2,786
- Patriots@Bears discussion 3,641
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 27,062
- Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,661
- Week 8 Money 7,555
- Republicans push back against the lunatic Trump and his team of liars. 23,327
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
