• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 7
      NFL Week 7
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    Obama prisoner exchange for Bergdahl

    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»
    MoneySRH
    rick3117
    SarasotaSlim
    Raiders22
    Killer_B
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 4605
    Posts: 82
    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2014 - 7:23 PM ET #51

    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

    There could be a third motive....and the one I support ....President Obama did the swap at this point in time,in an  attempt to gain back the support of Military men/women and their family's after the latest development in the mounting scandal surrounding the Department for Veterans Affairs..

    Oh, brother, Wow… that’s stupid. Let me see… the president thought… Hey, guys I’ve got a plan. Let’s throw logic out the damn window and let five terrorists go free to commit terrorist acts so I can get the military to love me.

    SMH, my eyes are burning... unbelievable
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

    There could be a third motive....and the one I support ....President Obama did the swap at this point in time,in an  attempt to gain back the support of Military men/women and their family's after the latest development in the mounting scandal surrounding the Department for Veterans Affairs..

    Oh, brother, Wow… that’s stupid. Let me see… the president thought… Hey, guys I’ve got a plan. Let’s throw logic out the damn window and let five terrorists go free to commit terrorist acts so I can get the military to love me.

    SMH, my eyes are burning... unbelievable
     
    rick3117
    rick3117
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2006
    Posts: 14715
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2014 - 8:46 AM ET #52

    A little more logical than your 007/ jack Bauer Bull$hit.


    But you know some beat cop, so I am sure you know more than we do. Lol
    Reply
    A little more logical than your 007/ jack Bauer Bull$hit.


    But you know some beat cop, so I am sure you know more than we do. Lol
     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35543
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2014 - 11:02 AM ET #53

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Oh, brother, Wow… that’s stupid. Let me see… the president thought… Hey, guys I’ve got a plan. Let’s throw logic out the damn window and let five terrorists go free to commit terrorist acts so I can get the military to love me.

    SMH, my eyes are burning... unbelievable


    Red Eyes ...listen and learn.

    The Swap was only the latest in a series of PR events staged by Obama and the Obama administration since it was reviled that Vets were dying because of a Veterans waiting list and that records were falsified to hide the facts.

    Try to follow the sequence of events ..

    1.) Obama's chief of staff went on TV say the president was "madder than hell" about the scandal and would get to the bottom of it.

    2.) Five days later, on the Friday before the Memorial Day weekend, and attention on veterans saturating the news media, Obama held a news conference and VOWED  "Anybody found to have manipulated or falsified records at VA facilities has to be held accountable."

    3.)The next day, a Saturday, in an apparent effort to shift attention to something more positive with regard to veterans, Obama stepped into the Rose Garden to announce  that the U.S. combat role in Afghanistan would end this year. Such announcements are rarely made on Saturdays, signaling White House worry about the VA scandal.

    4.) On Sunday, Obama made a surprise visit to Afghanistan where he was photographed surrounded by cheering American troops.

    Oh-Bama Oh-bama

    5.)The next day, Memorial Day, the president used his traditional speech at Arlington Cemetery to reiterate  that the war in Afghanistan is coming to an end. More photos in the midst of veterans and their families.

    6) A day later, he was off to West Point . And again, surrounded by uniformed military, Obama delivered a commencement speechthat outlined his revised foreign policy. It was widely panned for being rambling and incoherent.

    7.) He followed that up last Saturday with what the PR gurus must have thought was a stroke of genius. Obama announced , again in the Rose Garden, that he secured the freedom of the only U.S. soldier held by the Taliban in exchange for five high-level Taliban terrorists held at Guantanamo.

    With the soldier's parents beside him, it made good first-day headlines and pictures....sourcing from USA Today..

    Now even you Money... are smart enough to see how the Swap was just another PR move to put Obama in good light with the Americans in general and the Military men /women and their families in particular...and skipping Congress to do this.. to give all the credit for securing the release to Barack Obama hmmmmm hmmm hmmm.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Oh, brother, Wow… that’s stupid. Let me see… the president thought… Hey, guys I’ve got a plan. Let’s throw logic out the damn window and let five terrorists go free to commit terrorist acts so I can get the military to love me.

    SMH, my eyes are burning... unbelievable


    Red Eyes ...listen and learn.

    The Swap was only the latest in a series of PR events staged by Obama and the Obama administration since it was reviled that Vets were dying because of a Veterans waiting list and that records were falsified to hide the facts.

    Try to follow the sequence of events ..

    1.) Obama's chief of staff went on TV say the president was "madder than hell" about the scandal and would get to the bottom of it.

    2.) Five days later, on the Friday before the Memorial Day weekend, and attention on veterans saturating the news media, Obama held a news conference and VOWED  "Anybody found to have manipulated or falsified records at VA facilities has to be held accountable."

    3.)The next day, a Saturday, in an apparent effort to shift attention to something more positive with regard to veterans, Obama stepped into the Rose Garden to announce  that the U.S. combat role in Afghanistan would end this year. Such announcements are rarely made on Saturdays, signaling White House worry about the VA scandal.

    4.) On Sunday, Obama made a surprise visit to Afghanistan where he was photographed surrounded by cheering American troops.

    Oh-Bama Oh-bama

    5.)The next day, Memorial Day, the president used his traditional speech at Arlington Cemetery to reiterate  that the war in Afghanistan is coming to an end. More photos in the midst of veterans and their families.

    6) A day later, he was off to West Point . And again, surrounded by uniformed military, Obama delivered a commencement speechthat outlined his revised foreign policy. It was widely panned for being rambling and incoherent.

    7.) He followed that up last Saturday with what the PR gurus must have thought was a stroke of genius. Obama announced , again in the Rose Garden, that he secured the freedom of the only U.S. soldier held by the Taliban in exchange for five high-level Taliban terrorists held at Guantanamo.

    With the soldier's parents beside him, it made good first-day headlines and pictures....sourcing from USA Today..

    Now even you Money... are smart enough to see how the Swap was just another PR move to put Obama in good light with the Americans in general and the Military men /women and their families in particular...and skipping Congress to do this.. to give all the credit for securing the release to Barack Obama hmmmmm hmmm hmmm.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34802
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2014 - 11:34 AM ET #54

    Slim---you sure seeing some conspiracy there I think.   I feel you giving this administration heap of deep-thinking and planning.  You seen a lot of that thus far on other issues or just now they getting their act together on how to do this?
    Reply
    Slim---you sure seeing some conspiracy there I think.   I feel you giving this administration heap of deep-thinking and planning.  You seen a lot of that thus far on other issues or just now they getting their act together on how to do this?
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2014 - 1:35 PM ET #55

    Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:

    A little more logical than your 007/ jack Bauer Bull$hit.


    But you know some beat cop, so I am sure you know more than we do. Lol
    John Kerry just talked to CNN's Elise Labott…

    LABOTT:  I mean, tell me about that. And on a scale of one to 10, 10 being the most confident, how confident are you that the Qataris are going to be able to keep a close eye on these guys?

    KERRY: Well, they're not the only ones keeping an eye on them.

    LABOTT: The U.S. is going to be monitoring them?

    KERRY: I'm just telling you they aren't the only ones keeping an eye on them. And we have confidence in those requirements. And if they're violated, then we have ability to be able to do things. I'm not...

    LABOTT: What kind of things?

    KERRY: I'm not - Elise, I'm not telling you that they don't have some ability at some point to go back and get involved. But they also have an ability to get killed doing that. And I don't think anybody should doubt the capacity of the United States of America to protect Americans, nobody.

    LABOTT: Meaning you would kill them?

    KERRY: No one should doubt the capacity of America to protect Americans.

    And the president has always said he will do whatever is necessary in order to protect the United States of America. So, these guys pick a fight with us in the future or now or at any time at enormous risk. And we have proven what we're capable of doing with al Qaeda - let me just finish - with al Qaeda, the core al Qaeda in West Pakistan, Afghanistan.


    ... Only a naive idiot would believe that the NSA and the president of the freaking United States would risk thousands of innocent lives for a stupid PR stunt. The US military command center is watching those five terrorists...
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:

    A little more logical than your 007/ jack Bauer Bull$hit.


    But you know some beat cop, so I am sure you know more than we do. Lol
    John Kerry just talked to CNN's Elise Labott…

    LABOTT:  I mean, tell me about that. And on a scale of one to 10, 10 being the most confident, how confident are you that the Qataris are going to be able to keep a close eye on these guys?

    KERRY: Well, they're not the only ones keeping an eye on them.

    LABOTT: The U.S. is going to be monitoring them?

    KERRY: I'm just telling you they aren't the only ones keeping an eye on them. And we have confidence in those requirements. And if they're violated, then we have ability to be able to do things. I'm not...

    LABOTT: What kind of things?

    KERRY: I'm not - Elise, I'm not telling you that they don't have some ability at some point to go back and get involved. But they also have an ability to get killed doing that. And I don't think anybody should doubt the capacity of the United States of America to protect Americans, nobody.

    LABOTT: Meaning you would kill them?

    KERRY: No one should doubt the capacity of America to protect Americans.

    And the president has always said he will do whatever is necessary in order to protect the United States of America. So, these guys pick a fight with us in the future or now or at any time at enormous risk. And we have proven what we're capable of doing with al Qaeda - let me just finish - with al Qaeda, the core al Qaeda in West Pakistan, Afghanistan.


    ... Only a naive idiot would believe that the NSA and the president of the freaking United States would risk thousands of innocent lives for a stupid PR stunt. The US military command center is watching those five terrorists...
     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35543
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2014 - 2:40 PM ET #56

    In an interview recorded in France and aired on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry said
    in regards to questions relating to Bergdahl's disappearance"there is plenty of time to sort through what happened now that Bergdahl is safe from enemy hands."

    When asked questions relating to Bergdahl's disappearance – Kerry said there is plenty of time to sort through what happened now that Bergdahl is safe from enemy hands.

    It would have been, he said, "offensive and incomprehensible to consciously leave an American behind … in the hands of people who would torture him, cut off his head." cut off his ears, tape wires from portable telephones to his genitals and turn up the power, cut off limbs, in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan....

    Reply

    In an interview recorded in France and aired on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry said
    in regards to questions relating to Bergdahl's disappearance"there is plenty of time to sort through what happened now that Bergdahl is safe from enemy hands."

    When asked questions relating to Bergdahl's disappearance – Kerry said there is plenty of time to sort through what happened now that Bergdahl is safe from enemy hands.

    It would have been, he said, "offensive and incomprehensible to consciously leave an American behind … in the hands of people who would torture him, cut off his head." cut off his ears, tape wires from portable telephones to his genitals and turn up the power, cut off limbs, in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan....

     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2014 - 3:59 PM ET #57

    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

    In an interview recorded in France and aired on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry said
    in regards to questions relating to Bergdahl's disappearance"there is plenty of time to sort through what happened now that Bergdahl is safe from enemy hands."

    When asked questions relating to Bergdahl's disappearance – Kerry said there is plenty of time to sort through what happened now that Bergdahl is safe from enemy hands.

    It would have been, he said, "offensive and incomprehensible to consciously leave an American behind … in the hands of people who would torture him, cut off his head." cut off his ears, tape wires from portable telephones to his genitals and turn up the power, cut off limbs, in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan....

    Well... which is it?

    #1. Obama did an honorable thing for an American soldier and his family?

    Or

    #2. The NSA and the president executed an illegal rouge operation for PR purposes and naively let five dangerous terrorists walk free with no consideration of the consequences to close GITMO for Obama’s legacy?


    ... I believe the NSA and the president of the United States devised a plan of action. Bring the soldier home to own up to his actions and keep a REALLY close eye on him. Let the five terrorists go and gather intelligence on them… kill’em when the time comes...


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

    In an interview recorded in France and aired on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry said
    in regards to questions relating to Bergdahl's disappearance"there is plenty of time to sort through what happened now that Bergdahl is safe from enemy hands."

    When asked questions relating to Bergdahl's disappearance – Kerry said there is plenty of time to sort through what happened now that Bergdahl is safe from enemy hands.

    It would have been, he said, "offensive and incomprehensible to consciously leave an American behind … in the hands of people who would torture him, cut off his head." cut off his ears, tape wires from portable telephones to his genitals and turn up the power, cut off limbs, in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan....

    Well... which is it?

    #1. Obama did an honorable thing for an American soldier and his family?

    Or

    #2. The NSA and the president executed an illegal rouge operation for PR purposes and naively let five dangerous terrorists walk free with no consideration of the consequences to close GITMO for Obama’s legacy?


    ... I believe the NSA and the president of the United States devised a plan of action. Bring the soldier home to own up to his actions and keep a REALLY close eye on him. Let the five terrorists go and gather intelligence on them… kill’em when the time comes...


     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35543
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2014 - 6:37 PM ET #58

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Well... which is it?

    #1. Obama did an honorable thing for an American soldier and his family?

    Or

    #2. The NSA and the president executed an illegal rouge operation for PR purposes and naively let five dangerous terrorists walk free with no consideration of the consequences to close GITMO for Obama’s legacy?


    ... I believe the NSA and the president of the United States devised a plan of action. Bring the soldier home to own up to his actions and keep a REALLY close eye on him. Let the five terrorists go and gather intelligence on them… kill’em when the time comes...


    None of the above ..it's the last paragraph #53..

    Wait awhile and it will come out that millions of $$$$ were given to the Haqqani Network to take these washed up fmr.commanders ...they were offered these same 5 ..a year and a half ago for Bergdahl and they didn't take the trade..they don't need or want them ..what they do need and want is money ...and I believe they got it this time..

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Well... which is it?

    #1. Obama did an honorable thing for an American soldier and his family?

    Or

    #2. The NSA and the president executed an illegal rouge operation for PR purposes and naively let five dangerous terrorists walk free with no consideration of the consequences to close GITMO for Obama’s legacy?


    ... I believe the NSA and the president of the United States devised a plan of action. Bring the soldier home to own up to his actions and keep a REALLY close eye on him. Let the five terrorists go and gather intelligence on them… kill’em when the time comes...


    None of the above ..it's the last paragraph #53..

    Wait awhile and it will come out that millions of $$$$ were given to the Haqqani Network to take these washed up fmr.commanders ...they were offered these same 5 ..a year and a half ago for Bergdahl and they didn't take the trade..they don't need or want them ..what they do need and want is money ...and I believe they got it this time..

     
    rick3117
    rick3117
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2006
    Posts: 14715
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2014 - 7:21 PM ET #59

    I think that the U.S. trust the Qataris too much.

    I think that we would drone them if the re-enter the fight, I never said we wouldn't, that is plausible.

    I do not however, believe that they were let go to get higher ups.
    Reply
    I think that the U.S. trust the Qataris too much.

    I think that we would drone them if the re-enter the fight, I never said we wouldn't, that is plausible.

    I do not however, believe that they were let go to get higher ups.
     
    Killer_B
    Killer_B
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 6295
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2014 - 8:14 PM ET #60

    I love the fact that you lefties actually believe a government that can't even keep it's vets in good health with reasonable medical appointments is shrewd enough to let 5 Taliban leaders to go a country that is more or less sympathetic and likely supportive of their ideology and we have some upper hand in this situation.

    You guys kill me... 

    This is the most compelling reason that the POTUS is unqualified and likely subject to prosecution for this rogue insane move...

    Once again, they put Rice out there to parrot some message and it blows up in their faces. The difference here is (which I'm happy about) is this thing is far from over unlike Bengazi was an ended event. Now we get to watch if the military tries this obvious deserter and if we ever learn of the 5 "detainees" activities going forward. Certainly, the Taliban would love to rub our faces in this if these cavemen rise to be public leaders. 

    How stupid IS OUR "LEADERSHIP" to put themselves and US in game?

    Everyone should still be where they were a week ago. The deserter should remain where he PUT HIMSELF and the Taliban cavemen should be rotting at GITMO until the last soldier leaves Afghanistan. What's wrong with this scenario? Please lefties tell me, what's wrong with it?
    Reply
    I love the fact that you lefties actually believe a government that can't even keep it's vets in good health with reasonable medical appointments is shrewd enough to let 5 Taliban leaders to go a country that is more or less sympathetic and likely supportive of their ideology and we have some upper hand in this situation.

    You guys kill me... 

    This is the most compelling reason that the POTUS is unqualified and likely subject to prosecution for this rogue insane move...

    Once again, they put Rice out there to parrot some message and it blows up in their faces. The difference here is (which I'm happy about) is this thing is far from over unlike Bengazi was an ended event. Now we get to watch if the military tries this obvious deserter and if we ever learn of the 5 "detainees" activities going forward. Certainly, the Taliban would love to rub our faces in this if these cavemen rise to be public leaders. 

    How stupid IS OUR "LEADERSHIP" to put themselves and US in game?

    Everyone should still be where they were a week ago. The deserter should remain where he PUT HIMSELF and the Taliban cavemen should be rotting at GITMO until the last soldier leaves Afghanistan. What's wrong with this scenario? Please lefties tell me, what's wrong with it?
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2014 - 9:29 PM ET #61

    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

    None of the above ..it's the last paragraph #53..

    Wait awhile and it will come out that millions of $$$$ were given to the Haqqani Network to take these washed up fmr.commanders ...they were offered these same 5 ..a year and a half ago for Bergdahl and they didn't take the trade..they don't need or want them ..what they do need and want is money ...and I believe they got it this time..

    SS, Not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you? That would be number 2. LOL!

    First you say it was a PR stunt. Then, you go and post Kerry’s position on Bergdahl on post #56 to try and show that the president naively accepted the trade for honorable reasons with no consideration of the possible consequences. Now, you say, again, that it was a PR stunt but answer none of the above. LOL!

    Rick, the president is either naive or he's not. Stop waffling on your position. The president did this to get higher ups or to just to kill as many terrorists as possible. I don't see how it makes a difference.

    All I know is this was a devised plan. I’m not an Obama supporter, but I respect the president enough to know it wasn’t a stupid PR stunt.

    Killer_B, who are the lefties on covers? The only one that I’m aware of is Don Juan.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

    None of the above ..it's the last paragraph #53..

    Wait awhile and it will come out that millions of $$$$ were given to the Haqqani Network to take these washed up fmr.commanders ...they were offered these same 5 ..a year and a half ago for Bergdahl and they didn't take the trade..they don't need or want them ..what they do need and want is money ...and I believe they got it this time..

    SS, Not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you? That would be number 2. LOL!

    First you say it was a PR stunt. Then, you go and post Kerry’s position on Bergdahl on post #56 to try and show that the president naively accepted the trade for honorable reasons with no consideration of the possible consequences. Now, you say, again, that it was a PR stunt but answer none of the above. LOL!

    Rick, the president is either naive or he's not. Stop waffling on your position. The president did this to get higher ups or to just to kill as many terrorists as possible. I don't see how it makes a difference.

    All I know is this was a devised plan. I’m not an Obama supporter, but I respect the president enough to know it wasn’t a stupid PR stunt.

    Killer_B, who are the lefties on covers? The only one that I’m aware of is Don Juan.


     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35543
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2014 - 11:24 PM ET #62

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

     SS, Not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you? That would be number 2. LOL!



    No it is not ..you are the one saying the president executed an illegal rouge operation for PR purposes ..I did not ..I contend it was a scandal- deversion..


    ..and I did not say anything about Obama's legacy for closing Gitmo..you are making stuff up and it makes you look pretty weak having to do that ...


    Money you say you are not a liberal ,,but you resort to name calling and demeaning and disrespectful comments when you are in a pinch ...just like a lib..


    Two years ago when you first came into this forum... when no one wanted to talk to you.... I stepped up and we had a discussion about Derrick Bell ..remember ?


    At that time you said to me ....quote.."Thanks for responding SS, although we disagree, I want to keep the political debate as civil and respectful as possible. I enjoy seeing a different point of view and trying to learn from it."


    Well, MoneySRH ...were you lying then or are you a just a hypocrite?

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

     SS, Not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you? That would be number 2. LOL!



    No it is not ..you are the one saying the president executed an illegal rouge operation for PR purposes ..I did not ..I contend it was a scandal- deversion..


    ..and I did not say anything about Obama's legacy for closing Gitmo..you are making stuff up and it makes you look pretty weak having to do that ...


    Money you say you are not a liberal ,,but you resort to name calling and demeaning and disrespectful comments when you are in a pinch ...just like a lib..


    Two years ago when you first came into this forum... when no one wanted to talk to you.... I stepped up and we had a discussion about Derrick Bell ..remember ?


    At that time you said to me ....quote.."Thanks for responding SS, although we disagree, I want to keep the political debate as civil and respectful as possible. I enjoy seeing a different point of view and trying to learn from it."


    Well, MoneySRH ...were you lying then or are you a just a hypocrite?

     
    Killer_B
    Killer_B
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 6295
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2014 - 12:04 AM ET #63

    Anyone that defends this administration on its countless acts of b.s. is a lefty. They know who they are, they support every move he's made. This trade is indefensible if the facts are what they appear to be. His teammates seem a million more times honorable than Susan Rice & the gang behind her. 

    I'll put my chips on their claim that he inquired about the "what if's" regarding his equipment, he sent emails more or less regarding his hatred for the American military and deserted his fellow soldiers with possibly several dying trying to find his deserting behind. If any of this is incorrect in the end, I'll come on here and apologize.

    Now, I ask again for the Obama supporters to explain to me how they support HIS decision to make this trade.
    Reply
    Anyone that defends this administration on its countless acts of b.s. is a lefty. They know who they are, they support every move he's made. This trade is indefensible if the facts are what they appear to be. His teammates seem a million more times honorable than Susan Rice & the gang behind her. 

    I'll put my chips on their claim that he inquired about the "what if's" regarding his equipment, he sent emails more or less regarding his hatred for the American military and deserted his fellow soldiers with possibly several dying trying to find his deserting behind. If any of this is incorrect in the end, I'll come on here and apologize.

    Now, I ask again for the Obama supporters to explain to me how they support HIS decision to make this trade.
     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2014 - 12:15 AM ET #64

    "The future is too good to waste on lies," Bowe wrote. "And life is way too short to care for the damnation of others, as well as to spend it helping fools with their ideas that are wrong. I have seen their ideas and I am ashamed to even be american. The horror of the self-righteous arrogance that they thrive in. It is all revolting."

    The e-mail went on to list a series of complaints: Three good sergeants, Bowe said, had been forced to move to another company, and "one of the biggest garbage bags is being put in charge of the team." His battalion commander was a "conceited old fool." The military system itself was broken: "In the US army you are cut down for being honest... but if you are a conceited brown nosing garbage bag you will be allowed to do what ever you want, and you will be handed your higher rank... The system is wrong. I am ashamed to be an american. And the title of US soldier is just the lie of fools." The soldiers he actually admired were planning on leaving: "The US army is the biggest joke the world has to laugh at. It is the army of liars, backstabbers, fools, and bullies. The few good SGTs are getting out as soon as they can, and they are telling us privates to do the same."

    In the second-to-last paragraph of the e-mail, Bowe wrote about his broader disgust with America's approach to the war--an effort, on the ground, that seemed to represent the exact opposite of the kind of concerted campaign to win the "hearts and minds" of average Afghans envisioned by counterinsurgency strategists. "I am sorry for everything here," Bowe told his parents. "These people need help, yet what they get is the most conceited country in the world telling them that they are nothing and that they are stupid, that they have no idea how to live." He then referred to what his parents believe may have been a formative, possibly traumatic event: seeing an Afghan child run over by an MRAP. "We don't even care when we hear each other talk about running their children down in the dirt streets with our armored trucks... We make fun of them in front of their faces, and laugh at them for not understanding we are insulting them."

    Bowe concluded his e-mail with what, in another context, might read as a suicide note. "I am sorry for everything," he wrote. "The horror that is america is disgusting."

    Reply

    "The future is too good to waste on lies," Bowe wrote. "And life is way too short to care for the damnation of others, as well as to spend it helping fools with their ideas that are wrong. I have seen their ideas and I am ashamed to even be american. The horror of the self-righteous arrogance that they thrive in. It is all revolting."

    The e-mail went on to list a series of complaints: Three good sergeants, Bowe said, had been forced to move to another company, and "one of the biggest garbage bags is being put in charge of the team." His battalion commander was a "conceited old fool." The military system itself was broken: "In the US army you are cut down for being honest... but if you are a conceited brown nosing garbage bag you will be allowed to do what ever you want, and you will be handed your higher rank... The system is wrong. I am ashamed to be an american. And the title of US soldier is just the lie of fools." The soldiers he actually admired were planning on leaving: "The US army is the biggest joke the world has to laugh at. It is the army of liars, backstabbers, fools, and bullies. The few good SGTs are getting out as soon as they can, and they are telling us privates to do the same."

    In the second-to-last paragraph of the e-mail, Bowe wrote about his broader disgust with America's approach to the war--an effort, on the ground, that seemed to represent the exact opposite of the kind of concerted campaign to win the "hearts and minds" of average Afghans envisioned by counterinsurgency strategists. "I am sorry for everything here," Bowe told his parents. "These people need help, yet what they get is the most conceited country in the world telling them that they are nothing and that they are stupid, that they have no idea how to live." He then referred to what his parents believe may have been a formative, possibly traumatic event: seeing an Afghan child run over by an MRAP. "We don't even care when we hear each other talk about running their children down in the dirt streets with our armored trucks... We make fun of them in front of their faces, and laugh at them for not understanding we are insulting them."

    Bowe concluded his e-mail with what, in another context, might read as a suicide note. "I am sorry for everything," he wrote. "The horror that is america is disgusting."

     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35543
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2014 - 12:32 AM ET #65

    Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:

    Anyone that defends this administration on its countless acts of b.s. is a lefty. They know who they are, they support every move he's made. This trade is indefensible if the facts are what they appear to be. His teammates seem a million more times honorable than Susan Rice & the gang behind her. 

    I'll put my chips on their claim that he inquired about the "what if's" regarding his equipment, he sent emails more or less regarding his hatred for the American military and deserted his fellow soldiers with possibly several dying trying to find his deserting behind. If any of this is incorrect in the end, I'll come on here and apologize.

    Now, I ask again for the Obama supporters to explain to me how they support HIS decision to make this trade.


    It's beyond me Killer_B... how the lefties in this forum like SHR can portray this lop-sided swap....five dangerous Taliban commanders for one deserter and apparent Taliban sympathizer as a Obama foreign-affairs triumph.....lol

    With all these Obama nut suckers ..he's assured that his approval rating will never fall below 40%...no matter what he does ..

    ................... ROLF
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:

    Anyone that defends this administration on its countless acts of b.s. is a lefty. They know who they are, they support every move he's made. This trade is indefensible if the facts are what they appear to be. His teammates seem a million more times honorable than Susan Rice & the gang behind her. 

    I'll put my chips on their claim that he inquired about the "what if's" regarding his equipment, he sent emails more or less regarding his hatred for the American military and deserted his fellow soldiers with possibly several dying trying to find his deserting behind. If any of this is incorrect in the end, I'll come on here and apologize.

    Now, I ask again for the Obama supporters to explain to me how they support HIS decision to make this trade.


    It's beyond me Killer_B... how the lefties in this forum like SHR can portray this lop-sided swap....five dangerous Taliban commanders for one deserter and apparent Taliban sympathizer as a Obama foreign-affairs triumph.....lol

    With all these Obama nut suckers ..he's assured that his approval rating will never fall below 40%...no matter what he does ..

    ................... ROLF
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2014 - 1:59 PM ET #66

    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:


    No it is not ..you are the one saying the president executed an illegal rouge operation for PR purposes ..I did not ..I contend it was a scandal- deversion..


    ..and I did not say anything about Obama's legacy for closing Gitmo..you are making stuff up and it makes you look pretty weak having to do that ...


    Money you say you are not a liberal ,,but you resort to name calling and demeaning and disrespectful comments when you are in a pinch ...just like a lib..


    Two years ago when you first came into this forum... when no one wanted to talk to you.... I stepped up and we had a discussion about Derrick Bell ..remember ?


    At that time you said to me ....quote.."Thanks for responding SS, although we disagree, I want to keep the political debate as civil and respectful as possible. I enjoy seeing a different point of view and trying to learn from it."


    Well, MoneySRH ...were you lying then or are you a just a hypocrite?

    SS, PR stunt and scandal diversion are the same sh!t, SMH. You’re saying Obama naively put the way people view him and his administration ahead of the safety and security of others for a stupid PR stunt.

    You’re right, I did say that. My temper isn’t what it used to be. My tolerance for bullsh!t is at ZERO. I see bullsh!t… and I call it, as soon as I see it, now… with no restraint. I used to believe in civil discourse.

    I don’t really believe in civil discourse anymore. My admiration of Thaddeus Stevens has overcome me. I have become more of a high-handed and forthright person since then.

    I’m not in a pinch. I feel very… very comfortable with my position.

    I’m not a liberal. Liberals are timid, soft spoken and want civil discourse because yelling scares them. I’m angry, assertive, forthright, and heavy-handed like a radical republican.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:


    No it is not ..you are the one saying the president executed an illegal rouge operation for PR purposes ..I did not ..I contend it was a scandal- deversion..


    ..and I did not say anything about Obama's legacy for closing Gitmo..you are making stuff up and it makes you look pretty weak having to do that ...


    Money you say you are not a liberal ,,but you resort to name calling and demeaning and disrespectful comments when you are in a pinch ...just like a lib..


    Two years ago when you first came into this forum... when no one wanted to talk to you.... I stepped up and we had a discussion about Derrick Bell ..remember ?


    At that time you said to me ....quote.."Thanks for responding SS, although we disagree, I want to keep the political debate as civil and respectful as possible. I enjoy seeing a different point of view and trying to learn from it."


    Well, MoneySRH ...were you lying then or are you a just a hypocrite?

    SS, PR stunt and scandal diversion are the same sh!t, SMH. You’re saying Obama naively put the way people view him and his administration ahead of the safety and security of others for a stupid PR stunt.

    You’re right, I did say that. My temper isn’t what it used to be. My tolerance for bullsh!t is at ZERO. I see bullsh!t… and I call it, as soon as I see it, now… with no restraint. I used to believe in civil discourse.

    I don’t really believe in civil discourse anymore. My admiration of Thaddeus Stevens has overcome me. I have become more of a high-handed and forthright person since then.

    I’m not in a pinch. I feel very… very comfortable with my position.

    I’m not a liberal. Liberals are timid, soft spoken and want civil discourse because yelling scares them. I’m angry, assertive, forthright, and heavy-handed like a radical republican.


     
    Killer_B
    Killer_B
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 6295
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2014 - 11:33 PM ET #67

    Where's DJbrow, Dirt & DJ? All in the hate Fox News thread I suppose. Still waiting for some comments to the challenge I laid out. It's Susan Rice vs. the deserters squad. The truth has a certain ring to it and I'll be damn if his teammates aren't telling the truth here... If we didn't have a hyphenated president, he'd be up for impeachment for several acts during this circus of a presidency...
    Reply
    Where's DJbrow, Dirt & DJ? All in the hate Fox News thread I suppose. Still waiting for some comments to the challenge I laid out. It's Susan Rice vs. the deserters squad. The truth has a certain ring to it and I'll be damn if his teammates aren't telling the truth here... If we didn't have a hyphenated president, he'd be up for impeachment for several acts during this circus of a presidency...
     
    canovsp
    canovsp
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2009
    Posts: 5755
    Posted: Jun. 10, 2014 - 9:18 AM ET #68

    As it turns out everyone was wrong. Chuck Hagel made the call.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2653672/Now-White-House-says-Hagel-final-call-Bergdahl-criticism-Obama-prisoner-swap-mounts.html

    In totally unrelated news, Bo, the White House Dog, is taking the blame for "Cash for Clunkers"
    Reply
    As it turns out everyone was wrong. Chuck Hagel made the call.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2653672/Now-White-House-says-Hagel-final-call-Bergdahl-criticism-Obama-prisoner-swap-mounts.html

    In totally unrelated news, Bo, the White House Dog, is taking the blame for "Cash for Clunkers"
     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35543
    Posted: Jun. 10, 2014 - 11:12 AM ET #69

    Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:

    As it turns out everyone was wrong. Chuck Hagel made the call.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2653672/Now-White-House-says-Hagel-final-call-Bergdahl-criticism-Obama-prisoner-swap-mounts.html

    In totally unrelated news, Bo, the White House Dog, is taking the blame for "Cash for Clunkers"


    It wasn't me .... President Hagel made the call ..

        Chuckie did it !
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:

    As it turns out everyone was wrong. Chuck Hagel made the call.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2653672/Now-White-House-says-Hagel-final-call-Bergdahl-criticism-Obama-prisoner-swap-mounts.html

    In totally unrelated news, Bo, the White House Dog, is taking the blame for "Cash for Clunkers"


    It wasn't me .... President Hagel made the call ..

        Chuckie did it !
     
    djbrow
    djbrow
    Covers Referee
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 15759
    Posted: Jun. 10, 2014 - 11:27 AM ET #70

    Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:

    Where's DJbrow, Dirt & DJ? All in the hate Fox News thread I suppose. Still waiting for some comments to the challenge I laid out. It's Susan Rice vs. the deserters squad. The truth has a certain ring to it and I'll be damn if his teammates aren't telling the truth here... If we didn't have a hyphenated president, he'd be up for impeachment for several acts during this circus of a presidency...

    Some poster above made a comment stating 'as the facts appear to be' meaning that poster, nor I, know the facts of this case.

    If the facts come out that Bowe was a terrorist and the administration knew this, of course I would not support it.

    If the facts come out that he was a deserter, that is a much different scenario. I am not a fan of leaving behind any American to die if we have the ability to prevent it.

    So I guess it is too early for me to conclude one way or another. In fact the only factual comment I made upon this is it illustrates the hypocrisy of politics.

    If a Republican was President, he would be supported by the same posters/people attacking Obama and attacked by the same people/posters defending Obama.

    The funny thing is when I made this comment, the right wingers in this thread (as you will do) all fell into the same trap and (gasp) attacked Obama and defended Republicans.

    Hook, line, sinker my friend.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:

    Where's DJbrow, Dirt & DJ? All in the hate Fox News thread I suppose. Still waiting for some comments to the challenge I laid out. It's Susan Rice vs. the deserters squad. The truth has a certain ring to it and I'll be damn if his teammates aren't telling the truth here... If we didn't have a hyphenated president, he'd be up for impeachment for several acts during this circus of a presidency...

    Some poster above made a comment stating 'as the facts appear to be' meaning that poster, nor I, know the facts of this case.

    If the facts come out that Bowe was a terrorist and the administration knew this, of course I would not support it.

    If the facts come out that he was a deserter, that is a much different scenario. I am not a fan of leaving behind any American to die if we have the ability to prevent it.

    So I guess it is too early for me to conclude one way or another. In fact the only factual comment I made upon this is it illustrates the hypocrisy of politics.

    If a Republican was President, he would be supported by the same posters/people attacking Obama and attacked by the same people/posters defending Obama.

    The funny thing is when I made this comment, the right wingers in this thread (as you will do) all fell into the same trap and (gasp) attacked Obama and defended Republicans.

    Hook, line, sinker my friend.

     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35543
    Posted: Jun. 10, 2014 - 11:58 AM ET #71

    Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:



     As it turns out everyone was wrong. Chuck Hagel made the call.



    Obama first learned about the swap deal from the media...
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:



     As it turns out everyone was wrong. Chuck Hagel made the call.



    Obama first learned about the swap deal from the media...
     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35543
    Posted: Jun. 10, 2014 - 12:51 PM ET #72

    Looks like the Obama administration is at odds about who made the final call....

    Hagel himself said on Meet the Press on June 1. "I signed off on the decision," Hagel said. "The president made the ultimate decision."


    Reply

    Looks like the Obama administration is at odds about who made the final call....

    Hagel himself said on Meet the Press on June 1. "I signed off on the decision," Hagel said. "The president made the ultimate decision."


     
    THE-KID
    THE-KID
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 4756
    Posted: Jun. 10, 2014 - 7:45 PM ET #73

    Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

    Some poster above made a comment stating 'as the facts appear to be' meaning that poster, nor I, know the facts of this case.

    If the facts come out that Bowe was a terrorist and the administration knew this, of course I would not support it.

    If the facts come out that he was a deserter, that is a much different scenario. I am not a fan of leaving behind any American to die if we have the ability to prevent it.

    So I guess it is too early for me to conclude one way or another. In fact the only factual comment I made upon this is it illustrates the hypocrisy of politics.

    If a Republican was President, he would be supported by the same posters/people attacking Obama and attacked by the same people/posters defending Obama.

    The funny thing is when I made this comment, the right wingers in this thread (as you will do) all fell into the same trap and (gasp) attacked Obama and defended Republicans.

    Hook, line, sinker my friend.


    Exactly! The story changes but the game doesn't. It is always about positioning, not right or wrong.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

    Some poster above made a comment stating 'as the facts appear to be' meaning that poster, nor I, know the facts of this case.

    If the facts come out that Bowe was a terrorist and the administration knew this, of course I would not support it.

    If the facts come out that he was a deserter, that is a much different scenario. I am not a fan of leaving behind any American to die if we have the ability to prevent it.

    So I guess it is too early for me to conclude one way or another. In fact the only factual comment I made upon this is it illustrates the hypocrisy of politics.

    If a Republican was President, he would be supported by the same posters/people attacking Obama and attacked by the same people/posters defending Obama.

    The funny thing is when I made this comment, the right wingers in this thread (as you will do) all fell into the same trap and (gasp) attacked Obama and defended Republicans.

    Hook, line, sinker my friend.


    Exactly! The story changes but the game doesn't. It is always about positioning, not right or wrong.
     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35543
    Posted: Jun. 10, 2014 - 10:34 PM ET #74

    Breaking !!!

    CNN) -- A memorandum of understanding between the United States and Qatar on the deal that freed Bowe Bergdahl offered "no guarantee" that the five Taliban commanders exchanged for the captured Army sergeant would be tracked, a Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee told CNN.

    Rep. Adam Schiff ( D-CA )reviewed the agreement and said, based on his reading, that it is possible the former U.S. detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, "might disappear even during the first year in Qatar.

    Two days ago SoS Johm Kerry told CNN the men were also being closed monitored by the US, which had "the ability to do things" if the terms of the arrangement with Qatar were violated. Although he did not overtly refer to drone strikes, he said the five men would be liable to be killed by the US if they returned to the ranks of the Taliban....

     Baloney,,John
    Reply
    Breaking !!!

    CNN) -- A memorandum of understanding between the United States and Qatar on the deal that freed Bowe Bergdahl offered "no guarantee" that the five Taliban commanders exchanged for the captured Army sergeant would be tracked, a Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee told CNN.

    Rep. Adam Schiff ( D-CA )reviewed the agreement and said, based on his reading, that it is possible the former U.S. detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, "might disappear even during the first year in Qatar.

    Two days ago SoS Johm Kerry told CNN the men were also being closed monitored by the US, which had "the ability to do things" if the terms of the arrangement with Qatar were violated. Although he did not overtly refer to drone strikes, he said the five men would be liable to be killed by the US if they returned to the ranks of the Taliban....

     Baloney,,John
     
     
    Crusher13
    Crusher13
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 8071
    Posted: Jun. 12, 2014 - 12:59 AM ET #75

    $$ saw you mentioned Dave Chapelle somewhere in your posts, want to give you heads up he'll be on Tonight show with Jimmy Fallon Friday night........and I hope your premise is right..track these no good MFers
    Reply
    $$ saw you mentioned Dave Chapelle somewhere in your posts, want to give you heads up he'll be on Tonight show with Jimmy Fallon Friday night........and I hope your premise is right..track these no good MFers
    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Thursday 10/22/2026 935
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,953
    • Patriots vs Bears in-game live TNF 1,945
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 109,719
    • Patriots@Bears discussion 3,639
    • Thursday”s POD 2,714
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 27,061
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,660
    • Week 8 Money 7,508
    • Republicans push back against the lunatic Trump and his team of liars. 23,327

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.