If you can only post links and gibberish please just keep doing that in the box as it serves zero purpose or value or discussion. The reason for THIS forum is to have discussion not post partisan silly links and partisan poking comments and that alone. You seem completely incapable of any meaningful posts or interaction or content.
0
@sundance
If you can only post links and gibberish please just keep doing that in the box as it serves zero purpose or value or discussion. The reason for THIS forum is to have discussion not post partisan silly links and partisan poking comments and that alone. You seem completely incapable of any meaningful posts or interaction or content.
@sundance Quote Originally Posted by sundance: From President Trump! MAGA! mMr89k0Wp2yi.jpeg (731×350) Yep, good info. Just saw even Yahoo posted that. Hopefully, that will weaken their infrastructure and their willpower a bit. At this point that becomes more and more important.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
@sundance Quote Originally Posted by sundance: From President Trump! MAGA! mMr89k0Wp2yi.jpeg (731×350) Yep, good info. Just saw even Yahoo posted that. Hopefully, that will weaken their infrastructure and their willpower a bit. At this point that becomes more and more important.
@UNIMAN Using your analysis why are we going after or being involved with this situation when again using your measures there are MUCH bigger fish to fry? Iran is no threat to the US and never has been so isnt the purpose for ANY military involvement is a measure of harm to the US, not to cater to Israel and their zionist agenda? There were no precipitating events that caused this situation to escalate like ever but especially in the last month and yet we go forward to enable and support the removal of a country leader (again) without cause or without involvement with congress. No need to try and fluff a narrative we including you know what this is and why it happened and the intentional agenda Trump has not involving congress because to this point has he involved congress in ANYTHING he has done? The reason I want you to give parameters and boundaries is because that is how our government works it is not a fascist king who does what he wants and nobody has to follow the framework of our government and constitution and especially your political partisan side has to be strongly understanding this even more than the nasty evil lib side. Your side pounds the pavement on the framework of the government and the constitution and yet you have all the shade in the world for Trump, it just does not work like that...well it does because we see it does but that wont be lasting too much longer.
What analysis of mine says we have bigger fish to fry? Please explain.
Your problem is you hate Israel and Trump. A double whammy for you.
Iran wants nukes. Iran would probably be the first to use one. Whether it's Israel, Suadi Arabia, or Kuwait maybe, it's nuclear war. I'm not making any judgements until I see how things unfold. Could be a real mess, or could save a lot of future lives.
2
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@UNIMAN Using your analysis why are we going after or being involved with this situation when again using your measures there are MUCH bigger fish to fry? Iran is no threat to the US and never has been so isnt the purpose for ANY military involvement is a measure of harm to the US, not to cater to Israel and their zionist agenda? There were no precipitating events that caused this situation to escalate like ever but especially in the last month and yet we go forward to enable and support the removal of a country leader (again) without cause or without involvement with congress. No need to try and fluff a narrative we including you know what this is and why it happened and the intentional agenda Trump has not involving congress because to this point has he involved congress in ANYTHING he has done? The reason I want you to give parameters and boundaries is because that is how our government works it is not a fascist king who does what he wants and nobody has to follow the framework of our government and constitution and especially your political partisan side has to be strongly understanding this even more than the nasty evil lib side. Your side pounds the pavement on the framework of the government and the constitution and yet you have all the shade in the world for Trump, it just does not work like that...well it does because we see it does but that wont be lasting too much longer.
What analysis of mine says we have bigger fish to fry? Please explain.
Your problem is you hate Israel and Trump. A double whammy for you.
Iran wants nukes. Iran would probably be the first to use one. Whether it's Israel, Suadi Arabia, or Kuwait maybe, it's nuclear war. I'm not making any judgements until I see how things unfold. Could be a real mess, or could save a lot of future lives.
The facts are; Iran has a history supporting terrorism. Iran has spent billions trying to create a nuclear arsenal. Trump and Israel destroyed much of that capability back in July. Iran turned around and keeps moving on, and I'm sure faster, developing nuclear capabilities. They didn't heed the message. Unless they agree to stop all nuclear ambitions what else is left to do?
It's risky, sure. How much US involvement is questionable. But the alternative was Iran continue to kill their own people who desire freedom and then waiting for the day Iran starts a nuclear war. Cannot bury your head in the sand forever.
This is your rationalization for starting a war without congress being involved and as you also admitted to the 100% aid and support of Israel.
Now read what I said above, if THIS is the measure for validating this action there are BIGGER FISH TO FRY...your words, what is not understood in my message?
0
@UNIMAN
The facts are; Iran has a history supporting terrorism. Iran has spent billions trying to create a nuclear arsenal. Trump and Israel destroyed much of that capability back in July. Iran turned around and keeps moving on, and I'm sure faster, developing nuclear capabilities. They didn't heed the message. Unless they agree to stop all nuclear ambitions what else is left to do?
It's risky, sure. How much US involvement is questionable. But the alternative was Iran continue to kill their own people who desire freedom and then waiting for the day Iran starts a nuclear war. Cannot bury your head in the sand forever.
This is your rationalization for starting a war without congress being involved and as you also admitted to the 100% aid and support of Israel.
Now read what I said above, if THIS is the measure for validating this action there are BIGGER FISH TO FRY...your words, what is not understood in my message?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.