Gaz-a-Lago

@wallstreetcappers

Can you give an example otherwise?

@wallstreetcappers

So, to be clear:

If you were at the negotiating table you would have never agreed to this deal?

You would have never agreed to release the hostages?

This was your reply, your words and claim or was that ME that said everyone is partisan or they are a cheerleader. Was that me or you who made this contention?

You ask a question I answer it, was that not what I did there? Throwing in a one sided term of the bully does not change my comment. This was not a table there was no negotiations. This was a one sided gun to the head of a second party in a coma who has no rights no abilities and no participation. You trying to rope a dope with the hostage part is kind of childish and away from your COMMENT which I answered.

Yes. I am asking if you can think of any true exemptions.  I can think of maybe only 1 or 2 at the most.  Maybe I overlooked some.

Please steer clear of the personal jabs, there is no need for you to reply in this way. If a member has broken a rule of the site the please send in a member report and let Covers decide what happens.

Clear?

No sir, you did not give an answer. 

Nope, I am simply pointing out that you refuse to concede that it is a peace deal for now.  Better than what was going on, better than what NATO ws doing, better than what Europe was doing, or anyone else.

So, I am asking if they came directly to you and asked you if they should take the deal, would you have told them to refuse?  You did not answer this.  But, in fact, this is absolutely what it has boiled down to.  The way it was going cannot be continued.  I hope even you can admit this.

You asked a question, I answered the question...was this not understood? Why the attempt to frame me by throwing in a different element which had nothing to do with your initial stance? I do not have to prove anything no more than you do with the silly analogy about if not partisan then cheerleading. That contention is absurd and narrow minded, you said it so just own it and realize what you said, or NOT, try and worm out of it by diverting the discussion.

@wallstreetcappers

 It was not understood.

Was it a 'yes', or a 'no'?

@wallstreetcappers

 Isn't it at least the right direction until further things can be worked out?

This was not answered either?  Any?

@Raiders22

This was as I have said multiple times here a shake down thug intimidation bully tactic and shock this is BENNY who is in charge gee we have not seen this before. This is no deal this was no negotiation there was no table there is nothing to "take". So if you are pointing a gun at my head, I am hog tied on the ground within seconds of death you tell me do I accept the terms of your demand, this is your concept of DEAL and negotiation and peace? It is not to me. There was no deal to take this is not peace this is barbaric one sided humanitarian atrocities.

@Raiders22

 Right direction? Our definition of RIGHT and DIRECTION are not the same. If you run me over with a car to the inch of death and then decide to not run me over again to finish my death, this is RIGHT DIRECTION? Not to me it isnt...

Why did I run you over with a car?

So, is the answer no?

What is your solution to this for now?

I would still like an honest answer to anyone you see as an exception to this.  I am really curious about this?

LOL bait and bait...

Is there a justifiable reason for running someone over with a car to the inch of their life? If someone in your perspective has harmed you what is the course of action you take? The reasoning behind the invasion are not of any value because both sides have MILLIONS of lives and thousands of years of history to justify their position. You side with Israel in a blind fashion and thus your comment here, I know history and maybe you do maybe you do not but there is no WHY here, there is no justification or validation for what Israel did, hostages or not, death inflicted or not this is not a valid or reasonable approach no more than it is if Russia decided to steam roll Israel and wipe them out completely because they side with the other party. This form of response is not justified or acceptable.

However, if a member breaks the rules then please send in a member report and allow COVERS to decide the course of action. Outside of that there is no other action you should take. Phenominal

How long is this the stance to take?

Do you take this stance everywhere else in the world?  On all issues?

If so, why?

You are smart and no trapping for me, I know you too well. Many people are not partisan and are not thus cheerleaders, some can see both sides and form an non partisan conclusion that might actually conflict with some views they might have. Being partisan to me means certain decisions and conclusions are made based on a set of variables and them alone...that is partisan. None of my conclusions about the actual topic have anything to do with a political position or being part of a political collective.

I am not trapping you.  You stated it and it got me to thinking of some.

But curious who you thought.  Or do you mostly just agree with it.

You think everything is a trap.  Are you sacred you cannot get out of something you said. by simply giving some examples.  It would simply be your opinion on the folk's.  That is not a trap.

@ABooksNightmare

 Proof....prove this generalization with my words please, link where I have done what you suggest with my own words and then do it 5-10-15-20 times. If you want to categorize me and you DID in this case, you must be able to prove this or why make the comment in the first place? Where did I do as you suggested about Biden? I know you will be the front man to put me down and to humorously cheer someone who disagrees with me, this has always been the case but where did I do as you suggest? LINK ME please.

So what would one call your comment about making a stomp thread in the penalty box and belittling people for amusement 

"Table" may have been used metaphorically not figuratively in this sense....