Posted:
#176
Is anyone actually surprised? 
SJP is a Scammer
Posted:
#183
Quote Originally Posted by BostonKen:
I remember when everyone was getting boxed/banned for calling her out, Rizzo posted in the Box that he spoke to SJP on the phone and then personally vouched for her. I am going to see if I can dig up that post. It's ridiculous that the higher ups at Covers would shit on longtime members over this internet grifter box.The BetEd situation and SJP..... not a good look.
Bingo.
Covers members can be a little harsh, but most can spot B.S. a MILE away. Covers owes a lot of people an apology. They may have been a little crass, but that's only because covers just blew them off when it was plain as day what that fraud was up to.
I stopped going after her because it was apparent that covers had their nose firmly entrenched in her ass and that wasn't going to change no matter how much "evidence" people presented. 
Posted:
#184
don't blame Covers citizens for not smelling that rotten box out, blame the Moderators who stood behind her the whole time making them believe that it was real. And, they all bought it.
But, in due time. In due time, she was exposed just like any other touts. Nonetheless, the joke is still on Covers. I'm glad i wasn't involved with BetEd, either.
By the way, didn't we used to have a Covers police? Wasn't it BDUBB?
But, in due time. In due time, she was exposed just like any other touts. Nonetheless, the joke is still on Covers. I'm glad i wasn't involved with BetEd, either.
By the way, didn't we used to have a Covers police? Wasn't it BDUBB?
Posted:
#186
Let me just say this --
I was told in no uncertain terms to basically leave the SJP issue alone back in August of 2011 -- that "they" weren't allowing "attacks" on SJP in the mains.
It wasn't the mods like WSC or DJ or weebs that were doing the boxings in retaliation for "attacks" on SJP
I was told in no uncertain terms to basically leave the SJP issue alone back in August of 2011 -- that "they" weren't allowing "attacks" on SJP in the mains.
It wasn't the mods like WSC or DJ or weebs that were doing the boxings in retaliation for "attacks" on SJP
Posted:
#187
Quote Originally Posted by KktdocT:
don't blame Covers citizens for not smelling that rotten box out, blame the Moderators who stood behind her the whole time making them believe that it was real. And, they all bought it.
But, in due time. In due time, she was exposed just like any other touts. Nonetheless, the joke is still on Covers. I'm glad i wasn't involved with BetEd, either.
By the way, didn't we used to have a Covers police? Wasn't it BDUBB?
don't blame Covers citizens for not smelling that rotten box out, blame the Moderators who stood behind her the whole time making them believe that it was real. And, they all bought it.
But, in due time. In due time, she was exposed just like any other touts. Nonetheless, the joke is still on Covers. I'm glad i wasn't involved with BetEd, either.
By the way, didn't we used to have a Covers police? Wasn't it BDUBB?
Covers citizens were all over her B.S. pretty much from day 1. And they took it in the butt from the covers mods, etc., which is laughable. The only ones who drank the kool aid were largely newbies.
Would be nice if the covers staff would admit they were completely wrong and issue an apology to all of those they cracked because of it.
Posted:
#191
.... and I may get boxed for this, but so be it -- the part of that article that absolutely makes me sick is the allegation that covers staff (mods? someone else? who knows?) was able to read a member's PM and told SJP that this guy "Matt" was talking shiat about her to other members while trying to buddy up with her. That type of stuff sure suggests more than looking the other way by Covers
Posted:
#192
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
Let me just say this --
I was told in no uncertain terms to basically leave the SJP issue alone back in August of 2011 -- that "they" weren't allowing "attacks" on SJP in the mains.
It wasn't the mods like WSC or DJ or weebs that were doing the boxings in retaliation for "attacks" on SJP
Let me just say this --
I was told in no uncertain terms to basically leave the SJP issue alone back in August of 2011 -- that "they" weren't allowing "attacks" on SJP in the mains.
It wasn't the mods like WSC or DJ or weebs that were doing the boxings in retaliation for "attacks" on SJP
Exactly it was june of that year when she threatened to sue me for defamation
Posted:
#196
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
Seriously though, ESPN should be ashamed of themselves. I remember when they "hired" SJP and I just shook my head. No vetting whatsoever, you'd expect more from a multibillion dollar company, wouldn't you?
Seriously though, ESPN should be ashamed of themselves. I remember when they "hired" SJP and I just shook my head. No vetting whatsoever, you'd expect more from a multibillion dollar company, wouldn't you?
you have (high) expectations for espn? what changed there, i turned them off years ago,,,,,
Hot Forum Topics
